Bug#579509: ctpl package ready, new version 0.2.2

2010-06-14 Thread Jonathan Michalon
Le Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:41:42 +0800,
Chow Loong Jin hyper...@ubuntu.com a écrit :
 Yes, it does appear that it is required by GeanyGenDoc, and I've taken
 a look at the package though I can't upload it. Some comments:
 
  * Please don't run autogen.sh, the configure script itself looks
sufficient. Your debian/rules should just have the %: rule, then.
  * The stuff in README.Debian should be in README.source, but with
reference to the previous point, please remove it.
  * With reference to the first point, please also drop
autoconf/automake dependencies, but keep autotools-dev for
config.guess and config.sub.
  * Drop debian/*.dirs, they're unnecessary.
  * Drop lintian-overrides, that's also unnecessary.
 
 I'm CC-ing Evgeni; he sponsors my geany-plugins packages and I'm sure
 he'd be interested to look at ctpl, especially if there will be no
 geany-plugins 0.19 binaries without ctpl. ;-)

Hi,

Thank you for your comments!
I've followed all of your hints even if I'm very surprised that the advices
from autotools-dev should no more be taken into account.
New version available at the same URLs (no debian version bump as it didn't get
upladed before).

CC-ing you and our providential sponsor as I don't know whether you are
subscribed to bug report or not.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100614101432.00240...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net



Bug#579509: ctpl package ready, new version 0.2.2

2010-06-14 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:14:32 +0200
Jonathan Michalon johnde...@gmail.com wrote:

 Le Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:41:42 +0800,
 Chow Loong Jin hyper...@ubuntu.com a écrit :
  Yes, it does appear that it is required by GeanyGenDoc, and I've
  taken a look at the package though I can't upload it. Some comments:
  
   * Please don't run autogen.sh, the configure script itself looks
 sufficient. Your debian/rules should just have the %: rule, then.
   * The stuff in README.Debian should be in README.source, but with
 reference to the previous point, please remove it.
   * With reference to the first point, please also drop
 autoconf/automake dependencies, but keep autotools-dev for
 config.guess and config.sub.
   * Drop debian/*.dirs, they're unnecessary.
   * Drop lintian-overrides, that's also unnecessary.
  
  I'm CC-ing Evgeni; he sponsors my geany-plugins packages and I'm
  sure he'd be interested to look at ctpl, especially if there will
  be no geany-plugins 0.19 binaries without ctpl. ;-)
 
 Hi,
 
 Thank you for your comments!
 I've followed all of your hints even if I'm very surprised that the
 advices from autotools-dev should no more be taken into account.
 New version available at the same URLs (no debian version bump as it
 didn't get upladed before).

The configure script and provided Makefile.in's should be used if
possible, failing which autoconf/automake should be run to re-build
these. For packages which are properly created via make distcheck
that don't have any patches that touch the Makefile.am/configure.ac
files, you shouldn't regenerate the configure and Makefile.in files
using the method you used.

The advice in autotools-dev is only for the proper way of going about
regenerating these files, in the event that you've made changes that
need to be propagated over.

 
 CC-ing you and our providential sponsor as I don't know whether you
 are subscribed to bug report or not.
 
[[ It's evg...@debian.org, I for it wrong the first time. ]]


-- 
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#579509: ctpl package ready, new version 0.2.2

2010-06-14 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 10:14:32 +0200
Jonathan Michalon johnde...@gmail.com wrote:

 Le Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:41:42 +0800,
 Chow Loong Jin hyper...@ubuntu.com a écrit :
  Yes, it does appear that it is required by GeanyGenDoc, and I've
  taken a look at the package though I can't upload it. Some comments:
  
   * Please don't run autogen.sh, the configure script itself looks
 sufficient. Your debian/rules should just have the %: rule, then.
   * The stuff in README.Debian should be in README.source, but with
 reference to the previous point, please remove it.
   * With reference to the first point, please also drop
 autoconf/automake dependencies, but keep autotools-dev for
 config.guess and config.sub.
   * Drop debian/*.dirs, they're unnecessary.
   * Drop lintian-overrides, that's also unnecessary.
  
  I'm CC-ing Evgeni; he sponsors my geany-plugins packages and I'm
  sure he'd be interested to look at ctpl, especially if there will
  be no geany-plugins 0.19 binaries without ctpl. ;-)
 
 Hi,
 
 Thank you for your comments!
 I've followed all of your hints even if I'm very surprised that the
 advices from autotools-dev should no more be taken into account.
 New version available at the same URLs (no debian version bump as it
 didn't get upladed before).

The configure script and provided Makefile.in's should be used if
possible, failing which autoconf/automake should be run to re-build
these. For packages which are properly created via make distcheck
that don't have any patches that touch the Makefile.am/configure.ac
files, you shouldn't regenerate the configure and Makefile.in files
using the method you used.

The advice in autotools-dev is only for the proper way of going about
regenerating these files, in the event that you've made changes that
need to be propagated over.

 
 CC-ing you and our providential sponsor as I don't know whether you
 are subscribed to bug report or not.
 
[[ It's evg...@debian.org, I for it wrong the first time. ]]


-- 
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#579509: ctpl package ready, new version 0.2.2

2010-06-13 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Wed, 26 May 2010 13:10:56 +0200
Jonathan Michalon jonathan.micha...@etu.unistra.fr wrote:

 Ctpl is uploaded to m.d.n (with version 0.2.2) and ready for review.
 It is required for GeanyGenDoc from next release of geany-plugins
 package.
 
 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
 - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl
 - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
 unstable main contrib non-free
 - dget
 http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl/ctpl_0.2.2-1.dsc
 
 Best regards,
 Jonathan Michalon

Sorry, for the late reply, it looks like the e-mail got buried under
the hundreds of mail I received.

Yes, it does appear that it is required by GeanyGenDoc, and I've taken
a look at the package though I can't upload it. Some comments:

 * Please don't run autogen.sh, the configure script itself looks
   sufficient. Your debian/rules should just have the %: rule, then.
 * The stuff in README.Debian should be in README.source, but with
   reference to the previous point, please remove it.
 * With reference to the first point, please also drop
   autoconf/automake dependencies, but keep autotools-dev for
   config.guess and config.sub.
 * Drop debian/*.dirs, they're unnecessary.
 * Drop lintian-overrides, that's also unnecessary.

I'm CC-ing Evgeni; he sponsors my geany-plugins packages and I'm sure
he'd be interested to look at ctpl, especially if there will be no
geany-plugins 0.19 binaries without ctpl. ;-)

-- 
Kind regards,
Chow Loong Jin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#579509: ctpl package ready, new version 0.2.2

2010-05-26 Thread Jonathan Michalon
Ctpl is uploaded to m.d.n (with version 0.2.2) and ready for review.
It is required for GeanyGenDoc from next release of geany-plugins package.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctpl/ctpl_0.2.2-1.dsc

Best regards,
Jonathan Michalon



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100526131056.293ca...@runningpinguin.chalmion.homelinux.net