Bug#56179: Important please read

[Bryce]

Hello Millie ,

Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone 
calls?  
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for 
this program.


Give Us A Call 800-671-9012



hippocrates cortland gallant bushnell jehovah alginate incredulous bridgetown 
wavefront legendre calculi mean millinery insurrect lesotho forbore bicep 
allegation shotgun conciliate bootes befogging combatted contrition upstart 
bitumen kenya captive conductance increase confess poach 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#126519: Very important message

[Mitzi]

Hello Josefina ,

Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone 
calls?  
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for 
this program.


Give Us A Call 800-671-9012



pent judicable amos bedspread spoilage repository scion bloodstain dauphin 
agleam 





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#116507: check it out man :)

[Jenna]

Hello Gena ,

Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone 
calls?  
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for 
this program.


Give Us A Call 800-671-9012



brow scrounge swarthy haven jacobian ordnance option parentheses taffy 
eisenhower atmosphere recuse dutton agile cake doge cobweb chromium 
veterinarian spavin diffeomorphic rush brunt elliott avowal birdwatch bowl 
bespectacled insecticide 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#11147: long time we haven't spoken ;-)

[Nicole]

Hello Matilda ,

Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone 
calls?  
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for 
this program.


Give Us A Call 800-671-9012



arbitrage bladdernut desperate albrecht affair billiken cola glans firsthand 
cecropia calve combustible ada tallahassee dagger 





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#11147: been trying to contact you the past few days

[Lolita]

Hello Tanner ,

Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone 
calls?  
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for 
this program.


Give Us A Call 800-671-9012



choctaw jam nearest salient amra target werther coverlet denunciate dorcas 
lampoon cicada depositor blather 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#6682: $1K a day part-time returning calls!

[Kristen]

Hello Mariano ,

Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone 
calls?  
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for 
this program.


Give Us A Call 800-671-9012



algeria artificial bradbury fealty larkin quadrature carcinoma ilyushin 
laughlin snuffle cleave princess sulk chronology castigate hitachi lifeguard 
expellable 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#6682: have you heard about this one? ;-)

[Cameron]

Hello Porfirio ,

Would you like at least $1500.00 to $3500.00 per day just for returning phone 
calls?  
I do! If you have a telephone and can return calls you are fully qualified for 
this program.


Give Us A Call 800-671-9012



convivial gateway compressible horatio mossy sieglinda anselm maltreat blight 
polyhedral cobalt admixture realm exasperate grandparent edifice irrawaddy 
spoke aim postmaster chairlady drainage deletion yesterday cameroun artifact 
houston curie solitaire yaounde oersted victrola birgit antler 





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322284: x11-common: dbus provides a session since 2004

[Marc Wilson]

Package: x11-common
Followup-For: Bug #322284

Apparently dbus has provided a session bus for X since Feb of 2004, as
detailed in:

http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2004/02/msg00194.html

Anyone know whether Debian's xorg is suddenly going to inherit a dbus
dependency?  It'd be a show-stopper for allowing it to install, if it
does.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322253: same bug in sarge

[Pär Andersson]

I also have a local multi-user setup like Helge and use evdev for that
reason. However I didn't know about the evdev keyboard driver before
and always modified the XFree86 source package with another patch for
my second keyboard. I started using the evdev driver when I upgraded
to X.Org. I send this followup since I noticed that the same evdev
driver is in Sarges XFree86 package. Should I send a bug against
xserver-xfree86 also?

Btw it is really nice that the X.Org package includes everything
necessary for local multiuser X (IsolateDevice, novtswitch, sharevts,
evdev). As soon as this evdev bug is fixed in the real package I won't
have to rebuild the source package myself anymore. :-)

regards
/Pär

Re: today equipment was misidentified

[Dan Jacobson]

OK, changed to this:
$ grep -i ddc XF86Config
#   Load"ddc"
Option "NoDDCValue" "true"
P.S., but why still loading and reloading, even though I commented it out above?
# grep -i ddc /var/log/XFree86.0.log
(**) VIA(0): Option "NoDDCValue" "true"
(**) VIA(0): Option: Not using DDC probed value to set HorizSync & VertRefresh
(II) Loading sub module "ddc"
(II) LoadModule: "ddc"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libddc.a
(II) Module ddc: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
(II) Loading sub module "ddc"
(II) LoadModule: "ddc"
(II) Reloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libddc.a
(II) VIA(0): VESA VBE DDC supported
(II) VIA(0): VESA VBE DDC Level 2
(II) VIA(0): VESA VBE DDC transfer in appr. 1 sec.
(II) VIA(0): VESA VBE DDC read failed
(II) VIA(0): I2C device "I2C bus 1:ddc2" registered at address 0xA0.
(II) VIA(0): I2C device "I2C bus 1:ddc2" removed.
(--) VIA(0): No DDC signal


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: a little bit of xterm bug triage

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 318162 xterm: bold text became incredibly ugly after upgrading to 
> X.Org
Bug#318162: xterm bold text became incredibly ugly after upgrading to x.org
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)

> retitle 318513 xterm: 'sh -x uxterm' wrongly succeeds when 'uxterm' rightly 
> fails
Bug#318513: needed to use sh -x /usr/X11R6/bin/uxterm
Changed Bug title.

> # These upstream bugs were fixed in XTerm #204.
> tag 318162 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#318162: xterm: bold text became incredibly ugly after upgrading to X.Org
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream

> tag 318513 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#318513: xterm: 'sh -x uxterm' wrongly succeeds when 'uxterm' rightly fails
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

downtime expected on necrotic.deadbeast.net (SVN repo host)

[Branden Robinson]

Hi folks,

I'm expecting to bring Subversion services down on necrotic at some point
soon, possibly this evening.

Now that there's a known fix for bug #314381[1], I have successfully built
and used a patched Subversion 1.2.0-1 package for client-side operations
against the XSF repositories.

I now plan to build, install, and test patched 1.2.0-1 packages on
necrotic, and if I find no problems, dump and restore the xfree86 and
xorg-x11 repositories to get them using xdelta compression exclusively (see
the Subversion 1.2 release notes[2] for why).

Please watch this list for mails announcing the actual beginning of
downtime, and notice of service restoration (or problems, but
hopefully there won't be any of those).  I'm hoping the outage won't last
more than an hour.

#314381 was a showstopper for me and was the only thing keeping me from
upgrading to Subversion 1.2 on necrotic.  Those who have already upgraded
their clients should see performance improvements[3] due to various
optimizations in 1.2 as well as the new xdelta compression method.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314381
[2] http://subversion.tigris.org/svn_1.2_releasenotes.html
[3] But don't expect the world, poor necrotic is only a 300 MHz UltraSPARC
II with 256MB of RAM.  Starting to live up to its name, I think... :)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|It is the responsibility of
Debian GNU/Linux   |intellectuals to tell the truth and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |expose lies.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |-- Noam Chomsky


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r2289 - /

[Aaron M. Ucko]

X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Modified: NEWS.xhtml
> ===
> (Binary files differ)

It would be nice if svn could be told that this is a text file, and as
such reasonable to diff conventionally.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#24192: H0t penny pick fueled by high demand wearing

[Candi Chu]

reinfection

Insiders Pick Of The Week-  ORTE .Pk

Company: Oretech, Inc.
Ticker: ORTE . Pk
Current-Price: .57
52Wk High:  1. 60
Estimated 3-5 Day target: 1.10+
Estimated-6months-target: 2.32

Oretech Announces Cost Effective and Environmentally
Friendly Method of Extracting Oil from Tar Sand.

