Processing of libx11_1.1-2_i386.changes

2006-11-26 Thread Archive Administrator
libx11_1.1-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  libx11_1.1-2.dsc
  libx11_1.1-2.diff.gz
  libx11-data_1.1-2_all.deb
  libx11-6_1.1-2_i386.deb
  libx11-6-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
  libx11-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
  libx11-xcb1_1.1-2_i386.deb
  libx11-xcb1-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
  libx11-xcb-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



libx11_1.1-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
libx11-6-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-6-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-6_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-6_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-data_1.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-data_1.1-2_all.deb
libx11-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-xcb-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-xcb-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-xcb1-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-xcb1-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-xcb1_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-xcb1_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11_1.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11_1.1-2.diff.gz
libx11_1.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11_1.1-2.dsc


Override entries for your package:
libx11-6-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb - extra libdevel
libx11-6_1.1-2_i386.deb - optional libs
libx11-data_1.1-2_all.deb - optional x11
libx11-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb - optional libdevel
libx11-xcb-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb - optional x11
libx11-xcb1-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb - extra x11
libx11-xcb1_1.1-2_i386.deb - optional x11
libx11_1.1-2.dsc - source x11

Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 354315 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#400446: libXfixes: Unlocks the Display without having it locked

2006-11-26 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: libxfixes3
Version: 1:4.0.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream patch

libXfixes calls UnlockDisplay without calling LockDisplay.  This causes a
locking correctness assertion failure with libX11 1.1 and Xlib/XCB in
experimental, and will become RC after the etch release when libX11 1.1 enters
unstable.  Patch from upstream Git repository:

http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/lib/libXfixes.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=9dc7945eaa9216bf7b0056e815fba5bf8b5ded07

- Josh Triplett



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


upgrade to 222-2 errors out

2006-11-26 Thread Norbert Breun
Dear Devs,

just FYI:

Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xterm

cheers
Norbert


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#354315: marked as done (libx11-dev: XGetWindowAttributes man page is misleading)

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:47:40 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#354315: fixed in libx11 2:1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---

Package: libx11-dev
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

This man page does not discuss the actual return values of the
function, but says they are of type Status.  One might assume
that this means you could compare it with the Success macro.
One would be wrong.

The X functions seem to have two three types representing status.
If it is an int there are a number of error codes or Success
which can be compared against.  If it is a bool, the result can be
compared with True or False.  If the return type is Status it
appears that the return type is either 0 or 1.  Unfortunately the
value for Success is zero, so it is important to distinguish
between the first two types of return values and the third;
otherwise the conditional will be inverted.

XGetWindowAttributes() is one of the functions which returns zero
for failure.  The man page should make this clear.

A simple patch is provided below.


As a general note, the quality of the X11 API documentation is low.
Much of it seems to be boiler-plate and obvious questions and
caveats are not documented.  Of particular note, the meanings of
individual function parameters are often not explained (things like
time   Specifies the time -- time of what?).  And some pages
document functions which have little to do with each other.
Should I submit bug reports for those items as I notice them?

Also, two of the pages specifically state they are incomplete:

 This manual pages[sic] needs a lot more work.

  XShapeQueryExtension.3x
  XmbufQueryExtension.3x

Thanks,
-Ross


--- XGetWindowAttributes.3x 2006-02-24 20:47:24.0 -0600
+++ XGetWindowAttributes.3x-updated 2006-02-24 20:48:17.0 -0600
@@ -192,7 +192,8 @@
 .ZN XGetWindowAttributes
 function returns the current attributes for the specified window to an
 .ZN XWindowAttributes
-structure.
+structure.  It returns a nonzero status on success; otherwise, it returns a
+zero status.
 .LP
 .ZN XGetWindowAttributes
 can generate
@@ -209,6 +210,8 @@
 These are described in the argument list.
 It is legal to pass to this function a window whose class is
 .ZN InputOnly .
+It returns a nonzero status on success; otherwise, it returns a
+zero status.
 .SH STRUCTURES
 The
 .ZN XWindowAttributes




-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.5
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to C)

Versions of packages libx11-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev [libc-de 2.3.2.ds1-22  GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libx11-6   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxext-dev4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxi-dev  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System Input extension li
ii  x-dev  4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X protocol development files
ii  xfree86-common 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr
ii  xlibs-static-dev   4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1 X Window System client library dev

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libx11
Source-Version: 2:1.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libx11, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libx11-6-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-6-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-6_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-6_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-data_1.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-data_1.1-2_all.deb
libx11-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-xcb-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-xcb-dev_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-xcb1-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-xcb1-dbg_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11-xcb1_1.1-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11-xcb1_1.1-2_i386.deb
libx11_1.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11_1.1-2.diff.gz
libx11_1.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/libx/libx11/libx11_1.1-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Josh Triplett [EMAIL 

Bug#400443: libx11-6: multiple wrong calls to LockDisplay and UnlockDisplay

2006-11-26 Thread Jamey Sharp
Package: libx11-6
Version: 2:1.0.3-3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream patch

libX11's XKB and XIM support have several potential race conditions and
deadlocks for multi-threaded applications, due to missing or incorrectly
placed calls to UnlockDisplay or LockDisplay.

http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/lib/libX11.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=941f02ede63baa46f93ed8abccebe76fb29c0789
http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/lib/libX11.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=1eedf1bd033e496843cfde42ae4ae5a119298605

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libx11-6 depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libx11-data  2:1.0.3-3   X11 client-side library
ii  libxau6  1:1.0.1-2   X11 authorisation library
ii  libxdmcp61:1.0.1-2   X11 Display Manager Control Protoc
ii  x11-common   1:7.1.0-7   X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc

libx11-6 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: upgrade to 222-2 errors out

2006-11-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 13:43:53 +0100, Norbert Breun wrote:

 Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
 error in control file: `Format' value not specified at
 /usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
 dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  xterm

Hi Norbert,
this has already been reported (six times) and is fixed in xterm 222-3,
which is currently on incoming.debian.org and should hit the mirrors
tonight.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 164917 + wontfix
Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies
Tags were: moreinfo patch upstream
Tags added: wontfix

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#400403: marked as done (invalid doc-base file)

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:48:18 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400375: fixed in xterm 222-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: serious

The upgrade of xterm fails with the following error message:

Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs 
line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xterm
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

As this makes the package uninstallable I'm filing the bug with severity 
serious.

Cheers,
Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (300, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.19-rc6
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1   2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libice6  1:1.0.1-2   X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.5-5   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsm6   1:1.0.1-3   X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.3-4   X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7  1:1.0.2-4   X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxft2  2.1.8.2-8   FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6  1:1.0.2-2   X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6   1:1.0.2-2   X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps 1.0.1-2 Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  xutils  1:7.1.ds.3-1 X Window System utility programs

-- no debconf information

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xterm
Source-Version: 222-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xterm_222-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.diff.gz
xterm_222-3.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.dsc
xterm_222-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xterm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:37:22 -0500
Source: xterm
Binary: xterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 222-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 xterm  - X terminal emulator
Closes: 400375
Changes: 
 xterm (222-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Julien Cristau ]
   * Split xterm.doc-base in xterm.doc-base.faq and xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs, to
 make the package installable again, thanks to Ryan Murray
 (closes: #400375).
Files: 
 27120d4155859cc19c5858318dcf4b64 813 x11 optional xterm_222-3.dsc
 2e7e45264bdd32752531d37b7e3d3341 61407 x11 optional xterm_222-3.diff.gz
 01bef6889a6b2584359a01da17c74d0c 438388 x11 optional xterm_222-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFaNn4yLfpNdY0ad8RAt1RAJ4uOrt9L76Q2YXPeYsdfvISdB07xwCdEnlf
74rlTuC/uc/G9v94EYFyvWw=
=BhuZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#400389: marked as done (xterm: installation fails)

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:48:18 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400375: fixed in xterm 222-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: grave

Hello,

xterm 222-2 fails to install:

Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs 
line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xterm


regards
   Mario
-- 
When Bruce Schneier uses double ROT13 encryption, the ciphertext is totally
unbreakable.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xterm
Source-Version: 222-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xterm_222-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.diff.gz
xterm_222-3.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.dsc
xterm_222-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xterm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:37:22 -0500
Source: xterm
Binary: xterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 222-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 xterm  - X terminal emulator
Closes: 400375
Changes: 
 xterm (222-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Julien Cristau ]
   * Split xterm.doc-base in xterm.doc-base.faq and xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs, to
 make the package installable again, thanks to Ryan Murray
 (closes: #400375).
Files: 
 27120d4155859cc19c5858318dcf4b64 813 x11 optional xterm_222-3.dsc
 2e7e45264bdd32752531d37b7e3d3341 61407 x11 optional xterm_222-3.diff.gz
 01bef6889a6b2584359a01da17c74d0c 438388 x11 optional xterm_222-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFaNn4yLfpNdY0ad8RAt1RAJ4uOrt9L76Q2YXPeYsdfvISdB07xwCdEnlf
74rlTuC/uc/G9v94EYFyvWw=
=BhuZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#400478: xterm: error on post-install

2006-11-26 Thread Julien Langer
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: normal

With version 222-2 I get the following error on post-installation of the
package:

Preparing to replace xterm 222-2 (using .../archives/xterm_222-2_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement xterm ...
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
ln: creating symbolic link `/usr/share/man/man1/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz' to 
`/etc/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz': File exists
dpkg: error processing xterm (--install): subprocess post-installation script 
returned error exit status 1
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  xterm


Regards,
Julien

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1   2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libice6  1:1.0.1-2   X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.5-5   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsm6   1:1.0.1-3   X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.3-4   X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7  1:1.0.2-4   X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxft2  2.1.8.2-8   FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6  1:1.0.2-2   X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6   1:1.0.2-2   X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps 1.0.1-2 Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  xutils  1:7.1.ds.3-1 X Window System utility programs

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#400401: marked as done (xterm upgrade: error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, /usr/share/doc-bae/xterm-faq line 22.)

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:48:18 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400375: fixed in xterm 222-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2

When I upgraded xterm using aptitude, I recieved these error messages:

---

Setting up mozilla-livehttpheaders (0.13.1-2) ...

Setting up mozilla-tabextensions (2.1.2006031301-2) ...

Setting up xserver-xorg-core (1.1.1-11) ...
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs li
ne 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xterm
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs li
ne 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xterm
Press return to continue.

---

(FWIW, this came from:
# dd if=/dev/vcs2 of=/tmp/vcs2 conv=unblock ibs=80 cbs=80)

Xterm seems to be itself working properly.

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xterm
Source-Version: 222-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xterm_222-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.diff.gz
xterm_222-3.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.dsc
xterm_222-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xterm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:37:22 -0500
Source: xterm
Binary: xterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 222-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 xterm  - X terminal emulator
Closes: 400375
Changes: 
 xterm (222-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Julien Cristau ]
   * Split xterm.doc-base in xterm.doc-base.faq and xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs, to
 make the package installable again, thanks to Ryan Murray
 (closes: #400375).
Files: 
 27120d4155859cc19c5858318dcf4b64 813 x11 optional xterm_222-3.dsc
 2e7e45264bdd32752531d37b7e3d3341 61407 x11 optional xterm_222-3.diff.gz
 01bef6889a6b2584359a01da17c74d0c 438388 x11 optional xterm_222-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFaNn4yLfpNdY0ad8RAt1RAJ4uOrt9L76Q2YXPeYsdfvISdB07xwCdEnlf
74rlTuC/uc/G9v94EYFyvWw=
=BhuZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#400450: doc-base can handle only one document per file

2006-11-26 Thread Jan Niehusmann
This bug is caused by debian/xterm.doc-base containing descriptions for
two documents. According to dh_installdocs, If your package needs to
register more than one document, you need multiple files. To accomplish
this, you can use files named debian/package.doc-base.*

Therefore, to fix this problem, you can use the attached patch.

Regards,
Jan

diff -urN xterm-222-orig/debian/xterm.doc-base xterm-222/debian/xterm.doc-base
--- xterm-222-orig/debian/xterm.doc-base2006-11-26 12:57:57.0 
+0100
+++ xterm-222/debian/xterm.doc-base 2006-11-26 13:09:26.0 +0100
@@ -12,13 +12,3 @@
 Format: HTML
 Index: /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.faq.html
 Files: /usr/share/doc/xterm/xterm.faq.html
-
-Document: xterm-ctlseqs
-Title: Xterm Control Sequences
-Author: Edward Moy, Stephen Gildea, Thomas Dickey
-Abstract: This document describes the terminal control sequences that XTerm
- recognizes.
-Section: XShells
-
-Format: text
-Files: /usr/share/doc/xterm/ctlseqs.txt.gz
diff -urN xterm-222-orig/debian/xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs 
xterm-222/debian/xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs
--- xterm-222-orig/debian/xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs1970-01-01 
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ xterm-222/debian/xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs 2006-11-26 13:09:31.0 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+Document: xterm-ctlseqs
+Title: Xterm Control Sequences
+Author: Edward Moy, Stephen Gildea, Thomas Dickey
+Abstract: This document describes the terminal control sequences that XTerm
+ recognizes.
+Section: XShells
+
+Format: text
+Files: /usr/share/doc/xterm/ctlseqs.txt.gz


