THE-HANOREABLE---UNICEF----2000+1000+...

[victoria laademan]

TO-THE-HANOREABLEUNICEF+INTERNET.www.sun.com+INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org+INTERNET.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/unicsdircctory.pdf+INTERNET.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htm+INTERNET.www.unsystem.org/+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.3com/pub/airconnect+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.nu2.nu+INTERNET.www.blastwave.org+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.moshier.net+INTERNET.www.miktex.org+INTERNET.www.nato.int/+INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html+INTERNET.www.inqueweb.com.au+INTERNET.www.ctbto.org+INTERNET.www.bbc.co.uk/NO.1.WEB.www.sun.comNO.2.WEB.www.unicefusa.orgNO.3.WEB.www.mirror.ac.uk/NO.4.WEB.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htmNO.5.WEB.www.unsystem.orgNO.6.WEB.www.nato.intNO.7.WEB.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.htmlNO.8.WEB.www.inqueweb.com.auNO.9.WEB.www.ctbto.orgN
O.10.WEB.www.bbc.co.uk/NO.11.WEB.www.usp.br.NO.12.WEB.www.w3.org/PICS/PICS-FAQ-980126.htmlTHE-HANOREABLE-UNICEF-KEAP/THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK---CYACLEUNICEF---USA...DATE.00.01.2000+...TIME.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org
YOUR`S-THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK/SERAGADABLOCKCOLONI/GANJAM/ORISSA/INDIA1.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.ctbto.orgOR2.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.orgOR3.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/OR4.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.nato.intOR5.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.ctbto.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/[EMAIL PROTECTED]passwod.INTERNET.www.nato.int[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html

Yahoo! India Mobile: Ringtones, Wallpapers, Picture Messages and more.
Download now.

THE-HANOREABLE---UNICEF----2000+1000+...

[victoria laademan]

TO-THE-HANOREABLEUNICEF+INTERNET.www.sun.com+INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org+INTERNET.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/unicsdircctory.pdf+INTERNET.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htm+INTERNET.www.unsystem.org/+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.3com/pub/airconnect+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.nu2.nu+INTERNET.www.blastwave.org+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.moshier.net+INTERNET.www.miktex.org+INTERNET.www.nato.int/+INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html+INTERNET.www.inqueweb.com.au+INTERNET.www.ctbto.org+INTERNET.www.bbc.co.uk/NO.1.WEB.www.sun.comNO.2.WEB.www.unicefusa.orgNO.3.WEB.www.mirror.ac.uk/NO.4.WEB.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htmNO.5.WEB.www.unsystem.orgNO.6.WEB.www.nato.intNO.7.WEB.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.htmlNO.8.WEB.www.inqueweb.com.auNO.9.WEB.www.ctbto.orgN
O.10.WEB.www.bbc.co.uk/NO.11.WEB.www.usp.br.NO.12.WEB.www.w3.org/PICS/PICS-FAQ-980126.htmlTHE-HANOREABLE-UNICEF-KEAP/THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK---CYACLEUNICEF---USA...DATE.00.01.2000+...TIME.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org
YOUR`S-THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK/SERAGADABLOCKCOLONI/GANJAM/ORISSA/INDIA1.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.ctbto.orgOR2.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.orgOR3.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/OR4.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.nato.intOR5.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.ctbto.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/[EMAIL PROTECTED]passwod.INTERNET.www.nato.int[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html

Yahoo! India Mobile: Ringtones, Wallpapers, Picture Messages and more.
Download now.

Bug#109338: marked as done (packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 14:04:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 09:04:46 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Ypfa-0002Ah-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:04:46 -0500
Received: from rzstud5.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.196.41.37])
by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
id 15Ypf3-0004GK-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:04:13 +0200
Received: from ut13 by rzstud5.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with local (Exim 3.31 #1)
id 15Ypf3-0002kX-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:04:13 +0200
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:04:13 +0200
From: Guentcho Skordev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dislpay the installed size too
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: Guentcho Skordev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: Wishlist

It would be nice to show the Installed-Size like dpkg -I does.

Regards
Guentcho

---
Received: (at 109338-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:04 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:03 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages

 Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big

* Minor fixes:

 Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
 Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone

 Closes: #219653: 

Bug#220218: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search_packages does not find package which)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 14:39:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 11 08:39:00 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mailbox.surfeu.at (surfeu.at) [212.197.128.120] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AJZfX-0007gs-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:38:59 -0600
Received: from [81.5.248.247] ([81.5.248.247] verified)
  by surfeu.at (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 64881408 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:38:57 
+0100
Received: from ametzler by downhill.univie.ac.at with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1AJZbE-0007zX-C3
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:34:32 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:34:32 +0100
From: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.debian.org: search_packages does not find package which
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-GPG-Fingerprint: BCF7 1345 BE42 B5B8 1A57  EE09 1D33 9C65 8B8D 7663
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-11-11
Severity: normal

http://packages.debian.org/which returns an empty list, however the
package is there, see bugs.d.o or packages.qa.d.o or
/debian/pool/main/w/which/.

You might want to merge this with #195614 which might be caused by the
same bug.
   cu andreas

---
Received: (at 131631-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:05 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing 

THE-HANOREABLE---UNICEF----2000+1000+...

