Bug#332341: marked as done (x11-common: bug in preinst script)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332341: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 22:46:31 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 15:46:31 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from p54b148f9.dip.t-dialin.net (xts.homelinux.net) [84.177.72.249] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENI1v-0001vI-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 15:46:31 -0700 Received: by xts.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65DD84FDBE; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 00:46:27 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthias Heinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: x11-common: bug in preinst script X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:46:27 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: x11-common Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 Severity: normal Hi, there's a bug in the x11-common.preinst script at line 914. It's just a simple "-" missing before the eq. I don't know if this breaks anything but i report it anyway. Regards, Matthias -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-17.08.2005 Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages x11-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.14.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii lsb-base 3.0-9 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip x11-common recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 332341-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 22:09:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 15:09:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQXgJ-Rb-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#332341: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xorg-x11 Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb
Bug#332414: marked as done (package kicks out xserver-xfree86 and leaves system without any xserver)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332414: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 09:57:37 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 02:57:37 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 213-232-83-137.dsl.prodigynet.co.uk (chloe.beth2.org) [213.232.83.137] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENSVN-00045r-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 02:57:37 -0700 Received: from www-data by chloe.beth2.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ENSS0-00026M-7R for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:54:08 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: package kicks out xserver-xfree86 and leaves system without any xserver Received: from 194.200.143.249 (auth. user [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by chloe.beth2.org with HTTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:54:07 + X-IlohaMail-Blah: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-IlohaMail-Method: mail() [mem] X-IlohaMail-Dummy: moo X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.14 (On: chloe.beth2.org) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Adrian Davey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bounce-To: "Adrian Davey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Errors-To: "Adrian Davey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:54:08 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xserver-common Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 Severity: Normal When upgrading xserver-common to 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 it conflicts with xserver-xfree86, introduced as a result of bug #318425, which is all fine but it does leave /etc/X11/X linking to /bin/true and no xserver on the system. I don't think this is quite the expected behavior, if the xserver-xfree86 is to be removed from the system surely the package should be replaced with an xserver package, most likely xserver-xorg? Kind regards, Adrian --- Received: (at 332414-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 22:09:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 15:09:03 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQXgJ-Rd-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#332414: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: xorg-x11 Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs6_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libglu1-xorg-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libglu1-xorg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-
Bug#332374: marked as done (x11-common: Update to 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8_all has shell script error)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332341: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 04:42:09 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 21:42:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from old.orcaware.com (orca1.orcaware.com) [207.105.228.75] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENNa4-0002AM-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 21:42:08 -0700 Received: from orca1.orcaware.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by orca1.orcaware.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-2) with ESMTP id j964g42a010514 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:42:05 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by orca1.orcaware.com (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j964g4hP010513; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:42:04 -0700 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Authentication-Warning: orca1.orcaware.com: blair set sender to [EMAIL PROTECTED] using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Blair Zajac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: x11-common: Update to 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8_all has shell script error X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 21:42:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: x11-common Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 Severity: normal Hello, Updating to x11-common_6.8.2.dfsg.1-8_all.deb today generated the following error message: Preparing to replace x11-common 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 (using .../x11-common_6.8.2.dfsg.1-8_all.deb) ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 914: [: eq: binary operator expected Unpacking replacement x11-common ... Regards, Blair -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages x11-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.14.3 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii lsb-base 3.0-9 Linux Standard Base 3.0 init scrip x11-common recommends no packages. -- debconf information: x11-common/experimental_packages: --- Received: (at 332341-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 22:09:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 15:09:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQXgJ-Rb-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#332341: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xorg-x11 Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.de
