Re: debian mentors FAQ

[Matthew Palmer]

On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 04:35:25PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> What do you think of adding a link to your "Unoffical debian mentors
> FAQ" on http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals?

I've got no problems with it.  It's fairly commonly referenced on d-mentors,
so I guess most people there like it, especially since I haven't gotten any
hate mail about it.  

It all really depends on whether the webmasters think my little FAQ deserves
status amongst the big guns of Debian documentation...

- Matt

Failure (msn_newsletters@hotmail.com)

[MSN Hotmail]

Dear MSN Newsletter customer,
 
You have received this mail because you have replied to an unmonitored alias.
For assistance with your newsletter subscription, please select one of the 
following options:
 
Manage (subscribe or unsubscribe)your newsletter subscriptions via our website.
http://newsletters.msn.com/
 
OR
 
Visit MSN Newsletter Technical Support to report a problem.
http://newsletters.msn.com/support.asp
 
OR
 
Visit MSN Newsletter Feedback to provide any additional feedback or ask
questions about MSN Newsletters.
http://newsletters.msn.com/feedback.asp
 
Best,
MSN Newsletter Staff
http://newsletters.msn.com

debian mentors FAQ

[Luk Claes]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi

What do you think of adding a link to your "Unoffical debian mentors
FAQ" on http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals?

Cheers

Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAycMt5UTeB5t8Mo0RAoSRAJ9F/lrZnlIOlvMyUO9sSBYgi+VuTQCgp2xt
1R8dKfgqW5C96BkBOZhUcZo=
=TJQy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#253817: page depending on po/whatever.po not rebuilt if whatever.po is modified

[Luk Claes]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

| this is because a target misc.$(LANGUAGE).html is defined
| and overrides default rule; one has to add $(GETTEXTDEP)
| to its dependencies. (I cannot commit at the moment)

I'll commit that if it is OK?

Cheers

Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAybF+5UTeB5t8Mo0RApMHAJ9sgHNPGyzQSM4qT/qeHKtkUfTC9gCcCuZk
uYkte6I9dITIBnuBW2EdKh8=
=3rM1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#253817: page depending on po/whatever.po not rebuilt if whatever.po is modified

[denis31.barbier]

Hi Nico,

this is because a target misc.$(LANGUAGE).html is defined
and overrides default rule; one has to add $(GETTEXTDEP)
to its dependencies. (I cannot commit at the moment)

--
Denis

Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net ; 
3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34€/mn) ; tél : 08 92 68 13 50 (0,34€/mn)

Re: Homepages in package descriptions

[Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo]

On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>  Package maintainers could add the link both in their package
> description, or on the packages.qa.debian.org page of the package (like
> I have done for tetrinet[1] -- I'm still lazy myself, sorry).

BTW: does uupdate has possibility to detect new version of package
 basing on the date of file?

If not then could you please tell me what is debian/watch in tetrinet for?

http://achurch.org/tetrinet/  tetrinet\.tar\.gz  debian  uupdate

regards
fEnIo



-- 
  _  Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | 
IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0)  phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo  http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#251205: marked as done (doc/docpolicy: rather a link to the list archives than to the list address)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:18:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#251205: doc/docpolicy: rather a link to the list archives 
than to the list address
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 12:17:14 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 27 05:17:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from apate.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.57] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BTJow-0007jG-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 05:17:14 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B88F62B42FA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:17:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from ugent.be (D5E0101A.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.16.26])
by apate.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F3F2B42EC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 27 May 2004 14:17:12 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 14:11:43 +0200
From: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040306)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: doc/docpolicy: rather a link to the list archives than to the list
 address
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.83.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist


This manual is quite outdated and there is an effort to fix it in
.

