Re: [debian-x] A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Gordon Heydon

Thanks - I didn't relise that it did that now in my smaller resolutions
did the pan and scan thing

Oh well I will have to play with the fonts and stuff so I can use it
quite easily.

Thanks again
Gordon.
* Seth Arnold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Gorden, I have a suggestion; while I have 1600x1200 in my Modes line, I
> also run 1600x1200 all the time. So, I can't say one way or another if
> this will work.
> 
> But, if I were a programmer at XFree86, I would start up in the first
> resolution listed with a desktop that size. Resolution changes downward
> would use a virtual desktop, resolution changes upward would increase
> (temporarily) the screen resolution.
> 
> So, try putting 1600x1200 at the end of your Modes list.
> 
> If that doesn't work, there is a Virtual entry in the display
> subsection. Full details are in XF86Config(5) (well, some details. Full
> details are in the source code. :) It might be able to help you. :)
> 
> * Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000930 18:07]:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > First off I would like to thank Branden for all the great work he is
> > doing.
> > 
> > Secound I am having a little problem. I doing think it is a problem with
> > the packages but more of a configuration problem. 
> > 
> > When I put the more "1600x1200" into my list of mode lines I get as
> > expected 1600x1200 except that in all other resulutions I get a
> > 1600x1200 screen size on a what ever resolution screen, the screen then
> > does a pan and scan of the 1600x1200 area.
> > 
> > I don't use 1600x1200 that offen but I do like to have it there without
> > having to edit my XF86Config nd restart my X Server everytime.
> > 
> > Thanks in advance
> > Gordon.
> > 
> > 
> > --  
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 12:05:41PM +1100, Gordon Heydon wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> First off I would like to thank Branden for all the great work he is
> doing.
> 
> Secound I am having a little problem. I doing think it is a problem with
> the packages but more of a configuration problem. 
> 
> When I put the more "1600x1200" into my list of mode lines I get as
> expected 1600x1200 except that in all other resulutions I get a
> 1600x1200 screen size on a what ever resolution screen, the screen then
> does a pan and scan of the 1600x1200 area.
> 
> I don't use 1600x1200 that offen but I do like to have it there without
> having to edit my XF86Config nd restart my X Server everytime.

At least in XF3, this was not possible.  It might have changed in XF4,
but I severely doubt it.  It's a limitation of the X protocol; the root
window can not be resized.

Dan

/\  /\
|   Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002   |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University   |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
\/  \/



Re: phase2v12, 2.4-test9-pre7 and DRI again.

2000-09-30 Thread Sean
I'm running the phase2v12 debs and a 2.4.0-test7 kernel with a G400Max.

In order to run DRI I grabbed the latest CVS from dri.sourceforge.net,
did a compile, and grabbed the mga.o file that was created. I much prefer
this method to using the module that comes with the kernel, as it is not
as up to date.

Sean

On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 04:56:49AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a couple of days ago I read that report from unworking DRI with phase2v10
> and kernel 2.4-test8. I've installed the test9-pre7 -kernel, but DRI do not 
> work
> anyway.
> 
> Every GL-app gives the error message:
> 
> Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x14) in reply type 0x0!
> X Error of failed request:  BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
>   Major opcode of failed request:  0 ()
>   Serial number of failed request:  0
>   Current serial number in output stream:  20
> 
> My video-adapter is Matrox G400 32mt.
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



phase2v12, 2.4-test9-pre7 and DRI again.

2000-09-30 Thread amijuli
Just a couple of days ago I read that report from unworking DRI with phase2v10
and kernel 2.4-test8. I've installed the test9-pre7 -kernel, but DRI do not work
anyway.

Every GL-app gives the error message:

Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x14) in reply type 0x0!
X Error of failed request:  BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
  Major opcode of failed request:  0 ()
  Serial number of failed request:  0
  Current serial number in output stream:  20

My video-adapter is Matrox G400 32mt.



Re: A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Seth Arnold
Gorden, I have a suggestion; while I have 1600x1200 in my Modes line, I
also run 1600x1200 all the time. So, I can't say one way or another if
this will work.

But, if I were a programmer at XFree86, I would start up in the first
resolution listed with a desktop that size. Resolution changes downward
would use a virtual desktop, resolution changes upward would increase
(temporarily) the screen resolution.

So, try putting 1600x1200 at the end of your Modes list.

If that doesn't work, there is a Virtual entry in the display
subsection. Full details are in XF86Config(5) (well, some details. Full
details are in the source code. :) It might be able to help you. :)

* Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000930 18:07]:
> Hello,
> 
> First off I would like to thank Branden for all the great work he is
> doing.
> 
> Secound I am having a little problem. I doing think it is a problem with
> the packages but more of a configuration problem. 
> 
> When I put the more "1600x1200" into my list of mode lines I get as
> expected 1600x1200 except that in all other resulutions I get a
> 1600x1200 screen size on a what ever resolution screen, the screen then
> does a pan and scan of the 1600x1200 area.
> 
> I don't use 1600x1200 that offen but I do like to have it there without
> having to edit my XF86Config nd restart my X Server everytime.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Gordon.
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Gordon Heydon
Hello,

First off I would like to thank Branden for all the great work he is
doing.

