Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
> > I've got time at the moment so I'd be happy to work on this. If you > > change it to RFP I'll come along and change it back to ITP, I think > > that is the easiest way of doing it, or maybe just an e-mail to the > > BTS saying that I'm ITP'ing it. > > Any progress on this? I just read Subversion has reached the > self-hosting stage and some bugs move bugs have been ironed out. > According to the progress page, an alpha should be available within a > month... has anyone of you produced something that can be called a > working package? I have produced something very close to a working package. Unfortunately the server doesn't yet work. I'm using apache2 from: deb http://kabuki.sfarc.net/apache2 ./ deb http://pandora.debian.org/~thom/apache2 ./ The updated Berkeley db packages (Bug #109853) I am using are at : http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ as well as the most recent subversion packages. I have been working with upstream to remove some oddities in the build system as well. -David
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
>> David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > and we need apache2, I think, which isn't even in unstable yet (but > people are working on it). *frown* > > These problems takes longer time to solve the right way. Time I dont > > have so I'm actually about to retrackt the ITP. If you want to package > > subversion please do otherwise I will just retrack the ITP on > > debian-devel. > > I've got time at the moment so I'd be happy to work on this. If you > change it to RFP I'll come along and change it back to ITP, I think > that is the easiest way of doing it, or maybe just an e-mail to the > BTS saying that I'm ITP'ing it. Any progress on this? I just read Subversion has reached the self-hosting stage and some bugs move bugs have been ironed out. According to the progress page, an alpha should be available within a month... has anyone of you produced something that can be called a working package? TIA, -- Marcelo | Item 16: Assign to all data members in 'operator=' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Scott Meyers, Effective C++
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've got time at the moment so I'd be happy to work on this. If you > change it to RFP I'll come along and change it back to ITP, I think > that is the easiest way of doing it, or maybe just an e-mail to the > BTS saying that I'm ITP'ing it. It should be equivivalent if you just close and reopen the bug with youself as originator. No need for us to change titles, this is allready in the BTS and should serve as documentation if needed. -- Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nørd, bliver jeg altid ilde til mode og svarer lidt undskyldende: "Nej, jeg bruger RedHat". -- Allan Olesen på dk.edb.system.unix
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
> There is some problems with co-existing with the libneon15 package all > ready available in Debian and for full support for Subversion we need > a newer libdb3. > and we need apache2, I think, which isn't even in unstable yet (but people are working on it). > These problems takes longer time to solve the right way. Time I dont > have so I'm actually about to retrackt the ITP. If you want to package > subversion please do otherwise I will just retrack the ITP on > debian-devel. I've got time at the moment so I'd be happy to work on this. If you change it to RFP I'll come along and change it back to ITP, I think that is the easiest way of doing it, or maybe just an e-mail to the BTS saying that I'm ITP'ing it. -David
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to play with subversion too. I don't want to step on any toes, or > repeat work though. I'm happy to help out however I can. Do you have any > preliminary pacakging done? No I don't have any packages above the stage where packageing is anything else than 'configure ; make; make install'. There is some problems with co-existing with the libneon15 package all ready available in Debian and for full support for Subversion we need a newer libdb3. These problems takes longer time to solve the right way. Time I dont have so I'm actually about to retrackt the ITP. If you want to package subversion please do otherwise I will just retrack the ITP on debian-devel. -- Når folk spørger mig, om jeg er nørd, bliver jeg altid ilde til mode og svarer lidt undskyldende: "Nej, jeg bruger RedHat". -- Allan Olesen på dk.edb.system.unix
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
Hi, I'd like to play with subversion too. I don't want to step on any toes, or repeat work though. I'm happy to help out however I can. Do you have any preliminary pacakging done? -David
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The goal of subversion is to build a version control system that could
> replace cvs. It will have all the features of CVS and rename of files
> and directories, permisions and other meta information and symbolic
> links. A lot of other features is mentioned on the above website.
>
> Subversion is licensed under an Apache/BSD-style license.
>
> I havn't tried it yet. But if it keeps half it's promises it's worth
> tho work.
No reason to package it yet, they barely have their first
commits working. Follow the mailing list and wait for the
first time they say "lets get a larger user base". Their web
site has reasonably good milestones set; use that to see when
its useable for the first time.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],havoc,gaeshido}.fi,{debian,wanderer}.org,stonesoft.com}
unix, linux, debian, networks, security, | First snow, then silence.
kernel, TCP/IP, C, perl, free software, | This thousand dollar screen dies
mail, www, sw devel, unix admin, hacks. | so beautifully.
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
>> Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I plan to package Subversion http://subversion.tigris.org> Good! You save me some work ;-) > I havn't tried it yet. But if it keeps half it's promises it's worth > tho work. oh. I looked at it four weeks ago. I had to patch here and there in order to get it to build (nothing big). At that time I couldn't do an import. I hope the situation has moved forward a bit. > I can't find it in the archive or at the wnpp bug page. So it > shouldn't be ITP'ed yet. Probably related to the fact that it doesn't work, yet. -- Marcelo | "ER...HO. HO. HO." [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Death makes a career move |(Terry Pratchett, Hogfather)
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 10:27:02AM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > I plan to package Subversion http://subversion.tigris.org> > > The goal of subversion is to build a version control system that could > replace cvs. It will have all the features of CVS and rename of files > and directories, permisions and other meta information and symbolic > links. A lot of other features is mentioned on the above website. > > Subversion is licensed under an Apache/BSD-style license. > > I havn't tried it yet. But if it keeps half it's promises it's worth > tho work. > > > I can't find it in the archive or at the wnpp bug page. So it > shouldn't be ITP'ed yet. > Well, that would be because it doesn't work yet. Or at least not that much. We're going to try to be self-hosting for the next milestone, which will hopefully be in the near future. But I wouldn't recommend packaging anything before then, and maybe not before the first beta release. sam th --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- http://www.abisource.com/~sam/ OpenPGP Key: CABD33FC --- http://samth.dyndns.org/key DeCSS: http://samth.dynds.org/decss pgpZF4QcMGPr7.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#97234: ITP: Subversion -- An alternative to CVS
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist I plan to package Subversion http://subversion.tigris.org> The goal of subversion is to build a version control system that could replace cvs. It will have all the features of CVS and rename of files and directories, permisions and other meta information and symbolic links. A lot of other features is mentioned on the above website. Subversion is licensed under an Apache/BSD-style license. I havn't tried it yet. But if it keeps half it's promises it's worth tho work. I can't find it in the archive or at the wnpp bug page. So it shouldn't be ITP'ed yet. -- hash-bang-slash-bin-slash-bash