Bug#333455: marked as done (chooser path is incorrect in /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#333455: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Oct 2005 23:55:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 11 16:55:54 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from uejikov.g-service.ru [84.22.141.217] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EPTyL-0007uc-00; Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:55:53 -0700 Received: by uejikov.g-service.ru (Postfix, from userid 40100) id 411003804F; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:55:47 +0800 (KRAST) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0339131295==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Eugene Konev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: chooser path is incorrect in /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:55:47 +0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===0339131295== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Package: xdm Version: 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 Severity: important /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config has path for chooser /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/chooser, but it was moved to /usr/X11R6/bin/chooser. This breaks querying xdm with -indirect until manually fixed. The attached patches update patches/debian/905_debian_xdm.diff to change chooser path in xdm/Imakefile and xdm/config/Imakefile to generate appropriate xdm-config. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7xen0 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xdm depends on: ii cpp 4:4.0.2-1 The GNU C preprocessor (cpp) ii debconf [debconf 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.3.5-6ejka1GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libice6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpam-modules 0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules f ii libpam-runtime 0.79-3 Runtime support for the PAM librar ii libpam0g 0.79-3 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii libselinux1 1.26-1 SELinux shared libraries ii libsm6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System Session Management ii libxau6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Authentication library ii libxaw8 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Athena widget set library ii libxdmcp66.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Display Manager Control Protocol ii libxext6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxinerama1 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System multi-head display ii libxmu6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System miscellaneous util ii libxp6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System printing extension ii libxpm4 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X pixmap library ii libxt6 6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii xbase-clients6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs6.8.99.900.dfsg.1-0pre1 X Window System client libraries m xdm recommends no packages. -- debconf information: xdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/X11/xdm * shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm --===0339131295== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="chooser-fix-6.8.diff" --- a/debian/patches/debian/905_debian_xdm.diff 2005-07-23 13:27:00.0 +0800 +++ b/debian/patches/debian/905_debian_xdm.diff 2005-10-11 22:44:08.0 +0800 @@ -23,12 +23,16 @@ - Define a default userPath and systemPath. Again, this smacks of the FHS. -diff -ruN xc-old/programs/xdm/config/Imakefile xc/programs/xdm/config/Imakefile xc-old/program
Bug#332566: marked as done (preinst error)
Your message dated Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#332341: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 04:45:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 21:45:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENk6h-0005VK-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:45:19 -0700 Received: from fwd34.aul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1ENk6d-0007uo-01; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:45:15 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fwd34.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1ENk6T-0nAB8a0; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 06:45:05 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 06:45:00 +0200 From: Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: preinst error X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="enigB62F77972D72F444BA85D7B4" X-ID: T53H5YZrreLsaIfT1ltix4UMYFXprqVACKyVNEutXg0GE925p1mBsd X-TOI-MSGID: 8b95e7b2-daa2-4cf8-9842-f1cbcfec4960 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enigB62F77972D72F444BA85D7B4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: x11-common Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 At install time on amd64 I got this message: Preparing to replace x11-common 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 (using .../x11-common_6.8.2.dfsg.1-8_all.deb) ... /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: line 914: [: eq: binary operator expected Regards Harri --enigB62F77972D72F444BA85D7B4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDRf1RUTlbRTxpHjcRAtCtAJ9YZBUCyCX0BnV82I8d444lzZyTrACcDmir pFSd48j4v8yIQtenMuf0q88= =sn4s -END PGP SIGNATURE- --enigB62F77972D72F444BA85D7B4-- --- Received: (at 332341-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 22:09:07 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 15:09:07 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQXgJ-Rb-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#332341: fixed in xorg-x11 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:05:39 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xorg-x11 Source-Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xorg-x11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/lbxproxy_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdmx1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1-dbg_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libdps1_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-x11/libfs-dev_6.8.2.dfsg.1-9_i386.deb libfs
Bug#333960: config script should honour preseeded debconf value for keyboard/options
Package: xserver-xorg Hi, the config script sets debconf variable xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/keyboard/options without actually checking for existing preseeded value and therefore overwrides it headlessly. You can trigger this easily on new installs in Czech where localization-config sets .../keyboard/layout to us,cz_qwerty .../keyboard/options to grp:shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll but after this config we end up with empty .../keyboard/options, thus locking users in foreign keyboard layout. On a similar note, dpkg-reconfigure initializes value of xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/keyboard/layout with value based on installation keyboard and not with current debconf value, which I consider rather strange. -- Miroslav Kure -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331518: xserver-xorg: xorg doesn't support multi-resolution xinerama
