Bug#804315: Seriously?

2015-11-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Joerg Jaspert dixit:

>not official", thats just wrong. You may not like its maintainer, you
>may not want that particular software and want to get your own. Thats
>all fine, but this action is not.

This becomes especially ridiculous when one considers that certain
people/parties/cabals inside Debian, which some of the people involved
this time may or may not belong to, deny other then-developers the
ability to want a particular piece of software, instead of that one
they wanted.

Why is it that some people can declare other peoples’ work “not
official” and thus less worth than their own, while that work is
still used with official releases?

Right. Debian, as a social ecosystem, isn’t a welcoming place any more.

I just am surprised that not more people leave it.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
“The final straw, to be honest, was probably my amazement at the volume of
petty, peevish whingeing certain of your peers are prone to dish out on
d-devel, telling each other how to talk more like a pretty princess, as though
they were performing some kind of public service.” (someone to me, privately)



Bug#804315: Seriously?

2015-11-09 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hi,

seriously? You are kidding, right? This *IS* a namespace invasion and a
bad one at that. The live-* is in Debian, scrap arguments of "its
not official", thats just wrong. You may not like its maintainer, you
may not want that particular software and want to get your own. Thats
all fine, but this action is not.

Use a different name or politely ask the originals name owner if they
care to give it to you.

-- 
bye, Joerg
Our lives are in the hands of men no smarter than you or I. Many of them
incompetent boobs. I know this because I’ve worked alongside them, gone
bowling with them, watch them pass me over for promotions time and
again.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature