Re: help needed to get XFree86 4.1.0 working on MIPS

2001-07-18 Thread Stephen Frost

* Branden Robinson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [I do not subscribe to debian-mips; please include debian-x when replying.]
> 
> Ryan Murray reported to me that a 4.1 compile on mips fails.

This is an update to this issue.

After adding another parameter to RANGE ('0' for pci domain) and
attempting to compile I ran into a few other problems.  First
off, write_mem_barrier was undefined under MIPS.  After looking
at some other archs I went ahead and defined it for MIPS as:

#define write_mem_barrier /* NOP */

As it is defined for a few other archs.  If someone more
familiar with this code feels this is in error, let me know.

The second problem is more difficult.  xf86WriteMmio32Be is
undefined in MIPS and is implemented under other archs in
assembly which I'm not sure what to do with.  xf86WriteMmio32Be
is used in atimach64.c (added by DaveM's big patch).  I'm not
exactly sure what it does so I'm not sure how to implement it in
C either.

> I do not have access, let alone physical access, to any mips boxen so I am
> going to rely on one of Debian's MIPS porters to resolve this problem.  I'm
> CC'ing David S. Miller as well, in case he has any insights he'd like to
> share.

I've got an r5k box with console which I'm happy to help with,
but I don't have a solution to the problem with
'xf86WriteMmio32Be'.  If anyone has any suggestions I'd be more
than happy to try them.

Stephen

 PGP signature


Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:15:43PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> At 17:47 -0500 7/18/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> >>  At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >>  >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> >>  >Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).

> >>  Do you have plans to release it to the m68k also?
> >
> >Maybe you should go look in the repository.  :)
> >
> 
>   ./config says I'm missing aclocal, autoconfig, automake, autoheader, 
> makeinfo and that my gcc doesn't work. Any advice on what provides 
> the first five members of the list can be found (grepping the stable 
> potato Packages for those isn't very informative and thought I'd ask 
> someone in the know)? I'm not sure why gcc fails ./config  --- I 
> don't have a very fast internet link but thought I'd picked up all 
> the gcc components.) I'm finding the documentation for linux m68k 
> overwhealmingly extensive and complete but maybe, a little 
> under-indexed  :-) and that's just the user-level.  Thanks, larry
> 
> Good thing I had played around with a 3b2 in my youth and this isn't 
> totally unfamiliar.
Ok, I admit, I am drinking german beer which has been imported to the US.
Somebody must have put something in there

What the *** are you talking about? What config, aclocal, etc???
Have you checked Brandens nice website? I just did (on my Amiga):
add this to /etc/apt/sources.list (as described on the page)

# X strike force
deb http://people.debian.org/~branden/ woody/$(ARCH)/

apt-get update; apt-get upgrade

eh voila, new X. I don't claim its working yet, the usual problem:
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module XFree86 Font Renderer: vendor="XFree86 Font Renderer"
compiled for 4.1.0, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) 
Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11.  Server aborting

So you have to use the 3.3.6 xserver-fbdev package with this.

If you really want to compile X yourself (which is the only explanation for
your mail, but why where you asking for an m68k version then?) you might
want to check the fine README in the source as well as the control file, to
find out what packages you need to satisfy the build-depends. And you might
want to read my other comments in the thread on debian-x, to prevent your
machine from compiling for a day, for nothing...

Christian
-- 
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/x4.0/(bit out-of-date...)



Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Larry Moore

At 17:47 -0500 7/18/01, Branden Robinson wrote:

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:

 At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
 >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
 >Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
 >
 >Binary .debs are available for i386, ia64, powerpc, and sparc.
 >
 >I forgot to add ia64 to the architecture list for the osmesa library
 >packages, but this code did compile successfully, so these packages will be
 >shipping for ia64 in the next version.

 Do you have plans to release it to the m68k also?


Maybe you should go look in the repository.  :)

(Thanks to Christian Steigies for building them.)