Oretech, Inc. (ORTE . Pk - News) announced
that the company is in the final stage of an agreement
to obtain a limited license for a newly developed
method of extracting oil from Tar Sand while being
extremely environmentally friendly.

Could the price per barrel of oil be radically reduced?
Could the US significantly reduce its dependency on oil
imports?

H. Stephen Shehane, CEO of Oretech, believes that the
solution exists now that will enable the US to utilize
its own resources and reduce dependency on foreign energy
sources. Shehane stated some of the highlights of this
unique proprietary system:

-The proprietary system utilizes an unconventional heat
 source

-No depletion of precious natural gas or coal reserves

-No polluted water or chemicals are released into the
 environment

-The small amounts of water used in processing remain in
 a closed system

-Requires no chemical catalysts

-Extremely low consumption of electrical energy

-Recent tests, consistently extracted higher percentages
 of bitumen than published extraction ratios from any
 other extraction method

-Environmentally friendly

-The ability of the proprietary technology to also be
 used in refining crude oil is an additional potential
 benefit

Shehane believes that this proprietary system could
rapidly revolutionize the present known systems for
extraction of oil from tar sand and help reduce US
dependency on foreign oil imports while significantly
reducing the cost per barrel of oil and avoiding
pollution of the environment.

Oretech, Inc. has developed a proof of concept model
that represents a breakthrough in oil extraction from
Tar Sand processing technology. Its business model is
to be a leading edge developer and licensor of
proprietary innovative technology that reduces the cost
of extraction of noble metals (Gold/Silver/ Platinum/
Titanium) and energy resources (Oil Extraction from
Tar-Sand and Shale). Focusing on reducing pollution
of the environment, Oretech is known for its
breakthrough materials processing technology, which
extracts specific minerals from diverse feedstock and
raw materials without the use of harmful chemicals or
the emission of environmentally unsafe gases. For full
details and links to all the company's products and
services.

ornament clock

adduced



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: XFree 4.1.0-0pre1v3 and xawtv (font problem?)

[Pavel Mlčoch]

I see this error too, but when I switch my profile to non utf-8, xawtv
runs. Same problem I has with motv.

Bey
-- 
Pavel Mlčoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321692: xserver-xfree86: crash when using Ethereal

[Vincent Lefevre]

On 2005-08-07 01:15:17 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
> Severity: important
> 
> I don't know if this is related to the crash: I had network problems
> (lost packets + following packets that arrived several seconds late,
> as shown by a ping). After the crash, the ping showed lost packets
> only (about 10%).

The X server has just crashed again, still with signal 7.
This time, I was using Firefox.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: 
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: 
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA

Bug#247737: xserver-common: bug is also reproducable with armagetron

[bremner]

> "David M" == David Martínez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

David M> [1 ] notfound
David M> 247737 xserver-common/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 found 247737
David M> xserver-xfree86/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 thanks

David M> El Martes, 9 de Agosto de 2005 02:08, David Tulloh
David M> escribió:

David M>David (Bremner), could you please see if you
David M> experience the same symptom when you use the latest
David M> version in stable, or better, in unstable? Either test
David M> would serve. I understand that you might be stable
David M> (Sarge) users.


These days I am using a custom 2.6.11 kernel (I'll attach the .config)
and I'm not sure if I have exactly the same setup as before. I think I
had APM before, and acpi now.  With xserver-xorg 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3.

1) I can't seem to duplicate the lcd-off w/o suspend by shutting the
lid. Maybe it just comes on really fast.  In any case no symptoms.

2) I tried manually shutting off the display with
vbetool dpms suspend
turning it back on with
vbetool dpms on
also no symptoms.

3) If I suspend using
echo mem > /sys/power/state
then bringing the system back up (using the fn key) gives a blank
screen.  The screen can be unblanked by 
chvt 1; chvt 7
"vbetool dpms on" does nothing here.

Maybe this is a different bug?

I hope some of this helps,

David


.config
Description: Binary data

Re: Bug#322076: xorg-x11: Dummy packages (3) generated from source package still needed?

[Andreas Metzler]

Dainel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 07:24:12PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> xlibs contains more than 300 dpkg-conffiles, and moving them from one
>> package to another requires lots of manual md5summing in the
>> package maintainer scripts as dpkg does not handle this at all and
>> will throw lots of unnecessary configuration-file changed prompts.

>> That is same problem anybody switching from xfree96 to xorg
>> experiences with /etc/Xsession, just on a gigantic scale.

> Check out the xlibs and xkeyboard-config packages from Ubuntu for how
> this has been done.

Hello,
thanks for the pointer, this basically works as I thought it would,
comparing every no-longer-shipped conffile with the known md5sum of
the previous release nd removing it, if this is the case.

BTW is thee a reason why you do not use remove_conffile* as their
describig comments suggest:

remove_conffile_prepare () {
  # Check a conffile "filename" against a list of canonical MD5 checksums.
  # If the file's current MD5 checksum matches one of the "official_md5sum"
  # operands provided, then prepare the conffile for removal from the system.
  # We defer actual deletion until the package is configured so that we can
  # roll this operation back if package installation fails.

but instead invoke both _prepare and _commit in xlibs' preinst?
 cu andreas
-- 
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
   http://downhill.aus.cc/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r2289 - /

[X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin]

Author: ender
Date: 2005-08-10 11:27:34 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 2289

Modified:
   NEWS.xhtml
Log:
Added news about 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 and the backported i810 driver.


Modified: NEWS.xhtml
===
(Binary files differ)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r516 - branches

[David Nusinow]

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:00:43AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin 
wrote:
> Removed:
>branches/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5/
> Log:
> Delete bogus tag.
> 
> Tags go in tags/, not branches/.

Crap. Thanks for catching that.

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r519 - trunk/debian

[X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin]

Author: branden
Date: 2005-08-10 11:03:31 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 519

Modified:
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
(cosmetic) Fix typo in historical changelog entry.


Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog  2005-08-10 16:01:39 UTC (rev 518)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog  2005-08-10 16:03:31 UTC (rev 519)
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@
 
   [ Branden Robinson ]
   * Document the function of the "v4l" X server module in the
-xserver-xorg/config/modules debconf template , and enable it by default.
+xserver-xorg/config/modules debconf template, and enable it by default.
 (Closes: #135768)
   * Remove versioned dependency expression from libxaw8's shlibs file, as
 there was never an earlier version of the package in existence to depend


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r518 - trunk/debian

[X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin]

Author: branden
Date: 2005-08-10 11:01:39 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 518

Modified:
   trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
Inaugurate 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 development.