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#400441: libXrandr: Calls UnlockDisplay without calling LockDisplay.

2006-11-26 Thread Josh Triplett
Package: libxrandr2
Version: 1.1.0.2-4
Severity: important
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream patch

libXrandr calls UnlockDisplay without calling LockDisplay.  This causes a
locking correctness assertion failure with libX11 1.1 and Xlib/XCB in
experimental, and will become RC after the etch release when libX11 1.1 enters
unstable.  Patch from upstream Git repository:

http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/lib/libXrandr.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=d914d05d34991b4cfa3af411fd2a3e281ea0e73b;hp=a8abbe92f0486f174fb89ca2c81eabede646bf32

- Josh Triplett



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#400444: xserver-xorg-video-nv: update removes package nvidia-glx

2006-11-26 Thread Martin Lutz
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
Version: 1:1.0.1.5-2
Severity: normal


The update of xserver-xorg-video-nv removes the package nvidia-glx,
which I need if I want to change to the commercial driver.

apt-get install xserver-xorg-video-nv xserver-xorg-core

The following packages will be REMOVED:
  freeglut3-dev libglu1-mesa-dev libglu1-xorg-dev nvidia-glx
  nvidia-glx-dev


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-nv depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  xserver-xorg-core1:1.0.2-9   X.Org X server -- core server

xserver-xorg-video-nv recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#400414: marked as done (xterm not installing (error in control file))

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:48:18 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400375: fixed in xterm 222-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: normal

Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs 
line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xterm
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
faerun:/home/tepperly# exit


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US)

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1   2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libice6  1:1.0.1-2   X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.5-5   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsm6   1:1.0.1-3   X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.3-4   X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7  1:1.0.2-4   X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxft2  2.1.8.2-8   FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6  1:1.0.2-2   X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6   1:1.0.2-2   X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps 1.0.1-2 Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  xutils  1:7.1.ds.3-1 X Window System utility programs

-- no debconf information

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xterm
Source-Version: 222-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xterm_222-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.diff.gz
xterm_222-3.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.dsc
xterm_222-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xterm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:37:22 -0500
Source: xterm
Binary: xterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 222-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 xterm  - X terminal emulator
Closes: 400375
Changes: 
 xterm (222-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Julien Cristau ]
   * Split xterm.doc-base in xterm.doc-base.faq and xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs, to
 make the package installable again, thanks to Ryan Murray
 (closes: #400375).
Files: 
 27120d4155859cc19c5858318dcf4b64 813 x11 optional xterm_222-3.dsc
 2e7e45264bdd32752531d37b7e3d3341 61407 x11 optional xterm_222-3.diff.gz
 01bef6889a6b2584359a01da17c74d0c 438388 x11 optional xterm_222-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFaNn4yLfpNdY0ad8RAt1RAJ4uOrt9L76Q2YXPeYsdfvISdB07xwCdEnlf
74rlTuC/uc/G9v94EYFyvWw=
=BhuZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#400424: marked as done (..error in control file)

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 11:48:18 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400375: fixed in xterm 222-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: normal


...I get:
Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
error in control file: `Format' value not specified at /usr/sbin/install-docs 
line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line 22.
 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-486
Locale: LANG=nb_NO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nb_NO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1   2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libice6  1:1.0.1-2   X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.5-5   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsm6   1:1.0.1-3   X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.3-4   X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7  1:1.0.2-4   X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxft2  2.1.8.2-8   FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6  1:1.0.2-2   X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6   1:1.0.2-2   X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps 1.0.1-2 Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  xutils  1:7.1.ds.3-1 X Window System utility programs

