Bug#224146: marked as done (www.debian.org: The link to X strike force in developper page does not work)

2003-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:18:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Link to the X Strike Force fixed now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2003 13:20:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 16 07:20:24 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AWBw9-0008Ab-00; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:56:18 -0600
Received: from localhost (lns-th2-4f-81-56-219-194.adsl.proxad.net 
[81.56.219.194])
by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5499826EB4; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:56:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from valette by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AWBsU-0001mC-00; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:52:30 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: The link to X strike force in developper page does not 
work
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:52:29 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

http://people.debian.org/~branden/xsf/xsf.html is not found...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tri-yann 2.4.23-rc5 #12 Tue Nov 25 23:21:48 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_IE


---
Received: (at 224146-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2003 10:13:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 26 04:12:33 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from twinette.techmag.info (twinette.migus.eu.org) [81.56.204.248] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AZo70-0003O5-00; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 03:18:26 -0600
Received: from migus by twinette.migus.eu.org with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1AZo6d-gw-7T
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:18:03 +0100
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 10:18:03 +0100
From: Pierre Machard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Link to the X Strike Force fixed now
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-pgp-fingerprint: B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7  82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87
Organization: debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: migus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 


--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I've just updated the link to the X Strike Force on
/devel/index.wml Modifications will be available online in a
few hours.

Cheers,
--=20
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87


--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/6/zLs6AtZiNwb4cRAkDmAKDLDCalm85LyCc13FG0XDFCMCJrjACg08fi
YhQmdhmc3OZ/rJkPSHPTCUM=
=EzQe
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--



Processed: it's lintian.debian.org

2003-12-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 224734 lintian.debian.org: still down
Bug#224734: www.debian.org: lintian.debian.org still down
Changed Bug title.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)



Bug#225121: language bugs in http://www.debian.org/users/

2003-12-26 Thread Joost van Baal
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: patch

Hi,

I've found an English language bug in http://www.debian.org/users/ .
Patch is here:

---

--- index.wml.orig  2003-12-26 12:50:06.0 +0100
+++ index.wml   2003-12-26 12:50:46.0 +0100
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@
 personnel.
   
   
-Debian was choosen for its ease of administration and installation
+Debian was chosen for its ease of administration and installation
 through the use of .debs and FAI, allowing installation of labs of
 12 computers within 20 minutes without the need for a CD or a
 floppy and without any user interaction. The creation of packages
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@
 DHCP, Usenet News and version control.
   
   
-We've choosen Debian for its reliable security update availability, strong 
+We've chosen Debian for its reliable security update availability, strong 
 presence on the GNU/Linux server market, because of available knowledge and
 
 experience in the UvT sysadmin group, flexibility of the OS, no license 
 costs (not even for security updates), and possibility to run a locally 
@@ -1287,7 +1287,7 @@
 http://www.cintegral.cl/";>
   
 Actually we have 2 servers using Debian, one for mail relaying using
-exim, and another for apache, bind, qmail. We have choosen Debian
+exim, and another for apache, bind, qmail. We have chosen Debian
 because of stability, functionality, flexibility and wonderful
 adaptability.
   
@@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@
 http://www.pasasa.cl/";>
   
 We have a network of 4 Debian servers; our servers run databases,
-apache, mail, and firewalling.  We have choosen Debian because of
+apache, mail, and firewalling.  We have chosen Debian because of
 stability, functionality, flexibility and adaptability. We are a
 Chilean company, of San Antonio port.
   
@@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@
   
   
 We will have a big Debian network base, our servers actually run
-Debian too (over 200) . We have choosen Debian because of
+Debian too (over 200) . We have chosen Debian because of
 stability, functionality, level of development, flexibility and
 adaptability.
   

--

(Thanks a lot for the recent update of the page, I am really proud
Tilburg University is listed now :)

Bye,

Joost

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux nagy 2.6.0-test11 #1 Wed Dec 3 12:33:13 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Debian BTS pkgreport.cgi show me "No reports found!" about mozilla-browser.

2003-12-26 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 12:48:20AM +0900, Donggyoo Lee wrote:
> Thank to all.
> It fixed.

For future reference, the contact address for problems with the bug
tracking system is [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debian BTS pkgreport.cgi show me "No reports found!" about mozilla-browser.

2003-12-26 Thread Donggyoo Lee
Thank to all.
It fixed.



Subprojects and Custom Distros

2003-12-26 Thread Benj. Mako Hill
In the list of subprojects on devel/, projects seem to be listed only
by when they were added which can make finding a custom distribution
(for example) a bit difficult as that list grows.

For a while I've thought it would make sense to split the list of
subprojects into two itemized lists: one for projects working on
Custom Debian Distributions and one for the others (like IPv6,
etc). In a couple long threads on -devel in the last 4-5 week this has
been brought up with a bit of positive feedback and no one speaking
against it.

If people don't have an objection, I'd like to go ahead and split the
CDDs into a little itemized list of their own in the Projects box on
devel.

There was also a bit of support for a Custom Debian Distribution page
to house definitions of terms and links to resources (we've been using
pages on the Wiki for this since Debconf in Oslo) but since I don't
have text written up to propose, we can wait on this unless people
have major objections to this altogether. I assume that this page
would belong under devel/ as well.

Regards,
Mako


-- 
Benjamin Mako Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mako.yukidoke.org/



pgp2GxTFYIVab.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Debian BTS pkgreport.cgi show me "No reports found!" about mozilla-browser.

2003-12-26 Thread Donggyoo Lee
Hello, I sent mail to Debian BTS for mozilla-browser. I want to see this bug 
info on web. But Debian BTS pkgreport.cgi show me below.
...
---
No reports found!
---
...

I think Debian BTS have a problem.
Please, check URL for this.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mozilla-browser

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=dpkg looks good.
pkgreport.cgi doesn't work well for mozilla-browser.

http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mozilla.html show me that mozilla-browser has 
many bug.

Please check it.
Thank you,
Donggyoo.

-- 
 Dan-gun(2457 B.C. ~ 2240 B.C.) who is the Father, Teacher and King of the Kore-
an people, first founded the country under the principle of "The greatest ser-
vice for the benefit of humanity.".   Sec. mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
olE 7  Donggyoo Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1st name means a star in east sky.
  oTT  1024g/0FD8D56F finger: 87E6 3DE3 6EF1 1EFD 3FF4  EF59 B1E0 8C2B 0FD8 D56F



Re: DEADLINK http://people.debian.org/~blade/install/preload

2003-12-26 Thread Benj. Mako Hill
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 12:52:46PM +0100, Markus Stephan Hertel wrote:
> For my Debian 3.0 installation I need the Preload Bootdisk, but the
> link to the disk is broken.  Can you please help me immediatly?
> 
> I'm really looking forward on your help!

The people.d.o pages are all managed by individual developers. Why
don't you try to contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Regards,
Mako

-- 
Benjamin Mako Hill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mako.yukidoke.org/



pgpmSc5EB1quj.pgp
Description: PGP signature