[victoria laademan]

TO-THE-HANOREABLEUNICEF+INTERNET.www.sun.com+INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org+INTERNET.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/unicsdircctory.pdf+INTERNET.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htm+INTERNET.www.unsystem.org/+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.3com/pub/airconnect+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.nu2.nu+INTERNET.www.blastwave.org+INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/sites/www.moshier.net+INTERNET.www.miktex.org+INTERNET.www.nato.int/+INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html+INTERNET.www.inqueweb.com.au+INTERNET.www.ctbto.org+INTERNET.www.bbc.co.uk/NO.1.WEB.www.sun.comNO.2.WEB.www.unicefusa.orgNO.3.WEB.www.mirror.ac.uk/NO.4.WEB.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htmNO.5.WEB.www.unsystem.orgNO.6.WEB.www.nato.intNO.7.WEB.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.htmlNO.8.WEB.www.inqueweb.com.auNO.9.WEB.www.ctbto.orgN
O.10.WEB.www.bbc.co.uk/NO.11.WEB.www.usp.br.NO.12.WEB.www.w3.org/PICS/PICS-FAQ-980126.htmlTHE-HANOREABLE-UNICEF-KEAP/THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK---CYACLEUNICEF---USA...DATE.00.01.2000+...TIME.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org
YOUR`S-THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK/SERAGADABLOCKCOLONI/GANJAM/ORISSA/INDIA1.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.ctbto.orgOR2.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.orgOR3.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/OR4.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.nato.intOR5.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.ctbto.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/[EMAIL PROTECTED]passwod.INTERNET.www.nato.int[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html

Yahoo! India Mobile: Ringtones, Wallpapers, Picture Messages and more.
Download now.

Bug#227273: packages.debian.org: charset mismatch (always in UTF-8?)

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:07:46PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
  But it causes mojibake by charset mismatch so we cannot read it without 
  changing to correct charset. 
  (mojibake: http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/mojibake/)
 
  For example, Japanese page must be in iso-2022-jp charset but it says that
  contents with UTF-8. (and Its Japanease pages content in EUC-JP charset.
  for histrical reason, three major charset are used in Japan. Many UNIX
  releated things are in EUC-JP (Windows and Macintosh are Shift-JIS),
  but Debian's Japanease Lang web page is in iso-2022-jp charset. SO,
  EUC-JP contents must be changed to iso-2022-jp for web pages.)

Hmm, I have difficulties to understand what you mean. I will try to
formulate your report in my own words:
Currently the Japanese pages are served in UTF-8 (is this right?),
but you request that we serve it in iso-2022-jp instead, because
UTF-8 causes problems in reading the pages.

Have I understood you correctly?

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#224143: marked as done (www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:26:22 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line packages.debian.org has been fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2003 12:25:40 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 16 06:25:39 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AWBtJ-0007rx-00; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:53:21 -0600
Received: from localhost (lns-th2-4f-81-56-219-194.adsl.proxad.net 
[81.56.219.194])
by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DA732C195; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:53:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from valette by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AWBpd-0001lx-00; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:49:33 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:49:33 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important

http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ still display a page about recent 
compromise.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tri-yann 2.4.23-rc5 #12 Tue Nov 25 23:21:48 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_IE


---
Received: (at 224143-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 03:53:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 21:49:45 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.36] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag5rK-0007yS-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:28:14 -0600
Received: from unknown (HELO thanatos-wireless.hubertnet) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with plain)
  by smtp005.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 17:28:14 -
Subject: packages.debian.org has been fixed
From: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:26:22 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

 http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ still display a page
 about recent compromise

It has been fixed.

Bug#227052: marked as done (www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages (perhaps others) broken)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:27:09 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#227052: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev 
packages (perhaps others) broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2004 18:47:43 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 10 12:47:10 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dev-zero.devaul.net (dev-zero.devaul.org) [209.58.153.94] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Af3CS-0004MB-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:25:44 -0600
Received: from rich by dev-zero.devaul.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Af3Co-0003Xg-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:26:06 -0500
From: Richard W. DeVaul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages (perhaps 
others) broken
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:26:06 -0500
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-09
Severity: important

The download form for the fftw3 and fftw3-dev packages are broken.
Clicking on the i386 button, for instance, results in the following message:

Method Not Allowed
The requested method POST is not allowed for the URL /cgi-bin/download.pl.

Apache/1.3.26 Server at packages.debian.org Port 80

This suggests that the packages.debian.org server is misconfigured.
If so, this problem is likely to affect more than just these two
packages, and perhaps all packages served through the www.debian.org
interface.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dev-zero 2.4.22 #2 Thu Dec 25 08:07:48 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 227052-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 05:56:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 23:56:02 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgCP5-0001dP-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:27:31 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AgCP1-0002cx-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:27:27 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AgCOm-0002ln-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:27:12 +0100
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:27:09 +0100
To: Richard W. DeVaul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#227052: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev 
packages (perhaps others) broken
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 06:51:23PM -0500, Richard W. DeVaul wrote:
 I tried it again a few minutes ago and I'm no longer getting the
 error, so it was either transient or fixed when packages.d.o was
 restored.
 
Then I will close the bug.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Anon pserver access (was: Re: write access in CVS server impossible.)

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* Tommi Vainikainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-13 15:09]:
 This would be much easier to do if even anonymous pserver would work.

 Of course...

 (Or is there anon cvs somewhere?  At least cvs.d.o says refuses my
 connections.)  I really don't bother to download files _with web
 browser_ to translate... :-(

 I guess you mean you _do_ bother :)

 I thought that maybe following (temporal) solution could be done if it
 takes a lot of time until repository is officially accessible with
 pserver.

 I am not sure, maybe it will be available soon now that the cvs
security update is done. But that is just a wild guess.