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: xterm
Source-Version: 222-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xterm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xterm_222-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.diff.gz
xterm_222-3.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3.dsc
xterm_222-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xterm/xterm_222-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xterm package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:37:22 -0500
Source: xterm
Binary: xterm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 222-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 xterm  - X terminal emulator
Closes: 400375
Changes: 
 xterm (222-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Julien Cristau ]
   * Split xterm.doc-base in xterm.doc-base.faq and xterm.doc-base.ctlseqs, to
 make the package installable again, thanks to Ryan Murray
 (closes: #400375).
Files: 
 27120d4155859cc19c5858318dcf4b64 813 x11 optional xterm_222-3.dsc
 2e7e45264bdd32752531d37b7e3d3341 61407 x11 optional xterm_222-3.diff.gz
 01bef6889a6b2584359a01da17c74d0c 438388 x11 optional xterm_222-3_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFaNn4yLfpNdY0ad8RAt1RAJ4uOrt9L76Q2YXPeYsdfvISdB07xwCdEnlf
74rlTuC/uc/G9v94EYFyvWw=
=BhuZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#400440: libxcomposite1: calls UnlockDisplay without calling LockDisplay first

2006-11-26 Thread Jamey Sharp
Package: libxcomposite1
Version: 1:0.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream patch

libXcomposite calls UnlockDisplay without calling LockDisplay.  This
causes a locking correctness assertion failure with libX11 1.1 and
Xlib/XCB in experimental, and will become RC after the etch release when
libX11 1.1 enters unstable.

http://gitweb.freedesktop.org/?p=xorg/lib/libXcomposite.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=f0a1453f24e29a9badc8f29d81c42c0eb3f67065

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages libxcomposite1 depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.3-3   X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxfixes3   1:4.0.1-4   X11 miscellaneous 'fixes' extensio
ii  x11-common   1:7.1.0-7   X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc

libxcomposite1 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#400450: xterm not installable

2006-11-26 Thread Mathias Brodala
Package: xterm
Version: 222-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Upgrading to the latest version fails:

 Reading package lists... Done
 Building dependency tree... Done
 The following packages will be upgraded:
   xterm
 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded.
 Need to get 0B/438kB of archives.
 After unpacking 36.9kB of additional disk space will be used.
 (Reading database ... 196388 files and directories currently
 installed.)
 Preparing to replace xterm 222-1 (using
 .../archives/xterm_222-2_i386.deb) ...
 Unpacking replacement xterm ...
 Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
 Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm
 ...
 error in control file: `Format' value not specified at
 /usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line
 22.
 dpkg: error processing xterm (--configure):
  subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
 Errors were encountered while processing:
  xterm
 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-k7
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to de_DE.UTF-8)

Versions of packages xterm depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libfontconfig1   2.4.1-2 generic font configuration library
ii  libice6  1:1.0.1-2   X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libncurses5  5.5-5   Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii  libsm6   1:1.0.1-3   X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6 2:1.0.3-4   X11 client-side library
ii  libxaw7  1:1.0.2-4   X11 Athena Widget library
ii  libxext6 1:1.0.1-2   X11 miscellaneous extension librar
ii  libxft2  2.1.8.2-8   FreeType-based font drawing librar
ii  libxmu6  1:1.0.2-2   X11 miscellaneous utility library
ii  libxt6   1:1.0.2-2   X11 toolkit intrinsics library
ii  xbitmaps 1.0.1-2 Base X bitmaps

Versions of packages xterm recommends:
ii  xutils  1:7.1.ds.3-1 X Window System utility programs

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFaXISYfUFJ3ewsJgRAhYKAKCB8ef3t9uw0fTKWVUqxmz8X6aDfwCfWGUu
7GkXj+P6XXNw7PCizPJ9wWc=
=/Klr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: notfound 400441 in 1.1.0.2-4, found 400441 in 2:1.1.0.2-4

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
 notfound 400441 1.1.0.2-4
Bug#400441: libXrandr: Calls UnlockDisplay without calling LockDisplay.
Bug marked as not found in version 1.1.0.2-4.

 found 400441 2:1.1.0.2-4
Bug#400441: libXrandr: Calls UnlockDisplay without calling LockDisplay.
Bug marked as found in version 2:1.1.0.2-4.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#164917: marked as done (xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies)

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 03:18:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#164917: xlibs-dev: moving away from Xmd.h arch dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: xlibs-dev
Version: 4.2.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream patch

This patch is an effort to start moving X into a more architecture
agnostic source code.

