Bug#284082: marked as done (Incomplete entry in the errata of rc2)
Your message dated Sat, 4 Dec 2004 17:01:16 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#284082: Incomplete entry in the errata of rc2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Dec 2004 12:50:01 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 03 04:50:01 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from lio.fmi.uni-sofia.bg (smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg) [62.44.101.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CaCsq-0006Cf-00; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 04:50:01 -0800 Received: from logic.fmi.uni-sofia.bg ([62.44.100.59]) by smtp.fmi.uni-sofia.bg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 14:45:30 +0200 Received: from zinoviev by logic.fmi.uni-sofia.bg with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CaDsk-0006Kh-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:53:58 +0200 Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 15:53:58 +0200 From: Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Incomplete entry in the errata of rc2 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: debian-installer Severity: critical Merit for the severity: may cause serious data loss. The current text in the errata is: * LVM failure on Sparc32 (at least). If you want to create LVM volume groups, the physical volumes must not reside at the beginning of the disk, or else activating new logical volumes within the volume group will fail. This is due to some unforeseen quirks in Sun disk labels. This failure happened because the the sun disk label resides at the beginning of the disk and the first partition may start from the beginning of the disk. Hence the partition table becomes part of the first partition. Most file systems are smart enough not to write data at the beginning of their place but this is not the case with the phisical volumes for LVM or RAID and not the case with the swap spaces. The users MAY NOT create swap spaces or partitions for LVM and RAID at the beginning of the disk or the partition table will be subsequently completely erased. Anton Zinoviev --- Received: (at 284082-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2004 01:21:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 04 17:21:52 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cal60-0003Ww-00; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 17:21:52 -0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.81.178.223]) by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id iB51JvN7022281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 4 Dec 2004 17:21:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CakmO-0001zi-Us; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 17:01:37 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 17:01:16 -0800 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Vincent McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#284082: Incomplete entry in the errata of rc2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:12:09 +) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on localhost.localdomain) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/614/Wed Dec 1 07:44:43 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level:
Bug#284152: marked as done ([patch] small edits to d-i rc2 errata)
Your message dated Sat, 4 Dec 2004 17:07:31 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#284152: [patch] small edits to d-i rc2 errata has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2004 01:58:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 03 17:58:57 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from act-ironport-ext-out3.csiro.au [150.229.7.39] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CaPCL-0007QM-00; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 17:58:57 -0800 Received: from crux.tip.csiro.au (130.155.194.32) by act-ironport-ext-out3.csiro.au with SMTP; 04 Dec 2004 12:58:27 +1100 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AQAAA+k= X-IronPort-AV: i="3.87,123,1099227600"; d="scan'208"; a="19319507:sNHT50453888" Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by crux.tip.CSIRO.AU (8.9.3/8.9.3/CIPAT-2.1a) id MAA16853 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 4 Dec 2004 12:58:25 +1100 (EST) Received: from venice.tip.CSIRO.AU(130.155.194.99) via SMTP by crux.tip.CSIRO.AU, id smtpdAAAa16850; Sat Dec 4 12:58:24 2004 Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by venice.tip.CSIRO.AU (8.9.3/8.9.3/TIPAT-1.0a) with ESMTP id MAA27884 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 4 Dec 2004 12:58:23 +1100 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: venice.tip.CSIRO.AU: mci156 owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 12:58:23 +1100 (EST) From: Vincent McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [patch] small