On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 04:53:56PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 12:06:16AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > It is still valid for aptitude to remove xserver-xfree86, even as a > > transitional package, if the old version is conflicted with. There's > > nothing in our packaging system that lets you mark a particular package as > > "not to be removed on upgrade". A dummy xserver-xfree86 package may fix > > this for most users, though. > > Right, but it might be a sufficient hint so that aptitude, and maybe apt, > will do the right thing. Ok... I'll lower the priority of the note to > medium and add the xserver-xfree86 dummy package. Hopefully that'll be > sufficient. As discussed elsewhere, I'd prefer to use NEWS.Debian, but it > won't be shown to the user in this case, so a medium priority debconf > abusing note should suffice. > > - David Nusinow >
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
