Bug#666468: (no subject)
I can verify this in Testing and Unstable.
mesa: Changes to 'ubuntu-precise'
debian/changelog |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) New commits: commit 700eea77bf661fbb48a162378b2c7509f4f3d2af Author: Bryce Harrington Date: Mon May 14 16:24:15 2012 -0700 s/updates/proposed/ diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 63b5064..4017b1b 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -mesa (8.0.2-0ubuntu3.1) precise-updates; urgency=low +mesa (8.0.2-0ubuntu3.1) precise-proposed; urgency=low * Add 118_fix_rendering_from_textures.patch: Postpone the setup of the workaround render target miptree until update_renderbuffer time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1su4cy-0004re...@vasks.debian.org
Bug#672644: X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 11:46:45PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > reopen 672644 > thanks > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:46:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 21:33:21 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > > So it looks like when it's missing, X gets it loaded, but not fast > > > enough to apply to the same session...? > > > > Correct. Closing as not a bug. > > Uhh, what? a) we know that users will be screwed and yet we'll declare the > screwage "not a bug"?! b) you didn't notice my earlier message where I found > it's an open bug upstream (with several submitters)? I see now that Michel also marked that one "resolved wontfix". Well, that's a great way to treat four bug submitters - nobody cares for your problem, and that's not all - your reports are so worthless to us that we also want to make an extra effort to publicly act like complete assholes towards you. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514215318.ga11...@entuzijast.net
Processed: tagging 672644, severity of 672644 is normal
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 672644 = wontfix Bug #672644 [xserver-xorg-video-radeon] X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade Added tag(s) wontfix; removed tag(s) moreinfo. > severity 672644 normal Bug #672644 [xserver-xorg-video-radeon] X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672644 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13370321713104.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Processed: Re: Bug#672644: X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 672644
Bug #672644 {Done: Julien Cristau }
[xserver-xorg-video-radeon] X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400)
broken after wheezy upgrade
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #672644 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
672644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672644
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13370320122372.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#672644: X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade
reopen 672644 thanks On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:46:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 21:33:21 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > So it looks like when it's missing, X gets it loaded, but not fast > > enough to apply to the same session...? > > Correct. Closing as not a bug. Uhh, what? a) we know that users will be screwed and yet we'll declare the screwage "not a bug"?! b) you didn't notice my earlier message where I found it's an open bug upstream (with several submitters)? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514214645.ga10...@entuzijast.net
Bug#672644: X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:19:02PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > dmesg can't tell you why the kernel module wasn't loaded by udev. > > But it *was* loaded by udev. I don't run 'modprobe radeon' at any point > between the two tests. After the broken startx, it's loaded, which is why > it is in the dmesg output I sent you. > > > Usually it's due to a stale blacklist entry in the udev/modprobe > > configuration. > > I went looking for that and found fglrx-driver's file, from the removed but > not purged package. I purged it (from the console), then did the first > startx, and the same thing happened again - I had to run startx twice. It didn't apply immediately, but it had effect after the next reboot - during it, radeon was apparently pre-loaded automatically. After that, it only took one startx to start X. So it looks like when it's missing, X gets it loaded, but not fast enough to apply to the same session...? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514193321.ga7...@entuzijast.net
Processed: found 666468 in 2:1.11.2.901-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 666468 2:1.11.2.901-1 Bug #666468 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #666538 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #666564 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #666565 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #95 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #666922 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #666998 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #667048 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #667073 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #667445 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #667520 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #667809 [xorg-server] xorg-server: major text display problems in several apps Bug #668182 [xorg-server] [gnome-terminal] incorrect partial redraw in mc Bug #668343 [xorg-server] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: Character rendering failures on GeForce 8600M GT with dual screen Bug #668993 [xorg-server] libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0: Font rendering corruption? Bug #672260 [xorg-server] libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade There is no source info for the package 'xorg-server' at version '2:1.11.2.901-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '2:1.11.2.901-1' Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. Marked as found in versions 2:1.11.2.901-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 666468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666468 