edits to d-i rc2 errata Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-559023410-1804928587-1102125503=:27800" Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS, HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_A autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info. ---559023410-1804928587-1102125503=:27800 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal This applies to http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/errata Is it correct to patch the html directly or is there some repo that I should be getting sgml from? Cheers Vince ---559023410-1804928587-1102125503=:27800 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="errata.htm.diff.linux26" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="errata.htm.diff.linux26" LS0tIGVycmF0YS5odG0ub3JpZwkyMDA0LTEyLTA0IDEyOjIxOjI2LjAwMDAw MDAwMCArMTEwMA0KKysrIGVycmF0YS5odG0JMjAwNC0xMi0wNCAxMjo1MToz Ny4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzExMDANCkBAIC0xMDcsMTUgKzEwNywxNSBAQA0KIAl2 b2x1bWVzIHdpdGhpbiB0aGUgdm9sdW1lIGdyb3VwIHdpbGwgZmFpbC4gVGhp cyBpcyBkdWUgdG8gc29tZQ0KIAl1bmZvcmVzZWVuIHF1aXJrcyBpbiBTdW4g ZGlzayBsYWJlbHMuDQogCTwvbGk+DQotCTxsaT48Yj4yLjYgaW5zdGFsbCBo YXZlIHRoZSBwb3RlbnRpYWwgdG8gbWVzcyB1cCBXaW5kb3dzIHBhcnRpdGlv bmluZy48L2I+DQotCVRoZSBmaXhlcyB0aGUgdGhlIDIuNiBDSFMgaXNzdWUg aW4gcGFydGVkIGFyZSBhcHBhcmVudGx5DQotCWluY29tcGxldGUgYW5kIHNv bWUgcGVvcGxlIGhhdmUgcmVwb3J0ZWQgdGhhdCB3aW5kb3dzIGRpZCBub3Qg Ym9vdA0KKwk8bGk+PGI+Mi42IGluc3RhbGxlciBoYXMgdGhlIHBvdGVudGlh bCB0byBtZXNzIHVwIFdpbmRvd3MgcGFydGl0aW9uaW5nLjwvYj4NCisJVGhl IGZpeGVzIHRvIHRoZSAyLjYgQ0hTIGlzc3VlIGluIHBhcnRlZCBhcmUgYXBw YXJlbnRseQ0KKwlpbmNvbXBsZXRlIGFuZCBzb21lIHBlb3BsZSBoYXZlIHJl cG9ydGVkIHRoYXQgV2luZG93cyBkaWQgbm90IGJvb3QNCiAJYWZ0ZXIgdGhl eSBpbnN0YWxsZWQgRGViaWFuLiBUaGlzIGRvZXMgbm90IHNlZW0gdG8gYWZm ZWN0IGFsbA0KIAlzeXN0ZW1zLCBvciBldmVuIG1vc3Qgc3lzdGVtcywgYnV0 IHdlIGhhdmVuJ3QgZW5vdWdoIGRhdGEgdG8gYmUNCi0Jc3VyZS4gSWYgeW91 ciB3aW5kb3dzIHBhcnRpdGlvbiBpcyBpbXBvcnRhbnQgdG8geW91IGFuZCB5 b3UgZG9uJ3QNCi0Jd2FudCB0byB0YWtlIHRoZSByaXNrLCBkbyBub3QgdXNl IHRoZSAibGludXgyNiIgYm9vdGggbWV0aG9kIGZvcg0KLQl0aGUgaW5zdGFs bGVyLCBhbmQgaW5zdGFsbCB3aXRoIGEgMi40IGtlcm5lbC4gWW91IGNhbiBh bHdheXMNCi0JdXBncmFkZSB0aGUgaW5zdGFsbGVkIGtlcm5lbCB0byAyLjYg bGF0ZXIuDQorCXN1cmUuIElmIHlvdXIgV2luZG93cyBwYXJ0aXRpb24gaXMg aW1wb3J0YW50IHRvIHlvdSBhbmQgeW91IGRvbid0DQorCXdhbnQgdG8gdGFr ZSB0aGUgcmlzaywgZG8gbm90IHVzZSB0aGUgImxpbnV4MjYiIGJvb3QgbWV0 aG9kIGZvcg0KKwl0aGUgaW5zdGFsbGVyLiBJbnN0ZWFkLCBpbnN0YWxsIHdp dGggYSAyLjQga2VybmVs
Proofread request for patch which fixes a/an errors
Hi all, I checked the website for errors related to the indefinite articles "a" and "an". As usual I found again many errors and need your approval before I apply this patch. I will not commit it when I get no OK! A short summary of this rule can be found on http://www.fortunecity.com/bally/durrus/153/gramch14.html#2 Nevertheless this article doesn't answer all my questions: Please check the following: A or an FTP|URL|HTML|LDAP? (Both versions are used regularly) Why is "an SSH (key|...)" used so often and not "a SSH"? Please note that I also attached files "a" and "an" which contain the grep output of phrases containing a resp. an where I'm not sure and which contain probably many errors too. Jens Index: CD/vendors/info.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/CD/vendors/info.wml,v retrieving revision 1.7 diff -u -r1.7 info.wml --- CD/vendors/info.wml 30 Jul 2002 00:15:58 - 1.7 +++ CD/vendors/info.wml 4 Dec 2004 21:17:25 - @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Produce your own CDs using the Official Debian CD Images. -Note that it is possible to sell the 'Official Debian CD', and add a extra disk +Note that it is possible to sell the 'Official Debian CD', and add an extra disk containing vendor additions and still use the term 'Official Debian CD'. Note: if you just want to install Debian, then you do not Index: MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-python === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-python,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 debian-python --- MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-python 15 Feb 2003 11:16:08 - 1.4 +++ MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-python 4 Dec 2004 21:17:25 - @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ Discussion of issues related to Python on Debian -systems with an stress on packaging standards. Therefore +systems with a stress on packaging standards. Therefore relevant for maintainers of Python related packages. Index: MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-ruby === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-ruby,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 debian-ruby --- MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-ruby 14 Mar 2004 14:47:32 - 1.1 +++ MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-ruby 