Re: new front page, take 3

2002-02-09 Thread Rob Bradford
On Sat, 2002-02-09 at 01:19, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > I removed the help section and replaced it with a big+bold link in the 
> > > quick
> > > links. The news section is getting on my nerves. :) It's really pathetic,
> > > too, those things are hardly news...
> 
> I liked 2.5 better. Sorry.. The loses my favorite part of the recent
> designs, the nice side-by-side install/upgrade.
> 
> -- 
> see shy jo
> 
I agree, this renders horifically on Galeon in X, there is soo much
spacing between the boxes they seems to be jumbled up and a mess.

Yes i know that the fact my browser window is somewhere in the region of
1600x1200 has some importance, but really it looks messy. At large
screen reses. 2.5 was fine.

:=)
-- 
Rob 'robster' Bradford
http://robster.org.uk



Re: new front page, take 2.5

2002-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:11:12PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Quick Links  News
> > > --   ---
> > > --   ---
> > > --
> > > --   Help Debian
> > > --   ---
> > > --   ---
> > 
> > When spread out into a single column, the links are waaay too long to do
> > this nicely, without leaving a load of empty space between News and Help.
> 
> Well, there's always more news you could pad it with for filler, right?

Yes, but it would take a lot more news, and that would be even more
embarrassing, since it would display items as much as several months old...

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



the top logo .jpg -> .png?

2002-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi,

In my front page sketches I also did one more thing -- replaced the
openlogo-nd-50.jpg with its PNG version. The PNG is better because it
doesn't have the ugly JPEG fuzziness around the image, yet it's five times
smaller (3.9 KB vs. 759 B).

We've been using the PNG on the CD web pages for a while now, and I don't
think anyone has complained about it. It's pretty logical, people who use a
graphical browser don't use prehistoric versions that don't support PNGs,
and people who use a non-graphical browser don't see the image anyway.

Are there any objections to making all the web pages use the PNG version?

BTW I'll think about converting the "debian" text at the top to PNG, too.
Its fuzziness doesn't look nearly as bad as the one on the swirl, but we
would still probably gain a bit on the file size if it's done properly.
Now if only I could figure out how to add transparency with Gimp...

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



attention translators

2002-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi,

Translators should update their translations in the
template/debian/links.tags.wml, I've added two new tags for the main page in
there recently.

Also, update/create distrib/index.wml. :)

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: packages' download.pl format

2002-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 06:15:19PM +0100, Jonathan Sambrook wrote:
> My tuppence w'th is:
> 
>   If download.pl used columns, those of us not in the US would have our
>   use of these webpages improved.
> 
>   On every page I have to scroll down to the same site's url. This is
>   annoying when one has to traipse through several .debs' pages and keep
>   seeing all that unused white space to the right of the US links.
> 
>   Move European links to the right of the US and the rest of the world
>   would catch up underneath - at least on my monitor.
> 
>   Worth a look?

I've done this. (How's that for a belated answer. :)

The download.pl format for non-US sites is unchanged since there aren't
nearly as many North American non-US mirrors listed.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by noel: webwml/english/devel/wnpp index.wml

2002-02-09 Thread peter karlsson
Debian WWW CVS:

> Modified files:
>  english/devel/wnpp: index.wml
>
> Log message:
>  added way to use reportbug for wnpp; my permission:
>  http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2002/debian-www-200201/msg00137.html
>  ;)

Hmm, I was looking into translating that but noticed it looks mostly
like you've just done some screendumps on reportbug's output. Could you
please transform it into a proper guide?

-- 
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/

  I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
  Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
  http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html



Re: Lack of non-profit partners/memberships listed on web site

2002-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:43PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> I notice a conspicuous lack of listings for non-profit organizations
> Debian is allied with, a member of, or in some other way formally
> recognizes as a partner.  The "partners" page is great, but that only
> lists corporate partners who act in a supportive capacity towards
> Debian.  Should this page be expanded in scope to include non-profits?

It now includes OPN.

> - Linux International (or is that just SPI?  but in any event, li.org
>   lists us as a member).
> 
> - LSB

Neither of these are really partners in a way that is described in the
partnership program. However, we do have some links to them, and can add
more...

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: the top logo .jpg -> .png?

2002-02-09 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 04:04:13PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> 
> Are there any objections to making all the web pages use the PNG version?
> 
Why not start by converting one image to see how it goes?

