Re: Memory leak?
On Saturday 26 February 2005 00:43, Iacopo Spalletti wrote: > My X is experimenting strange memory behaviours lately, and i'd like to > find out why. > How can i detect what is going on? > To be more precise, i have x-window-system, kde and their dependecies > installed from sid; running top i get: > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND > 7497 root 15 0 1337m 499m 1828 S 14.9 49.4 78:39.40 XFree86 take a look at xrestop. It shows you which X clients have reserved resources in your server. Probably galeon (or some other mozilla clone) leaking pixmaps in the server :( HTH, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Memory leak?
My X is experimenting strange memory behaviours lately, and i'd like to find out why. How can i detect what is going on? To be more precise, i have x-window-system, kde and their dependecies installed from sid; running top i get: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 7497 root 15 0 1337m 499m 1828 S 14.9 49.4 78:39.40 XFree86 i.e. 1338 of virtual image after just a few hours of uptime. Xfree log and ~/.xsession-errors don't show anything interesting, apparently Any hints on how to track down causes of this huge memory occupation would be very helpful. Thanks -- IS Iacopo Spalletti [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key block: http://www.spalletti.it/pgp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#295042: Keyboard problem resolved
Hi Braden and all! I can now confirm that indeed a bad mouse setup is causing all that keyboard trouble: After adding a "CorePointer" Option to the Section about the USB-mouse and commenting out the PS2-mouse from the "ServerLayout" Section, the keyboard is working now. If you want the technical details, then please read #169427. Harald -- http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0300802/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#296821: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 binary package is over 50M alone)
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:47:33 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#296821: xserver-xfree86: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 binary package is over 50M alone has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 21:15:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 13:15:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pa208.myslowice.sdi.tpnet.pl (finwe.eu.org) [213.76.228.208] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4Q8t-0003Xk-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:03:27 -0800 Received: by finwe.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 678B0389F4; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:06:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:06:06 +0100 From: Jacek Kawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xserver-xfree86: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 binary package is over 50M alone Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 Organization: Kreatorzy Kreacji Bialej User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 Severity: normal #apt-get install xserver-xfree86 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Suggested packages: discover mdetect read-edid libglide2 The following packages will be upgraded: xserver-xfree86 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 29 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/50.4MB of archives. ~~ After unpacking 113MB of additional disk space will be used. ~ 50M is about 10x more that 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 was. It seems, that modules (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/) are now a lot bigger. Actually it concerns also modules in xlibmesa-dri - these two together needs over 200M additional space while upgrading... bye! -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-ac12-amd Versions of packages xserver-xfree86 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-9 GCC support library ii xserver-common 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 files and utilities common to all ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- debconf information excluded -- Jacek Kawa **...to zycie to tylko taka metafora... [Kaczmarski]** --- Received: (at 296821-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2005 13:47:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 25 05:47:51 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from poseidon.uni-ak.ac.at [193.170.188.104] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1D4fot-0007n6-00; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:47:51 -0800 Received: from mcs3.auto.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.60.104] helo=zion) by poseidon.uni-ak.ac.at with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D4foh-0008KR-Tg; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:47:42 +0100 From: David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-x@lists.debian.org, Jacek Kawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#296821: xserver-xfree86: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 binary package is over 50M alone Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:47:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: EDV-Beratung&Service MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-test-SpamScore: -- Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Thursday 24 February 2005 22:06, Jacek Kawa wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 [...] > 50M is about 10x more that 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 was. It seems, that > modules (/usr/X11R6/lib
Re: Bug#296821: xserver-xfree86: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 binary package is over 50M alone
On Thursday 24 February 2005 22:06, Jacek Kawa wrote: > Package: xserver-xfree86 > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 [...] > 50M is about 10x more that 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 was. It seems, that > modules (/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/) are now a lot bigger. Actually > it concerns also modules in xlibmesa-dri - these two together > needs over 200M additional space while upgrading... This was caused by unstripped binaries and was fixed in the bin-NMU of 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Regards, David -- - hallo... wie gehts heute? - *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch* - gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;) -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15
Bug#296876: xvfb-run: does not properly look for xauth
Package: xvfb Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Severity: normal I have a cron job that needs an X server to be present, so wanted to use xvfb-run to make this work. However, there's an issue; my cron output looks like this: xvfb-run: error: xauth command not found even though xbase-clients is installed. This seems to be because xvfb-run looks for xauth using 'which', while xauth is installed in /usr/bin/X11/xauth; using which will thus work if that directory is in $PATH, but that is not usually the case when something is being called from cron. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xvfb depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype62.1.7-2.3FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#85601: xf86cfg runs well, now.