On 14.10.05 15:39:05, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Because that's the normal xinerama-thing to do when there is a > > non-rectangular layout. Xinerama takes the width of both heads+the > > maximum height and creates a desktop from this. And then it opens the 2 > > viewports, when one is non-virtual and smaller than his "part" of the > > desktop, a piece of the desktop can't be accessed. > > I'm still not quite sure exactly what you'd like to achieve I just want the minimum scrolling-around possible and that scrolling takes place on the CRT, as it's extremely disturbing on the Laptop display (which I work on). > and why XFree86 was closer to it than X.Org, but my best guess so far > is that it's because X.Org now actually knows a 1680x1050 mode for the > CRT, XFree86 was close, because I could use the full 1600 pixel in width and the full height (which would be 1050)... I think XFree86 might also have set up my monitor for 1680x1050 if I had told it to (via a proper Modes line). > whereas XFree86 didn't. If you change the SubSection "Display" of > "Screen1" to something like > > SubSection "Display" > Depth 24 > Modes "1400x1050" # change to the mode you want on the CRT > Virtual 1680 1050 > EndSubSection > > Does that come closer to what you want? ATM I again can't check, but... > If not, please provide an XFree86 logfile for comparison. That could be a problem :-( It seems that I have 3 log files left, one from a try with Radeon's MergedFB, one from another location where a 17" monitor as 2nd head is used and a last one that seems to use 1400x1050 but I'm pretty sure that I did not have to scroll 200 or 280 pixel to the left... As I currently have the benefit of having dsl here I'll setup a small Sarge system using XFree86 and get a fresh log on Sunday. I'll also test with X.org the 1400x1050 then. Andreas -- Good day to deal with people in high places; particularly lonely stewardesses. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318319: Similar - strat fine, hangs when moving window to fast
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 14:45 +0200, Morten Sickel wrote: > the log and conf are avaliable at http://sickel.net/Xorg.0.log.old and > http://sickel.net/xorg.conf > > A further observation: X may crash at any update, eg when doing a pagedown > in a kmail or konqueror window (yes I am running kde (3.4.2) ) At some > occation, the machine doesen't even answer ping when X has crashed. Does it also happen if you do any (combination) of the following? * Comment out the Load "dri" line in Section "Module" * Add Option "RenderAccel" "off" to the radeon Section "Device" Also, the log file shows several X server generations, which is probably a side-effect of using KDE. It would be interesting if the problem also occurs during the first server generation. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Bug#331518: xserver-xorg: xorg doesn't support multi-resolution xinerama
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 18:34 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > On 10.10.05 12:44:54, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 20:11 +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > with Screen1 being the CRT, Screen0 being the Laptop-Panel. Now I get a > > > 3320x1200 Xinerama desktop, with a scrolling CRT and a fixed > > > Laptop-Panel. Only problem is: There are 150x1680 pixel missing on that > > > Laptop-Panel, because the lower end is not accessible. The only way to > > > access these is to define a virtual resolution for the laptop panel > > > and have it scroll around. > > > > I don't understand why that would be. Please provide the full config and > > corresponding log file. > > Because that's the normal xinerama-thing to do when there is a > non-rectangular layout. Xinerama takes the width of both heads+the > maximum height and creates a desktop from this. And then it opens the 2 > viewports, when one is non-virtual and smaller than his "part" of the > desktop, a piece of the desktop can't be accessed. I'm still not quite sure exactly what you'd like to achieve and why XFree86 was closer to it than X.Org, but my best guess so far is that it's because X.Org now actually knows a 1680x1050 mode for the CRT, whereas XFree86 didn't. If you change the SubSection "Display" of "Screen1" to something like SubSection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1400x1050" # change to the mode you want on the CRT Virtual 1680 1050 EndSubSection Does that come closer to what you want? If not, please provide an XFree86 logfile for comparison. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Bug#333921: priority of mouse template too low
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
The priority of mouse template (medium) is too low, and unsuitable for use
with a LiveCD: Since the /etc/init.d/xserver-xorg script intended for LiveCD
usage uses "-phigh" when configuring this package, mice won't be configured
unless they can be configured automaticaly via mdetect, which:
a) doesn't always work
b) doesn't work on all platforms (currently not available for GNU/kFreeBSD)
Please find attached patch to rise priority to high.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to C)
Versions of packages xserver-xorg depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc0.1 2.3-1+kbsd.11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library
ii libxau6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Authentication library
ii libxdmcp6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Display Manager Control Protocol
ii xserver-common6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 files and utilities common to all
ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime
Versions of packages xserver-xorg recommends:
pn discover | discover1 (no description available)
pn laptop-detect (no description available)
pn mdetect(no description available)
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m
pn xresprobe (no description available)
-- debconf information excluded
Index: debian/xserver-xorg.config.in
===
--- debian/xserver-xorg.config.in (revision 676)
+++ debian/xserver-xorg.config.in (working copy)
@@ -1253,7 +1253,8 @@
# Let's keep the changes not intrusive, even if less elegant.
# priority of xserver-xorg/config/inputdevice/mouse/{port,protocol}
-PRIORITY=medium
+PRIORITY=high
+PRIORITY_CEILING=
AUTODETECTED_PORT=
AUTODETECTED_PROTOCOL=
Bug#11147: alternative date site
Damn brother You'll never guess what happened to me today. Basically found dirty date site that doesn't costs a dime. So many nasty girls are there messaging and meeting eachother. And it's clear there is someone (or more than one) for you. Although most of them want one-nighters, there are also those who like it serious. your reply to this confirmation message is not needed ;) http://www.quitgagging.com/extra/angie/ PS:no.more? http://www.quitgagging.com/extra/angie/getmeoff.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
