Bug#508126: Bug#508125: xine-ui: ctrl/shift key press emulation implementation broken
Hi Ben, Ben Hutchings wrote: I need some guidance on how to deal with the following related bugs: #374644: xine-ui: ctrl/shift key press emulation implementation broken #506001: xine-ui: xine causes left ctrl keyup events every 20 seconds These are the same bug: xine-ui suppresses screensavers by injecting fake keystrokes, which may be received by other windows. It also suppresses gnome-screensaver cleanly, so we could disable the key injection code without affecting GNOME users. However, this would be a regression for users of the X server screensaver, xscreensaver or the KDE screensaver. My proposed fix involves using xdg-screensaver, which supports all the different screensavers. However, this suffers from the following bugs: #508125: xdg-screensaver: Race in suspend/resume can lead to process leak #508126: x11-utils: xprop -spy does not handle destruction properly I do not think that these are, in themselves, RC. I have now proposed fixes for all of these, and the result appears to be robust. Should I NMU with these fixes? Should any of these bugs be down/upgraded? Feel free to NMU xdg-utils, as the maintainer I have no problems with that. I would appreciate if you commit directly to the git repository, which is in collab-maint (but it's not necessary). Sorry for not responding earlier. -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#464848: RFP: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome -- Improved Xorg video driver for VIA UniChrome graphics chipsets
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: xserver-xorg-video-openchrome Version : 0.2.901 Upstream Author : OpenChrome Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.openchrome.org/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: C Description : Improved Xorg video driver for VIA UniChrome graphics chipsets OpenChrome is based on VIA's UniChrome video driver. It seems to be much more actively maintained than the via driver in Xorg. It also has features such as 3D acceleration and XvMC for certain chipsets. There is already an Ubuntu package, and I found this git repository: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xorg/driver/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome.git But it's still nice to have a wnpp bug tracking it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#443726: Fixed upstream?
Mattia Dongili wrote: wow, I nic euser pointed to this: http://www.postnuklear.de/xorg-patches/files/xf86-input-evtouch-0.8.7-misc.patch (description at: http://www.postnuklear.de/xorg-patches/) I'll give it a try this weekend. hurray Great! -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463630: /etc/init.d/x11-common should not depend on $named
Package: x11-common Version: 1:7.3+10 Severity: normal File: /etc/init.d/x11-common Hi, /etc/init.d/x11-common currently list in its LSB dependencies: # Should-Start: $named # Should-Stop: $named According to LSB 3.2, $named means: IP name-to-address translation, using the interfaces described in this specification, are available to the level the system normally provides them. Example: if a DNS query daemon normally provides this facility, then that daemon has been started.[1] However, I can find nothing in /etc/init.d/x11-common which needs DNS resolution. Therefore, I think this dependency should be removed. [1] http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/facilname.html -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages x11-common depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.18 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.28.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii lsb-base 3.1-24 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip x11-common recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#443726: Fixed upstream?
Hi, Upstream's CHANGELOG[1] says: 0.8.8 - Make it work for current Xorg-GIT However, no version 0.8.8 has been released yet. Maybe we can ask upstream for a patch in the mean time? [1] http://www.conan.de/touchscreen/CHANGELOG.evtouch -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#450713: calibrator.c
Hi Daniel, Are you the author of calibrator.c, found at http://linux.chapter7.ch/touchkit/calibrator.c? If you are, what license is the code under? If you're not the author, do you know who is? Thanks in advance! -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#368858: Does it still segfault?
reassign 368858 libx11-6 thanks James Stone: On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:10:44PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: tag 368858 unreproducible thanks James Stone: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xa7dd0cb8 in XFindOnExtensionList () from /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 I think it may be related to the fact I have the proprietary NVidia driver installed. Does the problem go away if you switch to the nv driver? If it indeed does have to do with the proprietary nVidia driver, I'm afraid I can't do much to help you. Sorry, should have checked that.. It still segfaults with the nv driver. I have built the lyx-xforms by hand with debug enabled, and there is no further info, but it still segfaults. It looks a bit like this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00518.html Although not affecting as many apps.. Well, in any case it seems like it's a bug in the X libraries so I'm reassigning it to libx11-6. -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#368858: Does it still segfault?
reassign 368858 lyx-xforms tag 368858 help thanks Denis Barbier: On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote: It looks a bit like this: http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00518.html Although not affecting as many apps.. Well, in any case it seems like it's a bug in the X libraries so I'm reassigning it to libx11-6. Can you please reassign it back to lyx-xforms? At the moment, there is nothing in this bugreport to support your claim that it is caused by libx11-6. The backtrace shows 0xa7db4cb8 in XFindOnExtensionList (structure=0xc09, number=1040697125) and these arguments look clearly wrong, but we do not know where they do come from. Please work first with bug submitter to reproduce it, and then reassign it to libx11-6 if there is indeed a bug there, with explanations on how to reproduce it. I am afraid that Debian X maintainers cannot investigate random bugs in any X application. For instance, the following informations may be helpful: * Is X a local or remote display? * Does it crash when launched from a newly created account? * Does it crash at startup, or when processing a particular file? * Any special in user configuration? ... OK, I understand. I thought that this was maybe a known bug. I think lyx-xforms is deprecated anyway. -- Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#230664: xserver-common: Manpage missing for X program
Package: xserver-common Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v5 Severity: minor There is no manual page available for the X program. While there is an X(7x), it does not describe the X program but rather the X Window System as a whole. It seems like Xserver(1x) describes the X program, perhaps make a symlink to that manpage? /Pelle signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#39964: The xterm bug
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 03:03:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 12:25:25AM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: According to the Ion [0]FAQ and [1]Wiki this is a bug in xterm, not Ion. I am therefore reassigning it to xterm and merging it with bug #39964 which I think is the same problem. I have verified that this bug still exists in xterm 4.2.1-6. See the links below for more information. [0] http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/faq.htm This link is a 404, BTW. Oops, sorry, lost the last character. Should be: http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/faq.html [1] http://wiki.ael.be/ion/index.php/FrequentlyAskedQuestions Okay, I see. I'll apply this patch since Debian doesn't care about Solaris 2.6. :) Ok, good :) /Pelle
Bug#39964: The xterm bug
reassign 146210 xterm tags 146210 upstream merge 146210 39964 thanks According to the Ion [0]FAQ and [1]Wiki this is a bug in xterm, not Ion. I am therefore reassigning it to xterm and merging it with bug #39964 which I think is the same problem. I have verified that this bug still exists in xterm 4.2.1-6. See the links below for more information. [0] http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/faq.htm [1] http://wiki.ael.be/ion/index.php/FrequentlyAskedQuestions /Pelle -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#39964: The xterm bug
reassign 146210 xterm tags 146210 upstream merge 146210 39964 thanks According to the Ion [0]FAQ and [1]Wiki this is a bug in xterm, not Ion. I am therefore reassigning it to xterm and merging it with bug #39964 which I think is the same problem. I have verified that this bug still exists in xterm 4.2.1-6. See the links below for more information. [0] http://modeemi.cs.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/faq.htm [1] http://wiki.ael.be/ion/index.php/FrequentlyAskedQuestions /Pelle
