Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
reassign 307644 ftp.debian.org retitle 307644 RM: battfink -- replaced by the new HAL GNOME Power system thanks * Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 14:55]: > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 15:47 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Right, than I also propose to remove it from unstable then :). Do you > > agree? > > I've had a few people (well, two) say that they actually use battfink, > so I'd say remove from sarge and if no-one has taken the package over > when Sarge is released, remove it from unstable too. OK. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 307644 ftp.debian.org Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration Bug reassigned from package `wnpp' to `ftp.debian.org'. > retitle 307644 RM: battfink -- replaced by the new HAL GNOME Power system Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 14:57 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > I'm orphaning battfink as it is unmaintained upstream, is in danger of > > > being replaced by the new HAL GNOME Power system, and doesn't really > > > work that well. > > > > I strongly suggest to not introduce this package in sarge then. Do you > > object? It has no reverse dependencies at all. Or is this new "HAL GNOME > > Power sytem" not yet ready in sarge? (what's the packagename?) > > I see no reason for battfink to be in Sarge. This "HAL GNOME Power > system" has only just started, but will replace everything Battfink > does. > > Battfink was originally created as the standard battery applet in GNOME > sucked, but it doesn't any more. Die battfink die! Hinted for removal from sarge. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
* Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-04 14:55]: > > Right, than I also propose to remove it from unstable then :). Do you > > agree? > > I've had a few people (well, two) say that they actually use battfink, > so I'd say remove from sarge and if no-one has taken the package over > when Sarge is released, remove it from unstable too. OK, I noted this on my "after sarge TODO list". -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 15:47 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Right, than I also propose to remove it from unstable then :). Do you > agree? I've had a few people (well, two) say that they actually use battfink, so I'd say remove from sarge and if no-one has taken the package over when Sarge is released, remove it from unstable too. Ross -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 14:57 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > I'm orphaning battfink as it is unmaintained upstream, is in danger of > > > being replaced by the new HAL GNOME Power system, and doesn't really > > > work that well. > > > > I strongly suggest to not introduce this package in sarge then. Do you > > object? It has no reverse dependencies at all. Or is this new "HAL GNOME > > Power sytem" not yet ready in sarge? (what's the packagename?) > > I see no reason for battfink to be in Sarge. This "HAL GNOME Power > system" has only just started, but will replace everything Battfink > does. > > Battfink was originally created as the standard battery applet in GNOME > sucked, but it doesn't any more. Die battfink die! Right, than I also propose to remove it from unstable then :). Do you agree? --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 14:57 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > I'm orphaning battfink as it is unmaintained upstream, is in danger of > > being replaced by the new HAL GNOME Power system, and doesn't really > > work that well. > > I strongly suggest to not introduce this package in sarge then. Do you > object? It has no reverse dependencies at all. Or is this new "HAL GNOME > Power sytem" not yet ready in sarge? (what's the packagename?) I see no reason for battfink to be in Sarge. This "HAL GNOME Power system" has only just started, but will replace everything Battfink does. Battfink was originally created as the standard battery applet in GNOME sucked, but it doesn't any more. Die battfink die! Ross -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 01:44:00PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > Package: wnpp > > I'm orphaning battfink as it is unmaintained upstream, is in danger of > being replaced by the new HAL GNOME Power system, and doesn't really > work that well. I strongly suggest to not introduce this package in sarge then. Do you object? It has no reverse dependencies at all. Or is this new "HAL GNOME Power sytem" not yet ready in sarge? (what's the packagename?) --Jeroen -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#307644: O: battfink -- GNOME Power Management Configuration
Package: wnpp I'm orphaning battfink as it is unmaintained upstream, is in danger of being replaced by the new HAL GNOME Power system, and doesn't really work that well. Ross signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
