Bug#321693: Can vaiostat be removed?
Hi all, The vaiostat package: * Is not in testing; * Is RC-buggy; * Has been up for adoption for well over a year; * Is inactive upstream. Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions, especially from the maintainers? Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#321693: Can vaiostat be removed?
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:06:12PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: Hi all, The vaiostat package: * Is not in testing; * Is RC-buggy; * Has been up for adoption for well over a year; * Is inactive upstream. Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions, especially from the maintainers? No skin off my nose. Feel free. regards Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#321693: Can vaiostat be removed?
reassign 321693 ftp.debian.org retitle 321693 RM: vaiostat -- RoM; RC-buggy, no maintainer, inactive upstream thanks On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 05:26 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: No skin off my nose. Feel free. Ok, doing so (and labeling RoM seems appropriate). thanks, Thijs signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#321693: Can vaiostat be removed?
Scripsit Thijs Kinkhorst Since the RFA has had no takers and the package is not in Etch, I think it might be better to remove it rather than keep it in sid. Opinions, especially from the maintainers? Go ahead. As the last active maintainer, I have been meaning to file for removal for some time, except that I was (and am) snowed under by my day job. -- Henning Makholm Take a sad song, and make it bitter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