It would be better to have a link to the discussion ([1]?) than an
 tag.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2002/10/msg00103.html

Cheers

Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAtdr/5UTeB5t8Mo0RAqs3AJ9NonzHMvHTxvTLKe7SAyObUwfHzQCdHRpw
Jf7OIpJdtxaxKqquHND4jFs=
=HeXB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 251205-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2004 12:19:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 11 05:19:08 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from biedermanns.com (mail.biedermanns.com) [213.133.98.83] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BYl00-0002KL-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 05:19:08 -0700
Received: from lmlo.sil.at ([213.235.212.193] helo=tausendmorgenwald)
by mail.biedermanns.com with asmtp 
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BYkvB-0005KK-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:14:09 +0200
Received: from alfie by tausendmorgenwald with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BYkzn-0001nC-00; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:18:55 +0200
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:18:55 +0200
From: Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#251205: doc/docpolicy: rather a link to the list archives than 
to the list address
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PGNNI9BzQDUtgA2J"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Editor: Vi Improved 
X-Signature-Color: cyan
X-Signature-Prg: sigd/0.10.4 (Perl) 
X-Face: "`Q5\Ix+YG'{KDq<>5mcZL8Sp7$[L|%#^MSk'{Qpp"J8.
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
HTML_10_20 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--PGNNI9BzQDUtgA2J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-27 14:11]:
> 
> This manual is quite outdated and there is an effort to fix it in
> .
>=20
> It would be better to have a link to the discussion ([1]?) than an
>  tag.

 I've changed it to this now:

#v+
diff -r1.11 docpolicy.wml
4,5c4,6
< This manual is

Re: Homepages in package descriptions

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* Stafford Goodsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-10 19:52]:
> I think it would be reelly handy if you'd put a link to
> the homepages of the debian packages on the website.

 This request came up quite often, and I can just tell you to eather
search the archives for it, or take this short answers:

 Package maintainers could add the link both in their package
description, or on the packages.qa.debian.org page of the package (like
I have done for tetrinet[1] -- I'm still lazy myself, sorry).

 Of course a url field in the package control field would be nice (and
could be extracted automatically then), but that has to be requested
from the dpkg/apt maintainers. There is nothing the webteam can do about
it, sorry.

 So long,
Alfie
[1]  -- Static Information
-- 
"Dein Browser macht Probleme!"
  -- http://www.bravo.de/ bei deaktiviertem JS


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Unidentified subject!

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* Leland Dieno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-09 23:53]:
> hi, if possible could you remove this post from your database?

 I'm sorry but such requests are not fulfilled. The archives are there
for others to search for and get ideas out of the answers others have
received. Removing your post would render the two answers you have
received void and its not yours to request removal of the answers, too.

 People judging you by things you (didn't) know back in 1999 have their
own problems. Its not yours.

 So long, and have a nice time.
Alfie
-- 
 Thinking is dangerous.  It leads to ideas.
-- Seen on #Debian


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

call back already

[Maynard Elliot]

Hey, my name is jen and I'm new to this online dating thing. 
I've just my profile up, you should come check it out it's interesting. 
I just want to get to know you a little better if you don't mind, come check my 
profile out at:

www.starjen.com/cam.html

I also got a videocam so we can make it interesting, and don't worry you dont need a videocam.
Anyways I hope you get back to me soon! 

bye

Re: Typo in webwml/english/News/weekly/2004/21/index.wml

[Gerfried Fuchs]

* SUGIYAMA Tomoaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-27 23:37]:
> I do not know why that is not same as a title of those pages
> specially

 The title of the DSA pages is taken from a different part than the
entry in the DWN -- one is from the subject and the other from the
synopsis.

 HTH & HAND,
Alfie
-- 
  * Move from non-US to mani
 -- LaMont Jones, changelog.Debian for openssh (1:3.0.2p1-8.1)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#253817: www.debian.org: page depending on po/whatever.po not rebuilt if whatever.po is modified

[Nicolas Bertolissio]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

I modified french/po/templates.fr.po to fix a tag ( -> ) on
2004-06-02 but it seems CD/misc.fr.html has not been rebuilt since as
the fix does not appear in it (line 99).

Maybe a solution would be to touch CD/misc.wml but this is not a good
one... automatic rebuilt should occur.

Or I miss the right explaination, but It would be great if this page
could be rebuilt.

Regards


Nicolas Bertolissio

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

未承諾広告※他の商品と比べてく ださい！

[NetLake]

未承諾広告※
このメールを受信拒否の方は次のメール宛に受信拒否として
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 販売者　 NetLake　　
 代表者　田口　八重子
 所在地　京都市西京区下津林番条１００−１
 電話0774-55-6699

　売り上げの伸びないお店、
思いっきり宣伝したい方
独立したい人、勝ち組みになりたい方
成せば成るの
意気込みで頑張りませんか。
　http://hostrecord.mydns.jp/