Bug#590776: marked as done (RFA: python-django-djblets -- Re-usable components for Django projects)
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:07:41 +0200 with message-id 20110729220741.78705...@happycat.chris-lamb.co.uk and subject line Re: RFA: python-django-djblets -- Re-usable components for Django projects has caused the Debian Bug report #590776, regarding RFA: python-django-djblets -- Re-usable components for Django projects to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 590776: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=590776 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: wnpp Severity: normal I have less time for packaging work these days, especially for packages I have no personal or work connection to. Therefore, I am orphaning djblets. Even though I have some time available at Debconf, I'm orphaning this now so that the adopter can use the Debconf time instead going forward. This package was uploaded as dependency for reviewboard; it would seem sensible that an adopter interested in one should also take the other. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- It makes more sense to RM this package. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature ---End Message---
Bug#590776:
Hi Joe, Hi, I'm interested in maintaining python-django-djblets. I'm an enthusiastic student and developer in the Django community. I'd love to be able to contribute as a maintainer. It's great you would like to contribute. However, python-django-djblets is tightly coupled with reviewboard - it's not really possible to upgrade one without the other. Thus, it does not make sense to take over maintainership of djblets without also taking reviewboard. As it happens, I am also orphaning Reviewboard if you are interested in that, but I'm not sure it's particularly suited to a beginner due to the large amount of Debianisation required. Hope this is helpful to you. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110123031536.2507d...@happycat.chris-lamb.co.uk
Bug#590776: python-django-djblets -- Re-usable components for Django
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I'm interested in maintaining python-django-djblets. I'm an enthusiastic student and developer in the django community. I'd love to be able to contribute as a maintainer. -- Joe Cabrera signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#590776:
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, I'm interested in maintaining python-django-djblets. I'm an enthusiastic student and developer in the Django community. I'd love to be able to contribute as a maintainer. -- Joe Cabrera signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#590776: package mantainence
Hi, I'm interested in maintaining python-django-djblets. I'm an enthusiastic student and developer in the django community. I'd love to be able to contribute as a maintainer. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#590776: RFA: python-django-djblets -- Re-usable components for Django projects
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I have less time for packaging work these days, especially for packages I have no personal or work connection to. Therefore, I am orphaning djblets. Even though I have some time available at Debconf, I'm orphaning this now so that the adopter can use the Debconf time instead going forward. This package was uploaded as dependency for reviewboard; it would seem sensible that an adopter interested in one should also take the other. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org `- signature.asc Description: PGP signature