Modified: trunk/debian/changelog
===
--- trunk/debian/changelog  2005-08-10 16:01:13 UTC (rev 517)
+++ trunk/debian/changelog  2005-08-10 16:01:39 UTC (rev 518)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+xorg-x11 (6.8.2.dfsg.1-5+SVN) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * dummy entry; replace with real one
+
+ -- Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:57:24 -0500
+
 xorg-x11 (6.8.2.dfsg.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ David Nusinow ]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r517 - tags

[X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin]

Author: branden
Date: 2005-08-10 11:01:13 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 517

Added:
   tags/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5/
Log:
Tag 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 release.


Copied: tags/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 (from rev 516, trunk)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r516 - branches

[X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin]

Author: branden
Date: 2005-08-10 11:00:39 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 516

Removed:
   branches/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5/
Log:
Delete bogus tag.

Tags go in tags/, not branches/.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#320469: marked as done ([INTL:pt_BR] Please update xorg-x11 pt_BR debconf template translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320469: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 16:52:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 09:52:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 200-171-6-135.dsl.telesp.net.br (foolish.homelab.net) 
[200.171.6.135] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyY5j-0001bc-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:52:11 -0700
Received: by foolish.homelab.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 95EE593B8C; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:52:01 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1453569926=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [INTL:pt_BR] Please update xorg-x11 pt_BR debconf template translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:52:01 -0300
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-l10n-portuguese@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1453569926==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: xorg-x11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n


Hello,

Please consider applying the attached patch in order to update xorg-x11's
Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation.

It was already checked against errors using msgfmt and no errors were
found.

Regards,


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
pt_BR)

--===1453569926==
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pt_BR.po.patch.gz"
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--===1453569926==--

---
Received: (at 320469-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1

Bug#321313: marked as done (FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2005 20:04:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 13:04:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lenk.info [217.160.183.176] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E0lwt-0006IF-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 13:04:15 -0700
Received: from smtp.lenk.info ([82.165.24.235] ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1E0lzM-0003pt-C7; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:06:48 +0200
Received: from p54a3ec38.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.236.56] 
helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by smtp.lenk.info with esmtpsa 
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50 1)
id 1E0lyQ-0001Im-MO; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:05:50 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E0lws-0005Xn-KV; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:04:14 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS (unstable): cannot find -lselinux
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 22:04:14 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: login.app
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

trying to recompile login.app in a sid chroot leads to the following
error:

c++ -o Login.app -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -L/usr/X11R6/lib   Main.o 
App.o Input.o SwitchUser.o Panel.o -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXext -lX11 -lXext 
-lX11 -lXpm -lcrypt -lpam   -lselinux
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [Login.app] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/login.app-1.2.1'

Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---
Received: (at 319121-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001VN-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg

Bug#320473: marked as done (isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-dev.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 17:15:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 10:15:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyYSc-0003Tq-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:15:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id CC69B3BC078
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9663BC068
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 4682626136; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:15:49 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: isdnutils: FTBFS: Missing build depedency on libselinux1-dev.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: isdnutils
Version: 1:3.7.2005-07-09-1
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gcc -o xmonisdn -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -L/usr/X11R6/lib   xmonisdn.o Net.o 
-lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXpm -lXp -lXext -lX11 -lselinux -lm
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

This seems to be caused by a missing build dependency on
libselinux1-dev.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 319121-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001VN-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.d

Bug#319410: marked as done (imake assumes availability of selinux)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2005 21:27:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 21 14:27:36 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DviZr-00053U-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:27:36 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22442
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2896BF2DC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:33 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 14679-32 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST) 13991
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6LLRW7E020427;
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:27:32 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: imake assumes availability of selinux
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xutils
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3
Severity: serious

the xisdnutils imake run in isdnutils/xmonisdn generates:

   SELINUX_LDFLAGS =

   SELINUX_INCLUDES = -I/usr/include/selinux

   SELINUX_CFLAGS =  -DHAVE_SELINUX

   SELINUX_LIBS = -lselinux


Is this intended? There's nothing why xmonisdn would need selinux.
Looks like this leeds to many FTBFS for packages.

Maybe xutils should depend on some selinux package?

---
Received: (at 319121-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001VN-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 16

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.de

Bug#319121: marked as done (FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2005 23:38:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 19 16:38:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dv1fR-00015E-00; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:38:29 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain 
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6JNcPO0029188
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DuszL-ux-IR
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:22:27 -0700
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:22:27 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libselinux1-dev
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu"
Content-Disposition: inline


--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: groff
Version: 1.18.1.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: patch

groff fails to build because it cannot find libselinux:

gcc -m32 -o gxditview -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -L/usr/X11R6/lib   =
xditview.o   Dvi.o   draw.o   font.o   lex.o   page.o   parse.o   XFontName=
=2Eo   DviChar.o   device.o -lXaw -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lXpm -lXp -lXext -=
lX11   -lselinux   -lm
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lselinux
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [gxditview] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/groff-1.18.1.1/src/xditview'
make: *** [build-groff-x11] Error 2

The attached patch adds a build-dependency on libselinux1-dev, which
fixes this problem.

--=20
Matt

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="groff_1.18.1.1-8.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

diff -u groff-1.18.1.1/debian/control groff-1.18.1.1/debian/control
--- groff-1.18.1.1/debian/control
+++ groff-1.18.1.1/debian/control
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 Maintainer: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Uploaders: Fumitoshi UKAI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Standards-Version: 3.6.1
-Build-Depends: byacc, debhelper (>=3D 3.0.9), gs, netpbm, psutils, xutils,=
 libxaw7-dev | libxaw-dev, xlibs-dev
+Build-Depends: byacc, debhelper (>=3D 3.0.9), gs, netpbm, psutils, xutils,=
 libxaw7-dev | libxaw-dev, xlibs-dev, libselinux1-dev
=20
 Package: groff-base
 Architecture: any

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--

--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC3QyifNdgYxVXvBARAkYEAJ9o7R+xujF+PshkQx5uPBzyZa4qIQCfbNj2
P9SKLjwK41qHvXv6Y8T0V5w=
=bwD5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--LwW0XdcUbUexiWVK--

---
Received: (at 319121-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001VN-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -07

xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libice-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libice6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libice6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libsm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libsm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libsm6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libsm6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libsm6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libsm6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libx11-6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libx11-6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libx11-6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libx11-6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libx11-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libx11-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxau-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxau-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxau6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxau6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxau6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxau6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw6-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw6-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw7-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw7-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw7-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw7-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw7_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw7_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw8-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw8-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw8-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw8-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxaw8_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxaw8_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxcomposite-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxcomposite-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxcomposite1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxcomposite1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxcomposite1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxcomposite1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxdamage-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxdamage-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxdamage1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxdamage1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxdamage1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxdamage1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxdmcp-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxdmcp-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxdmcp6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxdmcp6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxdmcp6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxdmcp6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxevie-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxevie-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxevie1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxevie1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxevie1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxevie1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxext-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxext-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxext6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxext6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxext6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxext6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxfixes-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxfixes-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxfixes3-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libxfixes3-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libxfixes3_6.8.2.dfs

