xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: xserver-xorg-video-ati-dbg_6.13.1-2_i386.deb to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-ati/xserver-xorg-video-ati-dbg_6.13.1-2_i386.deb xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2.diff.gz to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-ati/xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2.diff.gz xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2.dsc to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-ati/xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2.dsc xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2_i386.deb to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-ati/xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2_i386.deb xserver-xorg-video-radeon-dbg_6.13.1-2_i386.deb to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-ati/xserver-xorg-video-radeon-dbg_6.13.1-2_i386.deb xserver-xorg-video-radeon_6.13.1-2_i386.deb to main/x/xserver-xorg-video-ati/xserver-xorg-video-radeon_6.13.1-2_i386.deb Override entries for your package: xserver-xorg-video-ati-dbg_6.13.1-2_i386.deb - extra debug xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2.dsc - source x11 xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2_i386.deb - optional x11 xserver-xorg-video-radeon-dbg_6.13.1-2_i386.deb - extra debug xserver-xorg-video-radeon_6.13.1-2_i386.deb - optional x11 Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ozgon-7e...@franck.debian.org
Processing of xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2_i386.changes
xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2.dsc xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2.diff.gz xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.13.1-2_i386.deb xserver-xorg-video-ati-dbg_6.13.1-2_i386.deb xserver-xorg-video-radeon_6.13.1-2_i386.deb xserver-xorg-video-radeon-dbg_6.13.1-2_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ozgnk-0008rk...@franck.debian.org
xserver-xorg-video-ati: Changes to 'refs/tags/xserver-xorg-video-ati-1_6.13.1-2'
Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-ati-1_6.13.1-2' created by Brice Goglin at 2010-07-15 05:11 + Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.13.1-2 to unstable. Changes since xserver-xorg-video-ati-1_6.13.1-1: Brice Goglin (3): Make libudev-dev build dependencies linux-any Update changelog after cherry-pick Prepare changelog for upload Dave Airlie (1): fix build on non-kms --- debian/changelog |7 +++ debian/control |2 +- src/r6xx_accel.c |2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ozgkf-0003r2...@alioth.debian.org
xserver-xorg-video-ati: Changes to 'debian-unstable'
debian/changelog |7 +++
debian/control |2 +-
src/r6xx_accel.c |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit d9da70ca0fab45487f3888174311207afa1b0d71
Author: Brice Goglin
Date: Thu Jul 15 07:07:10 2010 +0200
Prepare changelog for upload
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 622ca28..e397f1b 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-xserver-xorg-video-ati (1:6.13.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+xserver-xorg-video-ati (1:6.13.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Make libudev-dev build dependencies linux-any.
* Pull upstream commit 06691376 to fix build without KMS.
- -- Brice Goglin Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:06:04 +0200
+ -- Brice Goglin Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:07:07 +0200
xserver-xorg-video-ati (1:6.13.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
commit b2d0c07efb08ec562c0cbf3df3dd6796f47d80bb
Author: Brice Goglin
Date: Thu Jul 15 07:07:00 2010 +0200
Update changelog after cherry-pick
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 865a299..622ca28 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
xserver-xorg-video-ati (1:6.13.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* Make libudev-dev build dependencies linux-any.
+ * Pull upstream commit 06691376 to fix build without KMS.
- -- Brice Goglin Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:13:45 +0200
+ -- Brice Goglin Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:06:04 +0200
xserver-xorg-video-ati (1:6.13.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
commit 41d0440ede985724f6becf3a5a2356efb98c42f5
Author: Dave Airlie
Date: Wed Jul 7 13:15:03 2010 +1000
fix build on non-kms
diff --git a/src/r6xx_accel.c b/src/r6xx_accel.c
index 0edfe8b..73f9462 100644
--- a/src/r6xx_accel.c
+++ b/src/r6xx_accel.c
@@ -1262,9 +1262,9 @@ void r600_finish_op(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, int vtx_size)
void r600_vb_no_space(ScrnInfoPtr pScrn, int vert_size)
{
-#ifdef XF86DRM_MODE
RADEONInfoPtr info = RADEONPTR(pScrn);
struct radeon_accel_state *accel_state = info->accel_state;
+#ifdef XF86DRM_MODE
if (info->cs) {
if (accel_state->vb_bo) {
commit dea9487e0a588c8d85497df5f946a29ee5d174cd
Author: Brice Goglin
Date: Wed Jul 14 20:14:28 2010 +0200
Make libudev-dev build dependencies linux-any
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index c73349f..865a299 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+xserver-xorg-video-ati (1:6.13.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+ * Make libudev-dev build dependencies linux-any.
