Bug#235039: libxpm4 postinst runs bad 'grep' instance and stalls

2004-02-27 Thread David B Harris
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:13:38 -0500
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > libxpm4 appears to have a bad 'fgrep' in the postinst. Here's what it's
> > > actually running:
> > 
> > This is a duplicate of #233645, apologies for filing it (I didn't notice
> > the pending bugs).
> 
> Would it have helped if reportbug listed pending bugs first (or
> interleaved with the corresponding severities)?
> 
> I am always trying to think of wishlist bugs for reportbug, so I get
> fewer aggravative duplicates.  :)

As a matter of fact, it would have - the web interface to the BTS could
use the same. (I consulted the latter fully, checking for all
grave/critical/serious/important bugs, but failed to see the pending
bugs down at the bottem. I didn't look through reportbug's output,
having done that, but I'm sure there will be some occasion in the future
where I'll see reportbug's output and not consult the web interface.)




Bug#235039: libxpm4 postinst runs bad 'grep' instance and stalls

2004-02-27 Thread David B Harris
close 235039
thanks

David B. Harris wrote:
> Hey there
>
> libxpm4 appears to have a bad 'fgrep' in the postinst. Here's what it's
> actually running:

This is a duplicate of #233645, apologies for filing it (I didn't notice
the pending bugs).



Bug#235039: libxpm4 postinst runs bad 'grep' instance and stalls

2004-02-26 Thread David B Harris
Package: libxpm4
Version: 4.3.0-2
Severity: important

Hey there

libxpm4 appears to have a bad 'fgrep' in the postinst. Here's what it's
actually running:

root 17552  0.0  0.4  1540  404 pts/1S03:52   0:00 grep -F -qsvx 
/usr/X11R6/lib

It looks like 581 of libxpm4.postinst is the culprit, with the following
grep invocation: fgrep -qsvx "$dir" > "$ldsoconf.dpkg-tmp"

I'm not entirely sure what it's supposed to be doing, so I'll refrain
from suggesting any solutions. I will note though, in case it isn't
really obvious, that there is no second non-option argument to grep -
it's likely waiting on STDIN, looking for the term "$dir" expands to.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-linode23-1um
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages libxpm4 depends on:
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information




Re: kdm/wdm and ~/.xsession

2002-06-25 Thread David B Harris
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 18:30:48 +0100
Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice to know I'm not going mad (or being overly stupid). Have to say
> that well and truly sucks. Oh well, I'll stick to xdm (I have an
> irrational, pathological dislike of everything gtk and gnome ;).

Well, if you are going mad, both you and Branden are ;)

Anyways, if you want to use GDM, use the "Debian" or "Default" session.
It'll use Branden's scripts. Or at the very least, ~/.xsession :)

WDM over here uses ~/.xsession without any issues (or prompting). Dunno
what the deal on that end is.

-- 
________
\ David B. Harris, Systems administrator   |   http://www.terrabox.com /
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://eelf.ddts.net  \
\==/
/ Clan Barclay motto: Aut agere, aut mori.  (Either action, or death.) \



pgpWQBXMrnhzi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: kdm/wdm and ~/.xsession

2002-06-25 Thread David B Harris
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:17:13 -0500
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gdm ignores it, too.
> 
> I went to all this trouble to make session management nice for the
> various and sundry desktops in Debian, and then all the other display
> managers force people into the corresponding desktop environment at
> gunpoint ("because that's what upstream does").

WDM, by default, uses ~/.xsession. He may have an ~/.xinitrc

Both GDM and KDM let you choose the Xsession session (or something like
it), which does indeed use what you've got :)

Thanks, BTW, it is what I use. And I use GDM. :)

-- 
____________
\ David B. Harris, Systems administrator   |   http://www.terrabox.com /
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://eelf.ddts.net  \
\==/
/ Clan Barclay motto: Aut agere, aut mori.  (Either action, or death.) \



pgpMIy0jC3wMy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: kdm/wdm and ~/.xsession

2002-06-24 Thread David B Harris

On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 18:30:48 +0100
Dave Swegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice to know I'm not going mad (or being overly stupid). Have to say
> that well and truly sucks. Oh well, I'll stick to xdm (I have an
> irrational, pathological dislike of everything gtk and gnome ;).

