dpkg-reconfigure -VS- XFree86 -configure

2002-10-02 Thread John Gay
After playing with the XFree86 sources for a while, on a LFS box, I am 
wondering why Debian still has such a complex XF86Config-4 file?

I know the the 3.x series of X was a real pain to configure, but the 4.X 
series seems much easier, or maybe I've spent enough time playing with it to 
have finally figured it out for myself?

I know that on my LFS box, XFree86 -configure generates a perfectly workable 
XF86Config file that is fairly easy to understand, whereas on my Debian box, 
the XF86Config-4 file, though much better commented, seems to contain quite a 
number of extra bits and is much harder to modify without breaking things. 
But this is just my experience. 

I'm sure you have your reasons, I would be interested in hearing them. As I 
am finally learning enough about Linux and X to build my own box from scratch 
I really like to understand how and why my personal favourite Distribution 
does things.

Cheers,

John Gay



dpkg-reconfigure -VS- XFree86 -configure

2002-10-02 Thread John Gay

After playing with the XFree86 sources for a while, on a LFS box, I am 
wondering why Debian still has such a complex XF86Config-4 file?

I know the the 3.x series of X was a real pain to configure, but the 4.X 
series seems much easier, or maybe I've spent enough time playing with it to 
have finally figured it out for myself?

I know that on my LFS box, XFree86 -configure generates a perfectly workable 
XF86Config file that is fairly easy to understand, whereas on my Debian box, 
the XF86Config-4 file, though much better commented, seems to contain quite a 
number of extra bits and is much harder to modify without breaking things. 
But this is just my experience. 

I'm sure you have your reasons, I would be interested in hearing them. As I 
am finally learning enough about Linux and X to build my own box from scratch 
I really like to understand how and why my personal favourite Distribution 
does things.

Cheers,

John Gay


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

2002-10-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2002-10-02 at 21:10, Marco Lombardi wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device
> Date: 02 Oct 2002 19:11:15 +0200
> 
> > 
> > Either run radeonfb in console or don't use Option "UseFBDev".
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the quick answer.  However, I still have problems
> unfortunately...  Namely:
> 
> * I tried to use the module radeonfb.  When then I start the graphics,
>   there are no complains but the screen is unreadable (vertical lines
>   appear as diagonal stripes; it looks like the "synchronization"
>   problems that old TV set used to have... :-).

Could be disagreement between between radeonfb and the X radeon driver
about the pitch. Try another resolution?

>   I tried also to play with fbset, using different resolutions, but the
>   results I then obtain in X seem to be independent of the console
>   mode.

It is indeed independent. You should still define the modes you want to
use in the display subsection.


> * If I don't use the option "UseFBDev" everything is fine; however,
>   several programs (ehm, actually games... for example chromium) do
>   not work any more.

That can hardly be directly related. Chromium uses OpenGL, is the DRI
enabled? Do non-OpenGL games fail as well?


> In the worst case scenario I can live without UseFBdev; however, I am
> surprised that things were working so well on an old pre-release and
> are not working any more now.

What version worked? Are you sure the rest of your configuration etc.
hasn't changed since then?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast



Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

2002-10-02 Thread Michel Dänzer

On Mit, 2002-10-02 at 21:10, Marco Lombardi wrote:
> From: Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device
> Date: 02 Oct 2002 19:11:15 +0200
> 
> > 
> > Either run radeonfb in console or don't use Option "UseFBDev".
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the quick answer.  However, I still have problems
> unfortunately...  Namely:
> 
> * I tried to use the module radeonfb.  When then I start the graphics,
>   there are no complains but the screen is unreadable (vertical lines
>   appear as diagonal stripes; it looks like the "synchronization"
>   problems that old TV set used to have... :-).

Could be disagreement between between radeonfb and the X radeon driver
about the pitch. Try another resolution?

>   I tried also to play with fbset, using different resolutions, but the
>   results I then obtain in X seem to be independent of the console
>   mode.

It is indeed independent. You should still define the modes you want to
use in the display subsection.


> * If I don't use the option "UseFBDev" everything is fine; however,
>   several programs (ehm, actually games... for example chromium) do
>   not work any more.

That can hardly be directly related. Chromium uses OpenGL, is the DRI
enabled? Do non-OpenGL games fail as well?


> In the worst case scenario I can live without UseFBdev; however, I am
> surprised that things were working so well on an old pre-release and
> are not working any more now.

What version worked? Are you sure the rest of your configuration etc.
hasn't changed since then?