666538: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666538 666564: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666564 666565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666565 95: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=95 666922: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666922 666998: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666998 667048: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667048 667073: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667073 667445: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667445 667520: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667520 667809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667809 668182: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668182 668343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668343 668993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668993 672260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672260 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133702379121081.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#672644: X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:33:08PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 10:56 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:00:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > In any case, I rebooted using SysRq+S+U+B (I think, at least - couldn't > > > > see > > > > anything) and installed firmware-linux-nonfree, rebooted once again for > > > > good > > > > measure, and tried startx again, and now it just aborts X saying: > > > > > > > > [ 137.038] (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because > > > > of a version mismatch. > > > > [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0, > > > > [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.12.0. > > > > [dri] Make sure your module is loaded prior to starting X, and > > > > [dri] that this driver was built with support for KMS. > > > > [dri] Aborting. > > I'm afraid that's as good as it gets. When using a display manager, it > should automatically try starting the X server again, which should > succeed. What about the first upgrade issue, the lack of firmware? If the unknowing user does something simple and innocuous such as exit their X session for whatever reason, before installing the apparently critical firmware, the display manager will exit the working session and dump them into a broken screen. > > > Means your radeon kernel module is not being properly loaded by udev. > > > You need to figure out why. > > > > There's nothing strange about it, at least none that I can see. > > You can see in the attached dmesg output that it worked fine. > > dmesg can't tell you why the kernel module wasn't loaded by udev. But it *was* loaded by udev. I don't run 'modprobe radeon' at any point between the two tests. After the broken startx, it's loaded, which is why it is in the dmesg output I sent you. > Usually it's due to a stale blacklist entry in the udev/modprobe > configuration. I went looking for that and found fglrx-driver's file, from the removed but not purged package. I purged it (from the console), then did the first startx, and the same thing happened again - I had to run startx twice. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514191902.ga2...@entuzijast.net
Processed: Re: Bug#672921: xserver-xorg: segmentation fault after xlsfonts
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 672921 xserver-xorg-core Bug #672921 [xserver-xorg] xserver-xorg: segmentation fault after xlsfonts Bug reassigned from package 'xserver-xorg' to 'xserver-xorg-core'. No longer marked as found in versions xorg/1:7.6+13. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #672921 to the same values previously set > forcemerge 615975 672921 Bug #615975 [xserver-xorg-core] X server crashes when font path points to a font server Bug #616578 [xserver-xorg-core] Server crash when a font server is used Bug #622864 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: segfault when launching gitk remotely Bug #672921 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xorg: segmentation fault after xlsfonts Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31501'. Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' Marked as found in versions xorg-server/2:1.9.99.903-1 and xorg-server/2:1.9.5-1. Bug #616578 [xserver-xorg-core] Server crash when a font server is used Bug #622864 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: segfault when launching gitk remotely Merged 615975 616578 622864 672921 > kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 615975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615975 616578: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616578 622864: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622864 672921: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672921 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13370204603435.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#672921: xserver-xorg: segmentation fault after xlsfonts
reassign 672921 xserver-xorg-core forcemerge 615975 672921 kthxbye On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 19:22:51 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg > Version: 1:7.6+13 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I just found an interesting problem: > > xset fp+ unix/:7101 > xlsfonts > > then the server dies with segmentation fault. > > The font server at the given port is xfstt. I replaced the "Contents of > most recent Xorg X server log file (/var/log/Xorg.1.log)" with the log > leading up to the last crash. The respective server was started with > > startx `type -p xterm` > > before executing above command sequence. > > Thanks for maintaining this important package, > Known bug. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
mesa: Changes to 'ubuntu-precise'
New branch 'ubuntu-precise' available with the following commits: commit 406480f316d38d161905b9be1ad8f82ceb52af22 Author: Bryce Harrington Date: Mon May 14 11:05:43 2012 -0700 Retarget quantal fix to precise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1stzis-0008oq...@vasks.debian.org
[bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-input-synaptics # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #592303 (http://bugs.debian.org/592303) # Bug title: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: Dedicated vertical scroll areas not working and not configurable # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49579 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEEDINFO usertags 592303 + status-NEEDINFO thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514164100.16887.65199.btsl...@busoni.debian.org
[bts-link] source package xorg-server
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #672260 (http://bugs.debian.org/672260) # Bug title: libxrender1:amd64: transient graphical corruption on many windows after upgrade # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 # * remote status changed: (?) -> REOPENED usertags 672260 + status-REOPENED # remote status report for #671812 (http://bugs.debian.org/671812) # Bug
Bug#636135:
I upgraded wheezy today and with now xserver-xorg-video-radeon 1:6.14.4-2 the problem vanished. The default kdmrc has an entry ... # Restart instead of resetting the local X-server after session exit. # Use it if the server leaks memory etc. # Default is false #TerminateServer=true ..., so the default "false" is working now. Thank you! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514182219.t0331ilaoc0k0...@webmail.bluemonk.de
Bug#672883: FTBFS: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'
Package: xserver-xorg-video-qxl Version: 0.0.17-2+b1 -- CCLD libuxa.la make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY_J/xserver-xorg-video-qxl-0.0.17/build/src/uxa' make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY_J/xserver-xorg-video-qxl-0.0.17/build/src' CC qxl_driver.lo ../../src/qxl_driver.c: In function 'qxl_prepare_access': ../../src/qxl_driver.c:729:70: warning: declaration of 'access' shadows a global declaration [-Wshadow] ../../src/qxl_driver.c: In function 'qxl_solid': ../../src/qxl_driver.c:784:42: warning: declaration of 'y1' shadows a global declaration [-Wshadow] ../../src/qxl_driver.c: In function 'qxl_init_scrn': ../../src/qxl_driver.c:1628:41: warning: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [enabled by default] ../../src/qxl_driver.c: At top level: ../../src/qxl_driver.c:1740:5: warning: initialization discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [enabled by default] ../../src/qxl_driver.c: In function 'qxl_leave_vt': /usr/include/xorg/compiler.h:1395:5: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' make[4]: *** [qxl_driver.lo] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY_J/xserver-xorg-video-qxl-0.0.17/build/src' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-qxl_0.0.17-2+b1-ia64-5fbY_J/xserver-xorg-video-qxl-0.0.17/build/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514124640.gb17...@soko.mmjgroup.com
Bug#672882: FTBFS: inconsistent operand constraints in 'asm'
Package: xserver-xorg-video-i128 Version: 1:1.3.5-1+b1 -- Fails to build with the following error: config.status: executing libtool commands dh_auto_build -a -O--builddirectory=build/ make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-i128_1.3.5-1+b1-ia64-h5rmfB/xserver-xorg-video-i128-1.3.5/build' make all-recursive make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-i128_1.3.5-1+b1-ia64-h5rmfB/xserver-xorg-video-i128-1.3.5/build' Making all in src make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-i128_1.3.5-1+b1-ia64-h5rmfB/xserver-xorg-video-i128-1.3.5/build/src' CC i128accel.lo In file included from ../../src/i128accel.c:38:0: /usr/include/xorg/xf86PciInfo.h:50:2: warning: #warning "xf86PciInfo.h is deprecated. For greater compatibility, drivers should include necessary PCI IDs locally rather than relying on this file from xorg-server." [-Wcpp] CC i128dga.lo In file included from ../../src/i128dga.c:9:0: /usr/include/xorg/xf86PciInfo.h:50:2: warning: #warning "xf86PciInfo.h is deprecated. For greater compatibility, drivers should include necessary PCI IDs locally rather than relying on this file from xorg-server." [-Wcpp] CC i128exa.lo In file included from ../../src/i128exa.c:38:0: /usr/include/xorg/xf86PciInfo.h:50:2: warning: #warning "xf86PciInfo.h is deprecated. For greater compatibility, drivers should include necessary PCI IDs locally rather than relying on this file from xorg-server." [-Wcpp] CC i128_driver.lo In file included from ../../src/i128_driver.c:42:0: /usr/include/xorg/xf86PciInfo.h:50:2: warning: #warning "xf86PciInfo.h is deprecated. For greater compatibility, drivers should include necessary PCI IDs locally rather than relying on this file from xorg-server." [-Wcpp] ../../src/i128_driver.c: In function 'I128I2CGetBits': /usr/include/xorg/compiler.h:1432:5: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' make[3]: *** [i128_driver.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-i128_1.3.5-1+b1-ia64-h5rmfB/xserver-xorg-video-i128-1.3.5/build/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-i128_1.3.5-1+b1-ia64-h5rmfB/xserver-xorg-video-i128-1.3.5/build' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-xserver-xorg-video-i128_1.3.5-1+b1-ia64-h5rmfB/xserver-xorg-video-i128-1.3.5/build' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514124405.ga17...@soko.mmjgroup.com
Processed: Re: Bug #672601: pointer jumps/bounces after some time of usage (Lenovo ThinkPad x220i)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 672601 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49898 Bug #672601 [xserver-xorg-input-synaptics] pointer jumps/bounces after some time of usage (Lenovo ThinkPad x220i) Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49898'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 672601: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=672601 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133699591828347.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#672601: Bug #672601: pointer jumps/bounces after some time of usage (Lenovo ThinkPad x220i)
forwarded 672601 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49898 thanks W. Martin Borgert (14/05/2012): > Quoting "Cyril Brulebois" : > >and let us know the bug number for tracking. > > #49898 Thanks, marking as forwarded there. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672601: pointer jumps/bounces after some time of usage (Lenovo ThinkPad x220i)
