Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040422 00:06]: > > Are you sure stable takes 8GB? I thought woody came with 7 CDs, 7*650MB > > = 4.5 GB ? > I never said that stable takes 8 GB... stable+testing+unstable takes > 8 GB (plus 8 GB for the all packages). Makes the 15 GB you have. > (Yeah, I know that I took ceil(size)...) Sorry, small missinderstanding. Yours sincerely, Alexander
Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
Thanks for your findings guys. I'm a bit surprised since one debmirror run seemed to chew up more than 8GB for the binary portion of sid. I must have done something peculiar. Ryan
Re: Debian License Informations - a WML draft
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:00:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040402 23:40]:
> > Comments welcome (don't take the "DLE" naming too serious :)
>
> thank you for doing this work.
New version available at the old place:
http://people.debian.org/~djpig/www.d.o-licenses/dle-opl.{wml,data,en.html}
> Some ideas of me:
> - A link to the discussion on debian-legal (as this provides more
> in-depth information)
Added.
> - I guess that you plan to put the usual menu on the left side. Links
> from there to the DFSG, the FAQ and the list-archive could be
> useful.
Don't know what you mean with the "usual menu"? I added a menu at
the top of the page similar to that of the ports pages.
> - How about putting the most useful information in the first line and
> putting it at the largest size available?:
> Open Publication Licenses 1.0 - non-free
> Debian License Examination 1-1
I oriented the layout to the DSA pages... Not yet sure what to do here.
> - Well, the version is the version of the license? Then I'd rather
> write it as Open Publication License, Version 1.0.
Done.
> - "Date issued" is perhaps to strong. What about e.g. "Date published"?
Changed.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:26:29PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > The numbers are for all suites (stable/testing/unstable) in total. Since all > > packages are stored under pool/ it is a rather complex task to mirror > > only one suite. Therefor it is recommended to always mirror whole > > architectures. > > Are you sure? It seems to be trivial to mirror only one flavour > (stable/testing/unstable) by downloading the file specified in the > Packages file: > Filename: pool/contrib/a/acl-installer/acl-installer_1.12_i386.deb I consider "rsync --exclude *.deb --include *_.deb --include *_all.deb" to be way simpler. I didn't say you can't do it... Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:57:15PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Are you sure stable takes 8GB? I thought woody came with 7 CDs, 7*650MB > = 4.5 GB ? I never said that stable takes 8 GB... stable+testing+unstable takes 8 GB (plus 8 GB for the all packages). Makes the 15 GB you have. (Yeah, I know that I took ceil(size)...) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:00:57PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:23:38AM -0700, Ryan Lovett wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 07:06:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > Ok, I did some quick tests: > > > the whole Debian archive is about 95 GB today, plus 3 GB for contrib > > > and non-free. > > > > > > i386 is about 8 GB, all too. So the 8 GB seems to be correct, probably > > > the 4 is too low. I download from time to time binary Debian Sid DVDs and the sizes are 4.4GB and 3.8GB. > > Thank you for looking into this for me. Is the 8 GB for i386 the total for > > stable? If so, do you have the breakdown for unstable? (I should've > > mentioned > > this before.) If its not too much trouble, are there figures for binary and > > source as well? > > The numbers are for all suites (stable/testing/unstable) in total. Since all > packages are stored under pool/ it is a rather complex task to mirror > only one suite. Therefor it is recommended to always mirror whole > architectures. Are you sure? It seems to be trivial to mirror only one flavour (stable/testing/unstable) by downloading the file specified in the Packages file: Filename: pool/contrib/a/acl-installer/acl-installer_1.12_i386.deb > I only did some quick searches with du on gluck.d.o. To actually divide > that into binaries and source I would have to think of something smarter > than that or find a existing solution ;) So no, can't provide you > more information right now. But I can: Disk usage for binary sid packages (as of today): $ for f in /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_*Packages; do sum=0 for i in $(sed -n 's/^Size: //p' $f); do sum=$(echo $sum+$i | bc) done echo $f $sum done /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_contrib_binary-i386_Packages 245933488 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-i386_Packages 8521006576 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_non-free_binary-i386_Packages 354617754 stable: /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_contrib_binary-i386_Packages 110185752 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_main_binary-i386_Packages 4021300712 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_non-free_binary-i386_Packages 238591288 testing: /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_contrib_binary-i386_Packages 130586332 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_binary-i386_Packages 7766420252 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_non-free_binary-i386_Packages 325034070 stable source packages: $ for f in /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_*_source_Sources; do sum=0 for i in $(egrep '(\.dsc|\.orig\.tar\.gz|\.diff\.gz)$' $f | cut -d" " -f3); do sum=$(echo $sum+$i | bc) done echo $f $sum done /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_contrib_source_Sources 136718458 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_main_source_Sources 3858595919 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_stable_non-free_source_Sources 248088230 testing: /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_contrib_source_Sources 163720054 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_source_Sources 7131949892 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_non-free_source_Sources 337639440 unstable: /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_contrib_source_Sources 276999688 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources 7680484622 /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_non-free_source_Sources 351156728 I hope it helps, Jens
Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
* Ryan Lovett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040421 19:23]: > Thank you for looking into this for me. Is the 8 GB for i386 the total for > stable? If so, do you have the breakdown for unstable? (I should've mentioned > this before.) If its not too much trouble, are there figures for binary and > source as well? One moment... $ du -s /pub/debian 14988752/pub/debian Our stable, testing and unstable mirror (i386 without source) takes currently 15GB. Are you sure stable takes 8GB? I thought woody came with 7 CDs, 7*650MB = 4.5 GB ? Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:23:38AM -0700, Ryan Lovett wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 07:06:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Ok, I did some quick tests: > > the whole Debian archive is about 95 GB today, plus 3 GB for contrib > > and non-free. > > > > i386 is about 8 GB, all too. So the 8 GB seems to be correct, probably > > the 4 is too low. > > Thank you for looking into this for me. Is the 8 GB for i386 the total for > stable? If so, do you have the breakdown for unstable? (I should've mentioned > this before.) If its not too much trouble, are there figures for binary and > source as well? The numbers are for all suites (stable/testing/unstable) in total. Since all packages are stored under pool/ it is a rather complex task to mirror only one suite. Therefor it is recommended to always mirror whole architectures. I only did some quick searches with du on gluck.d.o. To actually divide that into binaries and source I would have to think of something smarter than that or find a existing solution ;) So no, can't provide you more information right now. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
US STOCK-MARKET---M.D. Appointed to Board of Advisors, Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:57:07 -0500
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:57:07 -0500 US STOCK-MArKET---BREAKING NEWS - M.D. Appointed to Board of Advisors Read the whole story on this groundbreaking company from the HealthCare/Medical Technologies Sector - http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040420/datu080_1.html boxy sumatra ahoy comedian edict diabetic selenium adverbial craftsman sorghum winifred degas fist erudite ward respite volumetric stump cabinetry cryptogram yak onward watt truce enjoinder along ac miocene anniversary fiesta softball taverna adolph extemporaneous lipscomb sue chinook bimetallism latin insert remonstrate riboflavin actuate satisfy tab oust carpathia breakthrough chinese inappropriate balsa bugeyed campanile
Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 07:06:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:08:05PM -0800, Ryan Lovett wrote: > > http://www.debian.org/mirror/size > > > > has a link to http://ftp-master.debian.org/~mmagallo/ labeled "graphs of > > Debian archive size growth" which is currently 404 Not Found. Also, > > reports on the web indicate the 'released architecture' size of 4-8 GB > > may be out of date. > > > > http://braindamage.alal.com/archives/debian-user/20030916/4295.html > > > > This is only going by web reports since I don't run a mirror. (I'd like > > to run a local mirror, but I need to know how big it needs to be > > initially.) > > Ok, I did some quick tests: > the whole Debian archive is about 95 GB today, plus 3 GB for contrib > and non-free. > > i386 is about 8 GB, all too. So the 8 GB seems to be correct, probably > the 4 is too low. > > I will update the info on the website accordingly (and try to contact > mmagello, if his site is coming back). Thank you for looking into this for me. Is the 8 GB for i386 the total for stable? If so, do you have the breakdown for unstable? (I should've mentioned this before.) If its not too much trouble, are there figures for binary and source as well? Regards, Ryan
Bug#240900: debian-www: Mirror Size page needs updating
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 01:08:05PM -0800, Ryan Lovett wrote: > http://www.debian.org/mirror/size > > has a link to http://ftp-master.debian.org/~mmagallo/ labeled "graphs of > Debian archive size growth" which is currently 404 Not Found. Also, > reports on the web indicate the 'released architecture' size of 4-8 GB > may be out of date. > > http://braindamage.alal.com/archives/debian-user/20030916/4295.html > > This is only going by web reports since I don't run a mirror. (I'd like > to run a local mirror, but I need to know how big it needs to be > initially.) Ok, I did some quick tests: the whole Debian archive is about 95 GB today, plus 3 GB for contrib and non-free. i386 is about 8 GB, all too. So the 8 GB seems to be correct, probably the 4 is too low. I will update the info on the website accordingly (and try to contact mmagello, if his site is coming back). Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by cjwatson: webwml/english/Bugs index.wml
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 06:01:09PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 05:29:25AM -0600, Debian WWW CVS wrote: > > Modified files: > > english/Bugs : index.wml > > > > Log message: > > Document severity: and tag:. > > May I additionally propose the following patch, since it seems to work: > Index: index.wml > === > RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/index.wml,v > retrieving revision 1.56 > diff -u -r1.56 index.wml > --- index.wml 21 Apr 2004 11:29:25 - 1.56 > +++ index.wml 21 Apr 2004 15:56:41 - > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ > value="src">source package > value="maint">maintainer email > value="submitter">submitter email > + value="severity">severity > value="tag">tag > > What to search for: size="50"> Yes, go for it. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how r u these days?
