Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Control: tags -1 + pending http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/scoop_0.7.1-1.html Much thanks for sponsoring this. Greetings, Daniel Stender -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540eaa83.4060...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Thanks for more review. On 08.09.2014 16:11, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: during the build, I have this message writing output... [ 50%] examples WARNING: LaTeX command 'latex' cannot be run (needed for math display), check the pngmath_latex setting writing output... [ 66%] index maybe it would be nice to install latex to generate the pngmath pictures. Alright, that was missing. I've added the needed b-deps. Cheers I just did a minor fix to the copyright. it seems to me that it is ok now. Fred Yes, that's better with the comment line. I've just pushed the latest changes. Greetings, Daniel -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540ddb47.9030...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Hello, during the build, I have this message writing output... [ 50%] examples WARNING: LaTeX command 'latex' cannot be run (needed for math display), check the pngmath_latex setting writing output... [ 66%] index maybe it would be nice to install latex to generate the pngmath pictures. Cheers I just did a minor fix to the copyright. it seems to me that it is ok now. Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1f37...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Hello Frederic, I've set up the DEP-8 tests, please see the latest commit. My buildlog incl. adt-run results is here: http://paste.debian.net/119580/ So, it would be o.k. with me to put it on its way. But, further comments welcome, I will fix this immediately. Greetings, Daniel On 04.09.2014 20:29, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: Setup for autopkgtest is coming up. I cannot wait :) -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540adf1b.9050...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Thanks for further stuff, this is going to be a hardened deb/copyright.
Won't do no harm with the FTP people.
On 04.09.2014 20:29, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
what about _static/copybutton.js ?
Can't find anything special on this (among other packages only to be
found in python{2.7,3.2}-doc [1]), so I suggest we just leave it out
(contains no copyright info, whatsoever)
look at here and add the same thing in the copyright file.
http://sources.debian.net/src/python-numpy/1:1.8.2-2/debian/copyright/
All right, here we go with copybutton.js ...
Added _template/globaltoc.html to deb/copyright, contains a copyright
header.
I can not find it in the current git repo 20:17 UTC+1
Now, it's
Files: doc/_static/sidebar.js
doc/_template/globaltoc.html
Copyright: 2007-2011 Sphinx Team
License: BSD-2-clause
dictconfig.py: added that to deb/copyright, the old Python license is
researched.
this file is an old copy of a file which is part of python-logutils.
It seems that the license is BSD-3 on the new vesion. but the version of scoop
is older.
http://sources.debian.net/src/python-logutils/0.3.3-2/logutils/
maybe the upstream should use this package instead of embeding this copy...
except if they have done some modifications.
Maybe they should use the latest version.
...
runpy.py: no copyright and no date are given. I've researched the year
and added the source for the info. Can't tell if this entry is
problematic, but cme-check doesn't complain.
can you ask the upstream where he took this file.
the problem is not cme-check but to do our best to simplify the load of the
ftp-master team
Great that you also find more on runpy.py (the other email). Added that,
too.
Setup for autopkgtest is coming up.
I cannot wait :)
Coming up, next.
cheers
Frederic
Please see the latest commit for the additions mentioned here.
Greetings,
Daniel
--
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com
PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0
C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5408e1d0.6010...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Hello
> > what about _static/copybutton.js ?
> Can't find anything special on this (among other packages only to be
> found in python{2.7,3.2}-doc [1]), so I suggest we just leave it out
> (contains no copyright info, whatsoever)
look at here and add the same thing in the copyright file.
http://sources.debian.net/src/python-numpy/1:1.8.2-2/debian/copyright/
> Added _template/globaltoc.html to deb/copyright, contains a copyright
> header.
I can not find it in the current git repo 20:17 UTC+1
> dictconfig.py: added that to deb/copyright, the old Python license is
> researched.
this file is an old copy of a file which is part of python-logutils.
It seems that the license is BSD-3 on the new vesion. but the version of scoop
is older.
http://sources.debian.net/src/python-logutils/0.3.3-2/logutils/
maybe the upstream should use this package instead of embeding this copy...
except if they have done some modifications.
Maybe they should use the latest version.
