Not sure if this helps, but I keep package lists of each build. Here is
a diff of 2/24 build (works) vs 3/24 (broken).
https://spins.tuxfamily.org/package-list-diff.txt I dont know if any
changes would break compiz, but at least its more info.
Jim
On 3/6/24 11:25, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 06:19:48PM +0100, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 06/03/2024 à 17:31, Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 03:46:41PM +0100, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Anyway, I'm CCing Steve (who did the unstable NMU) and Samuel in case they
have extra clues.
The only change in the NMU was to rename the libdecoration0 package to
libdecoration0t64 for the 64-bit time_t transition. Unless this managed to
break the *contents* of that package (i.e. the library has gone missing),
this should not have had any effect on the behavior of compiz.
So the package has not been rebuilt with different flags or anything?
Not *deliberately* as part of this upload. The only change to flags should
be on 32-bit architectures, excluding i386. I have assumed you are not
trying to run compiz on one of these archs!
But the toolchain also evolves over time, so this could certainly be a
misbuild due to underlying changes.
Anyway, I hardly expect this to be an issue, I just wanted to eliminate the
only Compiz-side change that happened in the last months.
