Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-12-04 Thread David Kimdon

Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:26:23PM + wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
  1. Berkeley db 3.3 - a bug has been filed (http::/bugs.debian.org/109853)
  I have been building with the preliminary packages on
  people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/.
 
 db3 is priority: required and is therefore frozen for the woody release.
 with 5 days to go until everything which depends on it is locked down,
 i'm less than keen on touching it.

FWIW, the db3.3-3.3.11 packages at people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/
were put together so that they can co-exist with the current db3
packages in much the same way that the db2 packages can co-exist
with the db3 pacakges.  With that in mind it isn't a question of
touching db3, rather the question is do we add db3.3 packages to the
archive.  I understand if you don't want to do that.

  Subversion will make its way into Debian shortly after these
  dependancies.  With this mail I am poking the respective maintainers
  to see where we stand.
 
 No subversion for woody.  I'll get db 3.3 sorted out once woody is out
 of the way.

I see where you are coming from.  I would, however, like to make
subversion available soon if possible.  I can just leave the packages
on people.debian.org, though there has been some discussion of moving
them to experimental.  

-David





Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-12-03 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
 1. Berkeley db 3.3 - a bug has been filed (http::/bugs.debian.org/109853)
 I have been building with the preliminary packages on
 people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/.

db3 is priority: required and is therefore frozen for the woody release.
with 5 days to go until everything which depends on it is locked down,
i'm less than keen on touching it.

 Subversion will make its way into Debian shortly after these
 dependancies.  With this mail I am poking the respective maintainers
 to see where we stand.

No subversion for woody.  I'll get db 3.3 sorted out once woody is out
of the way.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.



Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-12-01 Thread Peter Makholm
David Kimdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I heard Daniel didn't want me to give out the deb line until he finds
 a better place to mirror it, (still true Daniel?)

Couldn't you upload the relevant packages to 'experimental'? That
would probally be the easiest way to collaborated about a couple of
packages and get very interested people to help. (Or just to show
whats working).

The experimental distribution could be used a lot more than it is for
this kind of work.

-- 
Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nørd, bliver jeg altid ilde til mode
og svarer lidt undskyldende: Nej, jeg bruger RedHat.
-- Allan Olesen på dk.edb.system.unix



Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-11-30 Thread Grant Bowman
Hello David,

I appreciate your packaging Subversion!  I just added these lines to my
/etc/apt/sources.list

  # Subversion, db3 packages
  deb http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ ./
  deb-src http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ ./

I then installed the Subversion client (only the client for now) just
fine except that libapr0 isn't available and keeps showing an error on
every dselect selection session.  I can't find it from a search on
packages.debian.org or in the WNPP anywhere.  Should we file a RFP for
it to see if we can get some help to package it, or can someone getting
this email lend a hand?

Thanks for your effort,

--
-- Grant Bowman   [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-11-30 Thread Karl Fogel
Grant, your message was addressed to everyone except
[EMAIL PROTECTED]... ?? :-)

-K

Grant Bowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Hello David,
 
 I appreciate your packaging Subversion!  I just added these lines to my
 /etc/apt/sources.list
 
   # Subversion, db3 packages
   deb http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ ./
   deb-src http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ ./
 
 I then installed the Subversion client (only the client for now) just
 fine except that libapr0 isn't available and keeps showing an error on
 every dselect selection session.  I can't find it from a search on
 packages.debian.org or in the WNPP anywhere.  Should we file a RFP for
 it to see if we can get some help to package it, or can someone getting
 this email lend a hand?
 
 Thanks for your effort,
 
 --
 -- Grant Bowman   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-11-30 Thread Grant Bowman
Hi Karl,

I wanted to try to get the story straight before bothering the list and
to gauge how much active interest exists in moving forward among those
that have experessed interest before.  This omission did save me from my
own lack of follow through.  The libapr0 package is at a source already
known, listed in the RFP.

  deb http://kabuki.sfarc.net/apache2 ./

The other source listed is for the apache2 packages that has a different
apr package named apr.

  deb http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./

I am also curious when the packages will be going into woody which I am
running, but they don't seem to even be in sid yet.