I am going to join the xpert list and see if why they don't use exact
integer types. This may kill the need for most or all of the
architecture dependencies in Xmd.h

--- /usr/include/X11/Xmd.h  2002-10-08 01:05:41.0 -0500
+++ includes/Xmd.h  2002-10-13 22:54:46.0 -0500
@@ -55,9 +55,11 @@
 /*
  * Special per-machine configuration flags.
  */
-#ifdef CRAY
+#if !defined(WORD64)  defined(CRAY)
 #define WORD64 /* 64-bit architecture */
 #endif
+
+#if !defined(LONG64)
 #if defined(__alpha) || defined(__alpha__) || \
 defined(__ia64__) || defined(ia64) || \
 defined(__sparc64__) || \
@@ -65,7 +67,9 @@
 (defined(__hppa__)  defined(__LP64__))
 #define LONG64 /* 32/64-bit architecture */
 #endif
-#ifdef __sgi
+#endif
+
+#if !defined(LONG64)  defined(__sgi)
 #if (_MIPS_SZLONG == 64)
 #define LONG64
 #endif

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux braindead 2.5.42acpidebug #1 SMP Mon Oct 14 20:29:43 CDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages xlibs-dev depends on:
ii  libc6-dev 2.2.5-15   GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  xlibs 4.2.1-2X Window System client libraries

-- no debconf information


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
tags 164917 + wontfix
thanks

The patch suggested in this bug has not been applied upstream in the
four years since it was suggested, and no longer applies cleanly. It is
predominantly whitespace changes and syntactic edits with no semantic
difference. It does not fix any bugs with this package or those that
depend on it, as far as I can tell.

It seems to me that this patch should be cleaned up and submitted
upstream if it's worthwhile, and should not be applied by Debian unless
and until it appears in an upstream release. So I'm marking this bug
wontfix and closing it.

--Jamey


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#400450: xterm not installable

2006-11-26 Thread Julien Cristau
close 400450 222-3
forcemerge 400375 400450
kthxbye

On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:53:06 +0100, Mathias Brodala wrote:

  Setting up xterm (222-2) ...
  Installing new version of config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/KOI8RXTerm
  ...
  error in control file: `Format' value not specified at
  /usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, /usr/share/doc-base/xterm-faq line
  22.

Hi, this bug has already been reported (at least 7 times now) and is
fixed in xterm 222-3, which is in incoming.debian.org right now and
should hit the mirrors tonight (european time).

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: xterm not installable

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 close 400450 222-3
Bug#400450: xterm not installable
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 222-3, send any further explanations to Mathias 
Brodala [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 forcemerge 400375 400450
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400450: xterm not installable
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error in control file: `Format' value not specified 
at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, /usr/share/doc-bae/xterm-faq line 22.
Bug#400403: invalid doc-base file
Bug#400414: xterm not installing (error in control file)
Bug#400424: ..error in control file
Forcibly Merged 400375 400389 400401 400403 400414 400424 400450.

 kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: forcibly merging 400375 400450

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
 forcemerge 400375 400450
Bug#400375: fails to install
Bug#400450: xterm not installable
Bug#400389: xterm: installation fails
Bug#400401: xterm upgrade: error in control file: `Format' value not specified 
at /usr/sbin/install-docs line 699, /usr/share/doc-bae/xterm-faq line 22.
Bug#400403: invalid doc-base file
Bug#400414: xterm not installing (error in control file)
Bug#400424: ..error in control file
Forcibly Merged 400375 400389 400401 400403 400414 400424 400450.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: retitle 382225 to xterm: provide example configuration for draggable scrollbars

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
 retitle 382225 xterm: provide example configuration for draggable scrollbars
Bug#382225: xterm: scrollbars like firefox's
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#400444: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-nv: update removes package nvidia-glx)

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:21:54 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#400444: xserver-xorg-video-nv: update removes package 
nvidia-glx
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
Version: 1:1.0.1.5-2
Severity: normal


The update of xserver-xorg-video-nv removes the package nvidia-glx,
which I need if I want to change to the commercial driver.

apt-get install xserver-xorg-video-nv xserver-xorg-core

The following packages will be REMOVED:
  freeglut3-dev libglu1-mesa-dev libglu1-xorg-dev nvidia-glx
  nvidia-glx-dev


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-nv depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  xserver-xorg-core1:1.0.2-9   X.Org X server -- core server

xserver-xorg-video-nv recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:04:51 +0100, Martin Lutz wrote:

 Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
 Version: 1:1.0.1.5-2
 Severity: normal
 
 
 The update of xserver-xorg-video-nv removes the package nvidia-glx,
 which I need if I want to change to the commercial driver.
 