> runpy.py: no copyright and no date are given. I've researched the year
> and added the source for the info. Can't tell if this entry is
> problematic, but cme-check doesn't complain.
can you ask the upstream where he took this file.
the problem is not cme-check but to do our best to simplify the load of the
ftp-master team
If you need to find files do not hesitate to use
codesearch.debian.net (this is a fantastic service for copyright digging :)
> Further comments welcome.
here it is :)
> Setup for autopkgtest is coming up.
I cannot wait :)
cheers
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1f17...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Thanks for more comments.
On 03.09.2014 15:20, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
can you look with the upstream to add copyright headers where it is missing
UNKOWN
and it would be nice to have also the copyright in each header.
it seems thaht there is only the license without the copyright statement.
I'll suggest that by occasion.
> /tmp/scoop-0.7.1$ licensecheck -r *
I've checked the files again and added discovery/minusconf.py to
deb/copyright.
the sourc epacakge contain already build documentation.
for exemple the
doc/_static directory contain .js code which is part of sphinx, you should
indicate this in the copyright file.
Or better ask the upstream to remove this prebuild documentation.
Added copyright info for doc/_static/sidebar.js.
> what about _static/copybutton.js ?
Can't find anything special on this (among other packages only to be
found in python{2.7,3.2}-doc [1]), so I suggest we just leave it out
(contains no copyright info, whatsoever)
[1]
https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=copybutton.js&mode=exactfilename&suite=stable&arch=any
* doc/blu.diff ??? this should be removed from the source package.
Not very clean the tarball. Added to the list of comments.
> * doc/_template/* sphinx
>
> * doc/_themes/* ???
Added _template/globaltoc.html to deb/copyright, contains a copyright
header.
it sems thah some files hase the DEAP license header. This should be fixed by
the upstream or indicated in the copyright file.
picca@ORD03037:/tmp/scoop-0.7.1$ rgrep DEAP *
examples/deap_ga_onemax.py:raise Exception("This test needs DEAP to be
installed.")
examples/dependency/sortingnetwork.py:#This file is part of DEAP.
examples/dependency/sortingnetwork.py:#DEAP is free software: you can
redistribute it and/or modify
examples/dependency/sortingnetwork.py:#DEAP is distributed in the hope that
it will be useful,
examples/dependency/sortingnetwork.py:#License along with DEAP. If not, see
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
>>You removed the local-options (are you using gbp-buildpackage to build >> scoop ?) > Yes. What's this for, useful to keep? In fact I like when the master branch does not touch the upstream sources. This is why I use the unapply patches option this way I have the original sources in the master branch. But this is only me. You do exactly what you want :). > Great. Much thanks in advance. Once the copyright and autopackage part will be ready :) I know this copyright part is painfull but it is mendatory. thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1f14...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
copyright review
I used licensecheck as a starting point
can you look with the upstream to add copyright headers where it is missing
UNKOWN
and it would be nice to have also the copyright in each header.
it seems thaht there is only the license without the copyright statement.
this is not a blocker but it is good practive and this way no ambiguity.
This way your next license check will be easyer.
/tmp/scoop-0.7.1$ licensecheck -r *
doc/conf.py: *No copyright* GENERATED FILE
examples/map_doc.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/recurse.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/url_fetch.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/lambda.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/object.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/full_tree.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/grtest.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
examples/callback.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/url_fetch_doc.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/map_scan.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/deap_ga_evosn.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/testmut.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/deap_ga_onemax.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/sum_multiples.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/shared_example_doc.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/pi_calc_doc.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/conditional_import.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/conditional_execution.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/shared_example.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/sorting.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/dependency/sortingnetwork.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/map_reduce.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/tree/Tree.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
examples/tree/dtm-tree.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
examples/tree/TreeGen.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
examples/tree/scoop_tree.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
examples/tree/serial-tree.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
examples/pi_calc.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/rssDoc.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later) GENERATED FILE
examples/map_as_completed.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/interactive_shell.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
examples/image_resize.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/tree_traversal.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
examples/exceptExample.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/fallbacks.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/__init__.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/encapsulation.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/_comm/__init__.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/_comm/scoopzmq.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/_comm/scooptcp.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/_comm/scoopexceptions.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/backports/newCollections.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/backports/dictconfig.py: UNKNOWN
scoop/backports/runpy.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
scoop/launcher.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/utils.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/_control.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/discovery/minusconf.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
scoop/discovery/__init__.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/launch/__init__.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/launch/workerLaunch.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/launch/brokerLaunch.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/_debug.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/broker/brokertcp.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/broker/structs.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/broker/brokerzmq.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/broker/__main__.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/shared.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/bootstrap/__main__.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/_types.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/__main__.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
scoop/futures.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
setup.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
test/tests_stopwatch.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
test/tests_stat.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
test/tests.py: *No copyright* LGPL (v3 or later)
test/tests_parser.py: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
now
the sourc epacakge contain already build documentation.