Bug#318692: marked as done (xlibs-dev: compat package doesn't depend on libs formerly in xlibs-static-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2005 03:23:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 16 20:23:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dtzkq-0004Xb-00; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:23:48 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D7113171D23; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibs-dev: compat package doesn't depend on libs formerly in 
xlibs-static-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.12
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 20:23:47 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xlibs-dev
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious

The current version of xlibs-dev is not fully backwards-compatible with
previous versions built from xfree86, because in the xorg tree a number of
packages have been split out of the xlibs-static-dev package, e.g.,
libxxf86vm-dev.  Packages that previously had a build-dependency on
xlibs-dev only now FTBFS; if the intention is to break backwards
compatibility, I think it would be better to drop the xlibs-dev package
altogether, otherwise these libs should be re-added to the dependencies of
xlibs-dev.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xlibs-dev depends on:
ii  libice-dev   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library deve
ii  libsm-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-dev   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext-dev  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu-dev   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxmuu-dev  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 lightweight X Window System miscel
ii  libxp-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxpm-dev   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X pixmap library development files
ii  libxrandr-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxt-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Toolkit Intrinsics development f
ii  libxtrap-dev 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol-trapping 
ii  libxtst-dev  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System event recording an
ii  libxv-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System video extension li
ii  pm-dev   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 proxy management protocol developm
ii  x-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X protocol development files
ii  xlibs-static-dev 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System client library dev

-- no debconf information

---
Received: (at 318692-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001VA-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.or

Bug#320218: marked as done (bookmarkbridge: FTBFS: Missing build dependency?)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2005 17:13:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 27 10:13:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DxpTC-00082y-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:13:26 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id B8DEA2241D9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:13:25 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC5E22400F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:13:25 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 8DE1A26136; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:13:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:13:25 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bookmarkbridge: FTBFS: Missing build dependency?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: bookmarkbridge
Version: 0.72-5
Severity: serious

Hi,

Your package is failing to build with the new version of x:
checking for Xinerama... no
[...]
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXinerama

It looks like you atleast need to add a build dependency on
libxinerama-dev.

That makes the linking work, but configure still doesn't detect
that it's available for some reason.  You should take a look at
why that's failing.


Kurt


---
Received: (at 318692-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001VA-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 15

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/

Bug#318348: marked as done (xserver-xorg: Unichrome driver will only use 640x480 on KM400)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318348: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 23:34:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 16:34:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DtDEC-0003F1-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:34:52 -0700
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from teh30.trin.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.213.107]:1939 helo=weber)
by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:25)
with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
id 1DtDE6-YO-2c (Exim 4.51)
(return-path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:34:46 +0100
Received: from tom by weber with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DtDI8-00066P-Vh; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:38:56 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tom Huckstep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xserver-xorg: Unichrome driver will only use 640x480 on KM400
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:38:56 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch


There's a bug in the Unichrome driver code which means high resolution video
modes are not available.  There's a simple fix given to me by Luc Verhagen
of the Unichrome development team:

In the file programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/via/ (provided by
patches/000_stolen_from_unichrome.sf.net.diff), in the function
ViaGetMemoryBandwidth:

case VIA_KM400:
   if (pVia->ChipRev < 0x8F)

should read:

case VIA_KM400: 
   if (pVia->ChipRev < 0x84) 


Making this change and recompiling has solved the problem for me.

Cheers,

Tom

---
Received: (at 318348-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001Uq-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318348: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 13

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
lib

Bug#318629: marked as done (libxss-dev doesn't depend on libxss1)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318629: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 16:42:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 16 09:42:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp2.stanford.edu [171.67.16.125] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DtpkO-0008IZ-00; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:42:40 -0700
Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147])
by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j6GGgdt6009197
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:42:40 -0700
Received: by windlord.stanford.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4E0B4E7CB1; Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxss-dev doesn't depend on libxss1
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 09:42:39 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: libxss-dev
Severity: normal

I see that there is now a shared library for libXss, but libxss-dev
doesn't depend on libxss1.  As a result, packages that depend on
libxss-dev will continue to build against the static library, not
against the shared library (as I presume was intended).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.30
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

---
Received: (at 318629-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001Uw-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318629: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 14

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-

Bug#318276: marked as done (config refers to template migration but does not really touch templates)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318276: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 13:37:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 06:37:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dt3uB-0008VN-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:37:35 -0700
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (kitenet.net [127.0.0.1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8665817DD1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:37:34 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A50AF6E134; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:38:16 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:38:15 +0300
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: config refers to template migration but does not really touch templates
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: minor

  warn "migrating xserver-xfree86 templates to xserver-xorg."

This script does nothing to any debconf templates. It does copy a few debco=
nf
_questions_ around.

--=20
see shy jo

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC1mrHd8HHehbQuO8RAjZrAJ42+q4wZQW0yRQXdz7burJb4XyCyQCeJjXU
rYmZgLnDgK6h/a9BdcIzZuU=
=RD4v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--

---
Received: (at 318276-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:48 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001Ug-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#318276: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 12

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.

Bug#306709: marked as done ('man xvinfo' typo: "accesible")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306709: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 05:55:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 22:55:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx05.gis.net [208.218.130.13] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DR1zU-0001VY-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:55:12 -0700
Received: from arf ([207.7.201.208]) by mx05.gis.net; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:55:10 
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DR1zq-b4-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:55:34 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1220955743=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'man xvinfo' typo: "accesible"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:55:30 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1220955743==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


Found a typo in '/usr/X11R6/man/man1/xvinfo.1x.gz', see attached '.diff'.

Hope this helps...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages xbase-clients depends on:
ii  cpp  4:3.3.5-3   The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdps1  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libexpat11.95.8-3XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.4-4   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxaw7  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxcursor1  1.1.3-1 X cursor management library
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxmuu1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 lightweight X Window System miscel
ii  libxpm4  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X pixmap library
ii  libxrandr2   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  libxtrap64.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol-trapping 
ii  libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System event recording an
ii  libxv1   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System video extension li
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii  xlibmesa3-glu [libgl 4.2.1-16Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  xlibs-data   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System client data
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compre

