Bug#323420: Status update?
Hello, It seems that some parts of metasploit-framework (byakugan at least) are proprietary. What about doing a metasploit-framework package with the core and all the free parts and a metasploit-framework-nonfree with the non-free parts? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#323420: Status update?
El Martes, 23 de Mayo de 2006 17:37, James Westby escribió: Could you please confirm the current status of this ITP? I'm was with much work. I'm still working on it. probably will be a release candidate in the next week. BTW, what's your opinion with metasploit v3.0? luciano pgpTrLzk1n7H3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#323420: Status update?
Luciano Bello wrote: El Martes, 23 de Mayo de 2006 17:37, James Westby escribió: Could you please confirm the current status of this ITP? I'm was with much work. I'm still working on it. probably will be a release candidate in the next week. I would be interested in helping with this package if you agree. I have had an initial look and it does look difficult with lots of pitfalls. Could you let me know when you have a version together and I'll take a look. BTW, what's your opinion with metasploit v3.0? I think the license will have to go to debian-legal, I might do this in a week or so. I think the two versions should be packaged separately if they are both to be in. What do you think of setting up a metasploit alioth group to handle these packages? luciano James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#323420: Status update?
Could you please confirm the current status of this ITP? James -- James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jameswestby.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