 Giving anonymous pserver account could be done by any DD with read
 access to webwml CVS repository by just registering new project to
 alioth and rsyncing webwml CVS repository in raw format to alioth CVS
 with cron.  After that we translators could run cvs update from alioth
 anonymously and especially run cvs diff to generate patches!  Any DD
 interested?

 Might be interested, but need a helping hand (and some advice if its
worth the setup or might raise security problems).

 So long,
Alfie
-- 
I don't know, chmod g+a something  and the world goes crazy :)
  -- Craig Small, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: www.debian.com

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* Evert Meulie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-28 11:20]:
 The 'select a server near you' feature on this site is broken...

 Due to the compromise it was disfunctional -- it is working again in
the meantime.

 Thanks for your report.
Alfie
-- 
There are people who see things as they are and they wonder why, and
there are people who dream things as they have never been and they
wonder why not.
 G. Shaw


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Deb web links for 3.0r2 go to German page not default language

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* David Teague [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-11-28 11:50]:
 The problem: 
 The link to release Debian 3.0r2 (woody)
 http://www.debian.org/distrib/ftplist 
 links to a page in German. 

 This was most propably the problem of the compromise and the need to
move the www.debian.org to a different server. That server wasn't that
friendly to misconfigurations in the browser so it might be a good idea
to check your configuration against http://www.debian.org/intro/cn to
see if everything is correct.

 In the meantime the main server is back up for quite some time now so
you shouldn't encounter that problem on www.debian.org anymore. If you
do please mail back to state so, then we will take a closer look at it.

 Thanks for your report.
Alfie
-- 
Die Angabe des vollständigen Realnamens erleichtert die Kommunikation
im Usenet ungemein, man kann sich dann nämlich auf die Inhalte der
Postings konzentrieren und muß nicht über Sinn/Unsinn von Pseudonymen
o.ä. diskutieren. (Ingo Ließegang, de.newusers.questions, 6.10.1999)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#227052: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages (perhaps others) broken

[Frank Lichtenheld]

tags 227052 unreproducible
thanks

On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:26:06PM -0500, Richard W. DeVaul wrote:
 The download form for the fftw3 and fftw3-dev packages are broken.
 Clicking on the i386 button, for instance, results in the following message:
 
 Method Not Allowed
 The requested method POST is not allowed for the URL /cgi-bin/download.pl.
 
 Apache/1.3.26 Server at packages.debian.org Port 80

I can't reproduce this. Perhaps it was a temporary error while the page
was set up again. Could you still reproduce it? Otherwise the bug can
probably be closed.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: Suggestion for To-Do List Page

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* Alexander Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-12 17:38]:
 On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 14:38, Alexander Winston wrote:
 Currently, on http://www.debian.org/devel/todo/, we have a list of
 things to be done that users and developers can work on, though some are
 fairly limited to developers. I propose adding
 http://debian.vitavonni.de/packagebrowser/ and especially
 http://debian.vitavonni.de/packagebrowser/?tags=not-yet-tagged as
 things that can be assisted with by ordinary users or folks that do not
 have official Debian developer status yet.
 
 On second thought, should I file this in the BTS instead?

 I guess it would rather speed it up if you can provide the .wml file
to put into webwml/english/devel/todo/items/ best. See the other files
in there[1] as a reference.

 So long,
Alfie
[1] http://cvs.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/todo/items/?cvsroot=webwml
-- 
Jeder hat seine Weise, sagt man. Aber man wundert sich weniger, daß
man nicht die fremde, als daß der andere nicht die unsrige hat.
-- Jean Paul


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Anon pserver access (was: Re: write access in CVS server impossible.)

[Tommi Vainikainen]

On 2004-01-09T01:16:16+0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 You could file a bugreport with a tarball containing your patches, a
 Debian developer will commit them for you.

This would be much easier to do if even anonymous pserver would work.
(Or is there anon cvs somewhere?  At least cvs.d.o says refuses my
connections.)  I really don't bother to download files _with web
browser_ to translate... :-(

I thought that maybe following (temporal) solution could be done if it
takes a lot of time until repository is officially accessible with
pserver.

Giving anonymous pserver account could be done by any DD with read
access to webwml CVS repository by just registering new project to
alioth and rsyncing webwml CVS repository in raw format to alioth CVS
with cron.  After that we translators could run cvs update from alioth
anonymously and especially run cvs diff to generate patches!  Any DD
interested?

-- 
Tommi Vainikainen

Bug#125976: marked as done (packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for related packages when none of them exist)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2001 17:37:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 20 11:37:02 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 80-24-13-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es (getyouriso.dyndns.org) 
[80.24.13.86] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16H76X-00014m-00; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:36:57 -0600
Received: from aragorn ([192.168.0.3] helo=192.168.0.1)
by getyouriso.dyndns.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16H85Y-0002zd-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:38:40 +0100
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 17:20:34 +0100
From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for related packages 
when none of them exist
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Balsa 1.0.pre5
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

On the package download pages at packages.debian.org, when
it's listing a package that doesn't have any dependancy it shouldn't
print the Other packages related to *: header and the legend
explaining the kinds of dependencies.

-- 

Robert Millan  Debian GNU/Hurd user
zeratul2 wanadoo eshttp://getyouriso.dyndns.org/

Join us in civil disobedience and distribute DeCSS!!