> BTW I'll think about converting the "debian" text at the top to PNG, too.
> Its fuzziness doesn't look nearly as bad as the one on the swirl, but we
> would still probably gain a bit on the file size if it's done properly.
> Now if only I could figure out how to add transparency with Gimp...
> 
Isn't lack of transparency support for png one of the reasons we put the
switch off?

-- 
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: the top logo .jpg -> .png?

2002-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 03:10:37PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > Are there any objections to making all the web pages use the PNG version?
> 
> Why not start by converting one image to see how it goes?

One image? This is one image, s/openlogo-nd-50.jpg/openlogo-nd-50.png/

> > BTW I'll think about converting the "debian" text at the top to PNG, too.
> > Its fuzziness doesn't look nearly as bad as the one on the swirl, but we
> > would still probably gain a bit on the file size if it's done properly.
> > Now if only I could figure out how to add transparency with Gimp...
> 
> Isn't lack of transparency support for png one of the reasons we put the
> switch off?

No, it was the lack of support for PNG's transparency in Netscape 4.
But anyway, transparency would be just an added bonus for _these_ images,
because their background is white and the page background is also white.
The transparency is a (small) issue with the navbar images only.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: the top logo .jpg -> .png?

2002-02-09 Thread James A. Treacy
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:43:19PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 03:10:37PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > 
> > Isn't lack of transparency support for png one of the reasons we put the
> > switch off?
> 
> No, it was the lack of support for PNG's transparency in Netscape 4.

Hmm. Isn't that what I just said?

-- 
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: the top logo .jpg -> .png?

2002-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 05:34:03PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > > Isn't lack of transparency support for png one of the reasons we put the
> > > switch off?
> > 
> > No, it was the lack of support for PNG's transparency in Netscape 4.
> 
> Hmm. Isn't that what I just said?

That wasn't relevant to what I was saying :)

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



Re: the top logo .jpg -> .png?

2002-02-09 Thread James Troup
"James A. Treacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 09:43:19PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 03:10:37PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > > 
> > > Isn't lack of transparency support for png one of the reasons we put the
> > > switch off?
> > 
> > No, it was the lack of support for PNG's transparency in Netscape 4.
> 
> Hmm. Isn't that what I just said?

It initially read to me like you were suggesting PNG itself lacked
transparency support; perhaps Josip read it the same way.

-- 
James



Re: the top logo .jpg -> .png?

2002-02-09 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 10:43:38PM +, James Troup wrote:
> > > > Isn't lack of transparency support for png one of the reasons we put the
> > > > switch off?
> > > 
> > > No, it was the lack of support for PNG's transparency in Netscape 4.
> > 
> > Hmm. Isn't that what I just said?
> 
> It initially read to me like you were suggesting PNG itself lacked
> transparency support; perhaps Josip read it the same way.

Oh, yes.

But anyway, the transparency really is irrelevant to the issue at hand :)
so if I don't hear any complaints soon, I'm going to make the switch.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.



<±¤°í>ÃßõÀÎµÎ¸í¿¡ 50¸¸¿ø

2002-02-09 Thread ¹Ì·¡¿¡´Â

  
  