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

2002-10-02 Thread Marco Lombardi
From: Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device
Date: 02 Oct 2002 19:11:15 +0200

> 
> Either run radeonfb in console or don't use Option "UseFBDev".
> 

Thanks for the quick answer.  However, I still have problems
unfortunately...  Namely:

* I tried to use the module radeonfb.  When then I start the graphics,
  there are no complains but the screen is unreadable (vertical lines
  appear as diagonal stripes; it looks like the "synchronization"
  problems that old TV set used to have... :-).  I tried also to play
  with fbset, using different resolutions, but the results I then
  obtain in X seem to be independent of the console mode.

* If I don't use the option "UseFBDev" everything is fine; however,
  several programs (ehm, actually games... for example chromium) do
  not work any more.

In the worst case scenario I can live without UseFBdev; however, I am
surprised that things were working so well on an old pre-release and
are not working any more now.

Regards,

Marco Lombardi



Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

2002-10-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mit, 2002-10-02 at 14:31, Marco Lombardi wrote:
> 
> I am using the experimental Debian packages XFree86 v. 4.2.1 from X
> Strike Force on a Dell Inspiron 4100 (with ATI Radeon Mobility M6
> video card).  I was able to run the 4.2.1-0pre1v1 without problems,
> but since the second experimental pre-prelease I cannot run the X
> server any more.  More specifically, I obtain this error message
> 
> (**) RADEON(0): Using framebuffer device
> (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw"
> (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw"
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a
> (II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>   compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 0.0.2
>   ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5
> (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device
> 
> The complete log file is at the end of this message.  Note that
> everything, instead, is fine if I remove the option "UseFBDev" in my
> "Device" section of XF86Config-4:
> 
> Section "Device"
>   Identifier  "Generic Video Card"
>   Driver  "ati"
>   Option  "UseFBDev"  "true"
> EndSection

Either run radeonfb in console or don't use Option "UseFBDev".


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast



Re: xfree86 4.2.1-0pre1v2 (source,alpha,i386,hppa,powerpc,sparc) available at the X Strike Force

2002-10-02 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote:
>  - SECURITY: Implement LocalClientCred() to return the credentials of 
> local
>clients connected through Unix domain sockets on systems that have the
>required support (for now recent Linux, FreeBSD >= 4.6, OpenBSD >= 3.0
>are implemented), and use that in ShmAttach() to grant access to the
>client.  When client credentials are not available, require world
>accessibility. (Matthieu Herrb)

This is I suppose a little bit offtopic, but does openbsd use the same
getpeereid() and ucred structure as does freebsd? I suppose I should try
to pull that patch next time I'm online as anything I can do to make my
getcreds code more portable would be a good thing.

-- 
see shy jo


pgpmR88xIhAw9.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

2002-10-02 Thread Marco Lombardi

From: Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device
Date: 02 Oct 2002 19:11:15 +0200

> 
> Either run radeonfb in console or don't use Option "UseFBDev".
> 

Thanks for the quick answer.  However, I still have problems
unfortunately...  Namely:

* I tried to use the module radeonfb.  When then I start the graphics,
  there are no complains but the screen is unreadable (vertical lines
  appear as diagonal stripes; it looks like the "synchronization"
  problems that old TV set used to have... :-).  I tried also to play
  with fbset, using different resolutions, but the results I then
  obtain in X seem to be independent of the console mode.

* If I don't use the option "UseFBDev" everything is fine; however,
  several programs (ehm, actually games... for example chromium) do
  not work any more.

In the worst case scenario I can live without UseFBdev; however, I am
surprised that things were working so well on an old pre-release and
are not working any more now.

Regards,

Marco Lombardi


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [XF86 4.2.1] Blackdown JVM and Japanese Menu.

2002-10-02 Thread Peter Toneby
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:56:57AM +0900, ChanChan KO wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-0pre1v2
> Architecture: i386
> Severity: Normal
> 
> Hello,
>  I'm testing XFree86 4.2.1  built by Branden.
> 
>  When using any of Java Programs with Japanese "kanji" Menu (i.e. "King of 
> Translation v5" by IBM Japan).
>  When using IBM's JVM (included King of Translation v5), menu is displayed 
> with Kanji.

Havent tried this.

> But, using these programs with Blackdown's JVM (1.3.1 or 1.3.1.02b-2),
> Kanji is not displayed, Kanji is displaied as square.

This seems to happen with the mozilla java-plugin for me, and I'm
Swedish, so ISO-8859-1 characters are broken too.

