Bug#623969: libgl1-mesa-dri: Major gallium 2D performance bottleneck (most noticable with compiz)

2011-04-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
forwarded 623969 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36596
thanks

Jason Cassell bluesloth...@gmail.com (25/04/2011):
 The issue persists.
 
 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36596

Thanks for checking and forwarding upstream.

KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#623969: libgl1-mesa-dri: Major gallium 2D performance bottleneck (most noticable with compiz)

2011-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forwarded 623969 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36596
Bug #623969 [libgl1-mesa-dri] libgl1-mesa-dri: Major gallium 2D performance 
bottleneck (most noticable with compiz)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36596'.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
623969: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623969
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13037986512905.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#624146: xserver-xorg-video-intel: [SandyBridge] Totem crahses X.Org and then Failed to allocate framebuffer

2011-04-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi,

Luca Capello l...@pca.it (26/04/2011):
 Restarting GDM3 caused me to discover the error in the X.Org log
 [2][3], and I am sorry I did not check it before, so I do not really
 what was the cause of Totem crashing.

you could try that for next time:
  http://pkg-xorg.alioth.debian.org/howto/use-gdb.html

Anyway, you might want to try a x-x-v-intel backport for SandyBridge
when they come up, proposed backports policy there:
  http://pkg-xorg.alioth.debian.org/reference/squeeze-backports.html

 [3] why do I have 4 different of them?

Enjoy gdm3.

 [4] why is GDM3 never picking up VT 7?

Enjoy gdm3.

KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#624156: libGLw.so missing glwMDrawingAreaWidgetClass

2011-04-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi,

Steve M. Robbins s...@debian.org (25/04/2011):
 This bug is almost a repeat of #527483 except that the symbol is
 present in the static library.  It's not present in the shared lib,
 however, which breaks the build of Inventor.

apparently, you want to use something Motif-y while motif support
isn't enabled by default, according to that mail, and to configure.ac:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa3d-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05405.html

I guess we could consider building libGLw against lesstif2 (you could
try that for yourself by passing --enable-motif).

KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#624156: libGLw.so missing glwMDrawingAreaWidgetClass

2011-04-26 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:34:42AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Steve M. Robbins s...@debian.org (25/04/2011):
  This bug is almost a repeat of #527483 except that the symbol is
  present in the static library.  It's not present in the shared lib,
  however, which breaks the build of Inventor.
 
 apparently, you want to use something Motif-y while motif support
 isn't enabled by default,

The original bug (527483) was indeed that Motif became disabled by
default and the Debian build did not use --enable-motif.  That was
fixed.

Look at debian/rules for 7.10.2-1 and you'll see --enable-motif used
in many of the configure lines.  The bug today is that the shared lib
is not built using --enable-motif but the static one is.

Cheers,
-Steve


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#592855: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Garbage on Screen running some applications

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:16:08 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:

 package xserver-xorg-video-intel
 found 592855 2:2.14.0-4
 thanks
 
 On 13-Aug-2010, Jolinar wrote:
 
  Garbage on screen running some applications like audacious,
  openoffice, or browsing web pages w/flash content. Colour Distortion
  in icons and fonts , horizontal colour lines, dots, spots, etc.
 
 I get behaviour that meets the same description above.
 
Please file your own bug for your own issue.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426083328.gj2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#605750: Please remove hal from LSB init header

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 13:31:49 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:

 Am 03.12.2010 13:24, schrieb Michael Biebl:
  On 03.12.2010 10:54, Julien Cristau wrote:
  On Fri, Dec  3, 2010 at 03:05:14 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
 
  Package: xdm
  given that Xorg no longer uses hal for input hotplugging, the
  Should-Start/Should-Stop: hal in xdm's LSB init header no longer makes
  sense and should be removed.
 
  Xorg uses hal on kfreebsd.
  
  The hal version in experimental (0.5.14-4), which will be uploaded to sid 
  after
  the squeeze release, will use D-Bus activation, to start hal on demand.
  So even on kfreebsd it should be safe to remove it then.
 
 FWIW, the D-Bus activated HAL version is in unstable/wheezy now.
 
It's not in squeeze though, so removing the Should-Start from xdm.init
at this point would break partial upgrades.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426083525.gk2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#613593: Closing, not a bug but a configuration error

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:45:23 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:

 notfound 613593 1:6.13.2-2
 thanks
 
notfound doesn't mean what you think it means.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426083628.gl2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#622553: xserver-xorg: Calling XFlush causes a crasch from XNextEvent under 64 bit squeeze

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 23:40:00 +0200, Leif Asbrink wrote:

 Package: xserver-xorg
 Version: 1:7.5+8
 Severity: normal
 
 Not long ago (Mandriva 2007, 2.6.18 or so) it was necessary to call XFlush() 
 to
 make moving objects that were placed on screen with XPutImage mov smoothly.
 Long ago (Red Hat 9.0 2.4.20 or so) the screen would stay black until a call
 was made to XFlush (or the mouse was moved or a key pressed.)
 