for exemple the
doc/_static directory contain .js code which is part of sphinx, you should
indicate this in the copyright file.
Or better ask the upstream to remove this prebuild documentation.
what about _static/copybutton.js ?
* doc/blu.diff ??? this should be removed from the source package.
* doc/_template/* sphinx ?
* doc/_themes/* ???
it sems thah some files hase the DEAP license header. This should be fixed by
the upstream or indicated in the copyright file.
picca@ORD03037:/tmp/scoop-0.7.1$ rgrep DEAP *
examples/deap_ga_onemax.py:raise Exception("This test needs DEAP to be
installed.")
examples/dependency/sortingnetwork.py:#This file is part o
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
On 03.09.2014 14:05, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: * finalized ok, do not hesitate to use cme to fix your control file. The Vcs-Browser wasn't up-to-date. Fixed this. * running testsuite nice to have a test suite. You can look at the debci and autopkgtest infrastructure to implement also the integration continuous integration for scoop. All right. This is coming up. why did you removed the virtual package ssh-client ? I've tried it and it points to openssh-client, but o.k. that could be different on other systems ... Restored. * added no-adsense.patch could you discuss with the upstream to remove these privacy breach things. If they really want them, it should be nice to have a setup.py flag which allow to get rid of these google analytic links, instead of carrying a dedicated patch all the time. Yes, that's pretty ugly. I'm going to mention/forward this to upstream. You removed the local-options (are you using gbp-buildpackage to build scoop ?) Yes. What's this for, useful to keep? So I will consiede the pacakge ready for upload once Great. Much thanks in advance. > 1) you regenerate the -doc package (this will simplify thinks when python3 pacakge will be possible) > 2) re-add the ssh-client dependency (cheap) > 3) add the autopkgtest part (will simplify a lot the maintenance of the package, so important for me) I've commited the changes right now. I'm going to write again when the autopkgtest is fixed. Greetings, Daniel -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540713a8.4060...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
"scoop-doc" would be. But I would be tending to "python-scoop-doc" anyway. scoop-doc is better to my opinion I just looked at sphinx and it seems that this is better to use -doc (it is neutral > By-the-way: what's your opinion for the dep of the docs package on the > main package, Suggests or Recommends? Recommends Cheers Fred -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1f14...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Thanks for the review. On 03.09.2014 14:05, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: Hello, here a quick review of all the patches * dropped docs package (REJECT-FAQ: split this only if it's big) I think that this patch should be reverted. The problem if you add the documentation in python-scoop seems to me problematic when python3-scoop will come. It is best to my opinion especially for the python pacakging to put the documentation nto a dedicated package which can be recommended by python2 and python3. I do not think that this -doc package would be rejected by ftp-master. There argument is understandable when you have only one binary pacakge. But here we can intall python2 and/or python3 version but in both cases you want the documentation. O.k. I can set this up already. * changelog: restored 'initial release' and added info on previous package is there common binary packages between this old scoop package and the new one ? "scoop-doc" would be. But I would be tending to "python-scoop-doc" anyway. By-the-way: what's your opinion for the dep of the docs package on the main package, Suggests or Recommends? Greetings, Daniel -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54070b5b.5010...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Hello, here a quick review of all the patches * dropped docs package (REJECT-FAQ: split this only if it's big) I think that this patch should be reverted. The problem if you add the documentation in python-scoop seems to me problematic when python3-scoop will come. It is best to my opinion especially for the python pacakging to put the documentation nto a dedicated package which can be recommended by python2 and python3. I do not think that this -doc package would be rejected by ftp-master. There argument is understandable when you have only one binary pacakge. But here we can intall python2 and/or python3 version but in both cases you want the documentation. * finalized ok, do not hesitate to use cme to fix your control file. * changelog: restored 'initial release' and added info on previous package is there common binary packages between this old scoop package and the new one ? * build docs package ok * running testsuite nice to have a test suite. You can look at the debci and autopkgtest infrastructure to implement also the integration continuous integration for scoop. * changelog: improved package info * copyright: indent correction ok * control: corrected dependency, copyright: shortened too long line why did you removed the virtual package ssh-client ? * added no-adsense.patch could you discuss with the upstream to remove these privacy breach