Bug#724345: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 02:38:40PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 09:52:24AM +, Javi Merino wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:51:10PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +, Javi Merino wrote: > > > > Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low > > > > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining > > > > > it > > > > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took > > > > > over. > > > > > > > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules > > > > Team umbrella. I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape, > > > > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks! All I can > > > > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the > > > > debian/rules . I may do it just to justify the upload that changes > > > > the Maintainer field ;) > > > Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems > > > reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days? > > > > No, unfortunately it's still svn. I use git-svn and git-buildpackage > > with some packages though. > > > > > Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer? > > > > Of course you can be co-maintainer! Would you mind if I moved it to > > the Python Modules Team svn though? > > Hmm, maybe I should hold on to the package for a little while longer. > I'd rather not see the history lost because of importing to svn. I can > move it into the Python Modules Team once they migrate to Git. Ok, so shall we migrate it to git then? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#724345: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 09:52:24AM +, Javi Merino wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:51:10PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > Hi Javi, > > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +, Javi Merino wrote: > > > Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low > > > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it > > > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took > > > > over. > > > > > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules > > > Team umbrella. I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape, > > > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks! All I can > > > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the > > > debian/rules . I may do it just to justify the upload that changes > > > the Maintainer field ;) > > Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems > > reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days? > > No, unfortunately it's still svn. I use git-svn and git-buildpackage > with some packages though. > > > What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before. > > I meant pybuild. It's fairly recent. It's an easy way of making > packages that support multiple versions of python and removes most of > the pyversions "loops" in debian/rules: > > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Pybuild > > > Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer? > > Of course you can be co-maintainer! Would you mind if I moved it to > the Python Modules Team svn though? Hmm, maybe I should hold on to the package for a little while longer. I'd rather not see the history lost because of importing to svn. I can move it into the Python Modules Team once they migrate to Git. Cheers, Jelmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#724345: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:51:10PM +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > Hi Javi, > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +, Javi Merino wrote: > > Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low > > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it > > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took > > > over. > > > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules > > Team umbrella. I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape, > > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks! All I can > > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the > > debian/rules . I may do it just to justify the upload that changes > > the Maintainer field ;) > Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems > reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days? No, unfortunately it's still svn. I use git-svn and git-buildpackage with some packages though. > What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before. I meant pybuild. It's fairly recent. It's an easy way of making packages that support multiple versions of python and removes most of the pyversions "loops" in debian/rules: https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Pybuild > Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer? Of course you can be co-maintainer! Would you mind if I moved it to the Python Modules Team svn though? Cheers, Javi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#724345: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Hi Javi, On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +, Javi Merino wrote: > Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took > > over. > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules > Team umbrella. I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape, > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks! All I can > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the > debian/rules . I may do it just to justify the upload that changes > the Maintainer field ;) Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days? What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before. Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer? Cheers, Jelmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#724345: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Hi Javi, On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 04:26:32PM +, Javi Merino wrote: > Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low > > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it > > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took > > over. > > I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules > Team umbrella. I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape, > impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks! All I can > think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the > debian/rules . I may do it just to justify the upload that changes > the Maintainer field ;) Thanks! Moving it under the Python Modules Team umbrella seems reasonable. Do they support Git as VCS these days? What is pybuilder? I don't think I've come across it before. Would you mind me staying Co-Maintainer? Cheers, Jelmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#724345: ITA: subvertpy -- Alternative Python bindings for Subversion
Hi Jelmer, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > I request an adopter for the subvertpy package. It's a fairly low > maintenance package; I no longer use it myself. I'll keep maintaining it > in the mean time, but it'd probably be better if somebody else took > over. I'd like to adopt this package and put it under the Python Modules Team umbrella. I've had a quick look and it's in a pretty good shape, impressive for a package that's up for adoption, thanks! All I can think of doing is converting it to pybuilder to simplify a bit the debian/rules . I may do it just to justify the upload that changes the Maintainer field ;) Cheers, Javi signature.asc Description: Digital signature