>   When using XF86 4.2.0 pre1v3 , this issue was *not* appear, but,
>   this issue appers again with 4.2.1 pre1v2.

I can't verify this since I seldom run Java-things, but I'm using
4.2.1-0pre1v1.

/Peter
-- 
Alpha Test Version:  Too buggy to be released to the paying public. 
Beta Test Version:  Still too buggy to be released. 
Release Version:  Alternate pronunciation of "Beta Test Version". 



Re: (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

2002-10-02 Thread Michel Dänzer

On Mit, 2002-10-02 at 14:31, Marco Lombardi wrote:
> 
> I am using the experimental Debian packages XFree86 v. 4.2.1 from X
> Strike Force on a Dell Inspiron 4100 (with ATI Radeon Mobility M6
> video card).  I was able to run the 4.2.1-0pre1v1 without problems,
> but since the second experimental pre-prelease I cannot run the X
> server any more.  More specifically, I obtain this error message
> 
> (**) RADEON(0): Using framebuffer device
> (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw"
> (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw"
> (II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a
> (II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
>   compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 0.0.2
>   ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5
> (EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device
> 
> The complete log file is at the end of this message.  Note that
> everything, instead, is fine if I remove the option "UseFBDev" in my
> "Device" section of XF86Config-4:
> 
> Section "Device"
>   Identifier  "Generic Video Card"
>   Driver  "ati"
>   Option  "UseFBDev"  "true"
> EndSection

Either run radeonfb in console or don't use Option "UseFBDev".


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer
XFree86 and DRI project member   /  CS student, Free Software enthusiast


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




c&t 65555 and xfree 4.2 problems

2002-10-02 Thread Andrei Lahun

Hello.
after trying to install new 4.2 packages(4.2.0-0pre1v2 ) i have problems
with my c&t
6 card
( armada 1700). The problems is related to screen refresh , for example
after opening mozilla parts of screen is not refreshed when i use scrollbar.
After downgrading to 4.1 everything is ok.  Also i tried  chips_drv.o to
run with 4.1
also no this problem. Combination 4.1 + chips_drv (4.2) + XFree (4.2) no
problems.
Which module from 4.2 package can cause this problem ?
Xfree cvs work just fine.

regards
Andrei.






Re: xfree86 4.2.1-0pre1v2 (source,alpha,i386,hppa,powerpc,sparc) available at the X Strike Force

2002-10-02 Thread Joey Hess

Branden Robinson wrote:
>  - SECURITY: Implement LocalClientCred() to return the credentials of local
>clients connected through Unix domain sockets on systems that have the
>required support (for now recent Linux, FreeBSD >= 4.6, OpenBSD >= 3.0
>are implemented), and use that in ShmAttach() to grant access to the
>client.  When client credentials are not available, require world
>accessibility. (Matthieu Herrb)

This is I suppose a little bit offtopic, but does openbsd use the same
getpeereid() and ucred structure as does freebsd? I suppose I should try
to pull that patch next time I'm online as anything I can do to make my
getcreds code more portable would be a good thing.

-- 
see shy jo



msg03968/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [XF86 4.2.1] Blackdown JVM and Japanese Menu.

2002-10-02 Thread Peter Toneby

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:56:57AM +0900, ChanChan KO wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-0pre1v2
> Architecture: i386
> Severity: Normal
> 
> Hello,
>  I'm testing XFree86 4.2.1  built by Branden.
> 
>  When using any of Java Programs with Japanese "kanji" Menu (i.e. "King of 
> Translation v5" by IBM Japan).
>  When using IBM's JVM (included King of Translation v5), menu is displayed with 
>Kanji.

Havent tried this.

> But, using these programs with Blackdown's JVM (1.3.1 or 1.3.1.02b-2),
> Kanji is not displayed, Kanji is displaied as square.

This seems to happen with the mozilla java-plugin for me, and I'm
Swedish, so ISO-8859-1 characters are broken too.

>   When using XF86 4.2.0 pre1v3 , this issue was *not* appear, but,
>   this issue appers again with 4.2.1 pre1v2.

I can't verify this since I seldom run Java-things, but I'm using
4.2.1-0pre1v1.