/*efdtt.c Author:  Charles M. Hannum [EMAIL PROTECTED]*/
/*Length:  434 bytes (excluding unnecessary newlines)*/
/*Usage is:  cat title-key scrambled.vob | efdtt clear.vob  */
/*title-key can be read from the DVD by css-auth. (see livid.org)*/
#define m(i)(x[i]^s[i+84])
unsigned char x[5],y,s[2048];main(n){for(read(0,x,5);read(0,s,n=2048);write(1,s
,n))if(s[y=s[13]%8+20]/16%4==1){int i=m(1)17^256+m(0)8,k=m(2)0,j=m(4)17^m(3)9^k
*2-k%8^8,a=0,c=26;for(s[y]-=16;--c;j*=2)a=a*2^i1,i=i/2^j124;for(j=127;++jn
;c=cy)c+=y=i^i/8^i4^i12,i=i8^y17,a^=a14,y=a^a*8^a6,a=a8^y9,k=s
[j],k=7Wo~'G_\216[k7]+2^cr3sfw6v;*k+/n.[k4]*2^k*257/8,s[j]=k^(kk*234)
*6^c+~y;}}


---
Received: (at 125976-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:04:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:04:52 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, 

Bug#227388: packages.debian.org does not allow wildcards anymore

[Michael Ablassmeier]

Package: www.debian.org

hi,

http://packages.debian.org says:
 Even when searching on subwords is not checked, appending an 
 asterisk, '*', to the end of a keyword will allow subword 
 searching for that word.

Searching for foo* says:
 Error: foo* is not a valid search request

bye,
- michael

Bug#227273: packages.debian.org: charset mismatch (always in UTF-8?)

[Tomohiro KUBOTA]

Hi,

 Hmm, I have difficulties to understand what you mean. I will try to
 formulate your report in my own words:
 Currently the Japanese pages are served in UTF-8 (is this right?),
 but you request that we serve it in iso-2022-jp instead, because
 UTF-8 causes problems in reading the pages.
 
 Have I understood you correctly?

I will explain.  (I am the author of the Mojibake page which
Yamane-san introduced.)

For example, please see

   http://packages.debian.org/stable/misc/language-env.ja.html

The HTML source of the page says the page is written in UTF-8.
(The 6th line of

   meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=UTF-8

).  However, in the reality, the page is written in EUC-JP.
Because of this inconsistency, web browsers will render the page
by assuming the page is UTF-8 and the result will be the Mojibake.

The main point of the problem is this inconsistency.  Thus, at
least, this inconsistency must be fixed.

There are several ways to fix this problem.

(a) Change the encoding of the page to UTF-8 (to match the 6th line).
(b) Change the 6th line to EUC-JP (to match the real content).
(c) Change both the 6th line and the encoding of the page to some
other encoding (for example ISO-2022-JP).

Yamane-san asks to choose the solution (c).  This is because
ISO-2022-JP is the best encoding for Japanese web page because
of the least possibility to Mojibake even when web browsers cannot
understand the 6th line.  I agree that (c) is the best solution
but I don't think (a) and (b) are unacceptable at all.

I think EUC-JP will be acceptable (solution (b)), because recent
web browsers are likely to understand the 6th line.  (However,
UTF-8 (solution (a)) should be avoided if possible, because some
browsers such as w3m (popular in Japan) cannot handle UTF-8.)

In short, my opinion is:
(c) is the best solution.
(b) has no problem, too.
(a) should be avoided if possible.

---
Tomohiro KUBOTA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/

Re: Anon pserver access (was: Re: write access in CVS server impossible.)

[Denis Barbier]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:02:17PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
 * Tommi Vainikainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-13 15:09]:
[...]
  Giving anonymous pserver account could be done by any DD with read
  access to webwml CVS repository by just registering new project to
  alioth and rsyncing webwml CVS repository in raw format to alioth CVS
  with cron.  After that we translators could run cvs update from alioth
  anonymously and especially run cvs diff to generate patches!  Any DD
  interested?
 
  Might be interested, but need a helping hand (and some advice if its
 worth the setup or might raise security problems).

The CVS repository could be moved to Alioth, I see no reason to rsync it.

Denis

Bug#227517: packages.d.o: Links to sources of packages that have security updates point to the wrong location

[Florian Zumbiehl]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-13
Severity: normal

I'm not totally sure as to whether this is globally true but I've
recently come across two packages (cupsys (IIRC) and bind) for
which this was true ...

Re: Anon pserver access (was: Re: write access in CVS server impossible.)

[Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:28:33PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
   Giving anonymous pserver account could be done by any DD with read
   access to webwml CVS repository by just registering new project to
   alioth and rsyncing webwml CVS repository in raw format to alioth CVS
   with cron.  After that we translators could run cvs update from alioth
   anonymously and especially run cvs diff to generate patches!  Any DD
   interested?
  
   Might be interested, but need a helping hand (and some advice if its
  worth the setup or might raise security problems).
 
 The CVS repository could be moved to Alioth, I see no reason to rsync it.
 
That would be the greates solution. Many translators (including me)
aren't Debian developers.

regards
fEnIo
-- 
  _ Bartosz Feński aka fEnIo | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 
pgp:0x13fefc40 
_|_|_32-050 Skawina - Głowackiego 3/15 - w. małopolskie - Polska
(0 0) phone:+48501608340 | ICQ:46704720 | GG:726362 | IRC:fEnIo
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#227052: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages (perhaps others) broken

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 227052 unreproducible
Bug#227052: www.debian.org: download form for fftw3, fftw3-dev packages 
(perhaps others) broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#227273: packages.debian.org: charset mismatch (always in UTF-8?)

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:12:19PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
  Hmm, I have difficulties to understand what you mean. I will try to
  formulate your report in my own words:
  Currently the Japanese pages are served in UTF-8 (is this right?),
  but you request that we serve it in iso-2022-jp instead, because
  UTF-8 causes problems in reading the pages.
  
  Have I understood you correctly?
 