+
+ -- Brice Goglin Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:13:45 +0200
+
xserver-xorg-video-ati (1:6.13.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 57cdbf6..189a451 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Build-Depends:
libdrm-dev (>= 2.4.17) [!hurd-i386],
x11proto-dri2-dev,
x11proto-xf86dri-dev,
- libudev-dev,
+ libudev-dev [linux-any],
dpkg-dev (>= 1.14.17),
automake,
libtool,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ozgjw-0003pf...@alioth.debian.org
Bug#589075: xserver-xorg-video-intel: rendering errors with driver from experimental
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 20:31:28 +0200, Wolfram Quester wrote: > Hi altogether, > > I'm on a Macbook from 2007 an testing the intel driver in experimental > requested on debian-devel. > Since I upgraded I have rendering errors, especially of text in gnome-terminal > (sometimes letter are missing, sometimes whole lines look as if someone wiped > over them with a dirty sponge on a black board). Sometimes this not only > affects the text or inner area of windows, but also Window decorations and > menus with the distortion reaching into the inner areas of the winows. This > artifact mainly happens in the upper left areas of the windows, rarely in > other > areas. > Please report this upstream, following the instructions at http://intellinuxgraphics.org/how_to_report_bug.html Then let us know the bug number so we can track it. Thanks for your report, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [RFC] removing xserver-xorg-video-nv from squeeze
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:36:10 -0400 (EDT), Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> ... I didn't ask for an UMS-related bug reference. For some reason I was under the impression that KMS drivers were limited to modes which can be set by the video BIOS. I stand corrected. A bug report will be forth-coming. -- .''`. Stephen Powell : :' : `. `'` `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2044848160.193276.1279129700306.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
Bug#589045: libdrm-intel1/etc. useless package split
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 18:38:33 +0300, Török Edwin wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:47:21 +0100 > Julien Cristau wrote: > > > No. > > Hi, > > No in what sense? > The packages are meant to be individually installable/removable in > which case it is a bug in libdrm-intel1? > Or are the packages not meant to be individually installable/removable > in which case there should be only 1 libdrm package? > They're shared libraries, so they're meant to be installed as dependencies of other packages. So "no" in the sense "there's no bug here". Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#589045: marked as done (libdrm-intel1/etc. useless package split)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:47:21 +0100 with message-id <20100714144721.gc3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> and subject line Re: Bug#589045: libdrm-intel1/etc. useless package split has caused the Debian Bug report #589045, regarding libdrm-intel1/etc. useless package split to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 589045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589045 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libdrm-intel1 Version: 2.4.20-2 Severity: normal I see that there are a bunch of libdrm packages installed on my system: ii libdrm-dev 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to kernel DRM services - ii libdrm-intel1 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to intel-specific kernel ii libdrm-nouveau1 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to nouveau-specific kern ii libdrm-radeon1 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to radeon-specific kerne ii libdrm2 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to kernel DRM services - How nice, I can keep only the drm package I need for my card and remove the rest, right? That is why they were split into separate packages in the first place, right? Wrong. I have a radeon card, so I try removing libdrm-intel1. # apt-get remove libdrm-intel1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: libdrm-dev libdrm-intel1 libgl1-mesa-dri xorg xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-intel That didn't go well. # apt-get remove libdrm-nouveau1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: libdrm-dev libdrm-nouveau1 xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-nouveau This is a bit better, but it still wants to remove the -dev package. To sum up: the libdrm-* split is useless: you can't remove one package without removing all the other, so why split them up in the first place? Please either make these packages individually installable/removable, or create just 1 libdrm package and don't split it into 3 different packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-rc3-1-g6bdebf9 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libdrm-intel1 depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libdrm2 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to kernel DRM libdrm-intel1 recommends no packages. libdrm-intel1 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- No. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#589045: libdrm-intel1/etc. useless package split
Package: libdrm-intel1 Version: 2.4.20-2 Severity: normal I see that there are a bunch of libdrm packages installed on my system: ii libdrm-dev 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to kernel DRM services - ii libdrm-intel1 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to intel-specific kernel ii libdrm-nouveau1 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to nouveau-specific kern ii libdrm-radeon1 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to radeon-specific kerne ii libdrm2 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to kernel DRM services - How nice, I can keep only the drm package I need for my card and remove the rest, right? That is why they were split into separate packages in the first place, right? Wrong. I have a radeon card, so I try removing libdrm-intel1. # apt-get remove libdrm-intel1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: libdrm-dev libdrm-intel1 libgl1-mesa-dri xorg xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-intel That didn't go well. # apt-get remove libdrm-nouveau1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: libdrm-dev libdrm-nouveau1 xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-nouveau This is a bit better, but it still wants to remove the -dev package. To sum up: the libdrm-* split is useless: you can't remove one package without removing all the other, so why split them up in the first place? Please either make these packages individually installable/removable, or create just 1 libdrm package and don't split it into 3 different packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-rc3-1-g6bdebf9 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libdrm-intel1 depends on: ii libc6 2.11.2-2 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib ii libdrm2 2.4.20-2 Userspace interface to kernel DRM libdrm-intel1 recommends no packages. libdrm-intel1 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100714142513.3015.89611.report...@localhost
