Re: Unidentified subject!

2003-03-04 Thread Paul J. Keenan
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 23:42, Branden Robinson wrote: 
 The radeon module is a *sub*module of the ati module.  You should
 probably be using the ati driver instead, which will autoload the
 radeon module for your hardware.  If you had let debconf manage your
 XF86Config-4 file, this would have been autodetected, or you would have
 been given the option of using the ati module (but not radeon).

Hi Branden,

dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 lets me pick 'ati' or 'radeon', and
since 'radeon' seems more specific to my hardware, I chose that one.  I
might change and see what happens, although I've not noticed any
problems so far ...

KUTGW.

-- 

Paul J. Keenan [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unidentified subject!

2003-03-04 Thread Paul J. Keenan
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 23:42, Branden Robinson wrote: 
 The radeon module is a *sub*module of the ati module.  You should
 probably be using the ati driver instead, which will autoload the
 radeon module for your hardware.  If you had let debconf manage your
 XF86Config-4 file, this would have been autodetected, or you would have
 been given the option of using the ati module (but not radeon).

Hi Branden,

dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 lets me pick 'ati' or 'radeon', and
since 'radeon' seems more specific to my hardware, I chose that one.  I
might change and see what happens, although I've not noticed any
problems so far ...

KUTGW.

-- 

Paul J. Keenan [EMAIL PROTECTED]