Bug#848198: marked as done (ITP: fonts-noto-color-emoji -- Color emoji set from Android)
Your message dated Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#849042: fixed in fonts-noto-color-emoji 0~20170913-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #849042, regarding ITP: fonts-noto-color-emoji -- Color emoji set from Android to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 849042: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849042 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Ming-ting Yao Wei (魏銘廷)" * Package name: fonts-noto-color-emoji * URL : https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/emoji/ * License : Apache 2.0 Description : Color emoji set from Android Noto color emoji is the emoji font set originated from the Android project. It currently supports Unicode 9.0 specs with emojis for different skin tones and family forms. A Debian user discovered that Jessie includes the fontconfig capable of rendering color emoji, but needs a workaround for a bug fixed in newer fontconfig that is not in Debian main yet: http://stdio.tumblr.com/post/114082931782 Currently this package should be best maintained with the supports from Debian Fonts Task Force. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: fonts-noto-color-emoji Source-Version: 0~20170913-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of fonts-noto-color-emoji, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 849...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jeremy Bicha (supplier of updated fonts-noto-color-emoji package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 10:24:55 -0400 Source: fonts-noto-color-emoji Binary: fonts-noto-color-emoji Architecture: source all Version: 0~20170913-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force Changed-By: Jeremy Bicha Description: fonts-noto-color-emoji - color emoji font from Google Closes: 849042 Changes: fonts-noto-color-emoji (0~20170913-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Initial release. Closes: #849042 Checksums-Sha1: 3bd8f0217531f0f51bc63d34a0b465db4e2812e0 2219 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1.dsc ebd7dbe10a29f4049229d8bebb32b8d338e37ac8 41808038 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913.orig.tar.gz accff69baf50f6b97f365ec45175bbe39c169e5d 3780 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1.debian.tar.xz 643f6a4f250d8b9ed877b5c9ce49ddadd07739bd 6654936 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1_all.deb de21e4007c01d3e54d830e3bb356ac821aa1c294 9053 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1_amd64.buildinfo Checksums-Sha256: c55f834a3e9f43f0272ce936c8bb72a858ebd7d46a6aef0ebc9fab95577a6d0f 2219 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1.dsc e75e575cc5a6a5af7c5a331744d218fec9ad74cdb251d785f19458b17732e5d1 41808038 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913.orig.tar.gz 5080c4081e5c7fd25602cf83e0579f6b386afeafbdd29775c29113018942fc7a 3780 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1.debian.tar.xz 9092a6185e0fdc0a3ec70a0c2849624a530e32c7236acc7063a521c1e4cec78d 6654936 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1_all.deb 6e6734d96b1c193a1b6eda4363367a73eb5d724ee536a04c071a61bfab1df30c 9053 fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1_amd64.buildinfo Files: 9f94ca92a02331c888f806474fe93c13 2219 fonts optional fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1.dsc db6d2b1b517acf032459566dd37d0814 41808038 fonts optional fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913.orig.tar.gz 4ae34aff9470449c442903a46bed5e58 3780 fonts optional fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1.debian.tar.xz 154e79e7a72423ec830727af2728080c 6654936 fonts optional fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1_all.deb cc56fb84bd1382312cfc63746d495ada 9053 fonts optional fonts-noto-color-emoji_0~20170913-1_amd64.buildinfo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJZ+eLZAAoJEOZsd1rr/mx9UJsQAJ5kVKpPWZ1rCc8U2v/yshGA u3Rlz73NlsY2HiMPEWHjaVIH92gr59dqq8mYeQnuwG0IDfKAqiSmaNacwzD+BliH FQjj4ydwnC90Oy/HnonbkGEtDkqQKAUqMo9614chp0m01j+GzJuyBbta/TPFXW61 Qan6rX+qViCnCMnpYvF8OxF6IIom6ow/3R7/E5LfgcnNwRqAaveEk6R/YpKkgHnO xgMjPumPZl5zg9hRPYWtNNNd0iSNWmmN1j3ZLKfJt3dtsdXCm0XrPZFR9fKVQp+6 Y/yjEughzHKqMouPlNbX6pSptkhFBSg06iCyqv3CqkA92ieWklXJZd/hthhWicRm
Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji
On 24 October 2017 at 10:47, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Medical Wei wrote: >> I am recently (1-2 weeks ago) into some ITP and RFPs of some Python >> libraries to build fonts from source, like ufolib, defcon, and henrich is >> going to update fonttools. This can lead towards to packaging nototools to >> build this package from source. > > This is a priority for me for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. Please let me know if > I can help in any way. > > It looks like there are several more packages that you need to build > nototools, some don't even have ITPs yet (like pyclipper). > > Do you intend to maintain these packages yourself or with a team? > > Do you have git repos for your work so far? > > Have you been able to build nototools or the noto-color-emoji font locally > yet? > > I am usually in Debian IRC in #debian-gnome. Feel free to ping me. > > Thanks, > Jeremy Bicha Pre-built binary has been pushed to their github repo on Mar 11, 2017: https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji/blob/master/fonts/NotoColorEmoji.ttf I think we can use the binary instead of building from source, fonts-noto and fonts-noto-cjk do the same. Thanks, Anthony
Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Medical Wei wrote: > I am recently (1-2 weeks ago) into some ITP and RFPs of some Python > libraries to build fonts from source, like ufolib, defcon, and henrich is > going to update fonttools. This can lead towards to packaging nototools to > build this package from source. This is a priority for me for Ubuntu 18.04 LTS. Please let me know if I can help in any way. It looks like there are several more packages that you need to build nototools, some don't even have ITPs yet (like pyclipper). Do you intend to maintain these packages yourself or with a team? Do you have git repos for your work so far? Have you been able to build nototools or the noto-color-emoji font locally yet? I am usually in Debian IRC in #debian-gnome. Feel free to ping me. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji
Hi, Sorry for MIA. I am recently (1-2 weeks ago) into some ITP and RFPs of some Python libraries to build fonts from source, like ufolib, defcon, and henrich is going to update fonttools. This can lead towards to packaging nototools to build this package from source. Yao Wei On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 at 05:34 Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Control: merge 848198 849042 > > Hi, has there been any progress on packaging Noto Emoji? > > Thanks, > Jeremy Bicha >
Processed: Re: Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoj
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 848198 849042 Bug #848198 [wnpp] ITP: fonts-noto-color-emoji -- Color emoji set from Android Bug #849042 [wnpp] RFP: fonts-noto-emoji -- "No Tofu" emoji font Owner recorded as "Ming-ting Yao Wei (魏銘廷)" . Merged 848198 849042 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 848198: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848198 849042: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849042 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji
Processing control commands: > merge 848198 849042 Bug #848198 [wnpp] ITP: fonts-noto-color-emoji -- Color emoji set from Android Unable to merge bugs because: owner of #849042 is '' not '"Ming-ting Yao Wei (魏銘廷)" ' Failed to merge 848198: Did not alter merged bugs. -- 848198: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848198 849042: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849042 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji
Control: merge 848198 849042 Hi, has there been any progress on packaging Noto Emoji? Thanks, Jeremy Bicha
Bug#848198:
Seems good. I was on the mobile phone and the download link didn't appear for the mobile. On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 at 11:11 Anthony Wong wrote: > Hi Yao Wei, > > I see there is a colour one at > https://www.google.com/get/noto/#emoji-zsye-color, should we give this > one a shot instead? > > Thanks, > Anthony > > > On 6 March 2017 at 10:49, Yao Wei wrote: > > However prebuilt Noto Color Emoji isn't in the original repository but in > Android source. The TTF in the repo is old greyscale Emoji. If that's > considered okay I can go that way. > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 at 03:18 Anthony Wong wrote: > > Hi, > > I wonder if we can skip building it from source and just package the > pre-built font file provided by Google? Like what we are doing with Noto > CJK font. > The license of the font file is SIL Open Font License Version 1.1, as far > as I check. > > Thanks, > Anthony Wong > > >
Bug#848198:
Hi Yao Wei, I see there is a colour one at https://www.google.com/get/noto/#emoji-zsye-color, should we give this one a shot instead? Thanks, Anthony On 6 March 2017 at 10:49, Yao Wei wrote: > However prebuilt Noto Color Emoji isn't in the original repository but in > Android source. The TTF in the repo is old greyscale Emoji. If that's > considered okay I can go that way. > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 at 03:18 Anthony Wong wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I wonder if we can skip building it from source and just package the >> pre-built font file provided by Google? Like what we are doing with Noto >> CJK font. >> The license of the font file is SIL Open Font License Version 1.1, as far >> as I check. >> >> Thanks, >> Anthony Wong >> >
Bug#848198:
However prebuilt Noto Color Emoji isn't in the original repository but in Android source. The TTF in the repo is old greyscale Emoji. If that's considered okay I can go that way. On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 at 03:18 Anthony Wong wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if we can skip building it from source and just package the > pre-built font file provided by Google? Like what we are doing with Noto > CJK font. > The license of the font file is SIL Open Font License Version 1.1, as far > as I check. > > Thanks, > Anthony Wong >
Bug#848198:
Hi, I wonder if we can skip building it from source and just package the pre-built font file provided by Google? Like what we are doing with Noto CJK font. The license of the font file is SIL Open Font License Version 1.1, as far as I check. Thanks, Anthony Wong
Bug#849042: Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji
Yikes, that is quite a hassle. I am CC'ing the Debian Fonts Task force and maybe someone from there has some suggestion on how to deal with the nototools dependency in order to build the NotoColorEmoji.ttf. Also I think it's true based on the GitHub repo ( https://github.com/googlei18n/noto-emoji) that only the NotoColorEmoji source exists. But that is ok, right, I mean who needs black & white? On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Ming-ting “Yao” Wei wrote: > Hi, > > I am packing that but progressing slowly because there's need to upload > build dependency (nototools, #848206) to build from source and I might need > to handle the documentation of the package. > > I can do a rename of this ITP to include the fallback version of the > emoji. Should we do that? (Also I can't find the source of Noto Emoji > despite of the redistributable ttf.) > > Yao Wei, sending this on a phone > > On 23 Dec 2016, at 04:17, Taylor Kline wrote: > > Hello Yao, > > Are you progressing with packaging fonts-noto-color-emoji? I filed an RFP: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849042 > > and a fonts-noto wishlist item: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849127 > > before discovering your intent to package filed on 15 December. > > Thanks, > -Taylor > >
Bug#849042: Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji
Hi, I am packing that but progressing slowly because there's need to upload build dependency (nototools, #848206) to build from source and I might need to handle the documentation of the package. I can do a rename of this ITP to include the fallback version of the emoji. Should we do that? (Also I can't find the source of Noto Emoji despite of the redistributable ttf.) Yao Wei, sending this on a phone > On 23 Dec 2016, at 04:17, Taylor Kline wrote: > > Hello Yao, > > Are you progressing with packaging fonts-noto-color-emoji? I filed an RFP: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849042 > > and a fonts-noto wishlist item: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849127 > > before discovering your intent to package filed on 15 December. > > Thanks, > -Taylor
Bug#848198: fonts-noto-color-emoji
Hello Yao, Are you progressing with packaging fonts-noto-color-emoji? I filed an RFP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849042 and a fonts-noto wishlist item: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=849127 before discovering your intent to package filed on 15 December. Thanks, -Taylor
Bug#848198: ITP: fonts-noto-color-emoji -- Color emoji set from Android
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Ming-ting Yao Wei (魏銘廷)" * Package name: fonts-noto-color-emoji * URL : https://www.google.com/get/noto/help/emoji/ * License : Apache 2.0 Description : Color emoji set from Android Noto color emoji is the emoji font set originated from the Android project. It currently supports Unicode 9.0 specs with emojis for different skin tones and family forms. A Debian user discovered that Jessie includes the fontconfig capable of rendering color emoji, but needs a workaround for a bug fixed in newer fontconfig that is not in Debian main yet: http://stdio.tumblr.com/post/114082931782 Currently this package should be best maintained with the supports from Debian Fonts Task Force.