pivotal aspect architect swarthy oryzopsis diestrous minstrel amah huarache barkeeper empyrean lavatory . salacious refinance ransacking forefather stronghold bubo stepson ascariasis utopist parmelia christlike epingles biophysics . bipedal hymenium shown kalongr theban . Cheap Software for you, all are original!Major titles from Microsoft and Adobe for Rock Bottom Prices!We're saving you $1,250 on 3 BEST SELLERS! Super Cheap Microsoft, Adobe & all kind softwares here!CLI-CK HE-RE TO ENJOY OUR SUPERB DISCOUNT MICR0S0FT WIND0WS XP PR0FESSI0NAL - Only $50!Retail price: $270.99. You S-A-V-E $220 MICR0SOFT 0FF1CE XP PR0FESSI0NAL - Only $100!Retail price: 579.99. You S-A-V-E $480 AD0BE PH0T0SH0P 7 - Only $80!Retail price: 609.99. You S-A-V-E $550 15 More P0PULAR titles ~~>> CLI-CK HE-RE FOR MORE TITLES We're giving you these INSANE discounts because these are the official products without the box, manuals, documentation and guarantees.Hopefully my little tips help you out
Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by cjwatson: webwml/english/Bugs index.wml
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 05:29:25AM -0600, Debian WWW CVS wrote: > Modified files: > english/Bugs : index.wml > > Log message: > Document severity: and tag:. May I additionally propose the following patch, since it seems to work: Index: index.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/Bugs/index.wml,v retrieving revision 1.56 diff -u -r1.56 index.wml --- index.wml 21 Apr 2004 11:29:25 - 1.56 +++ index.wml 21 Apr 2004 15:56:41 - @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ source package maintainer email submitter email +severity tag What to search for: Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
Bug#244459: marked as done (Broken link on page http://www.debian.org/devel/)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:16:18 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#244459: Broken link on page http://www.debian.org/devel/ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2004 14:48:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 18 07:48:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from htklx2.htk.fi [195.156.245.118] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BFDbN-0003uY-00; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 07:48:57 -0700 Received: by htklx2.htk.fi (Postfix, from userid 88) id E2F267D7A; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:48:52 +0300 (EEST) Received: from fixel.org (f69b.pappila.ton.tut.fi [193.166.85.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by htklx2.htk.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5618A7D76 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:48:51 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 17:48:59 +0300 From: Pauli Borodulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Fixel Networking Org. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Broken link on page http://www.debian.org/devel/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 Package: www.debian.org Version: Thu, Apr 15 18:07:48 UTC 2004 In Miscellaneous section there's a broken link: Link title: New packages that wait to be included in Debian Address: http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ Result: 404 Not found Regards, --=20 .-- - | Pauli Borodulin | snail. . | email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Haukkam=E4enkatu 1 F 69 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | gsm. +358 44 381 | 33560 Tampere, Finland | http://boro.fixel.org '-- -- - --- Received: (at 244459-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 12:16:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 05:16:42 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BGGef-0007eS-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:16:42 -0700 Received: from catalunya (host-66-81-201-48.rev.o1.com [66.81.201.48]) by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i3LCGWiJ051001 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:16:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 4.30) id 1BGGeJ-ia-3w; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:16:19 -0700 Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 05:16:18 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#244459: Broken link on page http://www.debian.org/devel/ Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040209', clamav-milter version '0.66m' Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1 On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:52:06AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:27 AM, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:48:59PM +0300, Pauli Borodulin wrote: > >> Package: www.debian.org > >> Version: Thu, Apr 15 18:07:48 UTC 2004 > >> > >> In Miscellaneous section there's a broken link: > >> > >> Link title: New packages that wait to be included in Debian > >> Address: http:/
Bug#244459: Broken link on page http://www.debian.org/devel/
On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 4:27 AM, Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:48:59PM +0300, Pauli Borodulin wrote: >> Package: www.debian.org >> Version: Thu, Apr 15 18:07:48 UTC 2004 >> >> In Miscellaneous section there's a broken link: >> >> Link title: New packages that wait to be included in Debian >> Address: http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ >> Result: 404 Not found > > Frank, would you please track down the new location for this or > remove the link altogether? aj said on IRC this morning that queue-new is now only visible from merkel's /org/ftp.debian.org mirror (i.e. not public). Adam