--



 ./config says I'm missing aclocal, autoconfig, automake, autoheader, 
makeinfo and that my gcc doesn't work. Any advice on what provides 
the first five members of the list can be found (grepping the stable 
potato Packages for those isn't very informative and thought I'd ask 
someone in the know)? I'm not sure why gcc fails ./config  --- I 
don't have a very fast internet link but thought I'd picked up all 
the gcc components.) I'm finding the documentation for linux m68k 
overwhealmingly extensive and complete but maybe, a little 
under-indexed  :-) and that's just the user-level.  Thanks, larry


Good thing I had played around with a 3b2 in my youth and this isn't 
totally unfamiliar.




Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Christian T. Steigies

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:15:43PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> At 17:47 -0500 7/18/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> >>  At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >>  >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> >>  >Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).

> >>  Do you have plans to release it to the m68k also?
> >
> >Maybe you should go look in the repository.  :)
> >
> 
>   ./config says I'm missing aclocal, autoconfig, automake, autoheader, 
> makeinfo and that my gcc doesn't work. Any advice on what provides 
> the first five members of the list can be found (grepping the stable 
> potato Packages for those isn't very informative and thought I'd ask 
> someone in the know)? I'm not sure why gcc fails ./config  --- I 
> don't have a very fast internet link but thought I'd picked up all 
> the gcc components.) I'm finding the documentation for linux m68k 
> overwhealmingly extensive and complete but maybe, a little 
> under-indexed  :-) and that's just the user-level.  Thanks, larry
> 
> Good thing I had played around with a 3b2 in my youth and this isn't 
> totally unfamiliar.
Ok, I admit, I am drinking german beer which has been imported to the US.
Somebody must have put something in there

What the *** are you talking about? What config, aclocal, etc???
Have you checked Brandens nice website? I just did (on my Amiga):
add this to /etc/apt/sources.list (as described on the page)

# X strike force
deb http://people.debian.org/~branden/ woody/$(ARCH)/

apt-get update; apt-get upgrade

eh voila, new X. I don't claim its working yet, the usual problem:
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module XFree86 Font Renderer: vendor="XFree86 Font Renderer"
compiled for 4.1.0, module version = 1.0.0
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) 
Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11.  Server aborting

So you have to use the 3.3.6 xserver-fbdev package with this.

If you really want to compile X yourself (which is the only explanation for
your mail, but why where you asking for an m68k version then?) you might
want to check the fine README in the source as well as the control file, to
find out what packages you need to satisfy the build-depends. And you might
want to read my other comments in the thread on debian-x, to prevent your
machine from compiling for a day, for nothing...

Christian
-- 
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/x4.0/(bit out-of-date...)


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> >Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
> >
> >Binary .debs are available for i386, ia64, powerpc, and sparc.
> >
> >I forgot to add ia64 to the architecture list for the osmesa library
> >packages, but this code did compile successfully, so these packages will be
> >shipping for ia64 in the next version.
> 
> Do you have plans to release it to the m68k also?

Maybe you should go look in the repository.  :)

(Thanks to Christian Steigies for building them.)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|  I just wanted to see what it looked like
Debian GNU/Linux   |  in a spotlight.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |  -- Jim Morrison
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |


pgpbwb2rB921t.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Larry Moore

At 17:47 -0500 7/18/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
>>  At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
>>  >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
>>  >Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
>>  >
>>  >Binary .debs are available for i386, ia64, powerpc, and sparc.
>>  >
>>  >I forgot to add ia64 to the architecture list for the osmesa library
>>  >packages, but this code did compile successfully, so these packages will be
>>  >shipping for ia64 in the next version.
>>
>>  Do you have plans to release it to the m68k also?
>
>Maybe you should go look in the repository.  :)
>
>(Thanks to Christian Steigies for building them.)
>
>--


  ./config says I'm missing aclocal, autoconfig, automake, autoheader, 
makeinfo and that my gcc doesn't work. Any advice on what provides 
the first five members of the list can be found (grepping the stable 
potato Packages for those isn't very informative and thought I'd ask 
someone in the know)? I'm not sure why gcc fails ./config  --- I 
don't have a very fast internet link but thought I'd picked up all 
the gcc components.) I'm finding the documentation for linux m68k 
overwhealmingly extensive and complete but maybe, a little 
under-indexed  :-) and that's just the user-level.  Thanks, larry

Good thing I had played around with a 3b2 in my youth and this isn't 
totally unfamiliar.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules

2001-07-18 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon
>> Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 > Do you all think you could package up the DRI kernel modules from the
 > x source tree?  I don't even know where to get them.

 http://people.debian.org/~mmagallo/dri/ has the DRM sources for both
 4.0.3 and 4.1.0.  You'll also find a drm.patch file there.  You can
 apply it to an unpacked drm tree and put the result alonside other
 kernel module source trees to be built using kernel-package.  You get a
 drm-__.deb that way.

