Processed: [Fwd: Re: Bug#368796: xserver-xorg: OpenGL fails completely on AMD64 with ATI Radeon 8500 LE]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 368796 xorg-server Bug#368796: xserver-xorg: OpenGL fails completely on AMD64 with ATI Radeon 8500 LE Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `xorg-server'. > severity 368796 important Bug#368796: xserver-xorg: OpenGL fails completely on AMD64 with ATI Radeon 8500 LE Severity set to `important' from `normal' > merge 368796 364233 Bug#364233: mesa-swx11-source: indirect rendering broken on 64-bit platforms Bug#368796: xserver-xorg: OpenGL fails completely on AMD64 with ATI Radeon 8500 LE Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `blocked-by' don't match: #364233 has `364228'; #368796 has `' > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368796: [Fwd: Re: Bug#368796: xserver-xorg: OpenGL fails completely on AMD64 with ATI Radeon 8500 LE]
reassign 368796 xorg-server severity 368796 important merge 368796 364233 kthxbye The submitter of #368796 has confirmed that it's a duplicate of #364233. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://tungstengraphics.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer --- Begin Message --- On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 07:43:05PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 12:37 -0400, Adam C. Emerson wrote: > > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 01:33:51PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > Sounds like it could be a duplicate of > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364233 . > > > > I'm not sure, judging from the Xorg.log (which follows) it looks like X > > isn't having any problem initializing the DRM, so I'm not sure why it > > would be falling back onto indirect mode. > > In contrast to what it says, the above also affects direct rendering. > > > However I'm going to try applying the patch and recompliling, so I should > > have more info later today. > > Note that mesa-swx11-source 6.4.2-1 already has the patch applied, so you > should > only have to rebuild xorg-server against that. Alright, I've built xorg-xserver and everything seems to work fine. Thank you very much. --- End Message ---
Bug#185207: how are you today?
Hi, Hope I am not writing to wrong addraesas. I am nice, pretty looking girl. I am planning on visiting your town this maonth. Can wea meet each other in person? Message me back at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X Strike Force X.Org X11 SVN commit: r2277 - trunk/debian/xorg/debian
Author: bubulle Date: 2006-05-31 18:24:02 -0400 (Wed, 31 May 2006) New Revision: 2277 Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.templates Log: ReMove eXtra cApitaLiZation Modified: trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.templates === --- trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.templates 2006-05-31 03:10:21 UTC (rev 2276) +++ trunk/debian/xorg/debian/x11-common.templates 2006-05-31 22:24:02 UTC (rev 2277) @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Template: x11-common/x11r6_bin_not_empty Type: note -_Description: Can Not Remove /usr/X11R6/bin Directory +_Description: Cannot remove /usr/X11R6/bin directory This upgrade requires that the /usr/X11R6/bin directory be removed and replaced with a symlink. An attempt was made to do so, but it failed, most likely because the directory is not yet empty. You must move the files -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#364233: mesa-swx11-source: indirect rendering broken on 64-bit platforms
"Aaron M. Ucko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [XSF: when this patch is in, please bump xorg-server's build dependency > on mesa-swx11-source accordingly in order to pick up the fixes.] Marcelo recently uploaded a fixed version of Mesa (thanks!); as such, please go ahead and version xorg-server's build dependency on mesa-swx11-source to mesa-swx11-source (>= 6.4.2-1), mesa-swx11-source (<< 6.5) Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: adding ddccontrol to debian
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a package ready at the moment. However, it only cleanly builds > with the version of gcc in Sarge. I have been assured by upstream that > a new release is forthcoming which fixes the build issues with gcc 4.x. > Once it is out, the package will be updated and uploaded. I saw that 0.4.1 works with Fedora Core 4 and AFAIK it has new GCC so it should be enough. Am I wrong? Also, you might try to use CVS snapshots to get it in for testing too, if the released version isn't enough for us. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio - "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#359328: ERROR! sizeof(I830DRIRec) does not match passed size from device driver
Marcelo; I have picked up packages from mesa 6.5.0.cvs.20060524. The Eurphoria (GL) screensaver comes to life first time since I renewed my portable 2 years ago. Good work! Thanks, P. C. === Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 04:06:40PM -0400, P.C. Chan wrote: > Comparing I830DRIRec definition from xf86-video-i810-1.5.1.0 and Mesa-6.4.1, > the former has the extra: > > drmSize rotatedSize; > drm_handle_t rotatedbuffer; > > Hence they would be different in size and uncompatible. Thanks for pointing out the exact source of the problem. You can fix this by just installing the mesa packages from experimental. I'm sorry that I can't provide a solution that doesn't involve CVS code at the moment. Marcelo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#159437: ARTIscience notice
To be useful, a system has to be able to do more than just correctly perform some task. - John McDermott Dear reader, company ARTIscience, apologize for this letter. Since 1985 We deal with the development of the systems of artificial intellect with our partners on Finland territory and beyond its limits. There is Intel, Google, A.I Foundation, Honda and t.d. in the number of our partners. We want to accept more young tal of ented developers, who are ready to join our family, and ready to solve serious tasks assigned to them. People, who know how to achieve goal despite on the difficulty. They have an analytical turn of mind, capability for analysis and search for the accurate solutions in the nonstandard situations. For the search of precisely such people, who will prove their abilities, we carry out programming competition. Those who will collect the largest of the correct replays from our A.I. system, obtain prize in size of $ 2500 USD. Also him(or her) will be isolated working place in our company (of corse if you wish to collaborate with us). Search for details on the site: http://progcompetitions.info/ "I wish you luck and success!" st. engineer Azick Herenger Copyright © 2006 ARTIscience -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#19928: is it you?
Do not ignore me please, I found your email sbomewhere and now decided to write you. I am coming to your place in faew weeks and thougbht we can meet eaach other. Let me know if you do not mind. I am a nice pretty gibrl. Don't repbly to this email. Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
twm and menu
Hello David, The twm changelog say: twm (1:1.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=low * Point the menu method at /usr/bin/install-menu rather than /usr/sbin. Also bump the version of menu we depend on to >= 2.1.26, which implements this change -- David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 21 May 2006 19:14:42 -0400 Just for the record: Actually /usr/bin/install-menu was introduced in 2.1.9-3, and Sarge includes it as a symlink. The change in 2.1.26 is that /usr/bin/install-menu is no more a symlink and that this is the location menu-methods should use in etch, but a dependency on >= 2.1.26 is not necessary. Etch include /usr/sbin/install-menu as a symlink. Cheers, -- Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