Bug#321819: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-depends on libselinux1-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319121: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 17:57:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 10:57:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-082-083-118-086.arcor-ip.net (gleep.earth.sol) 
[82.83.118.86] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1oOn-Dv-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 09:53:21 -0700
Received: from cts by gleep.earth.sol with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E1oOm-0006Wr-6T
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:53:20 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: missing build-depends on libselinux1-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 18:53:20 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xcal
Version: 4.1-18.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Automatic build of xcal_4.1-18.1 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 42
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: debhelper, xlibs-dev, xutils, libxaw7-dev
[...]
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libfreetype6 libfs6 libice-dev libice6 libselinux1 libsm-dev libsm6 libx11-6
  libx11-dev libxau-dev libxau6 libxaw7 libxaw7-dev libxext-dev libxext6
  libxi-dev libxi6 libxkbfile-dev libxkbfile1 libxmu-dev libxmu6 libxmuu-dev
  libxmuu1 libxp-dev libxp6 libxpm-dev libxpm4 libxrandr-dev libxrandr2
  libxrender-dev libxrender1 libxt-dev libxt6 libxtrap-dev libxtrap6
  libxtst-dev libxtst6 libxv-dev libxv1 lsb-base pm-dev render-dev x-dev
  x11-common xlibs-data xlibs-dev xlibs-static-dev xutils zlib1g-dev
0 upgraded, 49 newly installed, 0 to remove and 21 not upgraded.
[...]
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_alarm.o xcal_alarm.c
xcal_alarm.c: In function 'AlarmScan':
xcal_alarm.c:335: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in 
function 'exit'
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_buts.o xcal_buts.c
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_days.o xcal_days.c
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_edit.o xcal_edit.c
gcc -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing   -DHAVE_SELINUX-I/usr/X11R6/include
-I/usr/include/selinux -Dlinux -D__mc68000__ -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L  
-D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_XOPEN_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE
  -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO   -DLONG_IS_32_BITS -DVER_VEC-c 
-o xcal_help.o

Bug#320545: marked as done ('man XStandards' typo: "Extention")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320545: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 05:43:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 22:43:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx03.gis.net [208.218.130.11] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dyk82-0007qh-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:43:22 -0700
Received: from arf ([69.87.199.92]) by mx03.gis.net; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:43:20 
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Dyk8g-0005nU-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:44:02 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1960528834=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'man XStandards' typo: "Extention"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:43:55 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1960528834==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: x11-common
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


Found a typo in '/usr/X11R6/man/man7/XStandards.7x.gz', see attached '.diff'.

Hope this helps...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages x11-common depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.52 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   2.14.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  lsb-base  3.0-1  Linux Standard Base 2.0 init scrip

x11-common recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

--===1960528834==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="XStandards.7x.diff"

--- -   2005-07-30 01:43:21.171955000 -0400
+++ /tmp/XStandards7x.gz.22113  2005-07-30 01:43:21.0 -0400
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@
 .fi
 .PP
 The following include files are part of the Colormap Utilization
-Policy and Extention specification.
+Policy and Extension specification.
 .PP
 .nf
 

--===1960528834==--

---
Received: (at 320545-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001Vn-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#320545: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 20

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/

Bug#320546: marked as done ('man Xsession' typo: "unfamilar")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320546: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2005 05:45:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 22:45:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx03.gis.net [208.218.130.11] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DykA5-0007y1-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:45:29 -0700
Received: from arf ([69.87.199.92]) by mx03.gis.net; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:45:27 
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DykAj-00067D-00; Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:46:09 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1126200940=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'man Xsession' typo: "unfamilar"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:46:00 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1126200940==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: x11-common
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


Found a typo in '/usr/share/man/man5/Xsession.5.gz', see attached '.diff'.

Hope this helps...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages x11-common depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.52 Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils   2.14.1 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  lsb-base  3.0-1  Linux Standard Base 2.0 init scrip

x11-common recommends no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

--===1126200940==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Xsession.5.diff"

--- -   2005-07-30 01:45:42.085493000 -0400
+++ /tmp/Xsession5.gz.23461 2005-07-30 01:45:42.0 -0400
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 .I Xsession
 when specifically directed to so by the user; see the documentation for
 your display manager to find out more.)
-Administrators unfamilar with the Bourne shell will likely find the
+Administrators unfamiliar with the Bourne shell will likely find the
 .BR Xsession.options (5)
 configuration file easier to deal with than
 .I Xsession

--===1126200940==--

---
Received: (at 320546-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001Vp-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#320546: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 21

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x

Bug#306707: marked as done ('man xedit' typos: "separeted" x 2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306707: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 05:46:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 22:46:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx05.gis.net [208.218.130.13] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DR1rS-0007qO-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:46:54 -0700
Received: from arf ([207.7.201.208]) by mx05.gis.net; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:46:52 
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DR1ro-0006is-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:47:16 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1885026595=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'man xedit' typos: "separeted" x 2
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:47:05 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1885026595==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


Found a few typos in '/usr/X11R6/man/man1/xedit.1x.gz', see attached '.diff'.

Hope this helps...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages xbase-clients depends on:
ii  cpp  4:3.3.5-3   The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdps1  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libexpat11.95.8-3XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.4-4   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxaw7  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxcursor1  1.1.3-1 X cursor management library
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxmuu1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 lightweight X Window System miscel
ii  libxpm4  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X pixmap library
ii  libxrandr2   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  libxtrap64.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol-trapping 
ii  libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System event recording an
ii  libxv1   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System video extension li
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii  xlibmesa3-glu [libgl 4.2.1-16Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  xlibs-data   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System client data
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4 

Bug#306706: marked as done ('man bitmap' typo: "normaly")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306706: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2005 05:36:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 22:36:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx03.gis.net [208.218.130.11] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DR1gx-0006Ex-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:36:03 -0700
Received: from arf ([207.7.201.208]) by mx03.gis.net; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:36:01 
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DR1hJ-00048v-00; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:36:25 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0501233286=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'man bitmap' typo: "normaly"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:36:17 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===0501233286==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


Found a typo in '/usr/X11R6/man/man1/bitmap.1x.gz', see attached '.diff'.

Hope this helps...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages xbase-clients depends on:
ii  cpp  4:3.3.5-3   The GNU C preprocessor (cpp)
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdps1  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii  libexpat11.95.8-3XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libfontconfig1   2.3.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4   FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii  libgcc1  1:3.4.3-12  GCC support library
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.4-4   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libpng12-0   1.2.8rel-1  PNG library - runtime
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management
ii  libstdc++5   1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libxaw7  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Athena widget set library
ii  libxcursor1  1.1.3-1 X cursor management library
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft2  2.1.7-1 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxmuu1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 lightweight X Window System miscel
ii  libxpm4  4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X pixmap library
ii  libxrandr2   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxrender1  0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  libxtrap64.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol-trapping 
ii  libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System event recording an
ii  libxv1   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System video extension li
ii  xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii  xlibmesa3-glu [libgl 4.2.1-16Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree
ii  xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  xlibs-data   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System client data
ii  zlib1g   1:1.2.2-4   compress

Bug#258399: marked as done (xlibs: dvorak keyboard layout is missing right alt key)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258399: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jul 2004 12:49:04 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 09 05:49:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h001057000cf9.ne.client2.attbi.com (doorstop.home.net) 
[24.60.135.62] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BiuoJ-0006WA-00; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 05:49:03 -0700
Received: from hazelsct by doorstop.home.net with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1Biunw-mC-1l
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 08:48:40 -0400
Subject: xlibs: dvorak keyboard layout is missing right alt key
From: Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 08:48:38 -0400
Sender: Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Severity: minor

Greetings,

On switching from a normal US layout to the dvorak layout in GNOME (on a
PC), I've lost the use of the right alt key...