Your version of nvidia-glx doesn't work with xserver-xorg-core 1.1, you
need the newer version from sid.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---


Bug#400505: xserver-xorg-video-mga: hangs on low AGP memory

2006-11-26 Thread Jens Seidel
Package: xserver-xorg-video-mga
Severity: important
Version: 1.4.4.dfsg.1-1

Using an OpenGL application I noticed a strange behaviour of xorg:
The application and probably the whole X server freezes but I can still
move the mouse (there is no access to the window manager menus). 
Logging into the system via ssh works and I noticed that xorg consumes
95-99% of the CPU. I killed it after a few hours with signal 9, the screen
gets blanked but I still cannot access a virtual console.
Starting X from ssh seems not to work (stops after displaying
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf).

dmesg reports

[drm] Initialized drm 1.0.1 20051102
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] - Link [LNKA] - GSI 10 (level, low) - 
IRQ 10
[drm] Initialized mga 3.2.1 20051102 on minor 0
agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at :00:00.0.
agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at :00:00.0 into 1x mode
agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at :01:00.0 into 1x mode
[drm:mga_do_agp_dma_bootstrap] *ERROR* Unable to bind AGP memory: -22
[drm] Initialized card for PCI DMA.

The graphic card is a Matrox Millenium G400 AGP:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400/G450 (rev 04)
01:00.0 0300: 102b:0525 (rev 04)

Driver: mga

BIOS settings:
AGP Aperture Size 4M
AGP-4X Mode Disabled
AGP Driving Control Auto

Increasing 4MB to 128MB help to prevent this problem but Xorg should keep
usable even with 4MB.

I attached the log which ends with
(EE) MGA(0): [dri] Idle timed out, resetting engine...

PS: The (default!??) resolution configured for this card (not long time ago)
was 1280x920, not 1280x1024.

Jens


Xorg.0.log.bz2
Description: Binary data


Bug#400507: Endianess problem whith compiz on PPC

2006-11-26 Thread Stephane Louise

Package: compiz-core
Version: 0.2.2-1

I tried compiz on my PPC mac-mini, but colours are wrongs. Compiz itself 
seems to have a little warning when it is starts:



~$ compiz --replace 
[1] 6396
~$ libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x4b
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x4b
/usr/bin/compiz.real: water: GL_ARB_fragment_program is missing



Nonetheless, OpenGl programs and games are working the way the ought to 
be, with correct colours. Compiz is the only one presenting a colour bug.


Observed effects are: a quite uniform blue shade (the blue and magenta 
syndrome), and some colour inversions (green to red, etc).



I saw that the same exact bug had been corrected for the ubuntu version 
of the Beryl project. The related page is:


http://blog.effraie.org/index.php/post/2006/10/26/Beryl/Emerald-sur-Edgy-PPC

and the related screenshot of the infamous blue shade is here (for beryl 
also):

http://vrac.effraie.org/beryl.png

If necessary I can provide the same kind of screenshot for the Debian 
version of compiz.
Last, but not least, on the first link I provided, it is said that the 
bug is xorg related rather than Beryl related, in this case. Since the 
symptoms look the same, I expect the reasons are the same here, but I 
cannot be sure.


I use a fairly up to date Etch Debian distribution with the standard 
linux 2.6.17-2-powerpc kernel.

The videocard as listed by lspci:
:00:10.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 
[Radeon 9200] (rev 01)


And I use the standard aty/radeon drivers for xorg.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



xspecs REMOVED from testing

2006-11-26 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the xspecs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:1.0.1-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: Package not in unstable

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#400515: /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/us: backslash not working in us layout if layout set to cz, us

2006-11-26 Thread Marek Schmidt
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.9-4
Severity: minor
File: /usr/share/X11/xkb/symbols/us


Hi!