 I will explain.  (I am the author of the Mojibake page which
 Yamane-san introduced.)
 
 For example, please see
 
http://packages.debian.org/stable/misc/language-env.ja.html
 
 The HTML source of the page says the page is written in UTF-8.
 (The 6th line of
 
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=UTF-8
 
 ).  However, in the reality, the page is written in EUC-JP.

Ahh, ok. I assumed that all the DDTP translations are provided in
UTF-8 but this seems not to be true for Japanese at least. I
should ask grisu about this. Can you please check if the pages
use different encodings (in which case it is a DDTP problem) or
if they use all EUC-JP (in which case it is a problem of my scripts)?

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#172197: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search_packages: should show the section of each package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:24:25 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Mostly fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Dec 2002 09:56:22 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 08 03:56:22 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from amadeus.ifi.unizh.ch (mail.ifi.unizh.ch) [130.60.48.21] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18KyAf-0004o2-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 03:56:22 -0600
Received: (qmail 18455 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 09:55:11 -
Received: (ofmipd 130.60.99.109); 8 Dec 2002 09:54:49 -
Received: from andel by abraxas.ifi.unizh.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18KyAe-0007Jl-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 10:56:20 +0100
Date: 8 Dec 2002 10:56:20 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David Andel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: David Andel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: it would be nice to have search_packages output 
showing the section of each package
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-08
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

when searching for packages with any as section entry it would be very
helpful to see the section to which each package belongs right on the
main search output page. Otherwise one has to either search multiple
times with the different section entries or to click on each package
separately for checking the section.
It would be even better to include all sections right away, like
admin, web, etc.
A cool thing would be also to add those sections to the section entry
to make possible searching just in admin or leave out games.

If I can help you somehow, please drop me a line.

David

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux abraxas.ifi.unizh.ch 2.4.19abraxas #1 SMP Mit Nov 27 12:17:21 CET 
2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 172197-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 19:22:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 13:22:48 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgPT6-0004Z5-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:24:32 -0600
Received: from pd953074c.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.76] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AgPT5-0005rH-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:24:31 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AgPT0-000167-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:24:26 +0100
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:24:25 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mostly fixed
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 

The output of search_packages includes the section information now, so
I think this bug can be closed.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#227273: packages.debian.org: charset mismatch (always in UTF-8?)

[Denis Barbier]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:12:19PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
[...]
 However, in the reality, the page is written in EUC-JP.
 Because of this inconsistency, web browsers will render the page
 by assuming the page is UTF-8 and the result will be the Mojibake.
[...]

I do not know how packages.debian.org is generated, but this mismatch
may be due to how Japanese pages are encoded under webwml/japanese/.
Japanese translators decided to generate HTML pages with ISO-2022-JP
encoding, and because this is their preferred encoding, .wml files
are ISO-2022-JP as well.  Unfortunately, WML cannot handle this
encoding, so .wml files are preprocessed and recoded into EUC-JP, then
normal WML processing takes place, and output files are converted back
to ISO-2022-JP.
For this reason, mojibake occurs also for all index files which include
material from other pages (/events, /News, etc).  I am going to commit
a fix.

Denis

Bug#227517: packages.d.o: Links to sources of packages that have security updates point to the wrong location

[Frank Lichtenheld]

tags 227517 pending
thanks

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:56:16PM +0100, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
 Package: www.debian.org
 Version: N/A; reported 2004-01-13
 Severity: normal
 
 I'm not totally sure as to whether this is globally true but I've
 recently come across two packages (cupsys (IIRC) and bind) for
 which this was true ...

The problem is known and already fixed in CVS. So this should go away
soon.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#176837: marked as done (www.debian.org: search on packages.debian.org doesn't find kernel-pcmcia-modules)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close packages.debian.org Bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2003 11:20:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 15 05:20:18 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dsl-213-023-020-112.arcor-ip.net [213.23.20.112] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Ylaj-0001hK-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 05:20:18 -0600
Received: from scorpion by dsl-213-023-020-112.arcor-ip.net with local (Exim 
3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18YlZz-fu-00; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:19:31 +0100
From: Tino Keitel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: search on packages.debian.org doesn't find 
kernel-pcmcia-modules
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:19:31 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Tino Keitel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-01-15
Severity: normal

When I search in packages directories on packages.debian.org, I can not
find any packages if I use the keyword kernel-pcmcia-modules . I don't 
know where the exact problem is, but there are a lot of packages whose
names start with kernel-pcmcia-modules. However, the search gives no
results.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thinkpad 2.4.20 #2 Thu Dec 5 00:08:38 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE


---
Received: (at 172055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 20:34:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 14:34:28 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46R-00079S-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:35:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ag46Q-59-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:43 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46H-0001Af-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close packages.debian.org Bugs
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Last week the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs:

 Closes: #224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored=20

* New search_packages script

 Closes:  #35765: packages.debian.org: text (HTML) that's on each page shou=
ld be excluded from description search=20
 Closes: #103694: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't search on s=
ubwords in package names
  Closes: #115004, #156794, #175644, #178831 merged bugs
 Closes: #172055: packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g=
. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
  Closes: #176837 merged bug
 Closes: #195614: packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package=
 check=20

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package 

Bug#195614: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package check)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close packages.debian.org Bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2003 22:31:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 31 17:31:10 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from aktaia.intevation.org (mail.intevation.de) [212.95.126.10] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19MEsX-00046e-00; Sat, 31 May 2003 17:31:10 -0500
Received: from thetis.hq (thetis.hq [192.168.11.13])
by mail.intevation.de (Postfix) with SMTP
id 1917B36D81; Sun,  1 Jun 2003 00:31:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 16228 invoked by uid 1004);
Sat, 31 May 2003 22:31:12 -
From: Bernhard Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.debian.org: not finding package check
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 00:31:12 +0200
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-01
Severity: normal

There is a packages called check.
(See http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/check.html)

Search of the packet directories does not find it
not with subsearch or the precise name of the package.

