Bug#278664: marked as done (Link on amd64-Package broken)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2004 01:10:27 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2004 14:30:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 28 07:30:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CNBI9-0005UQ-00; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:30:17 -0700
Received: from mail.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.144])
by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F221C87
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:30:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-2-52.mnet-online.de [82.135.2.52])
by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F170149337
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:30:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) 
[+prerelease])
id 1CNBI5-0006iB-6q
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:30:13 +0200
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:30:13 +0200
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Link on amd64-Package broken
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Tags: patch

Hi,

the link on http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ to
http://www.buildd.net/buildd/Installed_stats.png is broken; it should be
http://unstable.buildd.net/buildd/Installed_stats.png

Thanks,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

---
Received: (at 278664-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2004 00:12:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 01 16:12:38 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1COmHu-0008PI-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:12:38 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1COmFn-0002zq-Pa
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:10:27 +0100
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 01:10:27 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

As indicated in the bug report, this was already fixed.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#251198: marked as done (www.debian.org: Use png instead of jpeg for logo)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2004 01:08:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Comitted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2004 11:44:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 27 04:44:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from aopsysadsl.net1.nerim.net (stan.aopsys.com) [62.212.101.94] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BTJJa-0004xB-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 04:44:50 -0700
Received: from laurent by stan.aopsys.com with local (Exim 4.30)
id 1BTJJY-00011m-Ip; Thu, 27 May 2004 13:44:48 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Laurent Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Use png instead of jpeg for logo
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 13:44:48 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Laurent Martelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

The debian logo used in the header of almost all pages of the website
(http://www.debian.org/Pics/debian.jpg) is jpeg image which does not
look very good. I think it would be better to use a PNG image since it
would look better and have a smaller size. I created such an image
from the EPS file available from the site. You can download it here:

http://www.bearteam.org/~laurent/debian.png

It's 4412 bytes vs. 8442 for the current debian.jpg.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.22-pre8
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED])

---
Received: (at 251198-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2004 00:10:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 01 16:10:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1COmGF-0008JX-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:10:55 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1COmE5-0002zB-NM
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:08:41 +0100
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 01:08:41 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Comitted
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Committed the necessary changes. Should be online in a few hours.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#273820: marked as done (packages.debian.org: search_packages: do link directly to the binary packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2004 01:02:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2004 10:18:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 28 03:18:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.134.107] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CCF3u-00028q-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:18:23 -0700
Received: from pd953071b.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.27] helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1CCF4u-0001wz-1Y
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:19:24 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CCF3N-0001gu-Q1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:17:49 +0200
Resent-From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:17:49 +0200
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by feynman.djpig.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1CCEXZ-0001Us-1u
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:44:57 +0200
Received: from pop3.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:44:57 +0200 
(CEST)
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([146.82.138.6])
by mail.lenk.info with esmtp (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1CCEUy-0007DS-Ij
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:42:16 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id A02022E003; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:39:05 -0500 (CDT)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.134.107])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947422DF7E
for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:39:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from pd953071b.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.27] helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1CCESs-0001wJ-F9; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:40:06 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CCERM-0001U3-Fk; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:38:32 +0200
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:38:32 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kevin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-www@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: packages.debian.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-www@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rc-Virus: 2004-07-20_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2004-08-29_01
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: debian-www@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List:  archive/latest/18689
X-Loop: debian-www@lists.debian.org
List-Id: 
List-Post: 
List-Help: 
List-Subscribe: 
List-Unsubscribe: 
List-Archive: 
Precedence: list
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:39:05 -0500 (CDT)
X-Resent-For: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 


--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: confirmed

On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:37:42AM +0200, Kevin Price wrote:
> I have two suggestions to make about improving packages.debian.org. I fin=
d=20
> myself using it quite much, and it is very well done. I really missed it =
in=20
> the time after the attack last year. Thanks for getting it back up.
>=20
> 1. In every binary 

Problemas na instalção.

[alexandre]

Boa tarde,
 
estou com um problema na configuração da placa 
sis650
será que poderiam me ajudar ?
 
 
obrigado.
 
Alexandre.


XFree86.0.log
Description: Binary data

Re: small patche for italian/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2.wml

[Steve Kemp]

On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 02:49:27AM +0900, SUGIYAMA Tomoaki wrote:

> Please apply the patches to
> italian/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2.wml for fixing a typo.

  Applied, many thanks for your contribution.

Steve
--

small patche for italian/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2.wml

[SUGIYAMA Tomoaki]

Hello,

Please apply the patches to
italian/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2.wml for fixing a typo.

Regards,

--
SUGIYAMA Tomoaki 

--- running-kernel-2.2.wml.ori  2004-11-02 02:37:53.0 +0900
+++ running-kernel-2.2.wml  2004-11-02 02:38:25.0 +0900
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@

 bootpc non riceverà una risposta fintantoché l'interfaccia non sarà
 completamente configurata. Questo è stato regolato nel nuovo pacchetto
-di potato href="http://packages.debian.org/bootpc";>bootpc.
+di potato http://packages.debian.org/bootpc";>bootpc.
 
http://packages.debian.org/lsof";>lsof

Re: typo (?) on webwml/english/security/2004/dsa-579.wml

[Steve Kemp]

On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 01:52:23AM +0900, SUGIYAMA Tomoaki wrote:

> I think "disovered" should be "discovered" on
> webwml/english/security/2004/dsa-579.wml.
> If so, please fix it.

  I agree, and I've committed a fix for this now.  Thanks for the
 report.

Steve
--

typo (?) on webwml/english/security/2004/dsa-579.wml

[SUGIYAMA Tomoaki]

Hello,

I think "disovered" should be "discovered" on
webwml/english/security/2004/dsa-579.wml.
If so, please fix it.

Thanks in advance.

--
SUGIYAMA Tomoaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

http://www.debian.org/consultants/ policy

[Noèl Köthe]

Hello,

after long time I started working on http://www.debian.org/consultants/
to get it into a usefull page again. Right now there a alot of entries
outdated and there is no sorting in the countries.

The first step I want to discuss with you is that right now there is no
real policy about who will be added to this page. In my opinion these
minimal policy should be enough:

1. working URL entry
(if it timeouts its OK but if the URL doesn't resolve or the domain
isn't connected anymore the entry will be removed)

2. reachable E-Mail entry
(e-mail doesn't bounce and there will be an answer in the following 4
weeks)

3. on the webpage should be mentioned that the person/company is doing
Debian work

The information are the reasons why people will look on the consultants
page.

What do you think?
Do you agree I can use this as policy for the decisions of
additions/removals on the page?

-- 
Noèl Köthe 
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: Submission to Debian User List

[Kaare Olsen]

On 29/10/2004, "de Lanerolle, Trishan R."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Computer Science Department, Trinity College, Hartford Connecticut, USA
[...]

The site will be added to the "Who's using Debian" page shortly.

Thanks for your support!

--
Regards, Kaare -