[HOWTO] Downgrade from 4.0.1-0 to 3.3.6

2000-10-22 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom


 I tried to get XFree86 4.0.1 working on my laptop, but cannot.  I
 decided to just downgrade for now, so I can use it.  Here's how I did
 it, in case anyone else needs to do the similar.

 dpkg --list | grep '4.0.1-0' | awk '{print $2;}' | xargs --remove --force-depends 
--auto-deconfigure

 editor /etc/apt/sources.list
  comment off the lines pointing to the experimental X packages

 apt-get update

 apt-get -f install

 That's it.  It's still running now, but should be straightforward
 getting it going again, once I figured the other part out.

-- 
We should not penalize the conscientious to coddle those who run brain-dead software.
I am karlheg, of deB.ORG.  You will be freed.  Resistance is useful.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom)
http://www.debian.org/~karlheg


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




off-topic: howto build x4-debs for potato

2000-10-22 Thread Jens Thiele

I wouldn't do it again (it seems like building plain x4 and installing
it in parallel to
the current x debs is the best choice if you must get new hardware
working)
anyway my experience:
http://www-ti.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/~thiele/x4debian_potato_and_nvidia.html

--
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC   Karme 
HPhttp://www-ti.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/~thiele


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




VSZ memory of X

2000-10-22 Thread Christian Hammers

Hi

My X uses 80M of VSZ but only 8M of RSS memory. The eight megabytes seams
reasonably for an X server but why is the VSZ part so high? Does every
program that runs under X request it from X and so raises X's memory 
statistic?

I'm asking because I have only 64M and trying to save every bit...

bye,

 -christian-

-- 
Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet  Security for ProfessionalsFax 0241/911879
   WESTEND ist CISCO Systems Partner - Premium Certified


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: VSZ memory of X

2000-10-22 Thread Joshua Shagam

On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 07:59:09PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
 Hi
 
 My X uses 80M of VSZ but only 8M of RSS memory. The eight megabytes seams
 reasonably for an X server but why is the VSZ part so high? Does every
 program that runs under X request it from X and so raises X's memory 
 statistic?

Requested size is just the size of the memory footprint as it appears in
the page table.  My X server always reports about 160MB 'usage', likely
because of the way AGP is implemented in the kernel; similarly, my 3D
engine reports 160MB usage (for probably the same reason) when its RSS is
only 32 (and even that's when my LOD cache has become oversaturated, but
that's another matter).

Basically, the VSZ is just the *potential* usage, whereas the RSS is
*actual* usage.  Pay no mind to VSZ for anything which does funky memory
mapper tricks.

As a simple test of this, do a malloc() on some egregriously large amount
of memory (say, 64MB), but don't actually use it, and look as the VSZ vs.
RSS of the program.  Linux uses an allocate-on-demand policy for large
allocations (technically, it mmap()s /dev/zero, and mmap is a nice generic
interface to the pagetable), so even though it has 64MB of *potential*
memory usage, only the memory which has actually been touched is actually
allocated.  It's a similar issue with the X server et al.

-- 
Joshua Shagam  /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam   X  No Word docs in email
mp3.com/fluffyporcupine/ \ Respect for open standards


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: VSZ memory of X

2000-10-22 Thread Seth Arnold

Hmm. Just last night, I decided it was time to go to sleep once my X got
up to 192M of VSZ and 120M RSS. While quitting, my machine hung. :-/
Sysrq was good enough to sync and unmount, but not reboot. Oh well.

Has anyone else noticed strange memory use with recent phase2 .debs?

* Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001022 10:57]:
 Hi
 
 My X uses 80M of VSZ but only 8M of RSS memory. The eight megabytes seams
 reasonably for an X server but why is the VSZ part so high? Does every
 program that runs under X request it from X and so raises X's memory 
 statistic?
 
 I'm asking because I have only 64M and trying to save every bit...
 
 bye,
 
  -christian-
 
 -- 
 Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet  Security for ProfessionalsFax 0241/911879
WESTEND ist CISCO Systems Partner - Premium Certified
 
 
 --  
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: rendition support in dexter

2000-10-22 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 02:04:18PM +0200, Hein-Jan Leliveld wrote:
 In the latest phase2 debs (v20) it isn't possible to choose a rendition
 x-server in dexter. If I manually edit the XF86Config-4 file to add the
 rendition video card everything works fine.

Sorry, this was an oversight.  It will be fixed in the next release.

Thanks for pointing it out.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |   If you have the slightest bit of
Debian GNU/Linux|   intellectual integrity you cannot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   support the government.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |   -- anonymous


pgpbyBb1JLWLw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[HOWTO] Downgrade from 4.0.1-0 to 3.3.6

2000-10-22 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom

 I tried to get XFree86 4.0.1 working on my laptop, but cannot.  I
 decided to just downgrade for now, so I can use it.  Here's how I did
 it, in case anyone else needs to do the similar.

 dpkg --list | grep '4.0.1-0' | awk '{print $2;}' | xargs --remove 
--force-depends --auto-deconfigure

 editor /etc/apt/sources.list
  comment off the lines pointing to the experimental X packages

 apt-get update

 apt-get -f install

 That's it.  It's still running now, but should be straightforward
 getting it going again, once I figured the other part out.