 The man page says XFlush is not needed, but for compatibility I want to keep
 it.
 Xflush causes XNextEvent to kill my application with this error:
 .../../src/xcb_io.c:249:
 process_responses: Assertion'(((long) (dpy-last_request_read) - (long) (dpy-
 request)) = 0)' failed.
 
 This happens when I use the mouse on the title bar to move around my own
 or any other application.
 
 I can only see the problem on my 64 bit squeeze. It was not present in 64 bit
 Lenny
 and it is not present in 32 bit squeeze or any other distribution as far as I
 know.
 
 Everything was updated to the latest state on April 12 2011.
 
Is this reproducible with libx11-6 2:1.4.3-1?  Can you share a test app
demonstrating the bug?

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426090858.go2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#622660: xserver-xorg-video-vesa: The vesa video driver does not allow users on the console to execute X

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
reassign 622660 xserver-xorg
tag 622660 moreinfo
kthxbye

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 17:52:11 +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:

 Package: xserver-xorg-video-vesa
 Version: 1:2.3.0-5
 Severity: normal
 
 
   Executing X on a console (/dev/tty?) (a laptop computer)
 with the vesa video driver results in an error message:
 
 X: user not authorized to run the X server, aborting.
 
   The file /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config contains:
 
 allowed_users=console
 
   This parameter must then be changed to anybody to bypass the
 error.
 
   That should not be necessary.
 
Care to provide the full contents of Xwrapper.config, and the output of
'dpkg -s xserver-xorg' and 'stat `readlink -f /dev/stdin`'?

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426092715.gp2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#622695: xserver-xorg-video-intel: (EE)No devices dtected with intel driver and 82830 grphics

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:27:03 -0300, Ramon Caraballo wrote:

 Well and How I can avoid to get black screen on boot?

Try a newer kernel, or stick with the vesa driver if that doesn't work.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426092950.gq2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Re: x11-apps: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:05:59 +, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:

 diff --git a/debian/patches/oclock-ftbfs.diff 
 b/debian/patches/oclock-ftbfs.diff
 new file mode 100644
 index 000..edc8b7d
 --- /dev/null
 +++ b/debian/patches/oclock-ftbfs.diff
 @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
 +diff --git a/oclock/configure b/oclock/configure
 +index e3f9cc5..9ad7c3a 100755
 +--- a/oclock/configure
  b/oclock/configure
 +@@ -4603,11 +4603,11 @@ if test -n $OCLOCK_CFLAGS; then
 +  elif test -n $PKG_CONFIG; then
 + if test -n $PKG_CONFIG  \
 + { { $as_echo $as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \$PKG_CONFIG --exists 
 --print-errors \x11 xmu xext\; } 5
 +-  ($PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors x11 xmu xext) 25
 ++  ($PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors x11 xmu xext xt) 25
 +   ac_status=$?
 +   $as_echo $as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \$? = $ac_status 5
 +   test $ac_status = 0; }; then
 +-  pkg_cv_OCLOCK_CFLAGS=`$PKG_CONFIG --cflags x11 xmu xext 2/dev/null`
 ++  pkg_cv_OCLOCK_CFLAGS=`$PKG_CONFIG --cflags x11 xmu xext xt 2/dev/null`
 + else
 +   pkg_failed=yes
 + fi
 +@@ -4619,11 +4619,11 @@ if test -n $OCLOCK_LIBS; then
 +  elif test -n $PKG_CONFIG; then
 + if test -n $PKG_CONFIG  \
 + { { $as_echo $as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \$PKG_CONFIG --exists 
 --print-errors \x11 xmu xext\; } 5
 +-  ($PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors x11 xmu xext) 25
 ++  ($PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors x11 xmu xext xt) 25
 +   ac_status=$?
 +   $as_echo $as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: \$? = $ac_status 5
 +   test $ac_status = 0; }; then
 +-  pkg_cv_OCLOCK_LIBS=`$PKG_CONFIG --libs x11 xmu xext 2/dev/null`
 ++  pkg_cv_OCLOCK_LIBS=`$PKG_CONFIG --libs x11 xmu xext xt 2/dev/null`
 + else
 +   pkg_failed=yes
 + fi
 +@@ -4641,9 +4641,9 @@ else
 + _pkg_short_errors_supported=no
 + fi
 + if test $_pkg_short_errors_supported = yes; then
 +-OCLOCK_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --short-errors --print-errors 
 x11 xmu xext 21`
 ++OCLOCK_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --short-errors --print-errors 
 x11 xmu xext xt 21`
 + else
 +-OCLOCK_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --print-errors x11 xmu xext 
 21`
 ++OCLOCK_PKG_ERRORS=`$PKG_CONFIG --print-errors x11 xmu xext xt 
 21`
 + fi
 + # Put the nasty error message in config.log where it belongs
 + echo $OCLOCK_PKG_ERRORS 5

Please don't include generated files in quilt patches.  Either patch
directly or run the scripts on package build.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426093227.gs2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Re: x11-apps: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:05:59 +, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:

  debian/control   |5 ++-
  debian/patches/oclock-ftbfs.diff |   57 
 +++
  debian/patches/series|1 
  3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 
Also this is missing patch description and debian/changelog entries.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426093311.gt2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#576211: Lid Switch Unable to query/initialize Synaptics hardware.

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:07:50 +0200, Michele Porelli wrote:

 I've a similar(?) problem...
 
No you don't.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426093114.gr2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#622894: xserver-xorg: VT switching does not work.

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 18:46:51 +0200, Enno Deimel wrote:

 Kernel version (/proc/version):
 ---
 Linux version 2.6.30.bootlogd (2.6.30) (root@mash) (gcc version 4.3.4 (Debian 
 4.3.4-6) ) #1 Fri Sep 3 18:13:12 CEST 2010
 
Try again without xorg.conf and with debian's standard kernel (2.6.32 or
2.6.38).

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426093609.gu2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#594684: Please apply and rebuild the package

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 15:19:59 +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote:

 On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:05:07 +0200
 Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
 
  Roman Mamedov r...@romanrm.ru (18/04/2011):
   So... with a patch available for 1 month+, why is this still not
   applied and uploaded? The driver is currently useless on MIPS
   without this patch. Why do you make people jump through hoops just
   to use Debian on the Yeeloong (manually recompiling Xorg)?
   http://wiki.debian.org/DebianYeeloong/HowTo/Install
  
  you know about volunteer-based distributions? Debian is one of
  them. Meaning nobody (generally) gets paid to work on it, and meaning
  stuff gets done when people have time to.
 
 If a person stepped up to be a maintainer of a package, a certain amount of
 responsibility is expected. If they can not do something as simple as
 applying an already prepared patch in a 1.5 month timeframe, maybe it's
 time for them to just stop holding things up and put the package up as
 orphaned. If you have people waiting and relying on you, and simply can't
 deliver, then just stop wasting everyone's time.
 
 Actually I reviewed the patch and notice it actually touches not the
 -siliconmotion driver, but xserver-xorg-core. Maybe the bug should be
 reassigned as well?
 
I don't think this patch has ever been submitted upstream to Xorg.
Whoever wants it integrated needs to do that.

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426094432.gv2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Processed: severity of 556694 is important, severity of 556872 is important, severity of 556871 is important

2011-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # please leave my bugs alone kthxbye
 severity 556694 important
Bug #556694 [src:xdm] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Bug #614270 [src:xdm] xdm: FTBFS with --no-add-needed (default in wheezy/sid)
Bug #618085 [src:xdm] xdm: FTBFS: libXext.so.6: could not read symbols: Invalid 
operation
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

 severity 556872 important
Bug #556872 [src:x11-session-utils] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

 severity 556871 important
Bug #556871 [src:x11-apps] FTBFS with binutils-gold
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
556871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556871
556872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556872
556694: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=556694
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13038108093004.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#623604: xserver-xorg: AllowEmptyInput kills keyboard mouse

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 18:54:14 +0100, Conrad Hughes wrote:

 Package: xserver-xorg
 Version: 1:7.6+6
 Severity: normal
 
 
 A fresh amd64 install of wheezy with Graphical desktop environment
 selected in tasksel failed to start a usable graphical environment: the
 image was corrupt, and keyboard and mouse input were ignored.
 
Please submit the dmesg output when running in that default
configuration (no xorg.conf, no nvidia packages).

Cheers,
Julien



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426095124.gw2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Processed: closing 622175

2011-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 close 622175
Bug#622175: xserver-xorg-input-all: USB mouse and keyboard: I have to connect 
them to another USB
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Martin martin.m...@desineo.com

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
622175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13038117015730.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: closing 623604

2011-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 close 623604
Bug#623604: xserver-xorg: AllowEmptyInput kills keyboard  mouse
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Conrad Hughes debb...@xrad.org

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
623604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623604
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13038117155906.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: severity of 623961 is normal, reassign 623961 to xserver-xorg-core

2011-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 623961 normal
Bug #623961 [xserver-xorg-input-evdev] xserver-xorg-input-evdev: X11 mouse 
keys / plot mode completely unusable post-Lenny, on 3 machines
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'

 reassign 623961 xserver-xorg-core 2:1.7.7-13
Bug #623961 [xserver-xorg-input-evdev] xserver-xorg-input-evdev: X11 mouse 
keys / plot mode completely unusable post-Lenny, on 3 machines
Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg-input-evdev' to 'xserver-xorg-core'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions xserver-xorg-input-evdev/1:2.3.2-6.
Bug #623961 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xorg-input-evdev: X11 mouse keys / 
plot mode completely unusable post-Lenny, on 3 machines
Bug Marked as found in versions xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
623961: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623961
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13038118356615.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Unidentified subject!

2011-04-26 Thread bounce-debian-x=archive=mail-archive . com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110426111310.3955.94121.reportbug@localhost.localdomain



xorg-server: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
 debian/changelog |6 ++
 debian/control   |2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit 7bff3095550502e85017f3376f59114e896488cc
Author: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
Date:   Tue Apr 26 13:25:23 2011 +0200

Build xserver-xorg-core-udeb on hurd-i386.  Thanks, Samuel Thibault!

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 0c367f2..42ba9d4 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+xorg-server (2:1.10.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Build xserver-xorg-core-udeb on hurd-i386.  Thanks, Samuel Thibault!
+
+ -- Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org  Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:24:04 +0200
+
 xorg-server (2:1.10.1-1) experimental; urgency=low
 
   * New upstream release.
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 8a97023..ad69157 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ Package: xserver-xorg-core-udeb
 XC-Package-Type: udeb
 Section: debian-installer
 # exclude sparc because of linker errors
-Architecture: alpha amd64 armel armhf hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 
kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe s390
+Architecture: alpha amd64 armel armhf hppa hurd-i386 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 
kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe s390
 Depends:
 # merged: xserver-common (= ${source:Version}),
  xkb-data-udeb,


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qegos-0004dh...@alioth.debian.org



Bug#623604: xserver-xorg: AllowEmptyInput kills keyboard mouse

2011-04-26 Thread Conrad Hughes

Cyril Agreed. Conrad, can you please check udev+/run's status on your end?

Not sure what you mean by this, sorry..?

Conrad



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qegor-0001td...@sleekit.xrad.org



Bug#623604: xserver-xorg: AllowEmptyInput kills keyboard mouse

2011-04-26 Thread Conrad Hughes

Hi Julien,

Julien Please submit the dmesg output when running in that default
Julien configuration (no xorg.conf, no nvidia packages).

Hrm.  I've done a number of apt-get upgrades since last week, and cannot
now replicate the problem.  Removing nvidia (to run nouveau) and
removing xorg.conf, everything now just works, unlike from that fresh
install.  If you still want to see an old /var/log/dmesg from prior to
my fix, let me know.  Otherwise I guess this should be closed.  Sorry
for seemingly wasting your time :(

Conrad



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qegio-0001ev...@sleekit.xrad.org



xterm-270

2011-04-26 Thread Thomas Dickey
Patch #270 - 2011/04/26

 * build-fix, e.g., for using imake on platforms which use the termcap
   library.
 * modify utf8 resource to accept a name.
 * mention  default  for  fontWarnings  in  manpage  (report by Werner
   Scheinast).
 * split UTF-8 menu entry into UTF-8 Encoding and UTF-8 Fonts.
 * gray-out  font-menu  entries  when  a  font  fails to load, e.g., a
   bitmap font is not installed.
 * improve behavior when there is no app-defaults file:
  + set the toolBar resource to false
  + gray-out the font menu entries where no resource is found.
 * add configure option --with-desktop-category to allow customization
   of the .desktop files.
 * build-fix   for   the   install-desktop   makefile-rule,  when  the
   source/build directories differ (patch by Lo??c Minier).
 * add  menu  entry  and  corresponding  resource which can be used to
   suppress all bold-fonts (discussion with Jan Engelhardt).
 * make  internal  line-size  value consistent with allocated sizes of
   character  and  related  arrays to ensure that bulk copying of line
   data, e.g., in scrolling, accounts for the padding used for pointer
   alignment  (adapted from patch by Rajesh Mandalemula, also reported
   by Ali Bahar).
 * widen  ifdef  for  screen-resizing logic from patch #176 changes to
   send  SIGWINCH  to  process  group to include any system supporting
   ioctl(*,TIOCGPGRP,*)  (prompted by linux-specific patch in OpenSUSE
   rpm package).
 * add  printModeOnXError and printFileOnXError resources, which allow
   the  user  to  specify  that  xterm  will write the contents of its
   screen  to  a  file  if  it  is  exiting  due to an X error (Debian
   #280457).
 * restore  logic  that  made  reverse-video  apply to the scrollbar's
   foreground/background,  broken  in  patch  #158  (report  by  Bryan
   Ischo).
 * amend some of the window operations parameter-checks added in patch
   #251  for  the push/pop title feature, to allow the parameters used
   for  window  resizing  to  be  -1's,  which makes the corresponding
   values  ignored rather than using the window's maximum width/height
   (report by Noah Friedman).
 * correct  order  of  initialization  for  translations vs fullscreen
   resources  to  enable  a  special  case  which  omits the Alt-Enter
   translation when fullscreen is disabled (Debian #612978).
 * update config.guess, config.sub

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey dic...@invisible-island.net
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: x11-apps: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Viard de Galbert
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:32:28AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 Please don't include generated files in quilt patches.  Either patch
 directly or run the scripts on package build.
 

To be sure I got it right:
 Choice 1: I apply that patch directly to the git repos and that's it.
 Choice 2: The patch should not change the configure but the package
   should use autoreconf (or similar tool) to regenerate the
   configure file.

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:05:59 +, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
 
   debian/control   |5 ++-
   debian/patches/oclock-ftbfs.diff |   57 
  +++
   debian/patches/series|1 
   3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  
 Also this is missing patch description and debian/changelog entries.