--
-- Grant Bowman   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


* Karl Fogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011130 14:01]:
 Grant, your message was addressed to everyone except
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... ?? :-)
 
 -K
 
 Grant Bowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I appreciate your packaging Subversion!  I just added these lines to my
  /etc/apt/sources.list
  
# Subversion, db3 packages
deb http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ ./
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ ./
  
  I then installed the Subversion client (only the client for now) just
  fine except that libapr0 isn't available and keeps showing an error on
  every dselect selection session.  I can't find it from a search on
  packages.debian.org or in the WNPP anywhere.  Should we file a RFP for
  it to see if we can get some help to package it, or can someone getting
  this email lend a hand?




Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-11-30 Thread David Kimdon
Hi all,

As you can see subversion has some dependancies that aren't yet in
Debian.

Things we are waiting on include :

1. Berkeley db 3.3 - a bug has been filed (http::/bugs.debian.org/109853)
I have been building with the preliminary packages on
people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/.

2. apache2.  Daniel Stone and Thom May are working on that, we've been
working together to make subversion and apache2 play well together on
Debian.  I don't know when apache2 will be uploaded to unstable.  Last
I heard Daniel didn't want me to give out the deb line until he finds
a better place to mirror it, (still true Daniel?)

Subversion will make its way into Debian shortly after these
dependancies.  With this mail I am poking the respective maintainers
to see where we stand.

Thanks for the interest!  I hope that clears things up,

-David

Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:05:37PM -0600 wrote:
 Grant, your message was addressed to everyone except
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]... ?? :-)
 
 -K
 
 Grant Bowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Hello David,
  
  I appreciate your packaging Subversion!  I just added these lines to my
  /etc/apt/sources.list
  
# Subversion, db3 packages
deb http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ ./
deb-src http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ ./
  
  I then installed the Subversion client (only the client for now) just
  fine except that libapr0 isn't available and keeps showing an error on
  every dselect selection session.  I can't find it from a search on
  packages.debian.org or in the WNPP anywhere.  Should we file a RFP for
  it to see if we can get some help to package it, or can someone getting
  this email lend a hand?
  
  Thanks for your effort,
  
  --
  -- Grant Bowman   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-11-30 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
 2. apache2.  Daniel Stone and Thom May are working on that, we've been
 working together to make subversion and apache2 play well together on
 Debian.  I don't know when apache2 will be uploaded to unstable.  Last
 I heard Daniel didn't want me to give out the deb line until he finds
 a better place to mirror it, (still true Daniel?)

Well, the current URL sits on my home ISDN connection, which doesn't
need any help having its bandwidth crippled. If someone wants to mirror
it on pandora (it contains SSL), I'll be very grateful.

 Subversion will make its way into Debian shortly after these
 dependancies.  With this mail I am poking the respective maintainers
 to see where we stand.

As for apache2, it's waiting on vhost-base, which needs a policy
amendment. I've posted a draft to debian-devel, when I get the final one
done I'll propose it, upload vhost-base and apache2. I'm not going to
give a timeline because it's bound to be too optimistic.

:) d

-- 
Daniel Stone[EMAIL PROTECTED]
asuffield Omnic: how do you detect whether somebody is listening to you
or not?
elmo well, if they chat as much shit as you do asuffield, it's a fair
bet that no one's listening :P



Bug#97234: Debian Packaging of Subversion

2001-11-30 Thread Grant Bowman
* Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011130 19:30]:
 On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
  2. apache2.  Daniel Stone and Thom May are working on that, we've been
  working together to make subversion and apache2 play well together on
  Debian.  I don't know when apache2 will be uploaded to unstable.  Last
  I heard Daniel didn't want me to give out the deb line until he finds
  a better place to mirror it, (still true Daniel?)
 
 Well, the current URL sits on my home ISDN connection, which doesn't
 need any help having its bandwidth crippled. If someone wants to mirror
 it on pandora (it contains SSL), I'll be very grateful.


Daniel,

I posted your mirror to the Subversion mail list before I knew you
didn't want this published.  I'll write a follow-up right now.

  Subversion will make its way into Debian shortly after these
  dependancies.  With this mail I am poking the respective maintainers
  to see where we stand.
 
 As for apache2, it's waiting on vhost-base, which needs a policy
 amendment. I've posted a draft to debian-devel, when I get the final one
 done I'll propose it, upload vhost-base and apache2. I'm not going to
 give a timeline because it's bound to be too optimistic.

Right.  :-)

--
-- Grant Bowman   [EMAIL PROTECTED]