-- 
We should not penalize the conscientious to coddle those who run brain-dead 
software.
I am karlheg, of deB.ORG.  You will be freed.  Resistance is useful.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom)
http://www.debian.org/~karlheg



off-topic: howto build x4-debs for potato

2000-10-22 Thread Jens Thiele
I wouldn't do it again (it seems like building plain x4 and installing
it in parallel to
the current x debs is the best choice if you must get new hardware
working)
anyway my experience:
http://www-ti.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/~thiele/x4debian_potato_and_nvidia.html

--
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC   Karme 
HPhttp://www-ti.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/~thiele



Re: [HOWTO] Downgrade from 4.0.1-0 to 3.3.6

2000-10-22 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 12:49:39AM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
  I tried to get XFree86 4.0.1 working on my laptop, but cannot.  I
  decided to just downgrade for now, so I can use it.  Here's how I did
  it, in case anyone else needs to do the similar.

I'd appreciate knowing what problems you experienced, since Debian packages
are supposed to be downgradeable.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson |   What influenced me to atheism was
Debian GNU/Linux|   reading the Bible cover to cover.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |   Twice.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |   -- J. Michael Straczynski


pgpTUwTppmzZu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


VSZ memory of X

2000-10-22 Thread Christian Hammers
Hi

My X uses 80M of VSZ but only 8M of RSS memory. The eight megabytes seams
reasonably for an X server but why is the VSZ part so high? Does every
program that runs under X request it from X and so raises X's memory 
statistic?

I'm asking because I have only 64M and trying to save every bit...

bye,

 -christian-

-- 
Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet  Security for ProfessionalsFax 0241/911879
   WESTEND ist CISCO Systems Partner - Premium Certified



Re: [HOWTO] Downgrade from 4.0.1-0 to 3.3.6

2000-10-22 Thread Will Lowe
 I'd appreciate knowing what problems you experienced, since Debian packages
 are supposed to be downgradeable.

I did almost the same thing on my laptop the other day, except that I
--purged a fair number of the leaf nodes in the dependency tree (all of
the xfont-* stuff, and a few other things) by hand before
--force-depends'ing my way through it, and had absolutely no troubles at
all.

Will



Re: VSZ memory of X

2000-10-22 Thread Joshua Shagam
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 07:59:09PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
 Hi
 
 My X uses 80M of VSZ but only 8M of RSS memory. The eight megabytes seams
 reasonably for an X server but why is the VSZ part so high? Does every
 program that runs under X request it from X and so raises X's memory 
 statistic?

Requested size is just the size of the memory footprint as it appears in
the page table.  My X server always reports about 160MB 'usage', likely
because of the way AGP is implemented in the kernel; similarly, my 3D
engine reports 160MB usage (for probably the same reason) when its RSS is
only 32 (and even that's when my LOD cache has become oversaturated, but
that's another matter).

Basically, the VSZ is just the *potential* usage, whereas the RSS is
*actual* usage.  Pay no mind to VSZ for anything which does funky memory
mapper tricks.

As a simple test of this, do a malloc() on some egregriously large amount
of memory (say, 64MB), but don't actually use it, and look as the VSZ vs.
RSS of the program.  Linux uses an allocate-on-demand policy for large
allocations (technically, it mmap()s /dev/zero, and mmap is a nice generic
interface to the pagetable), so even though it has 64MB of *potential*
memory usage, only the memory which has actually been touched is actually
allocated.  It's a similar issue with the X server et al.

-- 
Joshua Shagam  /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   \ / No HTML/RTF in email
www.cs.nmsu.edu/~joshagam   X  No Word docs in email
mp3.com/fluffyporcupine/ \ Respect for open standards



Xfree86 4.0.1-0phase2v

2000-10-22 Thread Russell Coker
I am trying to get Xfree86 to work on my Voodoo 3 - 3000 video card.  I am 
running kernel 2.4.0-test9 and have libglide2 version 2000.08.08 installed.

I get a segv from Xfree86, I have attached the messages that I get on stderr 
and have pasted in the back-trace from gdb on the core file.

If you have any suggestions on further tests I can run or other things I can 
do then please let me know.  The machine in question has no important data so 
I am not afraid of trying things that have potential to cause data loss.