Looks like I've been a little too quick in pushing those changes...
I forgot the patch description, I will fix that.

About the debian/changelog I remeber having trouble with it about how to
name the next version... this package appears to be a native one, and
I'm not used to it.
Changing the version means uploading the full tarball while just the
packaging changed, but native does not allow that if I understood
correctly. So I didn't really know what to do.

 
 Cheers,
 Julien
 
Thanks for your help,


-- 
Julien Viard de Galbertjul...@vdg.blogsite.org
http://silicone.homelinux.org/   jul...@silicone.homelinux.org
GPG Key ID: D00E52B6  Published on: hkp://keys.gnupg.net
Key Fingerprint: E312 A31D BEC3 74CC C49E  6D69 8B30 6538 D00E 52B6


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#622299: Corrupt GL rendering with KMS (r300) enabled on IA-64 platform (Itanium)

2011-04-26 Thread Émeric Maschino
Sorry for the delay,

  Anyway, it would be great if you could report this upstream at
  http://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Mesa , component
  Drivers/Gallium/r300. The main upstream r300g developer (Marek Olšák) is
  usually quite responsive to bug reports.

Done. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36608.

 OK, will do. But... Are you talking about the unaligned accesses or
 the rendering issue?

 Well, given the unaligned accesses seem to be gone upstream... :)

Sure, but are they gone because of a dedicated fix, os as a
side-effect of an other fix in the graphics pipeline...

Émeric



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=gtejckudhwnscbakhslnlvig...@mail.gmail.com



Re: x11-apps: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 16:53:43 +0200, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:

 On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:32:28AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
  Please don't include generated files in quilt patches.  Either patch
  directly or run the scripts on package build.
  
 
 To be sure I got it right:
  Choice 1: I apply that patch directly to the git repos and that's it.
  Choice 2: The patch should not change the configure but the package
should use autoreconf (or similar tool) to regenerate the
configure file.
 
Pretty much.  The third (and probably best) option is to get the patch
applied upstream and in a new tarball and update the package to that.

 On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
  On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:05:59 +, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
  
debian/control   |5 ++-
debian/patches/oclock-ftbfs.diff |   57 
   +++
debian/patches/series|1 
3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
   
  Also this is missing patch description and debian/changelog entries.
 
 Looks like I've been a little too quick in pushing those changes...
 I forgot the patch description, I will fix that.
 
Thanks.

 About the debian/changelog I remeber having trouble with it about how to
 name the next version... this package appears to be a native one, and
 I'm not used to it.
 Changing the version means uploading the full tarball while just the
 packaging changed, but native does not allow that if I understood
 correctly. So I didn't really know what to do.
 
Yup, the app bundles are native packages since they're not just one
upstream tarball but a bunch of different ones with different versions.
So the debian package version is basically
$current_xorg_katamari_version + $debian_revision, as an approximation
of something sort of meaningful.  The katamari version (7.x) changes
roughly once a year, the debian revision whenever the bundle gets
updated.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426164254.gc2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Processed: Re: Bug#622299: Corrupt GL rendering with KMS (r300) enabled on IA-64 platform (Itanium)

2011-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forwarded 622299 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36608
Bug #622299 [libgl1-mesa-dri] Corrupt GL rendering with KMS (r300) enabled on 
IA-64 platform (Itanium)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36608'.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
622299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622299
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130383631716686.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#622299: Corrupt GL rendering with KMS (r300) enabled on IA-64 platform (Itanium)

2011-04-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
forwarded 622299 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36608
thanks

Émeric Maschino emeric.masch...@gmail.com (26/04/2011):
 Done. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36608.

Thanks!

KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: x11-apps: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 18:42:54 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:

 Pretty much.  The third (and probably best) option is to get the patch
 applied upstream and in a new tarball and update the package to that.
 
I've done the first part now.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426165050.gd2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#613593: Closing, not a bug but a configuration error

2011-04-26 Thread Stephen Kitt
Hi Julien,

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:36:28AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:45:23 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
  notfound 613593 1:6.13.2-2
  thanks
  
 notfound doesn't mean what you think it means.

Perhaps I don't think what you think I'm thinking ;-).

Given that this bug turned out not to be a bug but a configuration
error, I thought it more accurate to remove the record of specific
versions supposedly affected, especially since fixing the problem
involved changing the configuration rather than upgrading to a later
version of the package (and therefore no “fixed” version could be
specified). Admittedly the configuration error only ended up causing a
problem starting with 1:6.13.2-2, so it could still be interesting to
have the version info...

It seems to me this is a kind of bug which doesn't quite align with
the found/fixed BTS semantics, but then again I'm probably wrong.

If you don't mind explaining how I should have proceeded I wouldn't
mind learning!

Regards,

Stephen



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426171930.gp10...@sk2.org



Bug#613593: Closing, not a bug but a configuration error

2011-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 19:19:30 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:

 Hi Julien,
 
 On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:36:28AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
  On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 07:45:23 +0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
   notfound 613593 1:6.13.2-2
   thanks
   
  notfound doesn't mean what you think it means.
 
