Re: X apparently not releases memory
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:57:27AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/analyse-x.pl Why not use depth 16? AFAIK depth 16 is a 2 bytes not much difference from 15 (almost 2 bytes) what makes it worth over depth 16? -- Carlos Barros.
building xfree 4.0.2-1. (report)
Hello The problems that I had. debhelper must be less than 2.2.12. dh_suidregister is no longer valid. You need to download from unstable freetype-2.0.1, glide2000.11.02.07, debhelper-2.2.11. ( in http://packages.debian.org/$package ) Build those packages. After that, install them. And finally build xfree. Now I'm going to install them over 4.0.1-8. dpkg-buildpackage time: 5418.94user 540.66system 1:46:07elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (17628712major+7857414minor)pagefaults 0swaps (using a dual PII400/128MB/SCSI, but only 1 cpu was used) The log was about 9MB -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
building xfree 4.0.2-1. (report)
Hello The problems that I had. debhelper must be less than 2.2.12. dh_suidregister is no longer valid. You need to download from unstable freetype-2.0.1, glide2000.11.02.07, debhelper-2.2.11. ( in http://packages.debian.org/$package ) Build those packages. After that, install them. And finally build xfree. Now I'm going to install them over 4.0.1-8. dpkg-buildpackage time: 5418.94user 540.66system 1:46:07elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (17628712major+7857414minor)pagefaults 0swaps (using a dual PII400/128MB/SCSI, but only 1 cpu was used) The log was about 9MB -- Carlos Barros.
Re: building xfree 4.0.2-1
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:30PM -0800, Tal Danzig wrote: Hi, I belive this may have something to do with the version of dpkg you are using. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the X4.0.x packages require dpkg 1.7 and newer? Yep, I see it now. Trying that... -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: building xfree 4.0.2-1
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:30PM -0800, Tal Danzig wrote: Hi, I belive this may have something to do with the version of dpkg you are using. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the X4.0.x packages require dpkg 1.7 and newer? Yep, I see it now. Trying that... -- Carlos Barros.
Re: building xfree 4.0.2-1
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:37:30PM -0800, Tal Danzig wrote: Hi, I belive this may have something to do with the version of dpkg you are using. Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't the X4.0.x packages require dpkg 1.7 and newer? Oh, BTW thank you. -- Carlos Barros.
building xfree 4.0.2-1
Hello! Im building 4.0.2-1 under potato. (glide 3 and libfreetype6 included). Now I'm lost. It doesn't make all packages. It stopped in xserver-xfree86 with this error dpkg-deb: parse error, in file 'Debian/xserver-xfree86/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package 'xserver-xfree86': line 'Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected dh_builddeb: command returned error code make: *** [debian/stampdir/binary-arch] Error 1 MANIFEST's files ar Ok.(all files are where they should, AFAIK) Can you give-me any hint? -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
building xfree 4.0.2-1
Hello! Im building 4.0.2-1 under potato. (glide 3 and libfreetype6 included). Now I'm lost. It doesn't make all packages. It stopped in xserver-xfree86 with this error dpkg-deb: parse error, in file 'Debian/xserver-xfree86/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package 'xserver-xfree86': line 'Depends' field, missing package name, or garbage where package name expected dh_builddeb: command returned error code make: *** [debian/stampdir/binary-arch] Error 1 MANIFEST's files ar Ok.(all files are where they should, AFAIK) Can you give-me any hint? -- Carlos Barros.
xkb for a la-latin keyboard
Hello! How can I configure a la-latin keyboard. It is a variant of the spanish. kbd has a la-latin. -- Carlos Barros.