Thanks,

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/The_Best_Stuff_In_The_World_Today_Cafe.ogg

---
Received: (at 258399-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001U1-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#258399: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libice-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libice6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libice6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libice6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libsm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb

Bug#135768: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [debconf] include v4l in xserver-xfree86/config/modules)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#135768: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Feb 2002 23:34:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 25 17:34:09 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fmfdns02.fm.intel.com (thalia.fm.intel.com) [132.233.247.11] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16fUdF-00074d-00; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:34:09 -0600
Received: from fmsmsxvs041.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxv041-1.fm.intel.com 
[132.233.48.109])
by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.51 2002/02/19 
21:12:32 root Exp $) with SMTP id XAA26642
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:34:08 GMT
Received: from milikk.co.intel.com ([10.10.213.18])
 by fmsmsxvs041.fm.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.1.16) with SMTP id M2002022515345131094
 ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:34:52 -0800
Received: from inaky by milikk.co.intel.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16fURr-0002EX-00; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:22:23 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xserver-xfree86: WISHLIST: please include v4l in the debconf prompts 
for server modules
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Inaky Perez Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:22:23 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.1.0-12
Severity: wishlist

Hi maintainer!

It'd be great if some time you could include module v4l (video
for linux) in the list of server modules to be loaded in the debconf
interface. It'd make it very easy for configuring fullscreen v4l viewers.

Thanks so much for the great work!!


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux milikk 2.4.17.1-milikk #1 SMP mar feb 12 17:03:45 PST 
2002 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages xserver-xfree86 depends on:
ii  debconf1.0.24 Debian configuration management system
ii  libc6  2.2.4-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  xserver-common 4.1.0-12   files and utilities common to all X servers
ii  zlib1g 1.1.3-18   compression library - runtime

---
Received: (at 135768-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:40:44 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:40:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001Tw-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#135768: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x

Bug#306689: marked as done ('man dexconf' typo: "writeable")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#306689: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Apr 2005 23:39:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 27 16:39:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx05.gis.net [208.218.130.13] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DQw85-000553-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:39:41 -0700
Received: from arf ([207.7.193.246]) by mx05.gis.net; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:39:39 
-0400
Received: from alfie by Arf with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DQw8Q-0001yN-00; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:40:02 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0871446207=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 'man dexconf' typo: "writeable"
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:39:54 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: A Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===0871446207==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch


Found a typo in '/usr/share/man/man1/dexconf.1.gz', see attached '.diff'.

Hope this helps...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C)

Versions of packages xserver-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]1.4.48  Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xfree86-common   4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr

-- debconf information excluded

--===0871446207==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dexconf.1.diff"

--- -   2005-04-27 19:39:44.249469000 -0400
+++ /tmp/dexconf1.gz.7534   2005-04-27 19:39:44.244335197 -0400
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@
 .I dirname
 or set the
 .B TMPDIR
-environment variable to the of a writeable directory.
+environment variable to the of a writable directory.
 .TP
 .BI "cannot generate configuration file; " question " not set"
 An answer to the indicated

--===0871446207==--

---
Received: (at 306689-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:38:34 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:38:34 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001U8-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#306689: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xorg-x11
Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5

Bug#315555: marked as done (xlibs: typo in /etc/X11/xkb/README.config)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#31: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 13:37:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 06:37:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlRtL-0008Uz-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 06:37:16 -0700
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from dh286.pem.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.210.176]:52839)
by ppsw-0.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]:25)
with smtp id 1DlRtG-7H-35 (Exim 4.51)
(return-path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:37:10 +0100
Received: by dh286.pem.cam.ac.uk (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 23 Jun 2005 
14:37:11 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Daniel Hulme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibs: typo in /etc/X11/xkb/README.config
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:37:11 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xlibs
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
Severity: minor

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Line 10 has "point a few" whereas it should read "point of view". On
line 16 "of" can be removed. On line 22 "how" can be removed and "tu"
should read "to". On line 48 "America" should read "American".

If you like I could go through and neaten the documentation up a bit
more and supply a comprehensive patch.

Daniel
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages xlibs depends on:
ii  libice6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libsm6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Session Management
ii  libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxft1  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxi6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Input extension li
ii  libxmu6  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System miscellaneous util
ii  libxmuu1 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 lightweight X Window System miscel
ii  libxp6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System printing extension
ii  libxpm4  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X pixmap library
ii  libxrandr2   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System Resize, Rotate and
ii  libxt6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Toolkit Intrinsics
ii  libxtrap64.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System protocol-trapping 
ii  libxtst6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System event recording an
ii  xlibs-data   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 X Window System client data

xlibs recommends no packages.

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCursHgoQ42ohbFw0RAji7AJ94ylQxitRFQi534ysMAS0TKLDDhgCeJJ2g
dSeTvujE40iFk7uWcIdwJK4=
=xcaP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---
Received: (at 31-close) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 15:38:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 08:38:32 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2sZq-0001Uc-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#31: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2

Bug#320457: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build-dependency on libxinerama-dev)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:33:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318692: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 15:16:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 08:16:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DyWb7-0002Mn-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:16:29 -0700
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:211:9ff:feed:c498])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1DyWb6-0001hR-8W; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:16:28 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DyWb5-0001Ff-O6; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:16:27 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: missing build-dependency on libxinerama-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:16:27 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: djvulibre
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

>From my build log:

...

