mesa_12.0.3-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Uploaded to wrong suite (jessie, not jessie-backports) === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.
Re: Comments regarding libglu_9.0.0-1_amd64.changes
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 20:38:22 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 18:05:04 +, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: the full text of the SGI-1.1 license is not included. Do we make use of the option to use a newer license version? That is SGI-2 instead of the SGI-1.1 license? IIRC the old one was non-free. By which I guess I mean yes, we use the newer version. So d/copyright should probably not mention the old one. Please mention in d/copyright explicitly that the original license allows to use a newer version and we make use of that option. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87txkf19jz@deep-thought.43-1.org
Comments regarding libglu_9.0.0-1_amd64.changes
Hi, the full text of the SGI-1.1 license is not included. Do we make use of the option to use a newer license version? That is SGI-2 instead of the SGI-1.1 license? Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1unymy-0004rd...@franck.debian.org
import failure from squeeze-backports
Hi, we integrated backports.d.o with ftp-master.d.o yesterday. However some packages could not be imported as they use a different tarball than already present in the main archive: msgpack-python (changed-by: uli) nx-libs-lite (siretart) ruby-actionpack-2.3 (anarcat) tortoisehg (vicho) xserver-xorg-video-rendition (kibi) Could you please reupload the packages using the same upstream tarball as the main archive? I'm not sure how wanna-build handles seeing the same version again; maybe just use ~bpo50+2 to be on the safe side even when the packages will only differ in the upstream tarball. You can check [1] or [2] if you are not sure which version was on backports before. Regards, Ansgar [1] http://backports-master.debian.org/changes/squeeze-backports.html [2] http://snapshot.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obeigtwb@deep-thought.43-1.org
Bug#683891: src:xkeyboard-config: please use xz compression for binary packages
Source: xkeyboard-config Version: 2.5.1-1 Severity: important Tags: patch Usertags: xz-for-wheezy Please use xz compression for the binary packages (patch attached). We are trying to fit a few more packages on the first CDs to get a usable desktop install with it, see [1] for more details. I will request a freeze exception once the package is uploaded; please keep in mind to not include additional changes. Regards, Ansgar [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/08/msg00049.html diff -u xkeyboard-config-2.5.1/debian/changelog xkeyboard-config-2.5.1/debian/changelog --- xkeyboard-config-2.5.1/debian/changelog +++ xkeyboard-config-2.5.1/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +xkeyboard-config (2.5.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/rules: Use xz compression for binary packages. + + -- Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:17:26 +0200 + xkeyboard-config (2.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release: diff -u xkeyboard-config-2.5.1/debian/rules xkeyboard-config-2.5.1/debian/rules --- xkeyboard-config-2.5.1/debian/rules +++ xkeyboard-config-2.5.1/debian/rules @@ -34,4 +34,7 @@ touch rules/base.o_k.part +override_dh_builddeb: + dh_builddeb -- -Zxz + %: dh $@ --with quilt,autoreconf --builddirectory=build/
Comments regarding libxtst_1.2.1-1_amd64.changes
Hi, the documentation (doc/*.xml) and specs/*.xml have an additional copyright holder: Copyright copy; 1992, 1994 X Consortium Copyright © 1995 X Consortiu Copyright © 1992,1994 X Consortium Please add them to the copyright information in the next upload. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1smhfc-0002qe...@franck.debian.org
Comments regarding libxt_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes
Hi, there is an additional copyright holder for the man pages (man/*.man): Copyright (c) 1993, 1994 X Consortium Please include them in d/copyright in the next upload. Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1smn8u-tj...@franck.debian.org
