Uncoordinated change in lenny D-I page

2009-02-15 Thread Frans Pop
I just noticed the following change in the website:

! Revision 1.10 - (view) (download) (as text) (annotate) - [select for diffs] 
!  Sun Feb 15 11:40:13 2009 UTC (4 hours, 24 minutes ago) by spaillar 
! Switch the place of CD/DVD ISO and bittorrent, so that bittorrent is first in 
the list


Is there any reason why this change was not first discussed with the
D-I and debian-cd teams?

Cheers,
FJP


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Uncoordinated change in lenny D-I page

2009-02-15 Thread Luk Claes
Frans Pop wrote:
 I just noticed the following change in the website:
 
 ! Revision 1.10 - (view) (download) (as text) (annotate) - [select for diffs] 
 !  Sun Feb 15 11:40:13 2009 UTC (4 hours, 24 minutes ago) by spaillar 
 ! Switch the place of CD/DVD ISO and bittorrent, so that bittorrent is first 
 in the list
 
 
 Is there any reason why this change was not first discussed with the
 D-I and debian-cd teams?

Because it's due to a mirror issue and is only cosmetical, no?

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Uncoordinated change in lenny D-I page

2009-02-15 Thread Frans Pop
Luk Claes wrote:
 Frans Pop wrote:
 Is there any reason why this change was not first discussed with the
 D-I and debian-cd teams?
 
 Because it's due to a mirror issue

How does that mean that the change should not be discussed with the teams 
who've created and do most of the maintenance of the page?

 and is only cosmetical, no? 

No. If it's only cosmetic there's no reason to change it at all.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Uncoordinated change in lenny D-I page

2009-02-15 Thread Luk Claes
Frans Pop wrote:
 Luk Claes wrote:
 Frans Pop wrote:
 Is there any reason why this change was not first discussed with the
 D-I and debian-cd teams?
 Because it's due to a mirror issue
 
 How does that mean that the change should not be discussed with the teams 
 who've created and do most of the maintenance of the page?
 
 and is only cosmetical, no? 
 
 No. If it's only cosmetic there's no reason to change it at all.

Only cosmetical to the D-I and debian-cd teams, not to the mirror team
of course.

Cheers

Luk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org