Bug#255070: 255070 - strange colors (blue) since xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4

2004-07-18 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Debian Bug report logs - #255070
strange colors (blue) since xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
 This was a duplicate of 241717 (fixed in xterm patch #192)

Is it really fixed?

I still have weird colours in xterm. Every other terminal has darker blue
as background.

regards
fEnIo

-- 
  _  Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | 
IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0)  phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo  http://skawina.eu.org | JID:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | RLU:172001


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#260104: xserver-common: Too many server config files?

2004-07-18 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
Severity: wishlist

Hi,
  As an observation there are a lot of different places that the Xserver
is configured and that this complicates the process of finding errors in
the configuration - the ones I'm aware of are:

  /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
  /etc/X11/serverconfig
  /etc/X11/xserver
  /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc

and probably some to do with particular display managers as well.
It seems to be that it would be nice to slim some of these down if
possible.

Dave (having just helped someone with a DPI problem)



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages xserver-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.29 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xfree86-common4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr

-- debconf information:
  xserver-common/xwrapper/nice_value/error:
* xserver-common/clobber_xwrapper_config: false
  xserver-common/aware_xwrapper:
  xserver-common/xwrapper/old_config_file_obsolete:
  xserver-common/xwrapper/nice_value: -10
  xserver-common/using_obsolete_xserver:
  xserver-common/xwrapper/allowed_users: Console Users Only
  xserver-common/xwrapper/actual_allowed_users: console



Bug#260099: xlibmesa-gl: for Voodoo3 cards, should suggest libglide3-dev instead of only libglide3

2004-07-18 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Package: xlibmesa-gl
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: normal


Hi,

direct rendering is disabled until libglide3-dev is installed since libglide3.so
is dlopened which is (due to Debian policy, I guess) only in package 
libglide3-dev.
Thus, this package needs to Suggest: libglide3-dev and not libglide3 (pulled in
by libglide3-dev) unless you get the maintainer to not follow policy, here.

Maybe this suggest should even be moved to xlibmesa-dri since the tdfx_dri.so 
module
causes this effect (or I got it all wrong ;)

HS

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages xlibmesa-gl depends on:
ii  libc6 2.3.2.ds1-13   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libxext6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m

-- no debconf information



Bug#255070: 255070 - strange colors (blue) since xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4

2004-07-18 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 03:50:08PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
 Debian Bug report logs - #255070
 strange colors (blue) since xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
  This was a duplicate of 241717 (fixed in xterm patch #192)
 
 Is it really fixed?

yes.

 I still have weird colours in xterm. Every other terminal has darker blue
 as background.

dfsg.1-4 seems to correspond to xterm patch #187.  (I don't know the
downstream packages state).  dfst.1-6 iirc incorporates xterm patch #191.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net


pgpYqhmCm6fO2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#259996: xterm: keybinding tables in manpage

2004-07-18 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:40:08PM +0200, Thomas Dickey wrote:
 On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:00:13PM +0200, Sebastian Kapfer wrote:
  Package: xterm
  Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6
  Severity: normal
  
  The keybinding tables in the xterm manpage don't format correctly here.
  It seems like the newline characters aren't interpreted by groff.
  
  It looks like this:
  
 The default bindings in the VT102 window are:
  Shift KeyPress Prior:scroll???back(1,halfpage) \n  
   Shift KeyPress Next:scroll???forw(1,halfpage) \n 
   Shift KeyPress Select:select???cursor???start()
  (more mess here...)

I made a fix for this in XFree86 CVS (affects more than xterm).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net


pgpuCvNcNYPzy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#230787: xterm: dies when XIM is killed

2004-07-18 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 08:10:11PM +0200, Branden Robinson wrote:
 retitle 230787 xterm: dies when kinput2 (XIM) process is killed
 severity 230787 important
 tag 230787 + moreinfo upstream
 thanks
 
 On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 04:32:15PM +0200, Rauli Ruohonen wrote:
  Package: xterm
  Version: 4.2.1-15
  Severity: normal
  
  When using kinput2 with xterm, if kinput2 is killed, xterm dies, too.
  Very undesirable, as kinput2 needs to be restarted when its
  configuration options are changed. GTK2 programs work fine with kinput2
  restarts, so xterm should, too.
 
 The current version of XTerm in Debian testing (sarge) is XTerm #187
 (2004-04-27).
 
 The current version of XTerm in Debian unstable (sid) is XTerm #190
 (2004-05-25).
 
 Can you still reproduce this problem?

I tried to reproduce the problem today but could not.  (If it's still a bug,
I'll need more information about the environment, procedure, etc).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net


pgp4dmfg8HRCR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Patch 031 (was: Re: hurd-i386 updates)

2004-07-18 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:16:20PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
 
 Hmm, well, how about this?
 
 --- xc/programs/glxinfo/Imakefile~2004-07-14 12:03:14.0 -0500
 +++ xc/programs/glxinfo/Imakefile 2004-07-14 12:12:57.0 -0500
 @@ -15,6 +15,6 @@
  
  #endif
  
 -  SYS_LIBRARIES = MathLibrary -lstdc++
 +  SYS_LIBRARIES = MathLibrary
  
 -SimpleProgramTarget(glxinfo)
 +SimpleCplusplusProgramTarget(glxinfo)
 
 Seems to build something.  Seems to work...but I'm GNU/Linux on PowerPC.

Seems like it. As long g++ was used, it should be ok.

I'll test this on GNU/kFreeBSD and commit.

-- 
Robert Millan

[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work.

 -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)



Re: hurd-i386 updates

2004-07-18 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:57:42AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
 
 I say do what you like, but keep in mind 1) that we no longer really have a
 relationship with XFree86 upstream, at least when it comes to Imakefiles
 and 2) no one other than XFree86 appears to be interested in retraining
 Imake as a build system.
 
 In other words, my ordinary caution about major overhauls in this part of
 the tree is not engaged, but please don't spend time engineering a solution
 for the ages, as the rest of the X community seems pretty interested in
 making sure Imake doesn't live very much longer.

Yeah, this makes a lot of sense. I've wished imake went eat rotten flesh for
a bunch of times now.. ;)

-- 
Robert Millan

[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work.

 -- J.R.R.T., Ainulindale (Silmarillion)