(gdb) bt
#0  0x4007de01 in kill () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1  0x4007dae4 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2  0x4007f1f1 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
#3  0x806dc63 in ddxGiveUp ()
#4  0x806dd06 in AbortDDX ()
#5  0x80cf7c8 in AbortServer ()
#6  0x80d0c6a in FatalError ()
#7  0x807eab2 in xf86SigHandler ()
#8  0x4007dd38 in sigaction () from /lib/libc.so.6
#9  0x806cf3f in InitOutput ()
#10 0x80bb439 in main ()
#11 0x4006ebcc in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) 

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/   Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page


XFree86 Version 4.0.1c / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 28 August 2000
	If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is newer
	than the above date, look for a newer version before reporting
	problems.  (see http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ)
Operating System: Linux 2.2.18pre15 i686 [ELF] 
Module Loader present
(==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Sun Oct 22 20:01:57 2000
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout Default Layout
(**) |--Screen Default Screen (0)
(**) |   |--Monitor Generic Monitor
(**) |   |--Device Generic Graphics Device
(**) |--Input Device Generic Keyboard
(**) XKB: rules: xfree86
(**) XKB: model: pc104
(**) XKB: layout: us
(**) |--Input Device Generic Mouse
(WW) The directory /usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic does not exist.
	Entry deleted from font path.
(**) FontPath set to unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi
(==) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb
(==) ModulePath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/modules
(--) using VT number 4

(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Module pcidata: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 0.1.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a
(II) Module scanpci: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 0.1.0
(II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a
(--) PCI:*(1:0:0) 3Dfx Interactive Voodoo3 rev 1, Mem @ 0xde00/25, 0xe200/25, I/O @ 0xd800/8
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libddc.a
(II) Module ddc: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libGLcore.a
(II) Module GLcore: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdbe.a
(II) Module dbe: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdri.a
(II) Module dri: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libdrm.a
(II) Module drm: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libextmod.a
(II) Module extmod: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.a
(II) Module glx: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libpex5.a
(II) Module pex5: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/librecord.a
(II) Module record: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.13.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libxie.a
(II) Module xie: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.a
(II) Module freetype: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.1.7
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libspeedo.a
(II) Module speedo: vendor=The XFree86 Project
	compiled for 4.0.1c, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading 

Re: VSZ memory of X

2000-10-22 Thread Seth Arnold
Hmm. Just last night, I decided it was time to go to sleep once my X got
up to 192M of VSZ and 120M RSS. While quitting, my machine hung. :-/
Sysrq was good enough to sync and unmount, but not reboot. Oh well.

Has anyone else noticed strange memory use with recent phase2 .debs?

* Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001022 10:57]:
 Hi
 
 My X uses 80M of VSZ but only 8M of RSS memory. The eight megabytes seams
 reasonably for an X server but why is the VSZ part so high? Does every
 program that runs under X request it from X and so raises X's memory 
 statistic?
 
 I'm asking because I have only 64M and trying to save every bit...
 
 bye,
 
  -christian-
 
 -- 
 Christian HammersWESTEND GmbH - Aachen und Dueren Tel 0241/701333-0
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet  Security for ProfessionalsFax 0241/911879
WESTEND ist CISCO Systems Partner - Premium Certified
 
 
 --  
 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''



xmessage

2000-10-22 Thread Frank Belew
I was going to use xmessage to clear up the error mozilla gives 
on startup with an old .mozilla dir since running it from a menu gives
no useful sign.

The problem is that when I did xmessage -f /path/to/messagefile 
it showed no real text, just an empty white box, and an Ok button.

Can anyone confirm this, and if so, is this a debian X problem, or 
upstream?

Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.0.1-0phase2v17

-- 
Frank aka Myth

The unix learning curve may be steep, but at leas you only have to climb
it once -- unknown



pgpeOQimrGJfg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


sawfish-capplet and Nvidia's driver

2000-10-22 Thread Thomas E. Vaughan

I have a machine on which I'm running the latest phase2 debs.  I have an
Nvidia GeForce 2 GTS, and I am using Nvidia's drivers.  3D stuff is really
fast, and X seems to work OK except that I cannot configure sawfish through
the gnome control panel.  Whenever, for example, I click the focus
behavior item under sawfish in the gnome control panel, the
sawfish-capplet goes off into lala land and consumes as much CPU as it can
get seemingly forever.  I am using the helix debs, but I think the same
problem occurs with the stock debian gnome debs.

Any ideas?

-- 
Thomas E. Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CIMMS/NSSL, Norman, OK, USA



Re: xmessage

2000-10-22 Thread Will Lowe
 The problem is that when I did xmessage -f /path/to/messagefile 

I'm using the 3.3.6 debs on this machine, but xmessage -f /tmp/x.msg
gives me an xmessage containing -f /tmp/x.msg, while xmessage -file
/tmp/x.msg works as expected.

Perhaps you just need to spell out -file?

Will




Re: xmessage

2000-10-22 Thread Frank Belew
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 11:34:45PM -0400, Will Lowe wrote:
  The problem is that when I did xmessage -f /path/to/messagefile 
 
 I'm using the 3.3.6 debs on this machine, but xmessage -f /tmp/x.msg
 gives me an xmessage containing -f /tmp/x.msg, while xmessage -file
 /tmp/x.msg works as expected.
 
 Perhaps you just need to spell out -file?
 
   Will
 
 
Odd, that worked, but putting the message on the command line itself didn't

Well, my purposes will now work, thanks for the debugging


-- 
Frank aka Myth

The unix learning curve may be steep, but at leas you only have to climb
it once -- unknown



pgp2LgdENLFQz.pgp
Description: PGP signature