Re: Erro de Página
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 To debian-www: Ailton is complaining that the given URL returns an error, I'm explaining to him what debian-www is about and pointing him that kdelibs4 does not exist in the current "stable". On 25-10-2007 13:15, Ailton Leite de Moraes wrote: > Prezados Senhores, Olá Ailton, > O endereço http://packages.debian.org/stable/libs/kdelibs4 está apresentando > erro de página. Sim, porque o pacote kdelibs4 não está disponível na versão "stable" do Debian, acesse: http://packages.debian.org/kdelibs4 e você verá em quais versões ela existe. > Fineza nos informar se o nome do referido endereço foi alterado. O endereço não foi alterado, embora o serviço por trás do site packages.debian.org tenha sido atualizado. De qualquer forma, eu gostaria de chamar a atenção para alguns detalhes, a debian-www é uma lista de discussão pública usada pela equipe que dá manutenção no site web do Debian, a língua oficial da lista é o inglês. Para dúvidas e questões técnicas, você pode usar uma outra lista, esta sim em português, a d-u-p: http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-portuguese > Obrigado, > Ailton Leite de Moraes > Participante do Curso GanttProject De nada, Abraço, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHIVnuCjAO0JDlykYRAsrzAKClpKiXpoW6rCqfd24VI4LiRnMlawCdERV4 UKvkUQK20A5xDegtIOrdJkM= =LZp+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#103975: whacking cock for Beverley
Mac's queen-size erectile organ http://mcattk.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#100188: Gain a biggish phallus Fern
extended massive shlong for Willa http://mcattk.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444965: Rather obvious phallus Muriel
elephantin rod for Esmeralda http://mcattk.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444965: grow a sizeable fuckstick Gilbert
titanic shaft for Dexter http://maszon.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#238245: Taylor's queen-sized rod
Lillie's fat cock http://maszon.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Erro de Página
Prezados Senhores, O endereço http://packages.debian.org/stable/libs/kdelibs4 está apresentando erro de página. Fineza nos informar se o nome do referido endereço foi alterado. Obrigado, Ailton Leite de Moraes Participante do Curso GanttProject <>
Re: Mentioning proposed-updates on the main website
Hi, From: Luk Claes Subject: Re: Mentioning proposed-updates on the main website Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:03:18 +0200 > > From: Josip Rodin > > Subject: Re: Mentioning proposed-updates on the main website > > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:57:13 +0200 > > > >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > >>> As you may (or may not) know proposed-updates is used as a basis for the > >>> next point release. As such it would be good that people would use it > >>> more so we find most bugs *before* a point release. To make this happen > >>> I want to mention proposed-updates more visibly on the main website. > >>> Does anyone have good ideas how and where on the website I should > >>> mention proposed-updates (and oldstable-proposed-updates and maybe the > >>> process involved)? > >> /releases/stable/errata actually includes some information about > >> that, but I'm not sure where else. Maybe we need a new page called > >> /releases/proposed-updates that explains the concept better, and > >> then link that one from other places? > > > > FYI http://www.debian.org/security/faq#proposed-updates currently > > explains that. Also, > > It only explains it very briefly and only to illustrate the connection > with the security archive... Yes, I agree. > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/proposed-updates.html shows the status. > > > > I worry about the status of the proposed updates. Those packages are > > not always released; only packages accepted by the Stable Release > > Manager are released and other packages will be dropped. So, IMHO > > those packages should not be recommended, unlike security updates. > > Enough explanation will be required. > > Wrong. The status shows what's in the p-u-new queue. All that is > accepted is in proposed-updates and gets released in the next point > release... Oh, sorry, I misunderstood. I didn't know about the NEW queue of the proposed-updates. Thank you for explanation. Now that what I worried has gone, I'm +1 on your idea. Regards, -nori -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mentioning proposed-updates on the main website
Kobayashi Noritada wrote: Hi, From: Josip Rodin Subject: Re: Mentioning proposed-updates on the main website Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:57:13 +0200 On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: As you may (or may not) know proposed-updates is used as a basis for the next point release. As such it would be good that people would use it more so we find most bugs *before* a point release. To make this happen I want to mention proposed-updates more visibly on the main website. Does anyone have good ideas how and where on the website I should mention proposed-updates (and oldstable-proposed-updates and maybe the process involved)? /releases/stable/errata actually includes some information about that, but I'm not sure where else. Maybe we need a new page called /releases/proposed-updates that explains the concept better, and then link that one from other places? FYI http://www.debian.org/security/faq#proposed-updates currently explains that. Also, It only explains it very briefly and only to illustrate the connection with the security archive... http://ftp-master.debian.org/proposed-updates.html shows the status. I worry about the status of the proposed updates. Those packages are not always released; only packages accepted by the Stable Release Manager are released and other packages will be dropped. So, IMHO those packages should not be recommended, unlike security updates. Enough explanation will be required. Wrong. The status shows what's in the p-u-new queue. All that is accepted is in proposed-updates and gets released in the next point release... One more reason to have proper documentation... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mentioning proposed-updates on the main website
Hi, From: Josip Rodin Subject: Re: Mentioning proposed-updates on the main website Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:57:13 +0200 > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:13:19PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > As you may (or may not) know proposed-updates is used as a basis for the > > next point release. As such it would be good that people would use it > > more so we find most bugs *before* a point release. To make this happen > > I want to mention proposed-updates more visibly on the main website. > > Does anyone have good ideas how and where on the website I should > > mention proposed-updates (and oldstable-proposed-updates and maybe the > > process involved)? > > /releases/stable/errata actually includes some information about > that, but I'm not sure where else. Maybe we need a new page called > /releases/proposed-updates that explains the concept better, and > then link that one from other places? FYI http://www.debian.org/security/faq#proposed-updates currently explains that. Also, http://ftp-master.debian.org/proposed-updates.html shows the status. I worry about the status of the proposed updates. Those packages are not always released; only packages accepted by the Stable Release Manager are released and other packages will be dropped. So, IMHO those packages should not be recommended, unlike security updates. Enough explanation will be required. Many thanks, -nori -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What's the proper comma usage in DSAs?
On Thu Oct 25, 2007 at 08:30:12 +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > For the stable distribution (etch), this problem has been fixed > For the stable distribution (etch) this problem has been fixed > I prefer the latter, but I might have been guilty of using both. > PS: Should I CC: the security team or debian-l10n-english for such > mails? What's the proper address? It wouldn't hurt, but I think many of us read here too. The address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: links roto!
Hello Ignacio, On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:25:25AM -0300, Ignacio Oyarzun C. wrote: > http://www.fs-security.com/download.php > *Debian Stable 3.1* (Sarge) (available through apt-get out of the box) > > [*NO*] http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/firestarter*.html* > [*YES*] http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/firestarter True, but the broken link is on the fs-security site, not on the Debian one. So you should contact the fs-security site. Regards -- Simon Paillard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