Quoting "Cyril Brulebois" : and let us know the bug number for tracking. #49898 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514124646.10381jlcucp5a...@webmail.in-berlin.de
Bug#672644: X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 10:56 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:00:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > In any case, I rebooted using SysRq+S+U+B (I think, at least - couldn't > > > see > > > anything) and installed firmware-linux-nonfree, rebooted once again for > > > good > > > measure, and tried startx again, and now it just aborts X saying: > > > > > > [ 137.038] (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of > > > a version mismatch. > > > [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0, > > > [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.12.0. > > > [dri] Make sure your module is loaded prior to starting X, and > > > [dri] that this driver was built with support for KMS. > > > [dri] Aborting. I'm afraid that's as good as it gets. When using a display manager, it should automatically try starting the X server again, which should succeed. > > Means your radeon kernel module is not being properly loaded by udev. > > You need to figure out why. > > There's nothing strange about it, at least none that I can see. > You can see in the attached dmesg output that it worked fine. dmesg can't tell you why the kernel module wasn't loaded by udev. Usually it's due to a stale blacklist entry in the udev/modprobe configuration. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1336991588.7335.212.camel@thor.local
Bug#672644: X on Mobility Radeon HD 3400 Series (Lenovo T400) broken after wheezy upgrade
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:00:46PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > In any case, I rebooted using SysRq+S+U+B (I think, at least - couldn't see > > anything) and installed firmware-linux-nonfree, rebooted once again for good > > measure, and tried startx again, and now it just aborts X saying: > > > > [ 137.038] (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] RADEONDRIGetVersion failed because of a > > version mismatch. > > [dri] This chipset requires a kernel module version of 1.17.0, > > [dri] but the kernel reports a version of 2.12.0. > > [dri] Make sure your module is loaded prior to starting X, and > > [dri] that this driver was built with support for KMS. > > [dri] Aborting. > > > Means your radeon kernel module is not being properly loaded by udev. > You need to figure out why. There's nothing strange about it, at least none that I can see. You can see in the attached dmesg output that it worked fine. The X output says it saw a kernel module, but it didn't like the version. The next time it starts, it sees something it likes. This message: [ 135.892] (II) [KMS] drm report modesetting isn't supported. is produced by: ret = drmCheckModesettingSupported(busIdString); I googled that and found: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-driver-ati/2009-December/013185.html that is: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25607 -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120514085628.ga25...@entuzijast.net
Processed: Re: Bug#563196: libx11-dev: XGrabKey(3) man page refers to XAllowAccess(3) but there is no such function
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package libx11-dev libx11-doc Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'libx11-dev', 'libx11-doc' Limit currently set to 'package':'libx11-dev', 'libx11-doc' > # libx11-dev/2:1.4.99.901-2 does not include any manual pages. > # They have been moved to libx11-doc. > reassign 563196 libx11-doc 2:1.4.4-3 Bug #563196 [libx11-dev] libx11-dev: XGrabKey(3) man page refers to XAllowAccess(3) but there is no such function Bug reassigned from package 'libx11-dev' to 'libx11-doc'. No longer marked as found in versions libx11/2:1.3.2-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #563196 to the same values previously set Bug #563196 [libx11-doc] libx11-dev: XGrabKey(3) man page refers to XAllowAccess(3) but there is no such function Marked as found in versions libx11/2:1.4.4-3. > found 563196 2:1.4.4-4 Bug #563196 [libx11-doc] libx11-dev: XGrabKey(3) man page refers to XAllowAccess(3) but there is no such function Marked as found in versions libx11/2:1.4.4-4. > # The XGrabKey(3) manual page now refers to XAllowEvents(3), > # which does exist. Fixed in > # > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libX11/commit/?id=e37a6da814b5653be46000a9a76902729660a2e6 > # > # http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#close says the close > # command is deprecated because it doesn't forward the message to > # the submitter; but I'm the submitter here, so there's no harm. > close 563196 2:1.4.99.1-1 Bug #563196 [libx11-doc] libx11-dev: XGrabKey(3) man page refers to XAllowAccess(3) but there is no such function Marked as fixed in versions libx11/2:1.4.99.1-1. Bug #563196 [libx11-doc] libx11-dev: XGrabKey(3) man page refers to XAllowAccess(3) but there is no such function Marked Bug as done > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 563196: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563196 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13369863107032.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#665992: bug not appearing in ubuntu, still in Xorg 1.12
On Son, 2012-05-13 at 13:49 +0200, Arian Sanusi wrote: > I recently booted Ubuntu 12.04 on this machine. Trief both unity and > unity-2D Environment. Both did not crash. I also upgraded the debian > Installation to X.org 2:1.12.1-2 from unstable. It's stilll crashing. > This is quite disappointing, knowing that it works elsewhere. Well, unless you're using a very similar desktop environment in Debian and used the Ubuntu system in exactly the same way (as much as possible), you might just have happened not to hit the bug with Ubuntu. Otherwise, it might be interesting to isolate how Ubuntu fixed this in which package(s) (most likely xserver-xorg-video-radeon, libdrm or the kernel). If you can change the amount of video RAM in the BIOS setup, have you tried whether increasing it helps? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1336983057.7335.208.camel@thor.local