/Peter
-- 
Alpha Test Version:  Too buggy to be released to the paying public. 
Beta Test Version:  Still too buggy to be released. 
Release Version:  Alternate pronunciation of "Beta Test Version". 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




c&t 65555 and xfree 4.2 problems

2002-10-02 Thread Andrei Lahun

Hello.
after trying to install new 4.2 packages(4.2.0-0pre1v2 ) i have problems
with my c&t
6 card
( armada 1700). The problems is related to screen refresh , for example
after opening mozilla parts of screen is not refreshed when i use scrollbar.
After downgrading to 4.1 everything is ok.  Also i tried  chips_drv.o to
run with 4.1
also no this problem. Combination 4.1 + chips_drv (4.2) + XFree (4.2) no
problems.
Which module from 4.2 package can cause this problem ?
Xfree cvs work just fine.

regards
Andrei.





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




(EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

2002-10-02 Thread Marco Lombardi
Dear all,

I am using the experimental Debian packages XFree86 v. 4.2.1 from X
Strike Force on a Dell Inspiron 4100 (with ATI Radeon Mobility M6
video card).  I was able to run the 4.2.1-0pre1v1 without problems,
but since the second experimental pre-prelease I cannot run the X
server any more.  More specifically, I obtain this error message

(**) RADEON(0): Using framebuffer device
(II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw"
(II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a
(II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 0.0.2
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5
(EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

The complete log file is at the end of this message.  Note that
everything, instead, is fine if I remove the option "UseFBDev" in my
"Device" section of XF86Config-4:

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Generic Video Card"
Driver  "ati"
Option  "UseFBDev"  "true"
EndSection

However, I am not sure I want to do that...  Can somebody help me?

Thank you in advance,

Marco Lombardi


N.B. My email address is

[EMAIL PROTECTED](dot)uni-bonn(dot)de

with (dot) replaced with a real dot (.).

--

XFree86 Version 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-0pre1v1 20020910202934 [EMAIL PROTECTED]) / 
X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 3 September 2002
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems.  (See http://www.XFree86.Org/)
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.18 i686 [ELF] 
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Wed Oct  2 11:41:51 2002
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
(==) ServerLayout "Default Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0)
(**) |   |-->Monitor "Generic Monitor"
(**) |   |-->Device "Generic Video Card"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard"
(**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
(**) XKB: rules: "xfree86"
(**) Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
(**) XKB: model: "pc104"
(**) Option "XkbLayout" "us"
(**) XKB: layout: "us"
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled
(**) |-->Input Device "Configured Mouse"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Mouse"
(WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(**) FontPath set to 
"unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
(==) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"
(==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
(++) using VT number 7

(II) Open APM successful
(II) Module ABI versions:
XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1
XFree86 Video Driver: 0.5
XFree86 XInput driver : 0.3
XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1
XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.3
(II) Loader running on linux
(II) LoadModule: "bitmap"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.3
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(II) LoadModule: "pcidata"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 0.1.0
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5
(II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1
(II) PCI: Config type is 1
(II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x, mode1Res1 = 0x8000
(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
(II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,3575 card , rev 02 class 06,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 8086,3576 card , rev 02 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:1d:0: chip 8086,2482 card 8086,4541 rev 01 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1e:0: chip 8086,2448 card , rev 41 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:1f:0: chip 8086,248c card , rev 01 class 06,01,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:1f:1: chip 8086,248a card 8086,4541 rev 01 class 01,01,8a hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1f:5: chip 8086,2485 card 1013,5959 rev 01 class 04,01,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1f:6: chip 8086,2486 card 134d,4c21 rev 01 class 07,03,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 1002,4c59 card 1028,00e4 rev 00 class 03,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 02:00:0: chip 10b7,9200 card 1028,00e3 rev 78 class 02,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 02:01:0: chip 104c,ac51 card e000, rev 00 class 06,07,00 hdr 82
(II) PCI: 02:01:1: chip 104c,ac51 card e800, rev 00 class 06,07,00 hdr 82
(II) PCI: End of PCI scan
(II) LoadModule: "scanpci"
(II) Load

(EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

2002-10-02 Thread Marco Lombardi

Dear all,

I am using the experimental Debian packages XFree86 v. 4.2.1 from X
Strike Force on a Dell Inspiron 4100 (with ATI Radeon Mobility M6
video card).  I was able to run the 4.2.1-0pre1v1 without problems,
but since the second experimental pre-prelease I cannot run the X
server any more.  More specifically, I obtain this error message

(**) RADEON(0): Using framebuffer device
(II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw"
(II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a
(II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 0.0.2
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5
(EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device

The complete log file is at the end of this message.  Note that
everything, instead, is fine if I remove the option "UseFBDev" in my
"Device" section of XF86Config-4:

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Generic Video Card"
Driver  "ati"
Option  "UseFBDev"  "true"
EndSection

However, I am not sure I want to do that...  Can somebody help me?

