Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2002-01-07 Thread Nicolas SABOURET
Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
 
 Hi Nicolas,
 
 Do you still intend to adopt this package?
 
 If yes, please upload a package;
 If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.

Your mail makes me realize that I haven't been working much on this
package and that I have no real improvement to give for woody.
I'm still VAC this week, but I'll try to upload a new package next
week. However, it won't contain much improvement.

Tell me if you think of anything special,
Nico.
-- 
Nicolas SABOURET
LIMSI-CNRS, BP133, 91403 Orsay, France
http://www.limsi.fr/Individu/nico



Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2002-01-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Hi Nicolas,

Do you still intend to adopt this package?

If yes, please upload a package;
If no, please change this WNPP bug back to RFA:.

Thanks,
Thomas






Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2001-10-02 Thread Nicolas SABOURET
I'll maintain this package from now on (if everybody's OK with that).
I do not want to make any major change right now. However, I intend to
add Recommands:boot-floppies since I don't see why you would have bf-utf
installed if you don't intend to make bootfloppies.
-- 
Nicolas SABOURET
LIMSI-CNRS, BP133, 91403 Orsay, France
http://www.limsi.fr/Individu/nico



Bug#93561: ITA bf-utf

2001-10-02 Thread David Kimdon
Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 03:34:43PM +0200 wrote:
 I'll maintain this package from now on (if everybody's OK with that).
Great, I'm glad to hear it :-)

 I do not want to make any major change right now. However, I intend to
 add Recommands:boot-floppies since I don't see why you would have bf-utf
 installed if you don't intend to make bootfloppies.
The only thing I can think of is if someone wanted these fonts
available to the rest of the system.  I don't know how feasible (or
valuable) that would be, just an idea.

But whatever you do, you have my support!

-David