Bug#673669: Sorry

2012-06-18 Thread DAVID HAND 
I'm honestly way out of my depth here.

Does the bug need to be re-submitted? Cannot some of you notify the
relevant people, or alter the package that it refers to?

Bug#673669: Any ideas?

2012-06-10 Thread DAVID HAND 
Would love to get to the bottom of this. Do you need any more information?

Bug#673669: EDID extracted from proprietary nvidia driver from laptop

2012-05-25 Thread DAVID HAND 
(via ubuntu 10.04) is the same as in Xorg.0.log (from debian live cd on
laptop) - yet gives accurate resolution choices.

I'm really confused.

Bug#673669: Additional info

2012-05-23 Thread DAVID HAND 
Forgot to say I have a laptop with VGA out - with an nvidia go 7600 with
which I could test the monitor bypassing the DVI>VGA adapter, though my
hunch is that the adapter is not the problem. Not only does windows work
with the same hardware configuration, but I remember having resolution
issues since 2006, when the monitor was being used with a different machine
using an ATI video card.

Bug#673669: xrandr output - appears to be set to a widescreen ratio, with LCD refresh rates

2012-05-20 Thread DAVID HAND 
xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 240, current 1280 x 800, maximum 1280 x 800
default connected 1280x800+0+0 0mm x 0mm
   1280x800   50.0*
   1024x768   51.0
   960x54052.0
   840x52553.0
   800x60054.0
   800x51255.0
   720x45056.0
   680x38457.0 58.0
   640x51259.0
   640x48060.0 61.0
   576x43262.0
   512x38463.0
   400x30064.0
   320x24065.0