 Perhaps I don't think what you think I'm thinking ;-).
 
 Given that this bug turned out not to be a bug but a configuration
 error, I thought it more accurate to remove the record of specific
 versions supposedly affected, especially since fixing the problem
 involved changing the configuration rather than upgrading to a later
 version of the package (and therefore no “fixed” version could be
 specified). Admittedly the configuration error only ended up causing a
 problem starting with 1:6.13.2-2, so it could still be interesting to
 have the version info...
 
 It seems to me this is a kind of bug which doesn't quite align with
 the found/fixed BTS semantics, but then again I'm probably wrong.
 
 If you don't mind explaining how I should have proceeded I wouldn't
 mind learning!
 
The way to mark such things is the absence of a 'fixed' version.
'found' doesn't matter in that case.

Cheers,
Julien



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426180058.ge2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Bug#585777: Radeon gamma bug, display too bright when using VGA output

2011-04-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Andrew Rule a.r...@freeuk.com wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi,

 I also have this problem.  It appeared for me when I upgraded from Xorg
 1.7.x to Xorg 1.9.5

 I am using
 ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 (M9+) 5C63 (AGP) (ChipID = 0x5c63)
 as X reports it, and
 Linux amos 2.6.38.3 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 16 22:03:19 BST 2011 i686
 GNU/Linux
 from kernel.org

 I tried setting Gamma in /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but it didn't pick it up.
 If I run xgamma after logging in to X, it *does* change the gamma - but
 still not enough.  So I can set Gamma to 0.3 in the file, but if I set
 it using xgamma, it actually darkens the screen somewhat - but it is
 still not right.  Output from xgamma:
 - - Red  0.300, Green  0.300, Blue  0.300
 - Red  0.300, Green  0.300, Blue  0.300


It's not the gamma, but the dac adj values.


 I tried
 radeontool regset DAC_MACRO_CNTL 0x0808
 but it didn't work for me.  (Perhaps that is not a surprise, I am using
 a tower PC, not a laptop.)

You are probably using the secondary dac.  The dac adjust values for
the TV dac are in
TV_DAC_CNTL.


 Perhaps I should not mention this here, but X is also unstable for me
 under KDE now, so I'm using sawfish for the time being.  Specifically,
 it crashes when notifications popup in KDE.

 Another problem I have noticed is that when scrolling a window under
 another window, the contents of the lower window smudges.  O, and popup
 hints from firefox come up in the wrong place for the search box.

 And, as you can see from the attached files, I am not using KMS -
 because I found that unstable since upgrading the kernel from 2.6.36.1
 to 2.6.38.x (although previously the virtual terminals had not worked at
 all, and now they do occasionally; but it was stable under X, now it is
 not.)

What is unstable with KMS?  KMS is more likely to be fixed that UMS at
this point.  If you want to fix UMS, you'll probably have to bisect
xf86-video-ati to find out what change caused the breakage.  Your time
would be better off spend bisecting to see what caused the instability
with KMS.

Alex


 Please ask further questions if you need.  I'm gonna try downgradeing X,
 cos I'd like to have a screen I can look at pictures on :-)

 Sincerely,

 Andrew Rule

 PS please tell me if I should open a new bug for some of this, I wasn't
 sure.  But the gamma stuff seemed so similar I thought it might be the
 same bug.

 PPS: package versions:
 firmware-linux/testing uptodate 0.29
 libc6/testing uptodate 2.11.2-11
 libdrm-radeon1/testing upgradeable from 2.4.23-3 to 2.4.24-2
 libdrm2/testing upgradeable from 2.4.23-3 to 2.4.24-2
 libpciaccess0/testing uptodate 0.12.1-1
 libpixman-1-0/testing uptodate 0.21.4-2
 libudev0/testing upgradeable from 166-1 to 167-3
 xserver-xorg-core/testing uptodate 2:1.9.5-1
 xserver-xorg-video-radeon/testing uptodate 1:6.14.1-1

 I upgraded to:
 firmware-linux/testing uptodate 0.29
 libc6/testing uptodate 2.11.2-11
 libdrm-radeon1/testing uptodate 2.4.24-2
 libdrm2/testing uptodate 2.4.24-2
 libpciaccess0/testing uptodate 0.12.1-1
 libpixman-1-0/testing uptodate 0.21.4-2
 libudev0/testing upgradeable from 166-1 to 167-3
 xserver-xorg-core/testing uptodate 2:1.9.5-1
 xserver-xorg-video-radeon/testing uptodate 1:6.14.1-1

 with no obvious change, certainly not to the gamma issue.
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iEYEARECAAYFAk22epYACgkQAXpg5UuOD0UtzwCgmLNnarwPog1J+v6TmvAwOA3Q
 PC8AnjW6/ejWvwW7ewVIIMq7MZWs+J72
 =NH8l
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 xorg-driver-ati mailing list
 xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org
 http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=h+1etp-fb3rd-ptozzzr1lj3...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#613593: Closing, not a bug but a configuration error

2011-04-26 Thread Stephen Kitt
found 613593 1:6.13.2-2
thanks

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:00:58PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
 The way to mark such things is the absence of a 'fixed' version.
 'found' doesn't matter in that case.