안녕하세요...사업자 박영수입니다.
정말 오늘 새벽에 나온 초특급 신규정보입니다..
두명만 모으면 50만원을 주는 곳입니다. 믿기지 않으시면 아래를 보세요..
저두 벌써 오픈도 하지 않은 상태에 테스트마켓팅에서 벌써 150만원벌었습니다 
말만하세요 통장스캔한거보여드릴께여<밑에 이멜주소로 연락주세요>
홈페이지 http://goldline.fu.st
이멜 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
지금 이 기회를 놓치시면 정말 후회 하실겁니다.
아직 정식 오픈도 하지 않은 상태인데... 이미 테스트 마케팅 으로도 많은 분들이 100~500만원 이상 벌고 계십니다. 이미 
한 달 만에 700만원을 바라보고 계신 분도 있습니다. 분명히 말씀 드리는데... 이제 정식으로 오픈되면... 엄청난 광풍이 휘몰아 
치리라 예상됩니다.
이 글을 보시는 분께서 지금 합류하신다면 바로 초헤드급의 위치에 서시는 것이고 수입은국내에 존재하는 그 어떤 마케팅 보다 
많이 버실 수 있습니다. 바이너리 방식으로 세줄마케팅이 가능하지만 권해드리고 싶지 않으며 일단 두줄마케팅을 하시다가 나중에 세줄로 
나가시면 무난하리라 봅니다. 바이너리 특성상 지금 합류하시면... 성공은 100% 보장 합니다.아직 정식 오픈도 하지 않은 
상태이기 때문에 자신있게 말씀 드리는 것입니다!!
이 마케팅의 특징은 매출이 생기면 그날 바로 결산해서 5일 내에 통장으로 넣어줍니다.수입이 바로 바로 
잡힙니다!!
☞ 그럼 어떻게 그런 많은 돈이 들어올까요 ?
⇒ 회사 : 내실있는 회사임 = 절대 안망함 / 이 회사는 1차사업 만으로도 충분히 유지되는회사로서 전업으로 하시는 분들을 위해 
이번에 이 2차사업(사업자 마케팅)을 도입하였고..대부분의 이익을 사업자들에게 수당으로 풀어주는 것입니다(국내 최고의 보상 
약속!!)
⇒ 제품 : 특허 출원은 물론 특허 인증 까지 목전에 둔 건강보조식품 이며, 드셔보시면...누구나 그 탁월한 효과를 
인정하십니다. / 한 번 드시면... 다시 찾을 수 밖에 없는 뛰어난 제품 입니다. / 제품 때문에 욕먹을 일 절대 없슴.
⇒ 사업의 초기성 : 아직 알려지지 않음 / 먼저 시작하는 사람이 장땡!! / 네트웍 마케팅(다단계) 라는게 앞줄에 
서면(정보가 앞선자) 돈번다는 건 알만한 사람은 다 알껍니다.
⇒ 인맥의 한계를 극복 : 오프라인 상에서 사업하시는 분들은 아마 아실 겁니다. 분명 한계가 옵니다. 하지만... 온라인 
상에서 홍보하므로서 이런 한계는 물론 시간, 공간적 한계까지도 극복이 가능 / 발로 뛸 필요 없슴.. 아는 사람 찾아가 비굴하지 않아도 
됨!!(나중에돈벌고, 아는 분께 통장 한번 보여주십시요.. 눈으로 확인하고.. 않따라 올 사람 있습니까?확인이 가장 
중요한겁니다..)
☞ 사업 방식
온라인 이나 오프라인 으로 홍보를 하여...
본인을 기준으로 A와 B에 사업자를 같은 날에 모시면 50만원이 들어오구요.그 다음 단계에 똑같이 A와 B에 사업자를 
같은 날에 모시면 50만원이 들어옵니다.3단계 이후 부터는 평생~ A와 B에 사업자를 모시면 날짜에 상관 없이50만원이 
들어옵니다.(18만명까지 시뮬레이션으로 돌렸으나 과부하가 일어나지 않았슴!!)
☞ 보상 제도
단계수당 / 후원수당 / 직급수당 / 유지수당 → 2단계 4명만 완성되도 상황 끝입니다!!
* 지 역 : 관계없슴 / 단, 등록하기 위해서 한 번은 청주에 오셔야 합니다!!* 자격조건 : 20세 이상 (말빨, 
외모 다 필요없슴. 뜨거운 가슴만 가지고 계십시요...)* 투 자 금 : 77만원 (18개월 까지 할부 가능 ≒ 한달 
42,800원)
77만원 투자해서 좌우에 한명씩 1 : 1 일때 50만원 주는 마케팅은 국내에 존재하지 않으며그러기에 이보다 더 돈벌기 
쉬운 마케팅은 없습니다. 또한 무한단계로 50만원 줍니다. 예전에 게시판을 휩쓸었던 위**나 휘** 처럼 허접한 회사가 아닌 공탁금 
2%의 우량 네트웍회사이고 제품도 특허를 받은 확실한 제품 입니다.
투자금이 많은 만큼 수입 장난 아님. (열심히 하면 한달에 200만원 이상 수입이 가능)
단, 시간과 노력을 투자해야 합니다. 온라인 홍보방법은 제가 다 알려드릴 것이며, 홍보해서 사업자와 연결되면 저한테 
연락주세요.. 제가 전주에서 직접 만나 상담 및 등록을 해드립니다. 님께서는 단지.. 홍보만 열심히 하시면 됩니다!! / 하루에 
1~2시간!!
정말 열의를 갖고 돈 많이 버실려는 분들만 연락 주세요...
국내에 있는 네트웍 회사 중에서 3년 ì