Re: RFS: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.904+svn858-1
Julien Viard de Galbert wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:43:32PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> >> Well, nothing to say besides it's alright. Did you consider applying >> for the DM status or for the NM process? >> > Yes, I considered it. But with only one package uploaded and only once, > I didn't think it was time to start such process. (I only see DM as a > first step to DD). Hi, with my "I am a DM"-hat on: I think you are wrong. :-) Having the DM status allows you to do unsupervised uploads for certain packages (for which you convinced some DD to allow you to do so) and this is a great freedom of work. In my (limited) experience, the most painful time within the packaging process is the "wait-on-a-sponsor" time (where you either search for a sponsor, ping your usual one, …) Getting rid of that period of time is just great IMHO (and that's absolutely not against my usual sponsors!). So, apply for DM ! :-) Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/i9mg8h$b6...@dough.gmane.org
Bug#597699: [xserver-xorg-video-intel] X does not start at system startup (but does so later)
Julien Cristau wrote: > > Seems like X is starting up fine in both cases, but in the "failing" > case the session gets terminated for some reason. That's unlikely to be > an X problem. > > Cheers, > Julien Hi, isn't this a duplicate of #583336 and/or #583312 ? (to which the workaround is increasing the "ServerTimeout" in /etc/kde4/kdm/kdmrc). Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1oyo4g-0001ib...@tamino
Bug#595776: xserver-xorg: [i915] Black-screen problems (VT switch, suspend
Le lundi 6 septembre 2010 17:19:05 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 17:03:21 +0200, Didier Raboud wrote: > > Package: xserver-xorg > > Version: 1:7.5+7 > > Severity: important > > > > Hi, > > > > Since the last update of xserver-xorg (5. sep 2010), I get "frequent" > > lockups > > > and "bad" X behaviour: > xserver-xorg is an empty metapackage, so it's not responsible for > whatever issues you're having. Please try to figure out if it's kernel > or xserver-xorg-video-intel. > > Cheers, > Julien Hrm, I did: [VERSION PRÉCÉDENTE] xorg 1:7.5+7 -> 1:7.5+6 [VERSION PRÉCÉDENTE] xserver-common 2:1.7.7-5 -> 2:1.7.7-4 [VERSION PRÉCÉDENTE] xserver-xorg 1:7.5+7 -> 1:7.5+6 [VERSION PRÉCÉDENTE] xserver-xorg-core 2:1.7.7-5 -> 2:1.7.7-4 And it "works better". Don't know where to look for, but conclusion is identical. (Does it help ?) Cheers, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM). CH-1020 Renens did...@raboud.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009061941.43568.did...@raboud.com
Re: xorg: Changes to 'debian-unstable'
Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 18:01 +, Timo Aaltonen wrote: >> debian/changelog |6 -- >> debian/x11-common.dirs |1 - >> 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-) >> >> New commits: >> commit 30a7db1bf67a4a5b6e4d146768b9f6deb80579fa >> Author: Timo Aaltonen >> Date: Tue Mar 30 21:00:45 2010 +0300 >> >> Don't install /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d, since it would override >> /usr/lib/X11/xorg.conf.d > > So if a user wants to put anything in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/, he also > needs to create symlinks there for everything > in /usr/lib/X11/xorg.conf.d/? That doesn't seem desirable. IMHO (and that's how other pieces actually in Debian work [udev]) : System configuration (from packages) go in /usr/lib/X11/xorg.conf.d and users use /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d . Both are used with /etc/… being "superior" to /usr/lib/… -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hovgio$ad...@dough.gmane.org
Bug#543903: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: keyboard layout mysteriously changes
Le jeudi 27 août 2009 14:21:52 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit : > Sounds like something is resetting the xkb rules to base instead of > evdev. Most likely not a driver bug. You're both kde users? > > Cheers, > Julien Hi Julien, I am using KDE and from what I read in Noah's mail, he also is… Assuming that it is a KDE bug, what should we grep/strace for ? Regards, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian user. CH-1802 Corseaux did...@raboud.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#543903: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: keyboard layout mysteriously changes
Le jeudi 27 août 2009 13:31:22 Noah Meyerhans, vous avez écrit : > Package: xserver-xorg-input-evdev > Version: 1:2.2.5-1 > Severity: important > > > Recently the keyboard layout within X has started unexpectedly > reconfiguring itself. The problem may somehow be related to > suspend-to-RAM events, but that's just a guess. The machine in question > is a thinkpad x300. > > Not all keys are affected. The affected keys seem to be the arrow keys, > the right Control and Alt keys, and the Insert, Delete, Page Up, etc. > cluster. xev shows, for example, that Page Down gets mapped to Menu, > while Page Up gets mapped to KP_Divide. > > Switching keyboard layout and options using KDE's xkb interface doesn't > seem to have any effect, nor does changing to a VT and back to X. > > noah Hi Noah, hi xserver-xorg-input-evdev maintainers, I am experiencing exactly the same behaviour. I can recover big parts of my keyboard layout by using setxkbmap, but the arrows never get back to something useable (having PrintScreen triggered instead of "up" is _really_ annoying) without an X restart. I am hesitant about the severity (I'd have set it "serious"), but it's not my call… Best regards, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian user. CH-1802 Corseaux did...@raboud.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#534475: [534475] A temporary solution
Hi all, For those waiting for a xserver-xorg-video-intel rebuild, Brice Goglin did one, available from his personal folder: http://people.debian.org/~bgoglin/rebuilds/Xserver1.6-ABIbreak/intel/ Best regards, OdyX N.B. Mentionned there: http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2009/06/msg00842.html -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian user. CH-1802 Corseaux did...@raboud.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