Thanks!

Regards,

Stephen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110426202454.gq10...@sk2.org



Processed: Re: Closing, not a bug but a configuration error

2011-04-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 found 613593 1:6.13.2-2
Bug #613593 {Done: Stephen Kitt st...@sk2.org} [xserver-xorg-video-radeon] 
xserver-xorg-video-radeon: [regression] X fails to start
Bug Marked as found in versions xserver-xorg-video-ati/1:6.13.2-2 and reopened.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
613593: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613593
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.130384950530535.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Bug#585777: Radeon gamma bug, display too bright when using VGA output

2011-04-26 Thread Andrew Rule
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 26/04/11 20:39, Alex Deucher wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Andrew Rule a.r...@freeuk.com wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I also have this problem.  It appeared for me when I upgraded from Xorg
 1.7.x to Xorg 1.9.5
 
 I am using
 ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 (M9+) 5C63 (AGP) (ChipID = 0x5c63)
 as X reports it, and
 Linux amos 2.6.38.3 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 16 22:03:19 BST 2011 i686
 GNU/Linux
 from kernel.org
 
 I tried setting Gamma in /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but it didn't pick it up.
 If I run xgamma after logging in to X, it *does* change the gamma - but
 still not enough.  So I can set Gamma to 0.3 in the file, but if I set
 it using xgamma, it actually darkens the screen somewhat - but it is
 still not right.  Output from xgamma:
 - Red  0.300, Green  0.300, Blue  0.300
 - Red  0.300, Green  0.300, Blue  0.300
 
 
 It's not the gamma, but the dac adj values.
 
 
 I tried
 radeontool regset DAC_MACRO_CNTL 0x0808
 but it didn't work for me.  (Perhaps that is not a surprise, I am using
 a tower PC, not a laptop.)
 
 You are probably using the secondary dac.  The dac adjust values for
 the TV dac are in
 TV_DAC_CNTL.
 
 
 Perhaps I should not mention this here, but X is also unstable for me
 under KDE now, so I'm using sawfish for the time being.  Specifically,
 it crashes when notifications popup in KDE.
 
 Another problem I have noticed is that when scrolling a window under
 another window, the contents of the lower window smudges.  O, and popup
 hints from firefox come up in the wrong place for the search box.
 
 And, as you can see from the attached files, I am not using KMS -
 because I found that unstable since upgrading the kernel from 2.6.36.1
 to 2.6.38.x (although previously the virtual terminals had not worked at
 all, and now they do occasionally; but it was stable under X, now it is
 not.)
 
 What is unstable with KMS?  KMS is more likely to be fixed that UMS at
 this point.  If you want to fix UMS, you'll probably have to bisect
 xf86-video-ati to find out what change caused the breakage.  Your time
 would be better off spend bisecting to see what caused the instability
 with KMS.
 
 Alex

So your saying that this problem with the dac adj values is totally
dependant on whether I'm using KMS or UMS?  And I should research
further and report it as another bug?  Or try Xorg 1.9.5 using KMS and
report any bugs that happen with them?

 
 
 Please ask further questions if you need.  I'm gonna try downgradeing X,
 cos I'd like to have a screen I can look at pictures on :-)
 
 Sincerely,
 
 Andrew Rule
 
 PS please tell me if I should open a new bug for some of this, I wasn't
 sure.  But the gamma stuff seemed so similar I thought it might be the
 same bug.
 
 PPS: package versions:
 firmware-linux/testing uptodate 0.29
 libc6/testing uptodate 2.11.2-11
 libdrm-radeon1/testing upgradeable from 2.4.23-3 to 2.4.24-2
 libdrm2/testing upgradeable from 2.4.23-3 to 2.4.24-2
 libpciaccess0/testing uptodate 0.12.1-1
 libpixman-1-0/testing uptodate 0.21.4-2
 libudev0/testing upgradeable from 166-1 to 167-3
 xserver-xorg-core/testing uptodate 2:1.9.5-1
 xserver-xorg-video-radeon/testing uptodate 1:6.14.1-1
 
 I upgraded to:
 firmware-linux/testing uptodate 0.29
 libc6/testing uptodate 2.11.2-11
 libdrm-radeon1/testing uptodate 2.4.24-2
 libdrm2/testing uptodate 2.4.24-2
 libpciaccess0/testing uptodate 0.12.1-1
 libpixman-1-0/testing uptodate 0.21.4-2
 libudev0/testing upgradeable from 166-1 to 167-3
 xserver-xorg-core/testing uptodate 2:1.9.5-1
 xserver-xorg-video-radeon/testing uptodate 1:6.14.1-1
 
 with no obvious change, certainly not to the gamma issue.

