Processed: Re: Bug#653113: Status of reviewboard?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package wnpp Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp' Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp' > retitle 653113 RFP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool Bug #653113 [wnpp] ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool Changed Bug title to 'RFP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool' from 'ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool' > noowner 653113 Bug #653113 [wnpp] RFP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Dmitry Nezhevenko . > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 653113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653113 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.139899873612326.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#653113: Status of reviewboard?
package wnpp retitle 653113 RFP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool noowner 653113 thanks On 15-Jul-2013, micah wrote: > I haven't seen an update on this ITP since 30 Aug 2012, and the mentors > bug was closed after no response (#669720). Given no response since 2012, I am reverting this report to a RFP, and removing the owner annotation. -- \“Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?” “Wuh, I think | `\ so, Brain, but burlap chafes me so.” —_Pinky and The Brain_ | _o__) | Ben Finney signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653113: Status of reviewboard?
Hello, I haven't seen an update on this ITP since 30 Aug 2012, and the mentors bug was closed after no response (#669720). It would be really great if this work wasn't lost, it seemed very close to being finished. Maybe now things are in a better state? micah pgpQd1l4by5Gs.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#653113: .
Any update on the progress of packaging ReviewBoard?! -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cabyrxsswsphwfjoisd_w65z4ahi061wppnws74myg-v1oyn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
Hi Dmitry, On Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > Sorry for very slow response. Currently I'm mostly busy with some other > things.. I'll return to this in a few weeks. [...] > That's why my current plan is to package ReviewBoard to experimental only > with some notes about these issues ah, that explains pretty well, thanks! Good luck with your other things! :-) cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201208300939.43386.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
On 30-Aug-2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > As about original question, we've a few important issues here: […] > That's why my current plan is to package ReviewBoard to experimental only > with some notes about these issues Thank you for the update. I look forward to more news about this package's progress, and remember you can ask for help on the ‘debian-python’ or ‘debian-mentors’ forums. -- \ “It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a | `\ thought without accepting it.” —Aristotle | _o__) | Ben Finney signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:36:00AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Samstag, 25. August 2012, Ben Finney wrote: > > Holger, thank you for offering to sponsor these packages. Have you made > > progress on helping Dmitry get this into Debian? > > it's stalled at the "python-django-pipeline vs python-pipeline" issue, > installing the former breaks the later, there is a serious bug (#674042) > filed > about this. Hi, Sorry for very slow response. Currently I'm mostly busy with some other things.. I'll return to this in a few weeks. As about original question, we've a few important issues here: 1. django-pipeline vs pipeline issue. 2. We can't ship latest release of ReviewBoard because it uses outdated version of django library (1.3.x) while debian already ships 1.4. Currently only git snapshots have support of 1.4: http://www.mail-archive.com/reviewboard@googlegroups.com/msg08761.html 3. ReviewBoard requires outdated versions of jQuery libraries. It's almost the same thing as with django. Upstream will not switch to recent versions soon, since it requires too much work. I was able to fix some of issues when using together with jQuery from Debian. But some of them are still present. Patches are not large but for now they can't be contributed upstream. 4. Upstream asked to not package git snapshot of reviewboard at all due to some known issues. There are some issues with db upgrades (it's impossible to 'upgrade' current 1.6 installation to 1.7-git and it'll be probably impossible to upgrade from 1.7-git to 1.7-release when it'll be ready). http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1835 That's why my current plan is to package ReviewBoard to experimental only with some notes about these issues -- WBR, Dmitry signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
Hi Ben, On Samstag, 25. August 2012, Ben Finney wrote: > Holger, thank you for offering to sponsor these packages. Have you made > progress on helping Dmitry get this into Debian? it's stalled at the "python-django-pipeline vs python-pipeline" issue, installing the former breaks the later, there is a serious bug (#674042) filed about this. cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201208251036.01638.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
On 22-Apr-2012, Holger Levsen wrote: > very cool! I'll see that I'll have a look in the next 2 weeks but wouldnt > mind if someone does it earlier! dget'ing the files at least now, so I > can look at them when I'm bored offline :) On 03-May-2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > Just a reminder. I'm still looking for sponsor for these reviewboard > related packages. Holger, thank you for offering to sponsor these packages. Have you made progress on helping Dmitry get this into Debian? -- \“Your [government] representative owes you, not his industry | `\ only, but his judgment; and he betrays, instead of serving you, | _o__)if he sacrifices it to your opinion.” —Edmund Burke, 1774 | Ben Finney signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
