Bug#593285: additional info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey Sorry for the late reply - I completely forgot this one. Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:49 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > > That would still require someone to actually write said support ;) > ;) > "patches welcome"?! ^^ Exactly > > [...] > > It is certainly possible; a note though, I believe Fedora is > > building the autotools plugin together with the CDT plugin[1], > > so we may have to do this as well in Debian. > What's the reason for them doing this? Seems rather ugly to me ;) Not sure why they do it. It might be for legacy - last I checked they built autotools and some "libhover" thingy together with -cdt. Anyhow, I figured I would mention it in case someone decides to work on this before I get to the bottom of my TODO list. If you/someone starts on this and realises that we need to package autotools via -cdt, then that is certainly possible (patches against -cdt to do this would certainly also be welcome ^^). On a related note, eclipse-cdt was uploaded to unstable a few days ago. It was too late for Squeeze, but now there is something to base the patches on, hehehe... ;) ~Niels -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMtVx6AAoJEAVLu599gGRCK7EP+wexeBFwjSAkrTvm07NK0hF/ ptn9UF9fGyV20RSTrxuHBam6qqmPNFTxNZ60kPdDQMtXXvsv8uyxkdlQpur2jlT6 KLe9zh6S7XwH1ocQldxqea0M61N73MuRRzmKDlNGp9DobamBqY0epuV9dTrXEI5i uig4felcCR4Km7EflRmrEIJXcWk+Df8Zy30bTgYKNf58s3ZzhYipr6z/hGo/IIjp y51CVldNpumesTJVzV9WdYWdePKoY9SykbBb299OKS4ctH+mvCXWXDyI9G/beeL+ asc6bbLU81CtHYRTizEyxCr1UzDSX6gkcc8TqlZ8ps7mjKOgIdNy6s8nwY6WN8sx iZ63RNGwRKniwmOFPG+rmGVKRxW0V6A2iXPvbSnFxkwJgTs8kFqPcUyYEZwXdHHg vz0i4rC2ErJ9nUSpB4ZXbamgjD5cA4LA3h7NHkZXa+guKthcdFkfCLfwYSSrLtGH +EGphLLuA+KwUWTosapIUyzMdXTt82lLSf8GFTS4ex3EQIXGn50PViFTj3dBtWmT TzXD157AD+wUAG5FmdCaLRnSfh4xldeV7oVfLZNzckLkAiDTpNirKTvuYenT1/rs TlKL8u1/Tn4ELVS5GeurqJGxD7YuIidrFKFYXc/gFlztUVv5A2usnFwEDlzTq9fd kz60fHkp8VaVHcYxlQ5c =HFzq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cb55c7b.6010...@thykier.net
Bug#593285: additional info
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:49 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > That would still require someone to actually write said support ;) ;) "patches welcome"?! ^^ > > It would probably make sense to have one (binary) package per (sub)plugin, > > if that's possible > It is certainly possible; a note though, I believe Fedora is building > the autotools plugin together with the CDT plugin[1], so we may have to > do this as well in Debian. What's the reason for them doing this? Seems rather ugly to me ;) Cheers, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1282089086.3196.23.ca...@fermat.scientia.net
Bug#593285: additional info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2010-08-17 00:53, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > IIRC, it's even planned to add support for deb-packages ;) > That would still require someone to actually write said support ;) > It would probably make sense to have one (binary) package per (sub)plugin, > if that's possible > It is certainly possible; a note though, I believe Fedora is building the autotools plugin together with the CDT plugin[1], so we may have to do this as well in Debian. > > Cheers, > Chris. > > > ~Niels [1] http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc//rpms/eclipse-cdt/devel/eclipse-cdt.spec?view=markup -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkxq57gACgkQVCqoiq1YlqzpxgCeJ8n1LfE3Eb/fm/qimKShnGS5 zNIAniTmA9sMzVDxsCs1F+UA4iTxk4d6 =5C2Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c6ae7b9.6020...@thykier.net
Bug#593285: additional info
IIRC, it's even planned to add support for deb-packages ;) It would probably make sense to have one (binary) package per (sub)plugin, if that's possible Cheers, Chris. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/76439f2db26107c1dabb89ea7cdd3...@imap.dd24.net