Bernhard


---
Received: (at 195614-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 20:34:28 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 14:34:27 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46R-00079S-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:35:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ag46Q-59-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:43 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46H-0001Af-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close packages.debian.org Bugs
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Last week the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs:

 Closes: #224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored=20

* New search_packages script

 Closes:  #35765: packages.debian.org: text (HTML) that's on each page shou=
ld be excluded from description search=20
 Closes: #103694: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't search on s=
ubwords in package names
  Closes: #115004, #156794, #175644, #178831 merged bugs
 Closes: #172055: packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g=
. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
  Closes: #176837 merged bug
 Closes: #195614: packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package=
 check=20

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 

Bug#172055: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close packages.debian.org Bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Dec 2002 22:15:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 06 16:15:54 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ping-ef-gw.ping.de (noefs.ping.de) [62.72.90.14] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18KQlF-0007mS-00; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:15:54 -0600
Received: from [10.11.11.81] (helo=stan ident=mail)
by noefs.ping.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18KQlD-0004vZ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 23:15:51 +0100
Received: from rene by stan with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18KQkv-0001wd-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 23:15:33 +0100
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 23:15:33 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o: search error on e.g. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.9
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
  USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-06
Severity: normal


Hi folks,

when I search on for e.g. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de on
http://packages.debian.org (or follow the link from my developer.php
page), the script returns

Malformed query! (Or something strange happened to this script.)

May it be that the package name's length is longer than the script can
handle? In that case it shhould be increased :)

Anyway, here a snipped from IRC dealing with that:

20:07  Joy _rene_:
20:07  Joy % /org/packages.debian.org/swish++/search++ -i
 /org/packages.debian.org/swish++/packages.index -m 20
 keywords=3Dopenoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
20:07  Joy search++: error: malformed query
20:08  Joy _rene_: so please file a bug about that

So I am doing that now ;)

Regards,

Rene

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux stan 2.4.18 #1 Son Nov 3 01:29:12 CET 2002 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--=20
 .''`.  Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE98SGF+FmQsCSK63MRAghcAJ9H3LuNlx7gEg1vhlJNLFqbf3O5OwCfQK00
ophWATMaARVxCQsS+9UTCio=
=ROad
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--

---
Received: (at 172055-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 20:34:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 14:34:28 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46R-00079S-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:35:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ag46Q-59-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:43 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46H-0001Af-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close packages.debian.org Bugs
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#178831: marked as done (packages.debian.org could use real substring searches)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close packages.debian.org Bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2003 22:11:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 28 16:11:51 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kei.netwinder.org (netwinder.org) [209.202.115.26] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ddxP-0003i8-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 16:11:51 -0600
Received: from ralphs by netwinder.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1)
id 18ddxO-0004FJ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:11:50 -0500
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:11:50 -0500
From: Ralph Siemsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.debian.org could use real substring searches
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
  USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: current as of 2003/01/28

It would be nice if the substring seach option on the Seach package
directories actually did substring searches.  That would mean if I
seach for base64 then libmime-base64-perl should be returned.
I realize the comments right on the page indicate that this doesn't
happen, so its not a bug.. so could this go on the wishlist?

-- 
Ralph Siemsen
www.netwinder.org

---
Received: (at 103694-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 21:22:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 15:22:58 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46R-00079S-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:35:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ag46Q-59-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:43 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46H-0001Af-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close packages.debian.org Bugs
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Last week the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs:

 Closes: #224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored=20

* New search_packages script

 Closes:  #35765: packages.debian.org: text (HTML) that's on each page shou=
ld be excluded from description search=20
 Closes: #103694: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't search on s=
ubwords in package names
  Closes: #115004, #156794, #175644, #178831 merged bugs
 Closes: #172055: packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g=
. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
  Closes: #176837 merged bug
 Closes: #195614: packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package=
 check=20

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: 

Bug#156794: marked as done (Package search subwords not working)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close packages.debian.org Bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2002 14:25:11 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 15 09:25:11 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from fl-mta04.durocom.com [216.53.195.241] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17fLYl-0001RQ-00; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:25:11 -0500
Received: from shade.durocom.com ([216.53.203.88]) by fl-mta04.durocom.com
  with SMTP
  id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:10 -0400
Received: by shade.durocom.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Aug 2002 
10:25:06 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:25:06 -0400
From: Chris Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Package search subwords not working
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org

Searching for 'mod-perl' on http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
results in 0 entries.  Subword appears to only work for the beginning 
of package names.  

example:  Searching for 'mod-perl' returns 0 entries,
searching for 'libapache-mod' returns the entry 'libapache-mod-perl'.