i486-linux-gnu-g++ -o .libs/djview -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../.. -I../../libdjvu -I./ 
-I../../gui/indep/QT/ -I../../gui/indep/QX/ -I../../gui/indep/utils/ 
-I../../gui/shared/QT/ -I../../gui/shared/res/ -I../../gui/shared/utils/ -I. 
-DNDEBUG -Wall -O3 -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -mtune=i486 -DTHREADMODEL=POSIXTHREADS 
-I/usr/include/qt3 qx_imager.o qxlib.o qt_imager.o qt_painter.o qlib.o 
qlib_moc.o col_db.o execdir.o cin_data.o qd_wpaper.o qd_wpaper_moc.o qd_prefs.o 
qd_prefs_moc.o qd_welcome.o qd_welcome_moc.o qd_pane.o qd_pane_moc.o qd_base.o 
qd_base_moc.o qd_base_paint.o qd_base_events.o qd_base_ant.o MapAreas.o 
MapAreas_moc.o MapBorder.o MapDraw.o qd_painter.o qd_doc_info.o 
qd_doc_info_moc.o qd_nav_goto_page.o qd_nav_goto_page_moc.o qd_set_zoom.o 
qd_set_zoom_moc.o qd_port.o qd_port_moc.o qd_decoder.o qd_decoder_moc.o 
qd_toolbutt.o qd_toolbutt_moc.o qd_doc_saver.o qd_doc_saver_moc.o qd_thumb.o 
qd_thumb_moc.o qd_search_dialog.o qd_search_dialog_moc.o qd_print_dialog.o 
qd_print_dialog_moc.o init_qt.o qd_messenger.o qd_messenger_moc.o qd_toolbar.o 
qd_toolbar_moc.o qd_tbar_mode_piece.o qd_tbar_mode_piece_moc.o 
qd_tbar_nav_piece.o qd_tbar_nav_piece_moc.o qd_tbar_print_piece.o 
qd_tbar_print_piece_moc.o qd_tbar_rotate_piece.o qd_tbar_rotate_piece_moc.o 
qd_page_saver.o qd_thr_yielder.o GMarginCache.o djvu_file_cache.o io.o prefs.o 
mime_utils.o saved_data.o netscape.o dispatch.o mime_check.o qd_viewer.o 
qd_viewer_moc.o qd_viewer_shell.o qd_viewer_shell_moc.o qd_viewer_prefs.o 
qd_viewer_prefs_moc.o qd_viewer_menu.o djvu_viewer.o djvu_viewer_moc.o 
qd_mime_dialog.o qd_mime_dialog_moc.o qd_about_dialog.o qd_about_dialog_moc.o 
main.o ppm_djvu_logo.o ppm_vzoom_in.o ppm_vzoom_out.o ppm_vnpage.o ppm_vppage.o 
ppm_vfpage.o ppm_vlpage.o ppm_vdjvu.o ppm_vpin_out.o ppm_vpin_in.o 
ppm_djview_icon.o bmp_djview_front.o ppm_vprint.o ppm_vfind.o ppm_vsave.o 
ppm_rotate90.o ppm_rotate270.o ppm_zoomselect.o ppm_textselect.o ppm_hand1.o 
ppm_back.o ppm_forw.o  -pthread ../../libdjvu/.libs/libdjvulibre.so -L/usr/lib 
/usr/lib/libqt-mt.so -L/usr/X11R6/lib -laudio -lXt -lpng -lz 
/usr/lib/libXrender.so -lXrandr /usr/lib/libXcursor.so -lXinerama 
/usr/lib/libXft.so /usr/lib/libfreetype.so -lfontconfig -ldl -lpthread -lSM 
-lICE -lXext -lX11 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so -lm
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXinerama
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [djview] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/djvulibre-3.5.14/gui/djview'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/djvulibre-3.5.14/gui'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/djvulibre-3.5.14'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20050729-1713
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--

Processing of xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5.dsc
  xorg-x11_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5.diff.gz
  pm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  x-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfonts-100dpi_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfonts-100dpi-transcoded_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfonts-75dpi_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfonts-75dpi-transcoded_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfonts-base_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfonts-base-transcoded_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfonts-cyrillic_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfonts-scalable_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  x11-common_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xlibs_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xlibs-data_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xspecs_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  x-window-system_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xfree86-common_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xlibs-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xlibs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  xlibs-pic_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_all.deb
  lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libice6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libice6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libice-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxp6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxp6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxp-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libsm6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libsm6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libsm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libx11-6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libx11-6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libx11-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxau6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxau6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxau-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw6-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw7_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw7-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw7-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw8_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw8-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxaw8-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxcomposite1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxcomposite1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxcomposite-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxdamage1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxdamage1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxdamage-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxdmcp6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxdmcp6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxdmcp-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxevie1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxevie1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxevie-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxext6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxext6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxext-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxfixes3_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxfixes3-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxfixes-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxi6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxi6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxi-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxinerama1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxinerama1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxinerama-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxkbfile1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxkbfile1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxkbfile-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxkbui1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxkbui1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxkbui-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxmu6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxmu6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxmu-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxmuu1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxmuu1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxmuu-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxpm4_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxpm4-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxpm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxrandr2_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxrandr2-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxrandr-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxres1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxres1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxres-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxss1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxss1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxss-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxt6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxt6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxt-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxtrap6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxtrap6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxtrap-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxtst6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxtst6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxtst-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxv1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxv1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxv-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxvmc1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxvmc1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxvmc-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86dga1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86dga1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86dga-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86misc1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86misc1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86misc-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86rush1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86rush1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86rush-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86vm1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86vm1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-5_i386.deb
  libxxf86vm-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1

X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r515 - branches

[X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin]

Author: dnusinow
Date: 2005-08-10 10:40:22 -0500 (Wed, 10 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 515

Added:
   branches/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5/
Log:
Tagging 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 release



Copied: branches/6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 (from rev 514, trunk)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#22506: Thank you for your loan request

[Refitted I. Stack]

Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT6516

Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a 
loan.

After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as 
3.45%

Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form

http://yartoday.com/?c=linker

Upon receiving your submission you will be contacted shortly via phone/email. 

Regards,
"Refitted I. Stack"





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#321528: xserver-xfree86: Switching to virtual console and back dims display considerably

[David Martínez Moreno]

El Miércoles, 10 de Agosto de 2005 06:10, Dale escribió:
> > Hello, Dale. First of all, why don't you use neomagic driver at all? You
> > are using VESA driver, the most generic one, commonly used when there is
> > no driver that works at all for your card.
>
> I normally do and thought I was.  I'll double check this next time I
> have my laptop up.
> If I'm running VESA, its unintentional.

I saw it in your config file. It seems to have been automaticatically 
generated (there are a lot of "generic" terms in it). Take a look at it.

> > And second thing, could you please run xgamma before and after the
> > switching, and post the results?
>
> Be happy to.  Just reply to this again with the info?

Emmm, please, do not send me directly information. Simply send it to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as I do. The X Strike Force will receive a copy of the 
mail.

Best regards,


Ender.
-- 
Network engineer
Debian Developer


pgpmLZQoRwIjI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Re: please provide a Debian XTerm be compiled with --enable-256-color

[David Nusinow]

On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:01:01PM +0200, David Martínez Moreno wrote:
>   Not only planning, I already have a semi-clean xterm tree and I need to 
> set 
> up proper options for configure and check that every thing we shipped with 
> X.Org is going to be shipped with latest xterm. After that, it will be time 
> for xterm-256 or whatever.
> 
>   I do not expect to spend a lot of additional time in xterm, it seems an 
> easy 
> target.
> 
>   I will have to contact Branden to open a new repository in necrotic.

Fantastic! Let's target this for -6 then. In the meantime, is there any
disadvantage to compiling the default xterm with 256 color support? What
sort of increased memory requirements and is there anything else we're not
aware of?

 - David Nusinow


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#322253: xserver-xorg: evdev ignores the same key on pc105 keyboards too

[Helge Hafting]

Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4
Followup-For: Bug #322253


evdev have the same problem with 105-key keyboards, and
Norwegian keyboard layout. The result is that
it is impossible to type the two chaacters < and >, which makes
the unix command line difficult to use.

Running "xev" shows keycode 7, keysym 0x0 and
XLookupString gives 0 bytes: ""

The normal, when not using evdev, is keycode 94, keysym 0x3c less,
XLookupString gives 1 bytes: "<"


Unfortunately, I need to use evdev in order to support two independent
X displays with separate keyboards, and it seems like evdev is the only
way to achieve this on linux. 

Helge Hafting
 

-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/X.roster:
xserver-xfree86
xserver-xfree86-dbg
xserver-xorg

/etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/xfree86/X.md5sum.