Well, if you are going mad, both you and Branden are ;)

Anyways, if you want to use GDM, use the "Debian" or "Default" session.
It'll use Branden's scripts. Or at the very least, ~/.xsession :)

WDM over here uses ~/.xsession without any issues (or prompting). Dunno
what the deal on that end is.

-- 
________
\ David B. Harris, Systems administrator   |   http://www.terrabox.com /
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://eelf.ddts.net  \
\==/
/ Clan Barclay motto: Aut agere, aut mori.  (Either action, or death.) \




msg03703/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: kdm/wdm and ~/.xsession

2002-06-24 Thread David B Harris

On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:17:13 -0500
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> gdm ignores it, too.
> 
> I went to all this trouble to make session management nice for the
> various and sundry desktops in Debian, and then all the other display
> managers force people into the corresponding desktop environment at
> gunpoint ("because that's what upstream does").

WDM, by default, uses ~/.xsession. He may have an ~/.xinitrc

Both GDM and KDM let you choose the Xsession session (or something like
it), which does indeed use what you've got :)

Thanks, BTW, it is what I use. And I use GDM. :)

-- 
____________
\ David B. Harris, Systems administrator   |   http://www.terrabox.com /
/  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://eelf.ddts.net  \
\==/
/ Clan Barclay motto: Aut agere, aut mori.  (Either action, or death.) \




msg03702/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DRIVER

2002-01-07 Thread David B Harris
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:44:54 -0500
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DEAR S1R:

Man ... You probably spent *waaay* too much time on that ;)

--
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='


pgpeNDUtbeo6z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DRIVER

2002-01-07 Thread David B Harris
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:26:23 +0500
"Hasib zaidi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DEAR SIR:
> 
> WE ARE LOOKING FOR VGA DRIVER FOR OUR COMPAQ  NOTE BOOK ARMADA 7400
> e.g S3 VIRGE MX WE WILL APPRECIATE IF U KINDLY HELP ME IN THIS
> REGARDS.
> 
> BEST REGARDS.
>  HASIB ZAIDI
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I will reply to this when it is re-written with your caps lock key
turned off.

--
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='


pgpGRGWZWlPiD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DRIVER

2002-01-07 Thread David B Harris

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:44:54 -0500
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DEAR S1R:

Man ... You probably spent *waaay* too much time on that ;)

--
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='



msg03261/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: DRIVER

2002-01-07 Thread David B Harris

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:26:23 +0500
"Hasib zaidi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DEAR SIR:
> 
> WE ARE LOOKING FOR VGA DRIVER FOR OUR COMPAQ  NOTE BOOK ARMADA 7400
> e.g S3 VIRGE MX WE WILL APPRECIATE IF U KINDLY HELP ME IN THIS
> REGARDS.
> 
> BEST REGARDS.
>  HASIB ZAIDI
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I will reply to this when it is re-written with your caps lock key
turned off.

--
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='



msg03259/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Test. Please ignore.

2002-01-04 Thread David B Harris
Test. Please ignore.

Thanks :)

pgpEMeCU9Td0N.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Test. Please ignore.

2002-01-04 Thread David B Harris

Test. Please ignore.

Thanks :)


msg03251/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Upgrade from 4.1.0-7 to 4.1.0-7pre8v2

2001-10-19 Thread David B Harris
At Branden's request, I'm mailing y'all to let you know how the upgrade
from 4.1.0-7 to 4.1.0-7pre8v2 went.

It was totally and wholly unnotable.

EXCELLENT work :)

--
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='


pgpeQ8gVLCuAx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Upgrade from 4.1.0-7 to 4.1.0-7pre8v2

2001-10-19 Thread David B Harris

At Branden's request, I'm mailing y'all to let you know how the upgrade
from 4.1.0-7 to 4.1.0-7pre8v2 went.

It was totally and wholly unnotable.

EXCELLENT work :)

--
 .--=-=-=-=--=---=-=-=.
/David Barclay HarrisAut agere, aut mori.  \
\Clan Barclay  Either action, or death./
 `---==-=-=-=-===-=---=--='

 PGP signature