___
xorg-driver-ati mailing list
xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk23LgwACgkQAXpg5UuOD0XQuwCg0mkLClLtR+UT9972+2853He9
WysAn3t87LNY02xCgB+rc26gggccn0jy
=1R4y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4db72e0d.8020...@freeuk.com



Bug#585777: Radeon gamma bug, display too bright when using VGA output

2011-04-26 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Andrew Rule a.r...@freeuk.com wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 26/04/11 20:39, Alex Deucher wrote:
 On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Andrew Rule a.r...@freeuk.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I also have this problem.  It appeared for me when I upgraded from Xorg
 1.7.x to Xorg 1.9.5

 I am using
 ATI Radeon Mobility 9200 (M9+) 5C63 (AGP) (ChipID = 0x5c63)
 as X reports it, and
 Linux amos 2.6.38.3 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 16 22:03:19 BST 2011 i686
 GNU/Linux
 from kernel.org

 I tried setting Gamma in /etc/X11/xorg.conf, but it didn't pick it up.
 If I run xgamma after logging in to X, it *does* change the gamma - but
 still not enough.  So I can set Gamma to 0.3 in the file, but if I set
 it using xgamma, it actually darkens the screen somewhat - but it is
 still not right.  Output from xgamma:
 - Red  0.300, Green  0.300, Blue  0.300
 - Red  0.300, Green  0.300, Blue  0.300


 It's not the gamma, but the dac adj values.


 I tried
 radeontool regset DAC_MACRO_CNTL 0x0808
 but it didn't work for me.  (Perhaps that is not a surprise, I am using
 a tower PC, not a laptop.)

 You are probably using the secondary dac.  The dac adjust values for
 the TV dac are in
 TV_DAC_CNTL.


 Perhaps I should not mention this here, but X is also unstable for me
 under KDE now, so I'm using sawfish for the time being.  Specifically,
 it crashes when notifications popup in KDE.

 Another problem I have noticed is that when scrolling a window under
 another window, the contents of the lower window smudges.  O, and popup
 hints from firefox come up in the wrong place for the search box.

 And, as you can see from the attached files, I am not using KMS -
 because I found that unstable since upgrading the kernel from 2.6.36.1
 to 2.6.38.x (although previously the virtual terminals had not worked at
 all, and now they do occasionally; but it was stable under X, now it is
 not.)

 What is unstable with KMS?  KMS is more likely to be fixed that UMS at
 this point.  If you want to fix UMS, you'll probably have to bisect
 xf86-video-ati to find out what change caused the breakage.  Your time
 would be better off spend bisecting to see what caused the instability
 with KMS.

 Alex

 So your saying that this problem with the dac adj values is totally
 dependant on whether I'm using KMS or UMS?  And I should research
 further and report it as another bug?  Or try Xorg 1.9.5 using KMS and
 report any bugs that happen with them?

No.  I'm saying UMS is slowly being deprecated, so if you are seeing a
problem, KMS is more likely to get fixed.  It should work fine with
either KMS or UMS, but it has apparently regressed on your card at
least with UMS.

Alex




 Please ask further questions if you need.  I'm gonna try downgradeing X,
 cos I'd like to have a screen I can look at pictures on :-)

 Sincerely,

 Andrew Rule

 PS please tell me if I should open a new bug for some of this, I wasn't
 sure.  But the gamma stuff seemed so similar I thought it might be the
 same bug.

 PPS: package versions:
 firmware-linux/testing uptodate 0.29
 libc6/testing uptodate 2.11.2-11
 libdrm-radeon1/testing upgradeable from 2.4.23-3 to 2.4.24-2
 libdrm2/testing upgradeable from 2.4.23-3 to 2.4.24-2
 libpciaccess0/testing uptodate 0.12.1-1
 libpixman-1-0/testing uptodate 0.21.4-2
 libudev0/testing upgradeable from 166-1 to 167-3
 xserver-xorg-core/testing uptodate 2:1.9.5-1
 xserver-xorg-video-radeon/testing uptodate 1:6.14.1-1

 I upgraded to:
 firmware-linux/testing uptodate 0.29
 libc6/testing uptodate 2.11.2-11
 libdrm-radeon1/testing uptodate 2.4.24-2
 libdrm2/testing uptodate 2.4.24-2
 libpciaccess0/testing uptodate 0.12.1-1
 libpixman-1-0/testing uptodate 0.21.4-2
 libudev0/testing upgradeable from 166-1 to 167-3
 xserver-xorg-core/testing uptodate 2:1.9.5-1
 xserver-xorg-video-radeon/testing uptodate 1:6.14.1-1

 with no obvious change, certainly not to the gamma issue.

 ___
 xorg-driver-ati mailing list
 xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org
 http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-driver-ati



 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

 iEYEARECAAYFAk23LgwACgkQAXpg5UuOD0XQuwCg0mkLClLtR+UT9972+2853He9
 WysAn3t87LNY02xCgB+rc26gggccn0jy
 =1R4y
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/banlktin3pemvwxosj7ugkhxgwqr096b...@mail.gmail.com