Thank you in advance,

Marco Lombardi


N.B. My email address is

lombardi@astro(dot)uni-bonn(dot)de

with (dot) replaced with a real dot (.).

--

XFree86 Version 4.2.1 (Debian 4.2.1-0pre1v1 20020910202934 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 3 September 2002
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems.  (See http://www.XFree86.Org/)
Build Operating System: Linux 2.4.18 i686 [ELF] 
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Wed Oct  2 11:41:51 2002
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config-4"
(==) ServerLayout "Default Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0)
(**) |   |-->Monitor "Generic Monitor"
(**) |   |-->Device "Generic Video Card"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard"
(**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
(**) XKB: rules: "xfree86"
(**) Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
(**) XKB: model: "pc104"
(**) Option "XkbLayout" "us"
(**) XKB: layout: "us"
(==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled
(**) |-->Input Device "Configured Mouse"
(**) |-->Input Device "Generic Mouse"
(WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist.
Entry deleted from font path.
(**) FontPath set to 
"unix/:7100,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi,/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
(==) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"
(==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
(++) using VT number 7

(II) Open APM successful
(II) Module ABI versions:
XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1
XFree86 Video Driver: 0.5
XFree86 XInput driver : 0.3
XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1
XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.3
(II) Loader running on linux
(II) LoadModule: "bitmap"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 1.0.0
Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.3
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(II) LoadModule: "pcidata"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
compiled for 4.2.1, module version = 0.1.0
ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.5
(II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1
(II) PCI: Config type is 1
(II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x, mode1Res1 = 0x8000
(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
(II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,3575 card , rev 02 class 06,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 8086,3576 card , rev 02 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:1d:0: chip 8086,2482 card 8086,4541 rev 01 class 0c,03,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1e:0: chip 8086,2448 card , rev 41 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:1f:0: chip 8086,248c card , rev 01 class 06,01,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:1f:1: chip 8086,248a card 8086,4541 rev 01 class 01,01,8a hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1f:5: chip 8086,2485 card 1013,5959 rev 01 class 04,01,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1f:6: chip 8086,2486 card 134d,4c21 rev 01 class 07,03,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 01:00:0: chip 1002,4c59 card 1028,00e4 rev 00 class 03,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 02:00:0: chip 10b7,9200 card 1028,00e3 rev 78 class 02,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 02:01:0: chip 104c,ac51 card e000, rev 00 class 06,07,00 hdr 82
(II) PCI: 02:01:1: chip 104c,ac51 card e800, rev 00 class 06,07,00 hdr 82
(II) PCI: End of PCI scan
(II) LoadModule: "scanpci"
(II) Loadin

Re: Problema with xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2

2002-10-02 Thread Ottavio Campana
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:00:57AM +0200, Martijn van de Streek wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2002, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> 
> > I've  installed xfree  4.2.1-0pre1v1  and everything  was  ok. Now  I've
> > upgraded and I've got the following problem:
> > 
> > Sorry for the messages in italian. it compalins that it cannota write in
> > the pipe in the copy (impossibile scrivere sulla pipe nella copia)
> 
> Could you retry with LC_ALL=C (temporarily)?

dirac:~# apt-get install xfonts-75dpi
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  xfonts-75dpi
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/1626kB of archives. After unpacking 4864kB will be used.
E: Archive is too short
(Reading database ... 35913 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking xfonts-75dpi (from .../xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb) ...
dpkg-deb (subprocess): short read in buffer_copy (failed to write to pipe in 
copy)
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste returned error exit status 2
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb (--unpack):
 short read in buffer_copy (backend dpkg-deb during 
`./usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/UTI___12.pcf.gz')
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
dirac:~#

Maybe it can be interesting for  you: I'm running debian woody and using
the backport of xfree 4.2.1

-- 
Non c'è più forza nella normalità, c'è solo monotonia.



Re: Problema with xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2

2002-10-02 Thread Martijn van de Streek
On Wed, 02 Oct 2002, Ottavio Campana wrote:

> I've  installed xfree  4.2.1-0pre1v1  and everything  was  ok. Now  I've
> upgraded and I've got the following problem:
> 
> Sorry for the messages in italian. it compalins that it cannota write in
> the pipe in the copy (impossibile scrivere sulla pipe nella copia)

Could you retry with LC_ALL=C (temporarily)?

Martijn
-- 
De importeur voerde niets uit.