things. If they really want them, it should be nice to have a setup.py flag which allow to get rid of these google analytic links, instead of carrying a dedicated patch all the time. * updated some files in deb/, removed source/local-options and egg-info, added examples and doc-base You removed the local-options (are you using gbp-buildpackage to build scoop ?) So I will consiede the pacakge ready for upload once 1) you regenerate the -doc package (this will simplify thinks when python3 pacakge will be possible) 2) re-add the ssh-client dependency (cheap) 3) add the autopkgtest part (will simplify a lot the maintenance of the package, so important for me) I need to build it and do the copyright check. then I think that it will be ok for me to sponsor the upload. Cheers Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1f14...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Control: tags -1 pending Hi again, I've advanced with the package, and would like to accept your offer for sponsoring this. Please cf http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/scoop.git/ http://www.danielstender.com/buildlogs/scoop_0.7.1-1_amd64.build http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/scoop/scoop_0.7.1-1.dsc Greetings, Daniel On 02.09.2014 08:12, Daniel Stender wrote: On 02.09.2014 06:46, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: sorry, here the right adress git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/scoop.git Ah, that's already in Git, too. Thanks, Frederic. Greetings, Daniel -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5406dd2f.10...@danielstender.com
Processed: Re: Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #760188 [wnpp] ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library Added tag(s) pending. -- 760188: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760188 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b760188.140973599310674.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
On 02.09.2014 06:46, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: sorry, here the right adress git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/scoop.git Ah, that's already in Git, too. Thanks, Frederic. Greetings, Daniel -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54055fd1.2010...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
sorry, here the right adress git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/scoop.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1f07...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
That's a pointer to another Debian Science package, but anyhow interesting (exemplarily) :-) Greetings, Daniel On 01.09.2014 22:47, Daniel Stender wrote: Hi Frederic, thanks for the offer to sponsor the package. Yes I would be interested to put into under Debian Science (I've did that already for Python-nltk). Thanks also for the pointer to your previous work on Scoop, I'll take a look into it and come back with the package, soon. Greetings, Daniel -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5404e140.9030...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Hi Frederic, thanks for the offer to sponsor the package. Yes I would be interested to put into under Debian Science (I've did that already for Python-nltk). Thanks also for the pointer to your previous work on Scoop, I'll take a look into it and come back with the package, soon. Greetings, Daniel On 01.09.2014 21:06, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: Hello, I already started to package it, but I did not intend to maintain it. I can sponsorize the upload if you need a sponsor. Did you considede maintaining it under the debian-science umbrella. I know that it is related to deap, so it is science related :). Here the debian-science git repository of my latest package just in case. git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/guidata.git tell me if you are interested. cheers Frederic -- https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian%40danielstender.com PGP key: 2048R/E41BD2D0 C879 5E41 1ED7 EE80 0F2E 7D0C DBDD 4D96 E41B D2D0 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5404db4d.7020...@danielstender.com
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Hello, I already started to package it, but I did not intend to maintain it. I can sponsorize the upload if you need a sponsor. Did you considede maintaining it under the debian-science umbrella. I know that it is related to deap, so it is science related :). Here the debian-science git repository of my latest package just in case. git://anonscm.debian.org/debian-science/packages/guidata.git tell me if you are interested. cheers Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b1f06...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Bug#760188: ITP: scoop -- concurrent parallel programmming library
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Daniel Stender * Package name: scoop Version : 0.7.1 Upstream Author : SCOOP Development Team * URL : http://code.google.com/p/scoop/ * License : LPGL-3.0 Description : concurrent parallel programmming library for Python I'm working on packaging Scoop for Debian. For info on this, please cf. http://scoop.readthedocs.org/en/0.7/. Thank you very much, Daniel Stender -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140901175647.2545.19196.report...@varuna.fritz.box
