X Strike Force Render SVN commit: rev 20 - /
Author: branden Date: 2003-10-15 01:01:03 -0500 (Wed, 15 Oct 2003) New Revision: 20 Added: tags/ Log: Create tags directory. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force Render SVN commit: rev 19 - trunk/debian
Author: branden Date: 2003-10-15 01:00:18 -0500 (Wed, 15 Oct 2003) New Revision: 19 Modified: trunk/debian/control Log: (cosmetic) Use the correct name for the X Rendering Extension in the extended description of render-dev. - debian/control Modified: trunk/debian/control === --- trunk/debian/control2003-10-15 05:48:58 UTC (rev 18) +++ trunk/debian/control2003-10-15 06:00:18 UTC (rev 19) @@ -16,5 +16,5 @@ either triangles or trapezoids. Text is drawn by loading glyphs into the server and rendering sets of them. . - This package contains header files and documentation for the X Render + This package contains header files and documentation for the X Rendering extension. Library and server implementations are separate. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force Render SVN commit: rev 18 - trunk/debian
Author: branden Date: 2003-10-15 00:48:58 -0500 (Wed, 15 Oct 2003) New Revision: 18 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/control Log: Increment standards-version to 3.6.1; no changes necessary. - debian/control Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2003-10-15 05:47:19 UTC (rev 17) +++ trunk/debian/changelog 2003-10-15 05:48:58 UTC (rev 18) @@ -8,8 +8,11 @@ + use debian/tmp/ prefix on source files + consistently specify destination directories - -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:43:20 -0500 + * Increment standards-version to 3.6.1; no changes necessary. +- debian/control + -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:48:17 -0500 + render (0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low * initial release Modified: trunk/debian/control === --- trunk/debian/control2003-10-15 05:47:19 UTC (rev 17) +++ trunk/debian/control2003-10-15 05:48:58 UTC (rev 18) @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0) -Standards-Version: 3.5.9 +Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: render-dev Section: libdevel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force Render SVN commit: rev 17 - trunk/debian
Author: branden Date: 2003-10-15 00:47:19 -0500 (Wed, 15 Oct 2003) New Revision: 17 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog trunk/debian/render-dev.install trunk/debian/rules Log: Make the versioned build-dependency on debhelper truthful, and thus make this package buildable on woody by avoiding a feature introduced in debhelper 4.0.4 (the version in woody is 4.0.2). - debian/rules: do not call dh_install with --sourcedir option - debian/render-dev.install: + use debian/tmp/ prefix on source files + consistently specify destination directories Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2003-10-15 05:38:19 UTC (rev 16) +++ trunk/debian/changelog 2003-10-15 05:47:19 UTC (rev 17) @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +render (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Make the versioned build-dependency on debhelper truthful, and thus make +this package buildable on woody by avoiding a feature introduced in +debhelper 4.0.4 (the version in woody is 4.0.2). +- debian/rules: do not call dh_install with --sourcedir option +- debian/render-dev.install: + + use debian/tmp/ prefix on source files + + consistently specify destination directories + + -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 15 Oct 2003 00:43:20 -0500 + render (0.8-1) unstable; urgency=low * initial release Modified: trunk/debian/render-dev.install === --- trunk/debian/render-dev.install 2003-10-15 05:38:19 UTC (rev 16) +++ trunk/debian/render-dev.install 2003-10-15 05:47:19 UTC (rev 17) @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -usr/share/doc/render/library usr/share/doc/render-dev/ -usr/share/doc/render/protocol usr/share/doc/render-dev/ -usr/lib/pkgconfig/render.pc -usr/X11R6/include/X11/extensions/render.h -usr/X11R6/include/X11/extensions/renderproto.h +debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/render/library usr/share/doc/render-dev +debian/tmp/usr/share/doc/render/protocol usr/share/doc/render-dev +debian/tmp/usr/lib/pkgconfig/render.pc usr/lib +debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/include/X11/extensions/render.h usr/X11R6/include/X11/extensions +debian/tmp/usr/X11R6/include/X11/extensions/renderproto.h usr/X11R6/include/X11/extensions Modified: trunk/debian/rules === --- trunk/debian/rules 2003-10-15 05:38:19 UTC (rev 16) +++ trunk/debian/rules 2003-10-15 05:47:19 UTC (rev 17) @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ dh_testdir dh_testroot $(MAKE) DESTDIR=debian/tmp install - dh_install --sourcedir=debian/tmp + dh_install dh_installdocs dh_installdebconf dh_installmenu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force Render SVN commit: rev 16 - trunk/debian
Author: branden Date: 2003-10-15 00:38:19 -0500 (Wed, 15 Oct 2003) New Revision: 16 Modified: trunk/debian/changelog Log: (cosmetic) Put the Vim modeline and $Id$ expando line in "canonical" (for me) order. - debian/changelog Modified: trunk/debian/changelog === --- trunk/debian/changelog 2003-05-04 12:34:13 UTC (rev 15) +++ trunk/debian/changelog 2003-10-15 05:38:19 UTC (rev 16) @@ -8,5 +8,6 @@ -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 4 May 2003 01:39:29 -0500 + $Id$ + vim:set ai tw=78 et sw=2 sts=2: - $Id$ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#215831: xserver-xfree86: sigILL from any DRI application
retitle 215831 xlibmesa3-gl: [mga_dri] SIGILL when using any DRI application with Matrox MGA G400 AGP rev 4 reassign 215831 xlibmesa3-gl thanks On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 08:19:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.2.1-12.1 > Severity: important > > > Unlimit your coredumpsize, install xserver-xfree86-dbg, configure it to > > be your default X server, and reproduce the bug. > > > > Then, please supply a full backtrace on the core file. > > I don't see any difference in the backtrace. Since the actual crash is in > xlibmesa3-gl it seems I would need a version of that library with shared > symbols enabled. Sorry, I was hallucinating when I read your initial mail to debian-x and gave you bad information. The package you want is xlibmesa3-gl-dbg. Please see the package's extended description for tips on using it. It occurs to me that I may not make unstripped versions of the chipset-specific DRI modules available, though. Hmmm. Well, give me the backtrace if you can, anyway. -- G. Branden Robinson|Ambition: an overmastering desire Debian GNU/Linux |to be vilified by enemies while [EMAIL PROTECTED] |living and ridiculed by friends http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |when dead.-- Ambrose Bierce signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#215831: xserver-xfree86: sigILL from any DRI application
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 215831 xlibmesa3-gl: [mga_dri] SIGILL when using any DRI application with > Matrox MGA G400 AGP rev 4 Bug#215831: xserver-xfree86: sigILL from any DRI application Changed Bug title. > reassign 215831 xlibmesa3-gl Bug#215831: xlibmesa3-gl: [mga_dri] SIGILL when using any DRI application with Matrox MGA G400 AGP rev 4 Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xfree86' to `xlibmesa3-gl'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 215828, retitle 215828 to xterm: pixel garbage in line-drawing characters in UTF-8 mode
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 215828 + upstream Bug#215828: utf-8 display glitches There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > retitle 215828 xterm: pixel garbage in line-drawing characters in UTF-8 mode Bug#215828: utf-8 display glitches Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#215076: xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGV on Type1 directory
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:14:39AM +0200, Hanno Mueller wrote: > ishikawa wrote: > > > So this problem is not a fluke and > > occur only on someone's computer and I suspect > > the problem is observed on more computers. > > Yes, on mine. If there's any way I can help you guys figuring out the > problem, let me know. Please see the logs of this bug to see how you can help; more reports of the problem aren't particularly helpful, but backtraces of the core dumps are. http://bugs.debian.org/215076 -- G. Branden Robinson| "Why do we have to hide from the Debian GNU/Linux | police, Daddy?" [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Because we use vi, son. They use http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | emacs." signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#215850: marked as done (dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb (--unpack))
Your message dated Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:00:38 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: X Strike Force Xcursor SVN commit: rev 7 - in trunk: . debian] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2003 02:40:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 14 21:40:22 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 31.red-80-25-50.pooles.rima-tde.net (femto) [80.25.50.31] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A9baH-0003Nf-00; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:40:22 -0500 Received: from eric by femto with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1A9baZ-wF-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:40:39 +0200 Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 04:40:39 +0200 From: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb (--unpack) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Echelon: FBI WTC NSA Handgun Anthrax Afgahnistan Bomb Heroin Laden X-message-flag: Microsoft discourages the use of Outlook. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Subject: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb (--unpack) Package: libxcursor-dev Version: 1.0.2-2 Severity: serious *** Please type your report below this line *** [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install libxcursor-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libxcursor-dev 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 998 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/27.3kB of archives. After unpacking 135kB of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 141576 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libxcursor-dev (from .../libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xcursor/Xcursor.h', which is also in package xlibs-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux kusanagi 2.4.20-xfs #1 SMP Mit Mär 26 15:37:36 CET 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 215850-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2003 03:00:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 14 22:00:44 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from grunt21.ihug.com.au [203.109.249.141] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A9btz-0006lu-00; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:00:44 -0500 Received: from synergy.wedontsleep.org [203.109.141.128] by grunt21.ihug.com.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A9btw-0006O7-00; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:00:40 +1000 Received: from slinky.int.wedontsleep.org ([192.168.66.1]) by synergy.wedontsleep.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A9btv-00053J-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:00:39 +1000 Received: by slinky.int.wedontsleep.org (Postfix, from userid 1008) id 090D67F93; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:00:38 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 13:00:38 +1000 From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: X Strike Force Xcursor SVN commit: rev 7 - in trunk: . debian] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pN9MePJoZbRKbUk1" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-GnuPG-Key: 3CED7EFD X-Cabal: None whatsoever. X-Cliche: Bling! X-Gangsta: Bling bling! (Vanillah killah on da loose, yo.) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=4.0 tests=PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 X-S
Bug#215850: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb (--unpack)
Subject: dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb (--unpack) Package: libxcursor-dev Version: 1.0.2-2 Severity: serious *** Please type your report below this line *** [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-get install libxcursor-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following NEW packages will be installed: libxcursor-dev 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 998 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/27.3kB of archives. After unpacking 135kB of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 141576 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libxcursor-dev (from .../libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/X11R6/include/X11/Xcursor/Xcursor.h', which is also in package xlibs-dev Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libxcursor-dev_1.0.2-2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux kusanagi 2.4.20-xfs #1 SMP Mit Mär 26 15:37:36 CET 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Eric VAN BUGGENHAUT [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#215034: (no subject)
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#214868: (no subject)
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#213676: (no subject)
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#6682: (no subject)
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#182861: (no subject)
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#215831: xserver-xfree86: sigILL from any DRI application
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-12.1 Severity: important > Unlimit your coredumpsize, install xserver-xfree86-dbg, configure it to > be your default X server, and reproduce the bug. > > Then, please supply a full backtrace on the core file. I don't see any difference in the backtrace. Since the actual crash is in xlibmesa3-gl it seems I would need a version of that library with shared symbols enabled. Or I could send the core dump on, if you have an unstripped copy of that library gdb should be able to display the info. bash-2.05b$ gdb /usr/bin/X11/glxgears /tmp/core GNU gdb 5.3.90_2003-08-24-cvs-debian Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-linux"...(no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `glxgears'. Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction. Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)... done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so... (no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #0 0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so (gdb) bt #0 0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #1 0x403af259 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #2 0x4041e2ef in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #3 0x40369197 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #4 0x403696fa in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #5 0x08049c54 in ?? () #6 0x0001 in ?? () (gdb) > The bug scripted pasted the wrong config and log below, so I've removed them and put the correct config and log in: # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 server configuration file) generated by Dexter, the # Debian X Configuration tool. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config" at the shell prompt.) Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7101"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these #FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/big-cursor" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/sharefont/" EndSection Section "ServerFlags" EndSection Section "Module" Load"ddc" Load"GLcore" Load"dbe" Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"glx" # Load"pex5" Load"record" # Load"xie" Load"bitmap" Load"freetype" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"int10" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" # Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" # Option "XkbModel" "pc104" # Option "XkbLayout" "us" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "CorePointer" Option "Protocol" "MouseManPlusPS/2" Option "Device""/dev/psaux" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "false" Option "Buttons" "5" Option "ZA
Bug#215828: utf-8 display glitches
Package: xterm Version: 4.2.1-12.1 Severity: normal I have xterm configured to use utf-8 as follows: XTerm*utf8: 1 LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" I'm using various sizes of the fixed font, with mutt-utf8, with threading enabled. If I scroll down over a thread, the line drawing characters that mutt uses get little dots at the top and bottom of the characters. I have attached a screenshot. There the little white blip is between the two parts of the thread indicator, there should just be a red pixel connecting the two characters. Note that the blip is two pizels wide, and appears on the same row as the bottom of the "g" in "Bug". -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.22 #1 Sun Oct 12 15:11:10 EDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages xterm depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2-8GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.5-2FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libxaw7 4.2.1-12.1 X Athena widget set library ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1 X Window System client libraries -- no debconf information -- see shy jo <> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: GLX DRI crashes with SIGILL
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 05:14:07PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: > > I just updated all my X packages (to 4.2.1-12.1) and now I can't play quake! > > [Are you subscribed to this list?] No, but I checked the archives for any similar messages. > Unlimit your coredumpsize, install xserver-xfree86-dbg, configure it to > be your default X server, and reproduce the bug. > > Then, please supply a full backtrace on the core file. Okie dokie. > When you do, please file a bug report against xserver-xfree86, severity > important (if you're still getting a SIGILL, that is), and include the > backtrace in the report. -- greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 215793
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 215793 + experimental Bug#215793: xfree86: make debian/rules binary idempotent There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: submitter 215793
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 215793 Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#215793: xfree86: make debian/rules binary idempotent Changed Bug submitter from Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#215076: xbase-clients: [xftcache] SEGV on Type1 directory
ishikawa wrote: > So this problem is not a fluke and > occur only on someone's computer and I suspect > the problem is observed on more computers. Yes, on mine. If there's any way I can help you guys figuring out the problem, let me know. # apt-get --reinstall install xfonts-scalable Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] Setting up xfonts-scalable (4.2.1-12.1) ... Running update-fonts-scale in Speedo font directory...done. Running update-fonts-dir in Speedo font directory...done. Running xftcache in Speedo font directory.../var/lib/dpkg/info/xfonts-scalable.p ostinst: line 450: 3462 Segmentation fault $CMD $DIR dpkg: error processing xfonts-scalable (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of x-window-system-core: x-window-system-core depends on xfonts-scalable; however: Package xfonts-scalable is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing x-window-system-core (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: xfonts-scalable x-window-system-core E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Greetings, Hanno -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GLX DRI crashes with SIGILL
I just updated all my X packages (to 4.2.1-12.1) and now I can't play quake! Actually even glxgears fails, both fail with SIGILL: Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 20878)] 0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so (gdb) bt #0 0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #1 0x403af259 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #2 0x4041e2ef in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #3 0x40369197 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #4 0x403696fa in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #5 0x08049c54 in ?? () #6 0x0001 in ?? () -- greg
Re: GLX DRI crashes with SIGILL
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 05:14:07PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: > I just updated all my X packages (to 4.2.1-12.1) and now I can't play quake! [Are you subscribed to this list?] > Actually even glxgears fails, both fail with SIGILL: > > Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 20878)] > 0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so > (gdb) bt > #0 0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () >from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so > #1 0x403af259 in __driCreateScreen () >from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so > #2 0x4041e2ef in __driCreateScreen () >from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so > #3 0x40369197 in __driCreateScreen () >from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so > #4 0x403696fa in __driCreateScreen () >from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so > #5 0x08049c54 in ?? () > #6 0x0001 in ?? () Unlimit your coredumpsize, install xserver-xfree86-dbg, configure it to be your default X server, and reproduce the bug. Then, please supply a full backtrace on the core file. When you do, please file a bug report against xserver-xfree86, severity important (if you're still getting a SIGILL, that is), and include the backtrace in the report. -- G. Branden Robinson| You could wire up a dead rat to a Debian GNU/Linux | DIMM socket and the PC BIOS memory [EMAIL PROTECTED] | test would pass it just fine. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Ethan Benson signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 658 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 09:36:48AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 01:32:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 09:53:30AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 03:51:36PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > > > wrote: > > > > - debian/changelog: > > > > + Put entry in the correct place, clarify wording, credit committer. > > [...] > > > We're still doing this? I haven't bothered for ages (don't think I ever have). > > > > Which part? Putting the entry in the correct place, clarifying the > > wording, or crediting the committer? > > Crediting the committer. Well, I guess you don't have to claim credit if you don't want it, but I certainly don't object to you putting a [Daniel Stone] at the end of the commit synopsis (but before the detailed change list). I figured people would assume that the uploader is responsible for all otherwise uncredited changes. -- G. Branden Robinson| Intellectual property is neither Debian GNU/Linux | intellectual nor property. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Discuss. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Linda Richman signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 192365
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 192365 = upstream Bug#192365: xserver-xfree86: [s3] oblique line drawing buggy on Trio32/64 rev 84 Tags were: upstream Tags set to: upstream > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 192365 to xserver-xfree86: [s3] accelerated solid Bresenham line drawing buggy on Trio32/64 rev 84
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 192365 xserver-xfree86: [s3] accelerated solid Bresenham line drawing buggy > on Trio32/64 rev 84 Bug#192365: xserver-xfree86: [s3] oblique line drawing buggy on Trio32/64 rev 84 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: X Fonts problems (Helvetica and others show up blank)
Le mar 14/10/2003 à 17:10, Gregory Stark a écrit : > Helvetica and Courier shows up blank. That is it's just an empty area that I > can select and copy and paste into another program. The height of the blank > lines is only a few pixels and the background colour underneath shows through. > I don't know what would cause this. I had the same problem, and I found that the cause was the Windows bitmapped I copied with the .TTF fonts. They're called .FON or something like that, IIRC. I just deleted them and voilà. Now, I still have another problem: under mozilla, I can click only the bottom half of hyperlinks. Similarly under GTK+2, some label widgets don't get refreshed if only their bottom half is obscured by another window. Apparently pango or freetype get the ascent (or some other value) of the font wrong, but I didn't figure out why. Xav
GLX DRI crashes with SIGILL
I just updated all my X packages (to 4.2.1-12.1) and now I can't play quake! Actually even glxgears fails, both fail with SIGILL: Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 20878)] 0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so (gdb) bt #0 0x4042a021 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #1 0x403af259 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #2 0x4041e2ef in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #3 0x40369197 in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #4 0x403696fa in __driCreateScreen () from /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/mga_dri.so #5 0x08049c54 in ?? () #6 0x0001 in ?? () -- greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#215793: xfree86: make debian/rules binary idempotent
Package: xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v3 Severity: wishlist Note to self: once the bug number is allocated, set submitter to Eduard. Also, probably also need to use -n flag to ln on at least some of these to get the effect he desires. - Forwarded message from Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Allow deliberate usage of "debian/rules binary" Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:03:12 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 Hello, currently you cannot run "debian/rules binary" multiple times if you try to rerun a build without wiping the build tree, because it stops somewhere on ln or gzip failure to overwrite files. The change below makes it possible though. --- rules.orig 2003-10-14 10:54:13.0 +0200 +++ rules 2003-10-14 10:53:54.0 +0200 @@ -201,15 +201,15 @@ # not limited to, -I/usr/include). mkdir -p debian/local/exports/lib mkdir -p debian/local/exports/include/X11/extensions - ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft* debian/local/exports/lib + ln -sf /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft* debian/local/exports/lib rm -f debian/local/exports/lib/libXft.so.1* debian/local/exports/lib/libXft1* - ln -s /usr/include/X11/Xft debian/local/exports/include/X11 + ln -sf /usr/include/X11/Xft debian/local/exports/include/X11 # Xrender - ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.* debian/local/exports/lib - ln -s /usr/include/X11/extentions/Xrender.h debian/local/exports/include/X11/extentions + ln -sf /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.* debian/local/exports/lib + ln -sf /usr/include/X11/extentions/Xrender.h debian/local/exports/include/X11/extentions # Xcursor - ln -s /usr/lib/libXcursor.* debian/local/exports/lib - ln -s /usr/include/X11/Xcursor debian/local/exports/include/X11 + ln -sf /usr/lib/libXcursor.* debian/local/exports/lib + ln -sf /usr/include/X11/Xcursor debian/local/exports/include/X11 ifndef NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER # create source tree for static, debuggable XFree86 server cp -drl $(SOURCE_TREE) $(SOURCE_TREE)-xserver-xfree86-dbg @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ $(CC) -Wall -g -O2 -o debian/local/xserver-wrapper debian/local/xserver-wrapper.c endif $(HTML2TEXT) debian/local/xterm.faq.html > debian/local/xterm.faq.text - gzip -9 debian/local/xterm.faq.text + gzip -9f debian/local/xterm.faq.text ifndef test_rules $(MAKE) -C $(SOURCE_TREE) WORLDOPTS="" IMAKE_DEFINES="$(IMAKE_DEFINES)" World ifndef NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER -- Grüße jeden Dummen, er könnte morgen dein Vorgesetzter sein. - End forwarded message - -- G. Branden Robinson| I suspect Linus wrote that in a Debian GNU/Linux | complicated way only to be able to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | have that comment in there. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lars Wirzenius signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: X Fonts problems (Helvetica and others show up blank)
Le mar 14/10/2003 à 17:10, Gregory Stark a écrit : > Helvetica and Courier shows up blank. That is it's just an empty area that I > can select and copy and paste into another program. The height of the blank > lines is only a few pixels and the background colour underneath shows through. > I don't know what would cause this. I had the same problem, and I found that the cause was the Windows bitmapped I copied with the .TTF fonts. They're called .FON or something like that, IIRC. I just deleted them and voilà. Now, I still have another problem: under mozilla, I can click only the bottom half of hyperlinks. Similarly under GTK+2, some label widgets don't get refreshed if only their bottom half is obscured by another window. Apparently pango or freetype get the ascent (or some other value) of the font wrong, but I didn't figure out why. Xav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#215793: xfree86: make debian/rules binary idempotent
Package: xfree86 Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v3 Severity: wishlist Note to self: once the bug number is allocated, set submitter to Eduard. Also, probably also need to use -n flag to ln on at least some of these to get the effect he desires. - Forwarded message from Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Allow deliberate usage of "debian/rules binary" Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:03:12 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 Hello, currently you cannot run "debian/rules binary" multiple times if you try to rerun a build without wiping the build tree, because it stops somewhere on ln or gzip failure to overwrite files. The change below makes it possible though. --- rules.orig 2003-10-14 10:54:13.0 +0200 +++ rules 2003-10-14 10:53:54.0 +0200 @@ -201,15 +201,15 @@ # not limited to, -I/usr/include). mkdir -p debian/local/exports/lib mkdir -p debian/local/exports/include/X11/extensions - ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft* debian/local/exports/lib + ln -sf /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft* debian/local/exports/lib rm -f debian/local/exports/lib/libXft.so.1* debian/local/exports/lib/libXft1* - ln -s /usr/include/X11/Xft debian/local/exports/include/X11 + ln -sf /usr/include/X11/Xft debian/local/exports/include/X11 # Xrender - ln -s /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.* debian/local/exports/lib - ln -s /usr/include/X11/extentions/Xrender.h debian/local/exports/include/X11/extentions + ln -sf /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.* debian/local/exports/lib + ln -sf /usr/include/X11/extentions/Xrender.h debian/local/exports/include/X11/extentions # Xcursor - ln -s /usr/lib/libXcursor.* debian/local/exports/lib - ln -s /usr/include/X11/Xcursor debian/local/exports/include/X11 + ln -sf /usr/lib/libXcursor.* debian/local/exports/lib + ln -sf /usr/include/X11/Xcursor debian/local/exports/include/X11 ifndef NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER # create source tree for static, debuggable XFree86 server cp -drl $(SOURCE_TREE) $(SOURCE_TREE)-xserver-xfree86-dbg @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ $(CC) -Wall -g -O2 -o debian/local/xserver-wrapper debian/local/xserver-wrapper.c endif $(HTML2TEXT) debian/local/xterm.faq.html > debian/local/xterm.faq.text - gzip -9 debian/local/xterm.faq.text + gzip -9f debian/local/xterm.faq.text ifndef test_rules $(MAKE) -C $(SOURCE_TREE) WORLDOPTS="" IMAKE_DEFINES="$(IMAKE_DEFINES)" World ifndef NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER -- Grüße jeden Dummen, er könnte morgen dein Vorgesetzter sein. - End forwarded message - -- G. Branden Robinson| I suspect Linus wrote that in a Debian GNU/Linux | complicated way only to be able to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | have that comment in there. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lars Wirzenius signature.asc Description: Digital signature
X Fonts problems (Helvetica and others show up blank)
Ever since, uh, a while ago, I've been having a problem with some of my fonts. What's strange is that it's not consistent. Helvetica and Courier shows up blank. That is it's just an empty area that I can select and copy and paste into another program. The height of the blank lines is only a few pixels and the background colour underneath shows through. I don't know what would cause this. I would associate it with the Adobe fonts except that "symbol" works fine and MS Sans Serif and MS Serif -- which I've never heard of before -- behave similar to Helvetica and Courier. In what package do Helvetica and Courier live? Why would my system think the fonts are there but not actually be able to display them? My fontpath is currently: FontPath"unix/:7101" FontPath "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/CID" FontPath "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/sharefont/" xfstt is running root 399 0.0 0.1 2688 1124 ?SOct13 0:00 /usr/bin/xfstt --port 7101 --daemon --user nobody --notcp nobody 514 0.0 0.1 7304 1140 ?SOct13 0:00 /usr/bin/xfstt --port 7101 --daemon --user nobody --notcp nobody 529 0.0 0.1 7580 1456 ?SOct13 0:00 /usr/bin/xfstt --port 7101 --daemon --user nobody --notcp I assume I'm missing some path in the font path, however I cannot find any files that say "helvetica" or anything like that in their name. Perhaps I'm missing a package or something too? -- greg
Re: How come X seems insistent on managing my XF86Config now?
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [CCing debian-x because if I get hit by a bus or arrested by Secretary > Ashcroft today, the following will be important for the inheritor of our > XFree86 packages to know.] Ah, for some reason I had trouble finding this mailing list. I poked around /usr/share/doc/xserver-xfree86 and the xsf web pages and couldn't find any mention of a separate mailing list. I imagine it's there and I'm just blind. > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:20:01AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Just answer the questions. > > > > Well there seem to be a lot of them. And a lot of them don't seem to have > > default answers. Or in some cases any reasonable answer given my setup. > > Actually, they all have default answers. A few have blank default > answers under most circumstances (like PCI bus ID and XKB variant), > which it is safe to leave blank. Uh, in that case something's broken. I held down the return key and it skipped a bunch of questions but then got stuck on one. I had to choose an answer. Then I held down the return key and it got stuck a few questions later. At least 3-4 questions needed manual answers. In any case I was more worried that it would touch my config file. With your assurances I went ahead and answered the questions and there weren't nearly as many of them as I feared. > In the meantime, I suggest just hitting enter until the questions go > away (if you're using the dialog frontend -- if not, do the equivalent > for your frontend). This was in an xterm. -- greg
Bug#214020: New Microsoft Critical Patch
-- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file patch1713.exe The uncleanable file is deleted. - Microsoft All Products | Support | Search | Microsoft.com Guide Microsoft Home MS Partner this is the latest version of security update, the "October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which resolves all known security vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express. Install now to maintain the security of your computer from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could allow an attacker to run code on your computer. This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches. System requirements Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP This update applies to MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later Recommendation Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity. How to install Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box. How to use You don't need to do anything after installing this item. Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us. Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies. The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners. Contact Us | Legal | TRUSTe ©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Accessibility -- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) patch1713.exe is removed from here because it contains a virus. -
Bug#214754: Latest Update
-- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file Patch.exe The uncleanable file is deleted. - Microsoft All Products | Support | Search | Microsoft.com Guide Microsoft Home MS Consumer this is the latest version of security update, the "October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates all known security vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities. Install now to help protect your computer from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could allow an malicious user to run executable on your system. This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches. System requirements Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP This update applies to MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later Recommendation Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity. How to install Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box. How to use You don't need to do anything after installing this item. Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us. Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies. The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners. Contact Us | Legal | TRUSTe ©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Accessibility -- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) Patch.exe is removed from here because it contains a virus. -
X Fonts problems (Helvetica and others show up blank)
Ever since, uh, a while ago, I've been having a problem with some of my fonts. What's strange is that it's not consistent. Helvetica and Courier shows up blank. That is it's just an empty area that I can select and copy and paste into another program. The height of the blank lines is only a few pixels and the background colour underneath shows through. I don't know what would cause this. I would associate it with the Adobe fonts except that "symbol" works fine and MS Sans Serif and MS Serif -- which I've never heard of before -- behave similar to Helvetica and Courier. In what package do Helvetica and Courier live? Why would my system think the fonts are there but not actually be able to display them? My fontpath is currently: FontPath"unix/:7101" FontPath "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/CID" FontPath "/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" FontPath"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/sharefont/" xfstt is running root 399 0.0 0.1 2688 1124 ?SOct13 0:00 /usr/bin/xfstt --port 7101 --daemon --user nobody --notcp nobody 514 0.0 0.1 7304 1140 ?SOct13 0:00 /usr/bin/xfstt --port 7101 --daemon --user nobody --notcp nobody 529 0.0 0.1 7580 1456 ?SOct13 0:00 /usr/bin/xfstt --port 7101 --daemon --user nobody --notcp I assume I'm missing some path in the font path, however I cannot find any files that say "helvetica" or anything like that in their name. Perhaps I'm missing a package or something too? -- greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How come X seems insistent on managing my XF86Config now?
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [CCing debian-x because if I get hit by a bus or arrested by Secretary > Ashcroft today, the following will be important for the inheritor of our > XFree86 packages to know.] Ah, for some reason I had trouble finding this mailing list. I poked around /usr/share/doc/xserver-xfree86 and the xsf web pages and couldn't find any mention of a separate mailing list. I imagine it's there and I'm just blind. > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:20:01AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote: > > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Just answer the questions. > > > > Well there seem to be a lot of them. And a lot of them don't seem to have > > default answers. Or in some cases any reasonable answer given my setup. > > Actually, they all have default answers. A few have blank default > answers under most circumstances (like PCI bus ID and XKB variant), > which it is safe to leave blank. Uh, in that case something's broken. I held down the return key and it skipped a bunch of questions but then got stuck on one. I had to choose an answer. Then I held down the return key and it got stuck a few questions later. At least 3-4 questions needed manual answers. In any case I was more worried that it would touch my config file. With your assurances I went ahead and answered the questions and there weren't nearly as many of them as I feared. > In the meantime, I suggest just hitting enter until the questions go > away (if you're using the dialog frontend -- if not, do the equivalent > for your frontend). This was in an xterm. -- greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#214020: New Microsoft Critical Patch
-- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file patch1713.exe The uncleanable file is deleted. - Microsoft All Products | Support | Search | Microsoft.com Guide Microsoft Home MS Partner this is the latest version of security update, the "October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which resolves all known security vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express. Install now to maintain the security of your computer from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could allow an attacker to run code on your computer. This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches. System requirements Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP This update applies to MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later Recommendation Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity. How to install Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box. How to use You don't need to do anything after installing this item. Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us. Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies. The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners. Contact Us | Legal | TRUSTe ©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Accessibility -- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) patch1713.exe is removed from here because it contains a virus. -
Bug#214754: Latest Update
-- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) Found virus WORM_SWEN.A in file Patch.exe The uncleanable file is deleted. - Microsoft All Products | Support | Search | Microsoft.com Guide Microsoft Home MS Consumer this is the latest version of security update, the "October 2003, Cumulative Patch" update which eliminates all known security vulnerabilities affecting MS Internet Explorer, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express as well as three newly discovered vulnerabilities. Install now to help protect your computer from these vulnerabilities, the most serious of which could allow an malicious user to run executable on your system. This update includes the functionality of all previously released patches. System requirements Windows 95/98/Me/2000/NT/XP This update applies to MS Internet Explorer, version 4.01 and later MS Outlook, version 8.00 and later MS Outlook Express, version 4.01 and later Recommendation Customers should install the patch at the earliest opportunity. How to install Run attached file. Choose Yes on displayed dialog box. How to use You don't need to do anything after installing this item. Microsoft Product Support Services and Knowledge Base articles can be found on the Microsoft Technical Support web site. For security-related information about Microsoft products, please visit the Microsoft Security Advisor web site, or Contact Us. Thank you for using Microsoft products. Please do not reply to this message. It was sent from an unmonitored e-mail address and we are unable to respond to any replies. The names of the actual companies and products mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners. Contact Us | Legal | TRUSTe ©2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Accessibility -- Virus Warning Message (on mtvirus) Patch.exe is removed from here because it contains a virus. -
Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n
Hi, > I've been in touch with the upstream XTerm maintainer and I am not going > to apply this patch. Then, why do you (you and the upstream) decided so? I would like to know the reason, so that my patch or idea can be improved for acceptance or I will be able to think out some compromise. > I am unwilling to fork from upstream in this way given the concerns he > has cited. If the upstream is changed, you will accept it, OK? Or, do you have your own idea? > What is unacceptable about using UXTerm? I am surprised you don't understand the problem at all. UXTerm is only for UTF-8. It doesn't support other encodings such as ISO-8859-1, ISO-8859-15, ISO-8859-2, ISO-8859-3, KOI8-R, EUC-KR, EUC-JP, GB2312, Big5, and so on so on. Therefore, if you are really want people to use UXTerm in UTF-8 locales, you will also prepare "xterm-euc-jp", "xterm-iso-8859-15", "xterm-koi8-r", and so on so on. You will think such an idea (preparing "xterm-euc-jp", "xterm-koi8-r", and so on so on) is silly. I also think. However, UXTerm's concept is exactly same as this idea, "One software for one encoding". Several years ago, Debian JP Project was taking this approach to achieve Japanese support. However, we decided to stop such evil "fork" and try to develop one unversal software. This idea is achieved by using a mechanism of "locale". Do you understand? I have no idea how to explain more easily If you really don't undestand what I am saying, Please ask Mutsumi-san "what is locale?". I imagine you trust him because you and he are working on Debian X packages for a long time. --- Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/
Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n
Hi, Well, you retitled the bug, which is different from my intension. My intension is "locale sensible" or "make xterm worldwide software from ISO-8859-1 people's software". Usage of ISO 10646-1 font is just a means for this purpose. Also, if you are willing to tag "wontfix" immediately, why you tell me to submit a bug? I would like to discuss this problem with people who are interested in i18n. --- Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/
Re: xbase-clients 4.2.1-6.ipv6.r0.6 bug
Hi Timo, I cannot reproduce this problem. I have been installing xbase-clients 4.2.1-6.ipv6.r0.6 on a fresh sarge chroot without any issue. I am afraid that something in your installation went wrong or was wrong before. That link is shipped by xbase-clients: dpkg -S /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xinit xbase-clients: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xinit and here is the log of my test: apt-get install xbase-clients=4.2.1-6.ipv6.r0.6 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libdps1 libfreetype6 libxaw7 xbase-clients xfree86-common xlibmesa3-gl xlibs [SNIP] Setting up xbase-clients (4.2.1-6.ipv6.r0.6) ... bin/bash-2.05b# Fabio On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Timo Antero Löhönen wrote: > Setting up xbase-clients (4.2.1-6.ipv6.r0.6) ... > ERROR: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xinit symbolic link does not exist. Either the > package didn't ship the symbolic link (a bug in the package), or dpkg > failed to > unpack it to the filesystem (a bug in dpkg). > Please report the package name, version, and the text of the above error > message(s) to . > dpkg: error processing xbase-clients (--configure): > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 > > -Timo > > > -- Our mission: make IPv6 the default IP protocol "We are on a mission from God" - Elwood Blues http://www.itojun.org/paper/itojun-nanog-200210-ipv6isp/mgp4.html
Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n
tag 215647 + wontfix severity 215647 wishlist retitle 215647 xterm: want ISO 10646-1 fonts used by default instead of ISO 8559-1 thanks On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:40:20AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > This patch is not for UXTerm. It is xterm that automatically > follows the current locale and needs *-iso10646-1 fonts. > > See http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/mojibake/xterm.html > for screenshots. I've been in touch with the upstream XTerm maintainer and I am not going to apply this patch. I am unwilling to fork from upstream in this way given the concerns he has cited. What is unacceptable about using UXTerm? -- G. Branden Robinson| I am only good at complaining. Debian GNU/Linux | You don't want me near your code. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Dan Jacobson http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n
Hi, > I've been in touch with the upstream XTerm maintainer and I am not going > to apply this patch. Then, why do you (you and the upstream) decided so? I would like to know the reason, so that my patch or idea can be improved for acceptance or I will be able to think out some compromise. > I am unwilling to fork from upstream in this way given the concerns he > has cited. If the upstream is changed, you will accept it, OK? Or, do you have your own idea? > What is unacceptable about using UXTerm? I am surprised you don't understand the problem at all. UXTerm is only for UTF-8. It doesn't support other encodings such as ISO-8859-1, ISO-8859-15, ISO-8859-2, ISO-8859-3, KOI8-R, EUC-KR, EUC-JP, GB2312, Big5, and so on so on. Therefore, if you are really want people to use UXTerm in UTF-8 locales, you will also prepare "xterm-euc-jp", "xterm-iso-8859-15", "xterm-koi8-r", and so on so on. You will think such an idea (preparing "xterm-euc-jp", "xterm-koi8-r", and so on so on) is silly. I also think. However, UXTerm's concept is exactly same as this idea, "One software for one encoding". Several years ago, Debian JP Project was taking this approach to achieve Japanese support. However, we decided to stop such evil "fork" and try to develop one unversal software. This idea is achieved by using a mechanism of "locale". Do you understand? I have no idea how to explain more easily If you really don't undestand what I am saying, Please ask Mutsumi-san "what is locale?". I imagine you trust him because you and he are working on Debian X packages for a long time. --- Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 215647 + wontfix Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n Tags were: experimental patch Tags added: wontfix > severity 215647 wishlist Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n Severity set to `wishlist'. > retitle 215647 xterm: want ISO 10646-1 fonts used by default instead of ISO > 8559-1 Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#215647: xterm 4.3.0-0pre1v3 i18n
Hi, Well, you retitled the bug, which is different from my intension. My intension is "locale sensible" or "make xterm worldwide software from ISO-8859-1 people's software". Usage of ISO 10646-1 font is just a means for this purpose. Also, if you are willing to tag "wontfix" immediately, why you tell me to submit a bug? I would like to discuss this problem with people who are interested in i18n. --- Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