Secound I am having a little problem. I doing think it is a problem with
the packages but more of a configuration problem. 

When I put the more "1600x1200" into my list of mode lines I get as
expected 1600x1200 except that in all other resulutions I get a
1600x1200 screen size on a what ever resolution screen, the screen then
does a pan and scan of the 1600x1200 area.

I don't use 1600x1200 that offen but I do like to have it there without
having to edit my XF86Config nd restart my X Server everytime.

Thanks in advance
Gordon.



Re: A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz

On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 12:05:41PM +1100, Gordon Heydon wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> First off I would like to thank Branden for all the great work he is
> doing.
> 
> Secound I am having a little problem. I doing think it is a problem with
> the packages but more of a configuration problem. 
> 
> When I put the more "1600x1200" into my list of mode lines I get as
> expected 1600x1200 except that in all other resulutions I get a
> 1600x1200 screen size on a what ever resolution screen, the screen then
> does a pan and scan of the 1600x1200 area.
> 
> I don't use 1600x1200 that offen but I do like to have it there without
> having to edit my XF86Config nd restart my X Server everytime.

At least in XF3, this was not possible.  It might have changed in XF4,
but I severely doubt it.  It's a limitation of the X protocol; the root
window can not be resized.

Dan

/\  /\
|   Daniel Jacobowitz|__|SCS Class of 2002   |
|   Debian GNU/Linux Developer__Carnegie Mellon University   |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |  |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |
\/  \/


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: phase2v12, 2.4-test9-pre7 and DRI again.

2000-09-30 Thread Sean

I'm running the phase2v12 debs and a 2.4.0-test7 kernel with a G400Max.

In order to run DRI I grabbed the latest CVS from dri.sourceforge.net,
did a compile, and grabbed the mga.o file that was created. I much prefer
this method to using the module that comes with the kernel, as it is not
as up to date.

Sean

On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 04:56:49AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a couple of days ago I read that report from unworking DRI with phase2v10
> and kernel 2.4-test8. I've installed the test9-pre7 -kernel, but DRI do not work
> anyway.
> 
> Every GL-app gives the error message:
> 
> Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x14) in reply type 0x0!
> X Error of failed request:  BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
>   Major opcode of failed request:  0 ()
>   Serial number of failed request:  0
>   Current serial number in output stream:  20
> 
> My video-adapter is Matrox G400 32mt.
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




phase2v12, 2.4-test9-pre7 and DRI again.

2000-09-30 Thread amijuli

Just a couple of days ago I read that report from unworking DRI with phase2v10
and kernel 2.4-test8. I've installed the test9-pre7 -kernel, but DRI do not work
anyway.

Every GL-app gives the error message:

Xlib: sequence lost (0x1 > 0x14) in reply type 0x0!
X Error of failed request:  BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes)
  Major opcode of failed request:  0 ()
  Serial number of failed request:  0
  Current serial number in output stream:  20

My video-adapter is Matrox G400 32mt.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Seth Arnold

Gorden, I have a suggestion; while I have 1600x1200 in my Modes line, I
also run 1600x1200 all the time. So, I can't say one way or another if
this will work.

But, if I were a programmer at XFree86, I would start up in the first
resolution listed with a desktop that size. Resolution changes downward
would use a virtual desktop, resolution changes upward would increase
(temporarily) the screen resolution.

So, try putting 1600x1200 at the end of your Modes list.

If that doesn't work, there is a Virtual entry in the display
subsection. Full details are in XF86Config(5) (well, some details. Full
details are in the source code. :) It might be able to help you. :)

* Gordon Heydon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000930 18:07]:
> Hello,
> 
> First off I would like to thank Branden for all the great work he is
> doing.
> 
> Secound I am having a little problem. I doing think it is a problem with
> the packages but more of a configuration problem. 
> 
> When I put the more "1600x1200" into my list of mode lines I get as
> expected 1600x1200 except that in all other resulutions I get a
> 1600x1200 screen size on a what ever resolution screen, the screen then
> does a pan and scan of the 1600x1200 area.
> 
> I don't use 1600x1200 that offen but I do like to have it there without
> having to edit my XF86Config nd restart my X Server everytime.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Gordon.
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




A small question

2000-09-30 Thread Gordon Heydon

Hello,

First off I would like to thank Branden for all the great work he is
doing.

Secound I am having a little problem. I doing think it is a problem with
the packages but more of a configuration problem. 

When I put the more "1600x1200" into my list of mode lines I get as
expected 1600x1200 except that in all other resulutions I get a
1600x1200 screen size on a what ever resolution screen, the screen then
does a pan and scan of the 1600x1200 area.

I don't use 1600x1200 that offen but I do like to have it there without
having to edit my XF86Config nd restart my X Server everytime.

Thanks in advance
Gordon.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Quick FAQ (some fonts not working)

2000-09-30 Thread Edward Betts
Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So any ideas? Have I done something dumb?
> 
> Yes, you forgot to add the font modules to your XF86Config file
> 
> Section "Module"
>   Load "freetype"
>   Load "type1"
> EndSection

Thanks. I thought it was something simple.

-- 
Don't worry  --  shop.