-- 
Marcelo | He'd never realized that, deep down inside, what he
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | really wanted to do was make things go splat.
| -- (Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man)



Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Larry Moore

At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:

The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).

Binary .debs are available for i386, ia64, powerpc, and sparc.

I forgot to add ia64 to the architecture list for the osmesa library
packages, but this code did compile successfully, so these packages will be
shipping for ia64 in the next version.


Do you have plans to release it to the m68k also?



Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Branden Robinson

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 04:25:21PM -0500, Larry Moore wrote:
> At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> >Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
> >
> >Binary .debs are available for i386, ia64, powerpc, and sparc.
> >
> >I forgot to add ia64 to the architecture list for the osmesa library
> >packages, but this code did compile successfully, so these packages will be
> >shipping for ia64 in the next version.
> 
> Do you have plans to release it to the m68k also?

Maybe you should go look in the repository.  :)

(Thanks to Christian Steigies for building them.)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|  I just wanted to see what it looked like
Debian GNU/Linux   |  in a spotlight.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |  -- Jim Morrison
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

 PGP signature


Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Larry Moore

At 23:02 -0500 7/14/01, Branden Robinson wrote:
>The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
>Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
>
>Binary .debs are available for i386, ia64, powerpc, and sparc.
>
>I forgot to add ia64 to the architecture list for the osmesa library
>packages, but this code did compile successfully, so these packages will be
>shipping for ia64 in the next version.

Do you have plans to release it to the m68k also?


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules

2001-07-18 Thread Marcelo E. Magallon

>> Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 > Do you all think you could package up the DRI kernel modules from the
 > x source tree?  I don't even know where to get them.

 http://people.debian.org/~mmagallo/dri/ has the DRM sources for both
 4.0.3 and 4.1.0.  You'll also find a drm.patch file there.  You can
 apply it to an unpacked drm tree and put the result alonside other
 kernel module source trees to be built using kernel-package.  You get a
 drm-__.deb that way.

-- 
Marcelo | He'd never realized that, deep down inside, what he
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | really wanted to do was make things go splat.
| -- (Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man)


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV

Philip Blundell wrote:


  defined(ia64Architecture) || \
+   defined(Arm32Architecture) || \
  defined(Mc68020Architecture))



Huh, I thought it was just "ArmArchitecture".  But if it works for you...

grep Arm `find xfree86-4.1.0/build-tree/xc/ -name Imakefile -print` 
turns up only Arm32Architecture, likewise for \*.tmpl.  I can't find 
anything with ArmArchitecture...  May be a 4.1 thing?


Zeen,
--

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! 







Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Philip Blundell
>defined(ia64Architecture) || \
>+   defined(Arm32Architecture) || \
>defined(Mc68020Architecture))

Huh, I thought it was just "ArmArchitecture".  But if it works for you...

p.




Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV

Adam C Powell IV wrote:


Branden Robinson wrote:


The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).

Great!  I tried to build -0pre1v4 on ARM, but it failed; build log at 
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/xfree86_4.1.0-0pre1v4.log .  I'll try 
-0pre1v5, but it'll take a few hours. :-)


That failed too, same error.

Okay, isolated the problem.  One-line patch attached for the relevant 
Imakefile.  Are there any other PCI-based arches (HPPA)?  If so, you'll 
need lines for those as well...


It's building now with the patch put in as 
debian/patches/999_z_arm_pci.diff (you'll probably give it a different 
number, or merge it with another patch?), log-in-progress at 
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/xfree86_4.1.0-0pre1v5b.log .


I hope this works, we haven't had a working X server since 4.0.2!

Zeen,
--

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! 




--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Imakefile~Wed Jul 18 
09:39:34 2001
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Imakefile Wed Jul 18 
09:44:43 2001
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
   (defined(PpcArchitecture) || \
defined(MipsArchitecture) || \
defined(ia64Architecture) || \
+   defined(Arm32Architecture) || \
defined(Mc68020Architecture))
 
 XCOMM generic linux PCI driver (using /proc/bus/pci, requires kernel 2.2)


Re: Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules

2001-07-18 Thread hugo
On 18 Jul 2001, 05:56:35 -0400 (+), Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Warren Turkal wrote:
> >Do you all think you could package up the DRI kernel modules from the x
> >source tree?
> >I don't even know where to get them.
> 
> The DRM kernel modules are in:
> 
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/*

   If, however, you don't wish to download the entire XF86 source and
apply the DRM patches, I found the source for the latest DRI kernel
modules (without anything else) at Alan Hourihane's page
(http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh), after about 45 minutes of searching.
This is all I needed to get DRI working (on a Radeon) after I
installed 4.1.0-pre1v3.

   Hugo.

-- 
 Hugo Mills --- The Creature from the Black Logon 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "We did a risk management review. We concluded 
that there was no risk of any management."



Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV

Philip Blundell wrote:

>>   defined(ia64Architecture) || \
>>+   defined(Arm32Architecture) || \
>>   defined(Mc68020Architecture))
>>
>
>Huh, I thought it was just "ArmArchitecture".  But if it works for you...
>
grep Arm `find xfree86-4.1.0/build-tree/xc/ -name Imakefile -print` 
turns up only Arm32Architecture, likewise for \*.tmpl.  I can't find 
anything with ArmArchitecture...  May be a 4.1 thing?

Zeen,
-- 

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! 





--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:52:12PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:02:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> > Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
> Doesn't build on m68k due to a stupid... idunno, is it a bug? Or just
> unlucky coincidence?
Compiled with 2.4.6 headers, but manifest failed. New file at:

  http://auric.debian.org/~cts/xfree86-4.1.0/MANIFEST.m68k.new 

Christian



Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Philip Blundell

>defined(ia64Architecture) || \
>+   defined(Arm32Architecture) || \
>defined(Mc68020Architecture))

Huh, I thought it was just "ArmArchitecture".  But if it works for you...

p.



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV

Adam C Powell IV wrote:

> Branden Robinson wrote:
>
>> The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
>> Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
>>
> Great!  I tried to build -0pre1v4 on ARM, but it failed; build log at 
> http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/xfree86_4.1.0-0pre1v4.log .  I'll try 
> -0pre1v5, but it'll take a few hours. :-)

That failed too, same error.

Okay, isolated the problem.  One-line patch attached for the relevant 
Imakefile.  Are there any other PCI-based arches (HPPA)?  If so, you'll 
need lines for those as well...

It's building now with the patch put in as 
debian/patches/999_z_arm_pci.diff (you'll probably give it a different 
number, or merge it with another patch?), log-in-progress at 
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/xfree86_4.1.0-0pre1v5b.log .

I hope this works, we haven't had a working X server since 4.0.2!

Zeen,
-- 

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe! 





--- xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Imakefile~Wed Jul 18 09:39:34 
2001
+++ xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/Imakefile Wed Jul 18 09:44:43 
+2001
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
   (defined(PpcArchitecture) || \
defined(MipsArchitecture) || \
defined(ia64Architecture) || \
+   defined(Arm32Architecture) || \
defined(Mc68020Architecture))
 
 XCOMM generic linux PCI driver (using /proc/bus/pci, requires kernel 2.2)



Re: Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules

2001-07-18 Thread hugo

On 18 Jul 2001, 05:56:35 -0400 (+), Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Warren Turkal wrote:
> >Do you all think you could package up the DRI kernel modules from the x
> >source tree?
> >I don't even know where to get them.
> 
> The DRM kernel modules are in:
> 
> xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/*

   If, however, you don't wish to download the entire XF86 source and
apply the DRM patches, I found the source for the latest DRI kernel
modules (without anything else) at Alan Hourihane's page
(http://www.xfree86.org/~alanh), after about 45 minutes of searching.
This is all I needed to get DRI working (on a Radeon) after I
installed 4.1.0-pre1v3.

