Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Nov 2003 14:39:09 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 11 08:39:00 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailbox.surfeu.at (surfeu.at) [212.197.128.120] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AJZfX-0007gs-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 08:38:59 -0600 Received: from [81.5.248.247] ([81.5.248.247] verified) by surfeu.at (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 64881408 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:38:57 +0100 Received: from ametzler by downhill.univie.ac.at with local (Exim 4.24) id 1AJZbE-0007zX-C3 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:34:32 +0100 Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:34:32 +0100 From: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: packages.debian.org: search_packages does not find package "which" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: BCF7 1345 BE42 B5B8 1A57 EE09 1D33 9C65 8B8D 7663 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: www.debian.org Version: unavailable; reported 2003-11-11 Severity: normal http://packages.debian.org/which returns an empty list, however the package is there, see bugs.d.o or packages.qa.d.o or /debian/pool/main/w/which/. You might want to merge this with #195614 which might be caused by the same bug. cu andreas --------------------------------------- Received: (at 131631-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:06 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net) by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt)) id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 Received: from 217.234.62.246 (SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank) by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET) Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-www@lists.debian.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal References: In-Reply-To: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 X-Spam-Level: Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail): * Contain information about non-i386 packages Closes: #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages should support multiple architectures Closes: #23350 merged bug Closes: #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms has a package been compiled Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are missing Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is outdated * Include DDTP translations * Better parsing/using of input data Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and non-US/non-free mixed together Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared * Handle virtual packages Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package names when listing dependencies. Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead to doubled dependencies * Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big * Minor fixes: Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for related packages when none of them exist Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug Closes: #221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview I will leave "#224143: www.debian.org: Packages.debian.org still not restored" open until search_packages is back, too. Special thanks to Joey for his work to get this done and to Joy for his feedback while writing the scripts. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld