Bug#360388: xserver-xorg: local user DoS and arbitrary code execution as root [CVE-2006-0745]
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 05:07:42PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > P.S. : If your mail implies there's a way to mark a bug as fixed at the > same time as it's open, I'd be glad to improve my debbugs skills as usual :) Unfortunately, opening and closing the bug have to happen as separate steps. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#360388: marked as done (xserver-xorg: local user DoS and arbitrary code execution as root [CVE-2006-0745])
Your message dated Sat, 1 Apr 2006 13:55:27 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#360388: xserver-xorg: local user DoS and arbitrary code execution as root [CVE-2006-0745] has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: grave Tags: security, upstream Justification: user security hole An upstream vulnerability rated as critical by upstream (bug #6213) was fixed in 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5, which was uploaded with urgency high. I'm opening this bug to track this nevertheless, as the transition to testing appears to be problematic. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 04:05:16PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg > Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 > Severity: grave > Tags: security, upstream > Justification: user security hole > An upstream vulnerability rated as critical by upstream (bug #6213) was > fixed in 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5, which was uploaded with urgency high. I'm > opening this bug to track this nevertheless, as the transition to > testing appears to be problematic. Then you should also mark it as *closed* in -5, otherwise you're *complicating* the transition to testing. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#360388: xserver-xorg: local user DoS and arbitrary code execution as root [CVE-2006-0745]
Steve Langasek a écrit : Then you should also mark it as *closed* in -5, otherwise you're *complicating* the transition to testing. Hi Steve, you're right. The mail you just sent should do that for me. Thanks. P.S. : If your mail implies there's a way to mark a bug as fixed at the same time as it's open, I'd be glad to improve my debbugs skills as usual :)
Bug#360388: xserver-xorg: local user DoS and arbitrary code execution as root [CVE-2006-0745]
Package: xserver-xorg Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 Severity: grave Tags: security, upstream Justification: user security hole An upstream vulnerability rated as critical by upstream (bug #6213) was fixed in 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5, which was uploaded with urgency high. I'm opening this bug to track this nevertheless, as the transition to testing appears to be problematic. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358751: xserver-xorg: evdev with MX 1000 mouse doesn't work anymore
Christian Marillat wrote: > retitle 358751 tilt buttons are inverted with MX 1000 mouse > thanks > > Hi, > > Would be very nice if the bug submitter can receive a Cc when somebody > post to a bug... > > For Elmimar, not I'm not blind, I read the changelog, and your > configuration doesn't work for me, X segfault when launched. > > Hmm. I get the same behavior here if I try to use the Name field, which is to say that X segfaults, and due to #347681, left the system unusable until I ssh'd in to reverse the config, start a new X server, and kill the X server. Instead, i'm using "Device" "/dev/input/event-mx1000", which works, but isn't supported in upstream anymore, after the evdev rewrite. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358751: xserver-xorg: evdev with MX 1000 mouse doesn't work anymore
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 05:22:07PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > Would be very nice if the bug submitter can receive a Cc when somebody > post to a bug... Yes, sorry for that. > Frank, your configuration works for me > but the "tilt" (tilt is explained here > http://floam.sh.nu/guides/mx1000)buttons are now inverted in mozilla > and galeon. You can correct that in about:config: mousewheel.horizscroll.withnokey.action = 0 mousewheel.horizscroll.withnokey.sysnumlines = false Frank -- gpg:FBB8E53A jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#358751: xserver-xorg: evdev with MX 1000 mouse doesn't work anymore