--chris

-- 
Liberty is not a means to a political end.  It is itself the highest
political end.  -- Lord Acton (Submitted anonymously) 

---
Received: (at 103694-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 21:22:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 15:22:58 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46R-00079S-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:35:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ag46Q-59-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:43 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46H-0001Af-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close packages.debian.org Bugs
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Last week the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs:

 Closes: #224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored=20

* New search_packages script

 Closes:  #35765: packages.debian.org: text (HTML) that's on each page shou=
ld be excluded from description search=20
 Closes: #103694: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't search on s=
ubwords in package names
  Closes: #115004, #156794, #175644, #178831 merged bugs
 Closes: #172055: packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g=
. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
  Closes: #176837 merged bug
 Closes: #195614: packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package=
 check=20

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 

Bug#175644: marked as done (www.debian.org: searching on packages.debian.org doesn't seem to work)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Close packages.debian.org Bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2003 07:35:44 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 07 01:35:43 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from uaf-du-08-06.alaska.edu (greenwood) [137.229.8.166] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18VoH0-0003lX-00; Tue, 07 Jan 2003 01:35:43 -0600
Received: from bkerin by greenwood with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18VoGn-0001HA-00; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 22:35:29 -0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Britton Leo Kerin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: searching on packages.debian.org doesn't seem to work
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 22:35:29 -0900
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Britton Leo Kerin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-06
Severity: normal

When I fill out the form in the Search package directories paragraph
like this:

Keywords: gtk-perl
Search on: X Package names only _ Descriptions
Allow searching on subwords: X
Distribution: any  Section: any

I get 'No responses to your query.'.

gtk-perl definately is a package, seems like its being missed somehow.

Britton


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux greenwood 2.4.20-k7 #1 Sat Dec 21 18:08:10 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 103694-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2004 21:22:58 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 15:22:58 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46R-00079S-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:35:43 -0600
Received: from pd9e39249.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.146.73] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1Ag46Q-59-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:43 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ag46H-0001Af-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:35:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close packages.debian.org Bugs
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Last week the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs:

 Closes: #224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored=20

* New search_packages script

 Closes:  #35765: packages.debian.org: text (HTML) that's on each page shou=
ld be excluded from description search=20
 Closes: #103694: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't search on s=
ubwords in package names
  Closes: #115004, #156794, #175644, #178831 merged bugs
 Closes: #172055: packages.debian.org: search_packages: search error on e.g=
. openoffice.org-spellcheck-de-de
  Closes: #176837 merged bug
 Closes: #195614: packages.debian.org: search_packages: not finding package=
 check=20

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support 

Processed: Re: Bug#227517: packages.d.o: Links to sources of packages that have security updates point to the wrong location

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 227517 pending
Bug#227517: packages.d.o: Links to sources of packages that have security 
updates point to the wrong location
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: retitle 102625 to packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't allow boolean expressions anymore ...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 102625 packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't allow boolean 
 expressions anymore
Bug#102625: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't accept and, not 
and or
Changed Bug title.

 severity 102625 wishlist
Bug#102625: packages.debian.org: search_packages: doesn't allow boolean 
expressions anymore
Severity set to `wishlist'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#103889: marked as done (packages.d.o: should give link to changelog)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Links are there
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2001 17:57:25 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 07 12:57:25 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from dhcp065-024-072-011.columbus.rr.com (deckard.local) 
[65.24.72.11] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14wpG5-0007hc-00; Mon, 07 May 2001 12:57:21 -0500
Received: from marvin.local ([192.168.1.12] ident=mail)
by deckard.local with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14wpG3-0002RA-00; Mon, 07 May 2001 13:57:19 -0400
Received: from rfunk by marvin.local with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14wpG2-00058I-00; Mon, 07 May 2001 13:57:18 -0400
From: Rob Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o: should give link to changelog
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.15
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.15
Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 13:57:17 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Rob Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-05-07
Severity: wishlist

The bottom of each package page gives links to the dsc and tarball, but no
link to the changelog.  So we can see that a package is at version 1.0 in
stable, 1.1 in testing, and 1.2 in unstable (though only by editing the URL
in the browser from /stable/ to /testing/ to /unstable/), but we can't see
the differences between them or why 1.2 hasn't made it to testing yet or
even the date that 1.2 was uploaded to unstable.  Yes, we could download
the tarball and look, but that's a pain.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux marvin 2.2.19 #1 Wed Apr 4 03:47:07 EDT 2001 i586


---
Received: (at 102214-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 00:32:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 18:32:32 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWk-0001ki-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:04:54 -0600
Received: from pd953074c.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.76] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AgYWi-sJ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:54 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWW-00030W-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Links are there
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The packages.debian.org pages have now links to the packages' changelogs.
The changelogs are currently hosted at people.debian.org by noel@
but should move soon to packages.debian.org.

Gruesse,
--=20
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFABIeYQbn06FtxPfARApJnAJ9PFriEfH2YyfJIQHx0A1+4YlBhxgCdFeFm
3MfDT89qQgM3eivGqncTGeA=
=O7Wy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB--

Bug#102214: marked as done (packages.debian.org: pages should offer link to changelog.Debian)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Links are there
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2001 12:51:22 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 25 07:51:22 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from tomts14.bellnexxia.net (tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net) 
[:::209.226.175.35] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15EVpk-0003rj-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:51:16 -0500
Received: from thanatos.ubishops.ca ([206.172.246.235])
  by tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net
  (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP
  id [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:50:57 -0400
Received: by thanatos.ubishops.ca (Postfix, from userid 500)
id E537D416; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:47:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: package page should offer link to changelog.Debian !
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:47:46 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using From header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-06-25
Severity: wishlist

It would be very very useful if the page displaying package
information had a link allowing one to view the 
/usr/share/doc/package/changelog.Debian.gz file!


-- System Information
Debian Release: newton
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thanatos 2.4.5-ac9 #2 Fri Jun 8 12:21:44 EDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 102214-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 00:32:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 18:32:32 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWk-0001ki-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:04:54 -0600
Received: from pd953074c.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.76] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AgYWi-sJ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:54 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWW-00030W-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Links are there
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The packages.debian.org pages have now links to the packages' changelogs.
The changelogs are currently hosted at people.debian.org by noel@
but should move soon to packages.debian.org.