My experiences making .debs of 4.0.1 for potato
Hello! I have downloaded the source that Branden release as phase2-v29 and then try to make the packages. 1- try to simple debuild, and failed in compiling 2- read the docs and findout build-depends ;-) 3- installed almost everything, couldn't find dpkg 1.7 nor glide3-dev. 4- debuild again... failed agin... but redirect the output to a file. 5- discover that glide3/* was required for some tdfx*. 6- I disabled in the xc/config/cf/host.def the HasGlide3 and debuild again. 7- compiled ok, but no .deb created. 8- in rules I saw in install the checking for MANIFEST.i386 MANIFEST.i386.new. The problem was the missing *tdfx* 9- deleted that line, dbuild again but some .deb failed. It stop when making xserver-xfree86. The problem was the malformed Depends: line in the control file generated. 10- looking further I discover that dh_movefiles didn't move the files, so dh_shlibdeps didn't make the Depends line correctly. 11- It also didn't move the files of xutils. 12- the contents of xutils.files and xserver-xfree86.list ar ok. They exist in th tmp/ dir in the right locations. 13- I saw some errors about dpkg not found. Why dh_movefiles failed? Is it anything to do with dpkg = 1.7? If it is, where is a potato dpkg = 1.7 package? (It isn't in proposed updates nor experimental) -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: My experiences making .debs of 4.0.1 for potato
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 05:37:02PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:53:53PM -0300, Carlos Barros wrote: I have downloaded the source that Branden release as phase2-v29 and then try to make the packages. Why dh_movefiles failed? Is it anything to do with dpkg = 1.7? If it is, where is a potato dpkg = 1.7 package? (It isn't in proposed updates nor experimental) For the the 20th time, read: http://cpbotha.net/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO :) WOW! Ok. Is there any hint(doc) about how to use make -j on building X? And how to make it pentium optimized? I change debian/rules but didn't work. :( -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My experiences making .debs of 4.0.1 for potato
Hello! I have downloaded the source that Branden release as phase2-v29 and then try to make the packages. 1- try to simple debuild, and failed in compiling 2- read the docs and findout build-depends ;-) 3- installed almost everything, couldn't find dpkg 1.7 nor glide3-dev. 4- debuild again... failed agin... but redirect the output to a file. 5- discover that glide3/* was required for some tdfx*. 6- I disabled in the xc/config/cf/host.def the HasGlide3 and debuild again. 7- compiled ok, but no .deb created. 8- in rules I saw in install the checking for MANIFEST.i386 MANIFEST.i386.new. The problem was the missing *tdfx* 9- deleted that line, dbuild again but some .deb failed. It stop when making xserver-xfree86. The problem was the malformed Depends: line in the control file generated. 10- looking further I discover that dh_movefiles didn't move the files, so dh_shlibdeps didn't make the Depends line correctly. 11- It also didn't move the files of xutils. 12- the contents of xutils.files and xserver-xfree86.list ar ok. They exist in th tmp/ dir in the right locations. 13- I saw some errors about dpkg not found. Why dh_movefiles failed? Is it anything to do with dpkg = 1.7? If it is, where is a potato dpkg = 1.7 package? (It isn't in proposed updates nor experimental) -- Carlos Barros.
Re: My experiences making .debs of 4.0.1 for potato
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 05:37:02PM +0100, Charl P. Botha wrote: On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 12:53:53PM -0300, Carlos Barros wrote: I have downloaded the source that Branden release as phase2-v29 and then try to make the packages. Why dh_movefiles failed? Is it anything to do with dpkg = 1.7? If it is, where is a potato dpkg = 1.7 package? (It isn't in proposed updates nor experimental) For the the 20th time, read: http://cpbotha.net/building_brandens_phase2_debs_on_potato.HOWTO :) WOW! Ok. Is there any hint(doc) about how to use make -j on building X? And how to make it pentium optimized? I change debian/rules but didn't work. :( -- Carlos Barros.
Re: potato X and i810
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: 1) Upgrade to the beta XFree86 4.x packages at the URL above 2) Downgrade your kernel to 2.2.17 Well, Im downloading the sources of XFree86 4.x to build the packages for potato. I'll tell you what happend in building XFree86. BTW Do I need to update kernel-headers to 2.2.18-pre17 to build XFree86? -- Carlos Barros. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: potato X and i810
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 11:22:39AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: 1) Upgrade to the beta XFree86 4.x packages at the URL above 2) Downgrade your kernel to 2.2.17 Well, Im downloading the sources of XFree86 4.x to build the packages for potato. I'll tell you what happend in building XFree86. BTW Do I need to update kernel-headers to 2.2.18-pre17 to build XFree86? -- Carlos Barros.