   Hugo.

-- 
 Hugo Mills --- The Creature from the Black Logon 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  "We did a risk management review. We concluded 
that there was no risk of any management."


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: XFree86 4.1.0-0pre1v5 now available; 4.1.0-1 imminent

2001-07-18 Thread Christian T. Steigies

On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 10:52:12PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 11:02:47PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > The latest prerelease of 4.1.0 .debs is now available at the X Strike
> > Force repository (see the URL in my .sig).
> Doesn't build on m68k due to a stupid... idunno, is it a bug? Or just
> unlucky coincidence?
Compiled with 2.4.6 headers, but manifest failed. New file at:

  http://auric.debian.org/~cts/xfree86-4.1.0/MANIFEST.m68k.new 

Christian


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules

2001-07-18 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Warren Turkal wrote:

>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 05:49:10 -0400
>From: Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>  charset="iso-8859-1"
>Subject: Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules
>
>Do you all think you could package up the DRI kernel modules from the x
>source tree?
>I don't even know where to get them.

The DRM kernel modules are in:

xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/*

TTYL

--
Mike A. Harris  Shipping/mailing address:
OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie,
XFree86 maintainer  Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3
Red Hat Inc.Phone: (705)949-2136
http://www.redhat.com   ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
--



Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules

2001-07-18 Thread Warren Turkal
Do you all think you could package up the DRI kernel modules from the x 
source tree?
I don't even know where to get them.



Re: xbase-clients bug

2001-07-18 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:32:50AM +0200, Alexander Brill wrote:
> Setting up xbase-clients (4.1.0-0pre1v3) ...
> ERROR: /etc/X11/xkb/compiled symbolic link does not exist.   
> Either the package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in  the package), 
> or dpkg failed to unpack it to the filesystem  (a bug in dpkg).

You can tell which happened by running dpkg-deb -c on the xbase-clients
.deb.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|   Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux   |   I met a man who wasn't there.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   He wasn't there again today,
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |   I think he's from the CIA.


pgp82wx7nfZvG.pgp
Description: PGP signature


xbase-clients bug

2001-07-18 Thread Alexander Brill
Setting up xbase-clients (4.1.0-0pre1v3) ...
ERROR: /etc/X11/xkb/compiled symbolic link does not exist.   
Either the package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in  the package), 
or dpkg failed to unpack it to the filesystem  (a bug in dpkg).

--
Alexander Brill
957 39511



Re: Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules

2001-07-18 Thread Mike A. Harris

On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Warren Turkal wrote:

>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 05:49:10 -0400
>From: Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>  charset="iso-8859-1"
>Subject: Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules
>
>Do you all think you could package up the DRI kernel modules from the x
>source tree?
>I don't even know where to get them.

The DRM kernel modules are in:

xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/*

TTYL

--
Mike A. Harris  Shipping/mailing address:
OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie,
XFree86 maintainer  Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3
Red Hat Inc.Phone: (705)949-2136
http://www.redhat.com   ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
--


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Offlist Wishlist: DRI Kernel Modules

2001-07-18 Thread Warren Turkal

Do you all think you could package up the DRI kernel modules from the x 
source tree?
I don't even know where to get them.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: xbase-clients bug

2001-07-18 Thread Branden Robinson

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:32:50AM +0200, Alexander Brill wrote:
> Setting up xbase-clients (4.1.0-0pre1v3) ...
> ERROR: /etc/X11/xkb/compiled symbolic link does not exist.   
> Either the package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in  the package), 
> or dpkg failed to unpack it to the filesystem  (a bug in dpkg).

You can tell which happened by running dpkg-deb -c on the xbase-clients
.deb.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|   Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux   |   I met a man who wasn't there.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   He wasn't there again today,
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |   I think he's from the CIA.

 PGP signature


xbase-clients bug

2001-07-18 Thread Alexander Brill

Setting up xbase-clients (4.1.0-0pre1v3) ...
ERROR: /etc/X11/xkb/compiled symbolic link does not exist.   
Either the package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in  the package), 
or dpkg failed to unpack it to the filesystem  (a bug in dpkg).

--
Alexander Brill
957 39511


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]