Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
Package will be in Debian Sid soon. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a8204b0b50008bd77fb0cd7bde292...@mb8-2.1blu.de
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
PackageKit/KPackageKit has Debconf-Support now: http://dantti.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/debconf-support-on-kpackagekit/ Can PackageKit be uploaded to Debian now, or is there something left speaking against it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/292dfd13bceb007e70e0b24173c6e...@mb8-2.1blu.de
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53:56AM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: PackageKit/KPackageKit has Debconf-Support now: http://dantti.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/debconf-support-on-kpackagekit/ Can PackageKit be uploaded to Debian now, or is there something left speaking against it? I am nowadays working nearly exclusively on aptdaemon and session-installer - apt based alternantives to PackageKit. So I won't have the time to push PackageKit. Feel free to adopt. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:01:11 +0200, Sebastian Heinlein de...@glatzor.de wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:53:56AM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: PackageKit/KPackageKit has Debconf-Support now: http://dantti.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/debconf-support-on-kpackagekit/ Can PackageKit be uploaded to Debian now, or is there something left speaking against it? I am nowadays working nearly exclusively on aptdaemon and session-installer - apt based alternantives to PackageKit. So I won't have the time to push PackageKit. Feel free to adopt. Hmm... Okay. I'll checkout if I can maintain it and if it gets accepted for Sid. (Probably not during freeze, but later) Thanks for the response! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd342398763981fd991d7c1c1d82...@mb8-2.1blu.de
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 04:18:31PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Hmm... Okay. I'll checkout if I can maintain it and if it gets accepted for Sid. (Probably not during freeze, but later) Thanks for the response! If you need some assistance on the integration, feel free to contact me. On the backend side I would recommend to stay with the Python based apt backend by default. Kubuntu recently switched to aptcc but this is also a little bit problematic. (I am biased here since I am the author of the apt backend :) To add the debconf support to the apt backend are only a few lines of code. Cheers, Sebastian signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
owner 468132 ! On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 04:18:31PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Hmm... Okay. I'll checkout if I can maintain it and if it gets accepted for Sid. (Probably not during freeze, but later) Thanks for the response! If you need some assistance on the integration, feel free to contact me. Okay, I'll do it :) On the backend side I would recommend to stay with the Python based apt backend by default. Kubuntu recently switched to aptcc but this is also a little bit problematic. (I am biased here since I am the author of the apt backend :) To add the debconf support to the apt backend are only a few lines of code. What are the problems with the APTcc backend? (I use it here and only noticed most tasks are a lot faster) Regards Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4631530093909aaba4dc43a68dcdf...@mb8-2.1blu.de
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
Hmm... I'll repackage some parts of PackageKit instead of taking the Ubuntu version. Maybe a package reorganisation is also needed. I think this will fix some bugs reported agains packagekit at Launchpad. (And the new debhelper will be used) Why does the Font-Finding application of PackageKit not work in Debian? (A comment claims it won't work but does not explain why) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f108006328473338f8b9dd475a6c5...@mb8-2.1blu.de
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
Is something going on on this bug? It would be excellent if we had PackageKit packaged on Debian too. A solution for debconf is also in progress! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral, interface to manage software packages
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:27:13 +0100, Sebastian Heinlein s...@glatzor.de wrote: On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:44:21PM +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote: Is something going on on this bug? It would be excellent if we had PackageKit packaged on Debian too. A solution for debconf is also in progress! Sorry to say. But AFAIK the debconf solution is currently far from being resolved: The approach of Dantti was not accepted by debconf upstream and the preferred one of upstream hasn't been yet written. I didn't know that... I really liked Danttis solution, but upstream will have had a good reason for rejecting his example. Is this the reason why PackageKit is not present in Debian? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral interface to manage software packages
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:41:53 +0100, Sebastian Heinlein wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 28.10.2008, 19:58 +0100 schrieb Stephan Peijnik:
I just wanted to ask what the status of this ITP is. Has there been some
progress?
there are some concerns of Debian developers against the non
interactiveness of PackageKit. So I want to have a working and mature
version uploaded to Debian to raise the acceptance.
But it this will happen in the near future.
The packaging for Debian can be found here:
lp:~glatzor/packagekit/packagekit-debian
Currently, packagekit is shipped with Ubuntu; it is maintained using
https://code.launchpad.net/~packagekit . I can't find any packagekit-debian
branch.
What's the status of getting this into Debian? Perhaps an upload to
experimental of the package as shipped with Ubuntu is useful?
Bye,
Joost
--
irc:joos...@{oftc,freenode} ∙ http://mdcc.cx/ ∙ http://ad1810.com/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral interface to manage software packages
Am Dienstag, den 28.10.2008, 19:58 +0100 schrieb Stephan Peijnik: Hello, I just noticed that packagekit has not been packaged for Debian yet and stumbled across this ITP. I just wanted to ask what the status of this ITP is. Has there been some progress? Even though I had a quick look at the code on https://code.edge.launchpad.net/packagekit/ no Debian package is available yet. Is there any specific reason for this? Regards, Stephan Hello, there are some concerns of Debian developers against the non interactiveness of PackageKit. So I want to have a working and mature version uploaded to Debian to raise the acceptance. But it this will happen in the near future. The packaging for Debian can be found here: lp:~glatzor/packagekit/packagekit-debian Cheers, Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral interface to manage software packages
Hello, I just noticed that packagekit has not been packaged for Debian yet and stumbled across this ITP. I just wanted to ask what the status of this ITP is. Has there been some progress? Even though I had a quick look at the code on https://code.edge.launchpad.net/packagekit/ no Debian package is available yet. Is there any specific reason for this? Regards, Stephan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral interface to manage software packages
Am Dienstag, den 06.05.2008, 06:57 +0200 schrieb Daniel Baumann: Hi, what is the status of this ITP? Regards, Daniel The packaging is already done. It can be found here https://code.edge.launchpad.net/packagekit/ I am waiting for my sponsor to upload it to experimental. Cheers, Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#468132: ITP: packagekit -- a distribution neutral interface to manage software packages
Hi, what is the status of this ITP? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