4 Dec 2004 21:17:25 - @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ Discussion of issues related to Ruby on Debian systems -with an stress on packaging standards. Therefore +with a stress on packaging standards. Therefore relevant for maintainers of Ruby related packages. Index: MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-sgml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-sgml,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 debian-sgml --- MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-sgml 15 Feb 2003 11:16:08 - 1.4 +++ MailingLists/desc/devel/debian-sgml 4 Dec 2004 21:17:25 - @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Discussion of issues related to SGML on Debian systems -with an stress on proper integration of tools, packaging +with a stress on proper integration of tools, packaging standards and the writing of documentation for SGML users. Therefore relevant for maintainers of SGML related packages. Index: News/weekly/2000/34/index.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/News/weekly/2000/34/index.wml,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 index.wml --- News/weekly/2000/34/index.wml 2 Oct 2004 19:56:49 - 1.6 +++ News/weekly/2000/34/index.wml 4 Dec 2004 21:17:26 - @@ -37,12 +37,12 @@ -This week's security fixes are: A update to +This week's security fixes are: An update to curl fixing a remotely-exploitable buffer overflow, a fix for a printf formatting attack in nis, a fix for a remote exploit in php3 and -php4, and a update to +php4, and an update to traceroute fixing a local root exploit. Index: News/weekly/2001/2/mail.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/News/weekly/2001/2/mail.wml,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 mail.wml --- News/weekly/2001/2/mail.wml 20 Feb 2001 02:09:41 - 1.2 +++ News/weekly/2001/2/mail.wml 4 Dec 2004 21:17:26 - @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ From: Thierry Laronde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 22:27:05 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel-announce@lists.debian.org -Subject: News about Debian Conference... and have an happy new year ! +Subject: News about Debian Conference... and have a happy new year! Hello, -First, I'd like to wish you all an happy new year ! +First, I'd like to wish you all a happy new year! Here are some news about the Debian Conference 1. @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ First of all, the "Speech from the Throne" where we will hear about the past, present and future of Debian : we do need t
CSS for packages.debian.org, was: switching packages.debian.org first?
Am Freitag, 03.12.04 um 00:44 Uhr schrieb Frank Lichtenheld: Just a little addition to the whole XHTML, CSS discussion: If someone would provide me with a sample layout for packages.debian.org and a CSS file I could switch these pages within a day to this new layout. I got a new cvs tree yesterday and apply changes there now. Seems Denis's changes have made it a bit easier. Most work is recompliling and look, where I was in error. If you want something similar (debian pages should have a similar look and feel), I can do that, if someone tells me what to get where, to figure out, what has to be done. I do not know, if someone cares, but I cannot view the pages with InError Browser else than that for OS X 10.2. The Debian Women Pages needed a workaround for that versions, I have no access here (only OS X and Debian GNU Linux). greetings Jutta -- http://www.witch.westfalen.de http://witch.muensterland.org
Bug#284082: Incomplete entry in the errata of rc2
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 05:45:16PM +1100, Vincent McIntyre wrote: > > Here is the same patch, but this time against the website cvs. Yes, the text is correct. I used your text to create another shorter version that fits in one paragraph. Anton Zinoviev --- errata-orig.wml Sat Dec 4 14:23:13 2004 +++ errata.wml Sat Dec 4 14:23:01 2004 @@ -43,11 +43,13 @@ As a workaround, use a different guided partitioning profile or partition your disk manually. - LVM failure on Sparc32 (at least). - If you want to create LVM volume groups, the physical volumes must not - reside at the beginning of the disk, or else activating new logical - volumes within the volume group will fail. This is due to some - unforeseen quirks in Sun disk labels. + Erased partition table on Sparc (at least). + On Sparc (and other machines with Sun disk label) + users may not create swap space partitions, + or partitions for LVM or RAID, at the beginning of the + disk. When users do this, the partition table resides in the + first partition and will be subsequently completely erased when + this partition is used. 2.6 install have the potential to mess up Windows partitioning. The fixes of the 2.6 CHS issue in parted are apparently
Minute Man? No More!