Gruesse,
--=20
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFABIeYQbn06FtxPfARApJnAJ9PFriEfH2YyfJIQHx0A1+4YlBhxgCdFeFm
3MfDT89qQgM3eivGqncTGeA=
=O7Wy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB--

Bug#198854: marked as done (www.debian.org: predictable link to a package's changelog)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Links are there
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jun 2003 06:12:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 26 01:12:17 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19VPzV-UC-00; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 01:12:17 -0500
Received: from tc218-187-83-164.2-7.pl.apol.com.tw ([218.187.83.164] 
helo=jidanni.org)
by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
id 19VPzQ-95-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 02:12:16 -0400
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19VMN5-0001dF-00; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:20:23 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: predictable link to a package's changelog
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:20:23 +0800
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_18 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-26
Severity: wishlist

It is unfortunate, that there is no easy access to the changelog, I know of,
but all other infos can be seen on the package tracking system:

http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/adns.html

This also includes the change notification mails. For me, this is good
enough, but I could understand when people want to have this offline
available.

I want to see the changelog before deciding if I need to get a fresh
copy of some giant package

You can get the changelog with qa.debian.org:
1) go to http://packages.debian.org/foo
2) go to link 'developer information for foo'
3) go to link Accepted foo 17.42-143 (i386 source)

I want a predictable  URL to get a package's changelog
One that does not need user interaction to figure out the file name.

One that could be fetched with wwwoffle in one shot.

And here is the last changelogs entry

Alternatively, you can replace step 1-2) with 
1-2) go to link http://packages.qa.debian.org/foo


Just subscribe to debian-devel-changes. You can get all the necessary
information from there.

too much for offline modem users


---
Received: (at 102214-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 00:32:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 18:32:32 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWk-0001ki-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:04:54 -0600
Received: from pd953074c.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.76] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AgYWi-sJ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:54 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWW-00030W-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Links are there
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The packages.debian.org pages have now links to the packages' changelogs.
The changelogs are currently hosted at people.debian.org by noel@
but should move soon to packages.debian.org.

Gruesse,
--=20
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB

Bug#142385: marked as done (www.debian.org: changelog's CGI is gone)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Links are there
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2002 15:22:46 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 11 10:22:46 2002
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pb132.pabianice.sdi.tpnet.pl (magi.nerv.pl) [217.99.159.132] 
(yacoob)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16vgPO-00062f-00; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:22:46 -0500
Received: from yacoob by magi.nerv.pl with local (MasqMail 0.1.16) id
 16vgQ3-1k2-00; Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:23:27 +0200
From: Jakub Turski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: changelog's CGI is gone
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:23:27 +0200
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-11
Severity: normal

There was a CGI on cgi.debian.org named changelog.pl. One could get
package's changelog using it. Now it is gone - which is very bad. Some
programs (aptitude) have special option for downloading a changelog, it
is broken now.

Can it be fixed?

Q.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux magi 2.4.18 #1 sob mar 2 17:00:33 CET 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL


---
Received: (at 102214-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 00:32:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 18:32:32 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWk-0001ki-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:04:54 -0600
Received: from pd953074c.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.76] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AgYWi-sJ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:54 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWW-00030W-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Links are there
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The packages.debian.org pages have now links to the packages' changelogs.
The changelogs are currently hosted at people.debian.org by noel@
but should move soon to packages.debian.org.

Gruesse,
--=20
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFABIeYQbn06FtxPfARApJnAJ9PFriEfH2YyfJIQHx0A1+4YlBhxgCdFeFm
3MfDT89qQgM3eivGqncTGeA=
=O7Wy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB--

Bug#109676: marked as done (changelogs on the web)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Links are there
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2001 19:53:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 14:53:49 2001
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from spider.morgul.net [18.24.4.35] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Ze4T-0007H8-00; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:53:49 -0500
Received: from frodo by spider.morgul.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 15Ze4S-0006pf-00; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:53:48 -0400
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:53:48 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: changelogs on the web
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: Noah L. Meyerhans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

It would be really cool if the changelogs for a given package could be
found on the package homepage (i.e. the pages on
http://packages.debian.org/).

I realize it could be potentially difficult to do...  maybe it could be
sucked from the package's .diff somehow.

If you think this is interesting and want some code, let me know and
I'll see if I can come up with an easy way of extracting the changelog
from either a .deb or its diff.

Thanks.
noah

-- 
 ___
| Web: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/
| PGP Public Key: http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html 

---
Received: (at 102214-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2004 00:32:33 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 13 18:32:32 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWk-0001ki-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:04:54 -0600
Received: from pd953074c.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.76] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AgYWi-sJ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:54 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AgYWW-00030W-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:40 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Links are there
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_13
X-Spam-Level: 


--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The packages.debian.org pages have now links to the packages' changelogs.
The changelogs are currently hosted at people.debian.org by noel@
but should move soon to packages.debian.org.

Gruesse,
--=20
Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.djpig.de/

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFABIeYQbn06FtxPfARApJnAJ9PFriEfH2YyfJIQHx0A1+4YlBhxgCdFeFm
3MfDT89qQgM3eivGqncTGeA=
=O7Wy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--P+33d92oIH25kiaB--

Processed: tagging 134077

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

  # I've an idea for this
 tag 134077 = confirmed
Bug#134077: packages.debian.org: pages for moved or deleted packages are 
deleted only once a week
Tags were: wontfix
Tags set to: confirmed


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)