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 the mental interface of Christian Marillat told: > retitle 358751 tilt buttons are inverted with MX 1000 mouse > thanks > > Hi, > > Would be very nice if the bug submitter can receive a Cc when somebody > post to a bug... > > For Elmimar, not I'm not blind, I read the changelog, and your > configuration doesn't work for me, X segfault when launched. Yeah, if you don't use the wron input out of $cat /proc/bus/input/devices. BTW you must use the one which is listet by N: Name="Logitech USB RECEIVER" ;) > Frank, your configuration works for me > > , > | Section "InputDevice" > | Identifier "MX1000" > | Driver "evdev" > | Option "CorePointer" > | Option "Name" "Logitech USB Receiver" > | EndSection > ` > > but the "tilt" (tilt is explained here > http://floam.sh.nu/guides/mx1000)buttons are now inverted in mozilla and > galeon. Did you ever try something like Option "XRelativeAxisButtons" "number number" for remapping your mousebuttons 6 and 7? The X-axis should be the right one for the tilt, isn't it? Elimar -- On the keyboard of life you have always to keep a finger at the escape key;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358751: xserver-xorg: evdev with MX 1000 mouse doesn't work anymore
retitle 358751 tilt buttons are inverted with MX 1000 mouse thanks Hi, Would be very nice if the bug submitter can receive a Cc when somebody post to a bug... For Elmimar, not I'm not blind, I read the changelog, and your configuration doesn't work for me, X segfault when launched. Frank, your configuration works for me , | Section "InputDevice" | Identifier "MX1000" | Driver "evdev" | Option "CorePointer" | Option "Name" "Logitech USB Receiver" | EndSection ` but the "tilt" (tilt is explained here http://floam.sh.nu/guides/mx1000)buttons are now inverted in mozilla and galeon. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#358751: xserver-xorg: evdev with MX 1000 mouse doesn't work anymore
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 358751 tilt buttons are inverted with MX 1000 mouse Bug#358751: xserver-xorg: evdev with MX 1000 mouse doesn't work anymore Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358254: fix found in bug #358682, reinstalled libxft-dev
Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.8.2-5.1 Followup-For: Bug #358254 Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.8.2-3 (using .../libxft-dev_2.1.8.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libxft-dev ... dpkg: warning - unable to delete old directory `/usr/include/X11/Xft': Directory not empty Preparing to replace libxft2 2.1.8.2-3 (using .../libxft2_2.1.8.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libxft2 ... Preparing to replace libxft-dev 2.1.8.2-3 (using .../libxft-dev_2.1.8.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libxft-dev ... dpkg: warning - unable to delete old directory `/usr/include/X11/Xft': Directory not empty Preparing to replace libxft2 2.1.8.2-3 (using .../libxft2_2.1.8.2-5.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libxft2 ... ... that works for me, apt-get upgrade now possible again. Thomas -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.1 Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libxft-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.6-4GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libfontconfig1-dev2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6-dev 2.1.10-2 FreeType 2 font engine, developmen ii libx11-dev6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxft2 2.1.8.2-5.1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender-dev1:0.9.0.2-1X Rendering Extension client libra ii x-dev 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5 X protocol development files ii x11-common6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii zlib1g-dev [libz-dev] 1:1.2.3-9 compression library - development libxft-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#358254: libxft-dev: same behaviour with amd64 sid
Package: libxft-dev Version: 2.1.8.2-3 Followup-For: Bug #358254 (Reading database ... 114257 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace x11-common 6.9.0.dfsg.1-4 (using .../x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg. 1-5_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement x11-common ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/include/X11', which is also in package libxft-dev System startup links for /etc/init.d/x11-common already exist. Setting up X server socket directory /tmp/.X11-unix...done. Setting up ICE socket directory /tmp/.ICE-unix...done. Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-5_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15.1 Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libxft-dev depends on: pn libc6-dev | libc-dev (no description available) ii libfontconfig1-dev 2.3.2-1.1 generic font configuration library pn libfreetype6-dev (no description available) pn libx11-dev (no description available) ii libxft2 2.1.8.2-3 FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxrender-dev 1:0.9.0.2-1 X Rendering Extension client libra pn x-dev (no description available) ii zlib1g-dev [libz-dev]1:1.2.3-9 compression library - development libxft-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