Selling every prescription u can think of! http://www.someone8avenue.info/?Z5r/LhNo/f=2/jBAUQ backside cerebellum public drudge organ central rosette at constantinople ribose
Re: problem
He says he doesn't want any informations about Debian, and that Debian's webpage appeared on his screen. I suppose that it's usual situation with newly installed Apache. I'm trying to explain him that Debian has nothing to do with that. On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 10:03:05AM +0100, Krzysztof Polanowski wrote: > Wasza strona wcisnęła mi sie do kompa.Nie chcę ,żadnych informacji na > temat debiana itp Debian nie ma nic wspólnego z tą stroną. No może poza faktem, że Twój dostawca sieci najwyraźniej używa Debiana. Strona, którą zobaczyłeś jest po prostu domyślną stroną po instalacji serwera WWW w systemie Debian. Kontaktuj się ze swoim dostawcą sieci jeśli problem będzie się powtarzał. Tutaj naprawdę nikt Ci w tej sprawie nie pomoże. To tak jakbyś pisał do producenta mopów, że sprzątaczka źle wyczyściła klatkę schodową. pozdr, fEnIo -- _ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo _|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska (0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
problem
Witam Wasza strona wcisnęła mi sie do kompa.Nie chcę ,żadnych informacji na temat debiana itp
Re: broken Polish translations
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:12:37AM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: [...] > > are 'broken'. Instead of normal html page user can see only very few > > words about some mailing list or just a blank page... > > Blank page is the most common result for me. It is likely that www-master disk is full, someone needs to remove useless stuff, and then all empty files wrongly generated. But few people have access to this machine. Denis
Bug#284082: Incomplete entry in the errata of rc2
Here is the same patch, but this time against the website cvs. Vince Index: webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml,v retrieving revision 1.61 diff -u -r1.61 errata.wml --- webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml3 Dec 2004 18:20:04 - 1.61 +++ webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml4 Dec 2004 06:43:20 - @@ -46,8 +46,24 @@ LVM failure on Sparc32 (at least). If you want to create LVM volume groups, the physical volumes must not reside at the beginning of the disk, or else activating new logical - volumes within the volume group will fail. This is due to some - unforeseen quirks in Sun disk labels. + volumes within the volume group will fail. + + This happens because the Sun disk label resides at the beginning + of the disk and the first partition may start from the beginning + of the disk. Hence the partition table becomes part of the first + partition. Most file systems are smart enough not to write data + at the start of their partition (which in this case clobbers the + partition table). Two important types of partition where data + will be written to the start of the partion are the physical + volumes for LVM or RAID, and swap space. + + + Therefore, on Sparc32 (at least) users may not create + swap space partitions, or partitions for LVM or RAID, at the + beginning of the disk. If users do this, the partition table + will subsequently be completely erased when the partition is used, + for example when booting a freshly installed system. + 2.6 install have the potential to mess up Windows partitioning. The fixes of the 2.6 CHS issue in parted are apparently
Bug#284152: [patch] small edits to d-i rc2 errata
> http://www.debian.org/devel/website/
thanks for the pointer.
Here is a diff against the cvs. I didn't do any of the translations.
At present I am trying to understand how all this works so I tried a
very simple change.
If it isn't useful, feel free to close this bug.
Vince
Index: webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.61
diff -u -r1.61 errata.wml
--- webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml3 Dec 2004 18:20:04
- 1.61
+++ webwml/english/devel/debian-installer/errata.wml4 Dec 2004 06:13:09
-
@@ -49,15 +49,15 @@
volumes within the volume group will fail. This is due to some
unforeseen quirks in Sun disk labels.
- 2.6 install have the potential to mess up Windows
partitioning.
+ 2.6 installer has the potential to mess up Windows
partitioning.
The fixes of the 2.6 CHS issue in parted are apparently
- incomplete and some people have reported that windows did not boot
+ incomplete and some people have reported that Windows did not boot
after they installed Debian. This does not seem to affect all
systems, or even most systems, but we haven't enough data to be
- sure. If your windows partition is important to you and you don't
+ sure. If your Windows partition is important to you and you don't
want to take the risk, do not use the "linux26" boot method for
- the installer, and install with a 2.4 kernel. You can always
- upgrade the installed kernel to 2.6 later.
+ the installer, and install with a 2.4 kernel ("linux" boot method).
+ You can always upgrade the installed kernel to 2.6 later.