Problema with xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2

2002-10-02 Thread Ottavio Campana
I've  installed xfree  4.2.1-0pre1v1  and everything  was  ok. Now  I've
upgraded and I've got the following problem:

Spacchettamento di xfonts-75dpi (da
.../xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb) ...
dpkg-deb (sottoprocesso): short read in buffer_copy (impossibile scrivere sulla 
pipe nella copia)
dpkg-deb: il sottoprocesso paste ha restituito un codice di errore 2
dpkg: errore processando 
/var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb (--unpack):
 short read in buffer_copy (dpkg-deb backend su 
`./usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/UTI___12.pcf.gz')
Sono occorsi degli errori processando:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb

Sorry for the messages in italian. it compalins that it cannota write in
the pipe in the copy (impossibile scrivere sulla pipe nella copia)

Bye

-- 
Non c'è più forza nella normalità, c'è solo monotonia.



Re: Problema with xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2

2002-10-02 Thread Ottavio Campana

On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:00:57AM +0200, Martijn van de Streek wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2002, Ottavio Campana wrote:
> 
> > I've  installed xfree  4.2.1-0pre1v1  and everything  was  ok. Now  I've
> > upgraded and I've got the following problem:
> > 
> > Sorry for the messages in italian. it compalins that it cannota write in
> > the pipe in the copy (impossibile scrivere sulla pipe nella copia)
> 
> Could you retry with LC_ALL=C (temporarily)?

dirac:~# apt-get install xfonts-75dpi
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  xfonts-75dpi
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0  not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/1626kB of archives. After unpacking 4864kB will be used.
E: Archive is too short
(Reading database ... 35913 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking xfonts-75dpi (from .../xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb) ...
dpkg-deb (subprocess): short read in buffer_copy (failed to write to pipe in copy)
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste returned error exit status 2
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb 
(--unpack):
 short read in buffer_copy (backend dpkg-deb during 
`./usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/UTI___12.pcf.gz')
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
dirac:~#

Maybe it can be interesting for  you: I'm running debian woody and using
the backport of xfree 4.2.1

-- 
Non c'è più forza nella normalità, c'è solo monotonia.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Problema with xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2

2002-10-02 Thread Martijn van de Streek

On Wed, 02 Oct 2002, Ottavio Campana wrote:

> I've  installed xfree  4.2.1-0pre1v1  and everything  was  ok. Now  I've
> upgraded and I've got the following problem:
> 
> Sorry for the messages in italian. it compalins that it cannota write in
> the pipe in the copy (impossibile scrivere sulla pipe nella copia)

Could you retry with LC_ALL=C (temporarily)?

Martijn
-- 
De importeur voerde niets uit.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Problema with xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2

2002-10-02 Thread Ottavio Campana

I've  installed xfree  4.2.1-0pre1v1  and everything  was  ok. Now  I've
upgraded and I've got the following problem:

Spacchettamento di xfonts-75dpi (da
.../xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb) ...
dpkg-deb (sottoprocesso): short read in buffer_copy (impossibile scrivere sulla pipe 
nella copia)
dpkg-deb: il sottoprocesso paste ha restituito un codice di errore 2
dpkg: errore processando /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb 
(--unpack):
 short read in buffer_copy (dpkg-deb backend su 
`./usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/UTI___12.pcf.gz')
Sono occorsi degli errori processando:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-0pre1v2_all.deb

Sorry for the messages in italian. it compalins that it cannota write in
the pipe in the copy (impossibile scrivere sulla pipe nella copia)

Bye

-- 
Non c'è più forza nella normalità, c'è solo monotonia.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: xfree86 4.2.1-0pre1v2 (source,alpha,i386,hppa,powerpc,sparc) available at the X Strike Force

2002-10-02 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 02:22:19PM +1000, Matt Chapman wrote:
> I think the IA64 unaligned functions should be "static __inline__" like
> the other architectures instead of "extern __inline__" (otherwise when
> optimisations are turned off in the debugging build, and those functions
> are not inlined, they are omitted).

That did it, thanks.  I thought I remembered fixing this at some point
in the past; perhaps an unintended regression took place.  Or maybe that
was for a different architecture.

Thanks again!  I'll roll an "stealth" version of 4.2.1-0pre1v2 with this
patch for ia64 and stick it up at the XSF.

All right, ARM guys, how about it?

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|If you make people think they're
Debian GNU/Linux   |thinking, they'll love you; but if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |you really make them think, they'll
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |hate you.


pgpThNrf2aNTl.pgp
Description: PGP signature