Hello, Oskar. I can launch xf86cfg just now. Several modules shout about SIGs, but the binary works well. Could you please test again and let us know if we can close this bug report? Thanks in advance, Ender. -- Servicios de red - Network services RedIRIS - Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Red.es - Madrid (Spain) Tlf (+34) 91.212.76.25 pgpKWGs2ukRJf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#257188: Cannot startx because no usable configuration for SiS card
El Sábado, 10 de Julio de 2004 12:47, Branden Robinson escribió: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:30:34PM -0700, Yankee Robotics, LLC wrote: > > Package: XFree86 > > Version: 4.1.0.1 > > > > I cannot 'startx', which fails with a 'no screens found' error. I ran 'X > > -configure', but I am getting an 'appropriate data has not been added to > > xf86PciInfo.h' error. I have included the 'startx', 'X -configure' and > > 'scanpci -v' output. > [...] > > You need to upgrade to a newer version of XFree86. > > As people on Slashdot never hesitate to point out, XFree86 4.1.0 is pretty > long in the tooth by now. > > If you're not able to upgrade to XFree86 4.3.0 (in Debian testing "sarge" > and Debian unstable "sid"), could you try to reproduce this problem using > one of the unofficial woody-backport packages of XFree86 4.3.0? > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2004/05/msg00224.html > > While not official, those backports are prepared my a member of the Debian > XFree86 package maintenance team and are *extremely* close to the official > packages. > > If you do this, please let us know so that we can close the bug as fixed by > a more recent version of the package. Hello, Daniel. Branden wrote you half a year ago about this subject, could you please let us know if you tried another solution? Thank you very much in advance, Ender. -- Servicios de red - Network services RedIRIS - Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Red.es - Madrid (Spain) Tlf (+34) 91.212.76.25 pgphkfwalUMWx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#204603: Bug #204603 - xserver-xfree86: [nv] SEGV on GeForce2 MX/MX 400 rev 178
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > This is a followup for : > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=204603 > > You reported issue while upgrading from woody to sarge. > The X server was segfaulting with the nv driver. > > Does the segfault still happens with latest xfree packages ? Everything works fine now. Here are a few bits from my automatically generated config-file, but they are probably not relevant. Section "Device" Identifier "GeForce" Driver "nv" VideoRam64000 EndSection Section "Module" Load"bitmap" Load"dbe" Load"ddc" Load"extmod" Load"int10" Load"record" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"xtt" EndSection Section "DRI" Mode0666 EndSection Sorry about the late reply, and thank you all for making Debian. Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#257062: Please include the new intel driver
El Viernes, 25 de Febrero de 2005 01:34, Jason Lunz escribió: > I have one of these new Dells at home running sarge/sid with an i910 > (915? 9xx anyway) chipset, and I use a Dell at work with i865. I also > have access at work to another type of dell workstation with a third > type of intel chipset, iirc. So I can test 2, maybe 3 chipsets, and am > willing to help develop as well. > > I have a middling amount of debian packaging experience and plenty of > build maintenance experience, so I think I can take this on. I'll get > started by reading HACKING.txt and getting things building this weekend > most likely. > > What's the word on this licensing issue? I'm uncertain from reading all > the emails in this bug which codebases might or might not be tainted. It should not be a problem since it is in freedesktop.org. The license (taken from intel_pixel.c) is: /** * * Copyright 2003 Tungsten Graphics, Inc., Cedar Park, Texas. * All Rights Reserved. * * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a * copy of this software and associated documentation files (the * "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including * without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, * distribute, sub license, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to * permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to * the following conditions: * * The above copyright notice and this permission notice (including the * next paragraph) shall be included in all copies or substantial portions * of the Software. * * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS * OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF * MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. * IN NO EVENT SHALL TUNGSTEN GRAPHICS AND/OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR * ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, * TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE * SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. * **/ I do not see any problem. What Pedro asked for is to merge this driver with the current XFree86 Debian tree, ans test if it is possible to ship it. Thank you for helping, Ender. -- Servicios de red - Network services RedIRIS - Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Red.es - Madrid (Spain) Tlf (+34) 91.212.76.25 pgphpjGOMMw3X.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#296207: xserver-xfree86: [Withdrawing] xanalogtv causes hard lock-ups
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Followup-For: Bug #296207 Further investigation has revealed that this problem can be solved by reducing my CPU and memory speed. I am running nforce2 with a Mobile Athlon XP. I had this at 10x193. So I backed it right down and, after much testing with the trusty xanalogtv, have slowly pushed it up again to 10x180, which has so far proven stable. Note that I am aware of the history of nforce2 problems and have been running 2.4.27 with a soon-to-be-released backport of the acpi timer override fix from 2.6. I have also been testing kernels without this fix and, in general, have tested under a large variety of different conditions (noapic, nolapic, acpi=off, nmi_watchdog=2, C1 disconnect enabled/disabled). In summary, I suspect that this problem has not been caused by xserver-xfree86 and that, by contrast, running xanalogtv is an excellent stability test for nforce2 systems. By the way, extensive memtest runs had shown no problem at 10x193. -Package-specific info: Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster: xserver-xfree86 /etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum. X server symlink status: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Mar 21 2003 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1745740 Dec 15 19:19 /usr/bin/X11/XFree86 Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.roster: xserver-xfree86 VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus: :02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev 04) /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 does not match checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum. XFree86 X server configuration file status: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5733 Feb 24 22:48 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 Contents of /etc/X11/XF86Config-4: # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 X Window System server configuration file) # # This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using # values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xfree86 package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xfree86 # package. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following commands as root: # # cp /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.custom # md5sum /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 > /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum # dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these # FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/" ModulePath "/usr/local/X11/matrox/" EndSection Section "ServerFlags" Option "DefaultServerLayout" "Single_Monitor_FB" Option "AllowDeactivateGrabs" "True" Option "AllowCloseDownGrabs" "True" EndSection Section "Module" Load"GLcore" Load"bitmap" Load"dbe" Load"ddc" # Load"dri" # incompatible with matroxfb in xfree > 4 Load"extmod" Load"freetype" Load"glx" Load"int10" Load"record" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"v4l" # This is for X to handle overlay, which you don't want with the mgavideo drivers EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbLayout" "gb" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Configured Mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "CorePointer" Option "Device""/dev/psaux" Option "Protocol" "PS/2" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "true" # Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "SendCoreEvents""true" Option "Device""/dev/input/mice" Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2" Option "Emulate3Buttons"