The BKSL key (backslash/pipe key) is not working properly if I set xxkbmap to

setxkbmap -rules xorg -model pc105 -layout cz,us -option
grp:alt_shift_toggle

The backslash key does not set back to backslash/pipe key when toggled
to us layout from cz layout. It has the same cz function on both
layouts.

Strangely enough, if I set us layout first...

setxkbmap -rules xorg -model pc105 -layout us,cz -option
grp:alt_shift_toggle

...everything works correctly.

Attached patch fixes the problem for me:

--- symbols/us.orig 2006-11-26 20:46:13.0 +0100
+++ symbols/us  2006-11-26 20:54:51.0 +0100
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
 key AB08 {   [ comma,less]   };
 key AB09 {   [period,greater ]   };
 key AB10 {   [ slash,question]   };
+key BKSL {   [ backslash,bar ] };

// End alphanumeric section
 };


Thank you,

Marek

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-k7
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to cs_CZ.UTF-8)

-- no debconf information
--- symbols/us.orig	2006-11-26 20:46:13.0 +0100
+++ symbols/us	2006-11-26 20:54:51.0 +0100
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
 key AB08 {	[ comma,	less		]	};
 key AB09 {	[period,	greater		]	};
 key AB10 {	[ slash,	question	]	};
+key BKSL {	[ backslash,	bar	]	};
 
 // End alphanumeric section
 };


Processed: tagging 354187

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
 # tagged pending back in February
 tags 354187 - pending
Bug#354187: libX11-6 : locales
Tags were: pending
Tags removed: pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: reassign 399789 to libx11-6

2006-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22
 reassign 399789 libx11-6
Bug#399789: xterm: does not honor ~/.Xdefaults
Bug reassigned from package `xterm' to `libx11-6'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#370709: xserver-xorg-video-nv: system hang in NVSync() when scrolling programs or terminal windows

2006-11-26 Thread Bernard Jungen
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 04:15:21PM +0200, Per Blomqvist wrote:
 Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
 Version: 1:1.0.1.5-2
 Severity: important
 
 
 Hello. 
 
 My X hangs sometimes when scrolling aterm and programs listbox.
 
 I made a previouse bugreport (soon two years ago):
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=277309
 Go and look at that report for full story. 
 I did some folwups, but have more to tell now.
 
 (What I have done since then, was holding back the update, with 
 /etc/apt/preferences:
 
 Package: xserver-xfree86
 Pin: release v=6.8.2.dfsg.1-10
 Pin-Priority: 1001
 
 BUT now when the names, and dependencies have changed.. It's getting
 harder to hold it back. )

I agree, that bug wouldn't have been a problem if downgrading X had been
easy to do. IMHO, mentioning X hanging possibility in the description of
such an important package would have greatly helped people like us avoid
getting trapped in that buggy environment. And having only a 56k connection
at upgrade time didn't help my sentiment of course. Nevertheless, that
bug greatly damages the Linux X stability reputation. What's an ignorant
user to do when confronted with X hanging much more often than Windows?

 The bug isn't active when NoAccel are set.
 And I find that ShadowFB set, also fix the problem.
 (But these two fixes have it's own problems.. As, my tv-card doesn't
 work with ShadowFB, and mouse scrolling looks terible with NoAccel.)
 
 And.. I have done some compiling of this package, and believe the problem
 isn't in this package, ehe! Here is the loong story: I reversed all the
 changes done on the nv.o/nv.so source files, in this package, so it match the 
 last recorded stable version (6.8.. in then xfree86, there wasn't that many 
 changes). 
 But the driver I produced have the same problem. So.. the bug must be
 traced to some of the includes headers things, of whatever dependens I
 can't dig that deep.
 
 Any ideer what?

I think you're right about the bug(s) not being in the card driver.
Latest version (unstable 1.2.0-3) of the card driver seems to make X a
bit more stable but X still hangs occasionally here.

Try using this X config option: XaaNoScanlineCPUToScreenColorExpandFill.
It seems to fix the problem for me *without* any noticeable redraw speed
problems. BTW, wouldn't the problem go away, Alt-SysRq-K is your friend.

A test of mine is this: run a program that outputs a lot of data
in an xterm making it scroll for very long, and resize its window manually
with the mouse for some time (solid redraws are enabled of course).

Another test: manipulate big sound files with sweep.

I hope it helps. Cheers,

Bernard.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]