Bug#921276: status update
On 2019-02-03 17:45:32, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > Control: block 921276 by 921286 921285 921287 921288 > > The above estimate is incorrect: docopt is already packaged, for > example. > > I've filed more ITPs for the other (currently) known build-deps, but > that might grow a little more. I didn't notice an RFP for termui > (#890567) so we have a duplicate there (#921286). > > I also filed a bunch of bugs upstream so they issue proper releases. Unfortunately, with the freeze looming on feb 12, it is unlikely this will cross NEW any time soon. It might make it to bullseye eventually, hopefully, but I'll probably take a break from this one until the freeze is over and focus on RC bugfixing. This will give time for upstreams to get their stuff in order as well (specifically, in https://github.com/distatus/battery/issues/9)... A. -- Si les triangles avaient un Dieu, ils lui donneraient trois côtés. - Montesquieu, Lettres persanes
Processed: Re: Bug#921276: status update
Processing control commands: > block 921276 by 921286 921285 921287 921288 Bug #921276 [wnpp] ITP: gotop -- A terminal based graphical activity monitor inspired by gtop and vtop 921276 was not blocked by any bugs. 921276 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 921276: 921286, 921285, 921288, and 921287 -- 921276: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921276 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#921276: status update
Control: block 921276 by 921286 921285 921287 921288 The above estimate is incorrect: docopt is already packaged, for example. I've filed more ITPs for the other (currently) known build-deps, but that might grow a little more. I didn't notice an RFP for termui (#890567) so we have a duplicate there (#921286). I also filed a bunch of bugs upstream so they issue proper releases. A. -- We are discreet sheep; we wait to see how the drove is going, and then go with the drove. - Mark Twain