X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root 17 2005-08-10 10:13 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/X11/Xorg
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 1835416 2005-07-20 19:49 /usr/bin/X11/Xorg

Contents of /var/lib/xfree86/xorg.conf.roster:
xserver-xorg

VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus:
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV100 QY 
[Radeon 7000/VE]

/var/lib/xfree86/xorg.conf.md5sum does not exist.

Xorg X server configuration file status:
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 4332 2005-08-10 14:01 /etc/X11/xorg.conf

Contents of /etc/X11/xorg.conf:
# XF86Config-4 (XFree86 X server configuration file) generated by dexconf, the
# Debian X Configuration tool, using values from the debconf database.
#
# Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page.
# (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.)
#
# This file is automatically updated on xserver-xfree86 package upgrades *only*
# if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xfree86
# package.
#
# If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated
# again, run the following commands as root:
#
#   cp /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.custom
#   md5sum /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 > /var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum
#   dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86

Section "Files"
 
FontPath "unix/:7100"
# if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi"
FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi"
EndSection

Section "Module"
#Kommentert ut de som xorg allikevel ignorerer . . .
Load"GLcore"
Load"bitmap"
Load"dbe"
Load"ddc"
#Pr�ver igjen.. Load"dri"
Load"extmod"
Load"freetype"
Load"glx"
Load"int10"
Load"record"
#   Load"speedo"
Load"type1"
Load"vbe"
EndSection


Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Generic Keyboard"
Driver  "kbd"
#Option  "Protocol"  "evdev"
#Option  "Dev Phys"  "isa0060/serio0/input0"
Option  "CoreKeyboard"
Option "XkbRules"  "xorg"
#Option "XkbVariant" "basic"
#Option "XkbKeycodes""xorg"
#Option "XkbTypes"   "default"
#Option "XkbSymbols" "en_US(pc105)+no"
Option "XkbGeometry""pc(pc105)"
#Option "XkbCompat"  "basic+pc+iso9995"
Option "XkbModel"   "ltcd"
Option "XkbLayout"   "no"

# Fra tenkende august, mangler st�rre-enn tegnet
#Option  "XkbRules"  "xfree86"
#Option  "XkbModel"  "pc105"
#Option  "XkbLayout" "no"
EndSection

#Gammelt
#Section "InputDevice"
#   Identifier  "Generic Keyboard"
#   Driver  "kbd"
#   Option  "CoreKeyboard"
#   Option  "XkbModel"  "pc105"
#   Option  "XkbLayout" "no"
#Option "XkbRules" "xorg"
#Option "XkbVariant"  "basic"
#Option "XkbKeycodes" "xorg"
#Option "XkbTypes""default"
#Option "XkbSymbols"  "en_US(pc105)+no"
#Option "XkbGeometry" "pc(pc105)"
#Option "XkbCompat"   "basic+pc+iso9995"
#
#EndSection

Section "InputDevice"
Identifier  "Configured Mouse"
Driver  "mouse"
Option  "CorePointer"
#   Option  "Device""/dev/gpmdata"
Option  "Device""/dev/input/mice"
Option  "Protocol"  "ImPS/2"
Option  "Emulate3Buttons"   "true"
Option  "ZAxisMapping"  "4 5"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "ATI Radeon"
Driver  "ati"
BusID   "PCI:01:00:0"
Option "RenderAccel" "true"

#Farlig i noen tilfeller:
Option "EnablePageFlip" "on"

#Farlig i noen tilfe

Re: please provide a Debian XTerm be compiled with --enable-256-color

[David Martínez Moreno]

El Miércoles, 10 de Agosto de 2005 03:33, David Nusinow escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:46:42PM +0200, Miernik wrote:
> > The Debian packages of X are made in such a way, that you cannot compile
> > only one of them, you have to recompile the whole Xorg set, which is
> > huge download of sources and takes a really long time, so it's very
> > difficult for example for me to package xterm with 256 colors enabled
> > each time a new release of X is done by Debian, which happens quite
> > often.
>
> I guess this is another call to split out xterm ASAP. David, are you still
> planning to work on this?

Not only planning, I already have a semi-clean xterm tree and I need to 
set 
up proper options for configure and check that every thing we shipped with 
X.Org is going to be shipped with latest xterm. After that, it will be time 
for xterm-256 or whatever.

I do not expect to spend a lot of additional time in xterm, it seems an 
easy 
target.

I will have to contact Branden to open a new repository in necrotic.

Best regards,


Ender.
-- 
I am a married potato! I am a married potato!
-- Mr. Potato (Toy Story 2).
--
Debian developer


pgpCEDRlY7v2t.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Bug#116507: Thank you for your loan request

[Legating A. Phantasy]

Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT2494

Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a 
loan.

After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as 
3.45%

Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form

http://yartoday.com/?c=linker

Upon receiving your submission you will be contacted shortly via phone/email. 

Regards,
"Legating A. Phantasy"





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#11147: Thank you for your loan request

[Dowdies Q. Nephritis]

Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT9164

Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a 
loan.

After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as 
3.45%

Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form

http://cacefi.com/?b=linker

Upon receiving your submission you will be contacted shortly via phone/email. 

Regards,
"Dowdies Q. Nephritis"





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#116507: Thank you for your loan request

[Thriftier H. Dick]

Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT6728

Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a 
loan.

After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as 
3.45%

Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form

http://yartoday.com/?c=linker

Upon receiving your submission you will be contacted shortly via phone/email. 

Regards,
"Thriftier H. Dick"





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#6682: Thank you for your loan request

[Topsoil A. Janacek]

Important information regarding your loan: ID FFT9125

Hello, Your refinance application has been accepted. We are ready to give you a 
loan.

After further review, our lenders have esstablished your locked rate as low as 
3.45%

Please finalize everything by visiting our Secure Web-Form

http://cacefi.com/?b=linker

Upon receiving your submission you will be contacted shortly via phone/email. 

Regards,
"Topsoil A. Janacek"





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#247737: xserver-common: bug is also reproducable with armagetron

[David Martínez Moreno]

notfound 247737 xserver-common/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
found 247737 xserver-xfree86/4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
thanks

El Martes, 9 de Agosto de 2005 02:08, David Tulloh escribió:
> Package: xserver-common
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
> Followup-For: Bug #247737
>
> I have the same error when using the armagetron game, the screen is
> shifted down and the top is full of grayish pixel noise.
>
> I am running two monitors, it only occurs on the monitor that loads the
> game.
>
> Switching out to a text console and back into X corrects the problem.

Sorry, David (Tulloh), but your bug report is invalid, as you are not 
using 
the latest version in stable or unstable. Please upgrade to the latest 
packages and report again.

David (Bremner), could you please see if you experience the same 
symptom when 
you use the latest version in stable, or better, in unstable? Either test 
would serve. I understand that you might be stable (Sarge) users.

Best regards,


Ender.
-- 
El conceto es el conceto.
-- Pazos (Airbag).
--
Debian developer


pgp0145gxBVjo.pgp
Description: PGP signature