Just a reminder. I'm still looking for sponsor for these reviewboard related packages. There is just one issue left (with conflicting python-django-pipeline vs python-pipeline). I'm not sure how to solve it. Author of python-pipeline (that is already in debian) stated that he is going to rename his module to something else. -- WBR, Dmitry signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
Hi Dmitry, On Samstag, 21. April 2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > I've uploaded reviewboard to mentors.debian.net and looking for sponsor: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669720 very cool! I'll see that I'll have a look in the next 2 weeks but wouldnt mind if someone does it earlier! dget'ing the files at least now, so I can look at them when I'm bored offline :) cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201204221230.10485.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:46:20PM +0300, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > I'm still working on it. Followed dependencies are packaged and are > waiting for sponsor: Hi, I've uploaded reviewboard to mentors.debian.net and looking for sponsor: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669720 It needs to be uploaded together with two other packages that contains python modules: > - python-django-djblets > - python-django-evolution -- WBR, Dmitry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120421124722.GA27632@laptop.local
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
block 653113 by 669426 block 653113 by 656275 stop I'm still working on it. Followed dependencies are packaged and are waiting for sponsor: - python-django-djblets - python-django-evolution ReviewBoard itself is almost ready with some minor issues -- WBR, Dmitry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120420104619.GA25171@laptop.local
Bug#653113: state of reviewboard ITP
Hi, On Mittwoch, 18. April 2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > I'm sorry, but unfortunately I was busy with other things. I've some > initial stuff. And since there is some demand on reviewboard in debian, > I'll try to make something to show this weekend. ok, cool! > It's will be cool if you'll review/sponsor it. yup! (Please go via the mentors infrastructure still, but do cc: me.) cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201204190855.47263.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#653113: state of reviewboard ITP
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 07:21:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > whats the status of your reviewboard ITP? The last reply on the bug is from > January > > I'm a DD and could help with reviewing or sponsoring! :) Hi, I'm sorry, but unfortunately I was busy with other things. I've some initial stuff. And since there is some demand on reviewboard in debian, I'll try to make something to show this weekend. It's will be cool if you'll review/sponsor it. Thanks a lot! -- WBR, Dmitry signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653113: state of reviewboard ITP
Hi Dmitry, whats the status of your reviewboard ITP? The last reply on the bug is from January I'm a DD and could help with reviewing or sponsoring! :) cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201204181921.43839.hol...@layer-acht.org
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:49:58AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Thank you, Dmitry. I'm not DD, so it'll take even more time =) > > > Please note that at least a few dependencies of current version of > > reviewboard are not packaged for debian, so it'll take more time > > Understood. What are the particular dependencies? I can file RFP bug > reports to coordinate the discussion, if you like. Firstly it's djblets. It was present in debian some times ago (together with old version of reviewboard). I've created new ITP for it: #656275 Also reviewboard optionally depends on pylucene which is in very bad state (removed for testing, unstable version still depends on python 2.5). -- WBR, Dmitry signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
On 18-Jan-2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote: > I'm using it now at work, so I'm going to package it soon. Thank you, Dmitry. > Please note that at least a few dependencies of current version of > reviewboard are not packaged for debian, so it'll take more time Understood. What are the particular dependencies? I can file RFP bug reports to coordinate the discussion, if you like. -- \ “Please leave your values at the front desk.” —hotel, Paris | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#653113: ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
retitle 653113 ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool owner 653113 ! stop I'm using it now at work, so I'm going to package it soon. Please note that at least a few dependencies of current version of reviewboard are not packaged for debian, so it'll take more time -- WBR, Dmitry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120117225102.GC15651@laptop.local
Bug#653113: RFP: review-board -- web-based code review tool
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: review-board Version : 1.6.3 Upstream Author : Beanbag, Inc. * URL or Web page : http://www.reviewboard.org/ * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description : web-based code review tool Review Board offers developers an easy way to handle code reviews via a web application. . It scales well from small projects to large companies and offers a variety of tools to take much of the stress and time out of the code review process. -- \ “Nature hath given men one tongue but two ears, that we may | `\ hear from others twice as much as we speak.” —Epictetus, | _o__) _Fragments_ | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87liq2vhug@benfinney.id.au
